Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 71 references

Modeling Filamentary Conduction in Reset Phase Change Memory Devices

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that snapback in reset phase change memory can be produced by electrothermal feedback alone: current collapses onto a ~2 nm molten filament at ~50 MV/m and 0.63 $\mu$A (300 K), switching from $10^8$ to $10^3\ \Omega$.

desk verdict A serious computational study of electrothermal snapback in a-GST, but the headline numbers are conditional on an untested 2D geometry and one scaling result is mislabeled. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.00866 v1 pith:L5XWALYP submitted 2025-02-02 physics.app-ph

Md Samzid Bin Hafiz , Helena Silva , Ali Gokirmak This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-ph
keywords phasechangememoryGe2Sb2Te5amorphousGSTthresholdswitchingsnapbackfilamentaryconductionelectrothermalfeedbackpercolationtransport
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the threshold-switching snapback seen in reset phase change memory cells does not require a separate electronic switching mechanism. Using a 2D electrothermal model of amorphous Ge2Sb2Te5 with locally random activation energies, the authors find that current percolates into filaments, one filament runs away thermally in under a nanosecond, and the device snaps from a high-resistance state near $10^8\ \Omega$ to a low-resistance state near $10^3\ \Omega$ at 300 K. The simulated snapback occurs at about 50 MV/m and 0.63 $\mu$A, matching the range of experimental observations. The paper concludes that low switching current alone is not evidence of electronic switching, and that filamentary conduction plus thermal runaway is a general tendency of highly resistive disordered materials.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is positive electrothermal feedback in a disordered conductor. Local random variations of carrier activation energy (2 nm by 2 nm blocks, $\sigma_E=0.05$ eV around 0.33 eV) create percolation paths; a path that carries slightly more current heats up, and because the activation energy falls with temperature, its conductivity rises, pulling more current until thermal runaway forms a molten filament. The transport law is a symmetric hyperbolic-sine trap-barrier model, and the heat equation includes Joule heating, thermoelectric terms, and latent heat, solved self-consistently; the 1 k$\Omega$ load resistor sets the maximum-power point after snapback.

What would settle it

Run a 3D electrothermal simulation of the same 50 nm by 20 nm by 2 nm cell with out-of-plane heat conduction and realistic contacts; if a single ~2 nm molten filament and a ~0.63 $\mu$A snapback no longer appear, the quantitative central claim fails. A complementary experiment would measure snapback current in cells of varying out-of-plane thickness: thermal filament theory predicts snapback current scales with thickness, while an electronic threshold-switching mechanism predicts it does not.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the experimentally observed I-V snapback emerges self-consistently from a model with no electronic threshold-switching physics. The model uses field- and temperature-dependent current density with activation energies that vary locally around 0.33 eV, coupled to heat conduction, Joule heating, thermoelectric effects, and latent heat. At a critical bias, a single ~2 nm filament reaches thermal runaway in less than 1 ns, melts, carries essentially all current, and the cell switches from roughly $10^8\ \Omega$ to $10^3\ \Omega$. The snapback current rises with ambient temperature (about 0.53 $\mu$A at 200 K to 16.93 $\mu$A at 800 K), while the snapback field falls with temperature and with increasing device length, converging near 38 MV/m for cells longer than 200 nm.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative results come from a 2D domain with 2 nm out-of-plane thickness and no out-of-plane heat conduction, so the reported filament diameter, snapback current, and snapback field depend on that assumed geometry.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Threshold switching in amorphous phase change chalcogenides can be thermal in origin, so electronic-switching models are not required to explain snapback.
  • A switching current near 1 $\mu$A does not by itself identify an electronic mechanism.
  • The molten conductive filament is only about 2 nm wide in these simulations, so the volume that controls the low-resistance state is much smaller than the cell.
  • Snapback field is tunable: it decreases with ambient temperature and with device length, saturating near 38 MV/m for long cells, and increases when filaments are thermally coupled to contacts.
  • Set operation can be completed at reduced power by lowering the bias after the molten filament is initiated.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: if the 2 nm filament is real, resistance drift and crystallization statistics in reset cells should be governed by a tiny molten channel rather than the full amorphous volume, which would change how endurance and retention are extrapolated from cell size.
  • Inference: the same electrothermal mechanism may account for filament formation in other high-resistance systems such as RRAM, ovonic threshold switches, and reverse-biased junctions; the paper lists these as planned extensions.
  • Inference: a 3D simulation with realistic out-of-plane heat spreading is the natural next test; the reported quantitative values (2 nm filament, 0.63 $\mu$A, 50 MV/m) are tied to the 2D 2 nm slab geometry.
  • Inference: the authors' observation that numerical noise alone seeds filaments suggests that even a perfectly uniform high-resistance film should show breakdown by thermal runaway, which could be tested with deliberately graded or uniform samples.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents two-dimensional finite-element electrothermal simulations of a TiN/a-GST/TiN stack with a locally varying activation-energy disorder map and a field- and temperature-dependent trap-assisted transport model calibrated to the authors' own resistivity and I-V measurements. The central result is that, during a voltage ramp, current collapses onto a single molten filament of ~2 nm width, producing snapback at ~50 MV/m and ~0.63 μA at 300 K, with I_Snap increasing and E_Snap decreasing with temperature, and E_Snap decreasing with device length toward ~38 MV/m. The authors conclude that electrothermal feedback alone can explain observed threshold switching and that low switching current is not a sufficient identifier of electronic switching.

Significance. The qualitative claim is significant: if supported, it shows that a purely electrothermal positive-feedback mechanism, without an electronic threshold-switching process, can reproduce the experimental snapback and filamentary conduction in a-GST. The paper is reasonably transparent about its parameter origins and explicitly acknowledges the metastable/stable parameter transfer. The strength is that the runaway and filament formation are emergent from the nonlinear equations rather than imposed. The quantitative values, however, are conditional on a 2D geometry with 2 nm out-of-plane thickness and no out-of-plane heat loss, so the central numbers should not be taken as predictions for realistic cells until a 3D check is provided.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV, device geometry and Eq. (16)] The central quantitative claims—~2 nm filament diameter, 0.63 μA snapback current, ~50 MV/m snapback field—are computed in a 2D domain (W×L×t = 50×20×2 nm) with the heat equation solved only in the plane. Since the out-of-plane direction has no heat conduction, the thermal runaway condition is set by in-plane spreading only, and the reported 'filament diameter' is actually the in-plane width of a 2 nm-thick slab. In a real cell the thickness is tens of nanometers, so radial heat loss and out-of-plane disorder variability will change the runaway condition and the percolation statistics. The paper offers no 3D comparison and no estimate of the out-of-plane thermal healing length. Because the conclusion that low switching current does not identify electronic switching rests on these specific values, this approximation is load-bearing and should be tested or clearly downgraded in the claims.
  2. [Fig. 10e and abstract] The abstract and Section IV state that the snapback electric field 'decreases exponentially with increasing device length, converging to ~38 MV/m.' The reported fit in Fig. 10e is E_Snap = 37.4 + 282.1/L_GST (MV/m with L in nm), which is a 1/L dependence, not an exponential. The exponential language should be corrected, and the text should state the functional form that is actually fitted.
  3. [Section II, parameter transfer] The transport model combines b and omega extracted from I-V measurements on stable a-GST cells (Fig. 2) with J0 computed from metastable a-GST resistivity (Fig. 1). The paper acknowledges the metastable/stable distinction but does not test whether b and omega are representative of the recently-reset metastable state used in the simulations. Since the absolute values of I_Snap and E_Snap inherit this calibration, a sensitivity sweep over b and omega (or a direct experimental extraction for metastable cells) is needed to support the quantitative claims.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (16)] The displayed heat storage term appears as 'd C_p dT/dt' with the mass density symbol missing; the text defines d as mass density, so the equation should read d C_p ∂T/∂t.
  2. [Abstract and Section IV] The abstract quotes 10^8 Ω and 10^3 Ω for the high- and low-resistance states, whereas Section IV reports 0.2 GΩ at 0.1 V and 1.75 kΩ at 0.25 V; use consistent numbers or state explicitly that these are order-of-magnitude values.
  3. [Fig. 10e caption] The caption should state the units of B explicitly; the text writes 'B=282.1±12.5 mV', which is dimensionally consistent with a 1/L (nm) term only if read as mV, and this is easy to misinterpret.
  4. [Section IV, zero-disorder limit] The statement that 'even perfectly uniform structures ... are expected to experience filamentary conduction ... due to thermal excitations' is extrapolated from the zero-σ_E data points in Fig. 10a,d, which still have finite mesh and a single random-number seed; a controlled uniform limit should be reported.
  5. [References] Reference [44] is cited as an arXiv preprint for the key b and omega extraction; if a peer-reviewed version exists, it should be cited instead of or in addition to the preprint.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Model is calibrated to the authors' own measured resistivity and line-cell I-V data, but the snapback, filament width, and switching current are emergent outputs of the coupled electrothermal simulation; no output equals an input by construction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: measured resistivity versus temperature (Fig. 1) fixes EA(T) through Eq. (4); measured line-cell I-V data (Fig. 2) fix the barrier-transport parameters b, omega, and J0 in Eq. (9); random disorder is introduced as 2 nm EA blocks; COMSOL then solves Eqs. (15) and (16) self-consistently; filamentation and snapback are read off the simulated current-density and temperature profiles. The fitted parameters set the pre-exponential factor and activation energy of the transport model, so the absolute current scale inherits those calibrations, but the snapback is not inserted by hand: it appears as a thermal-runaway branch of the coupled solution. The paper also shows that filaments still form in the no-EA-variation limit, where only numerical noise seeds the instability, so the filamentary behavior is not merely a restatement of the imposed disorder. The reported '~2 nm' filament width is a FWHM of the simulated current-density profile and is explicitly tested against mesh size, random seeds, EA standard deviation, device length, and ambient temperature; it is therefore not identical to the 2 nm EA block scale or the 2 nm out-of-plane slab depth by construction. The self-citations cited here ([32], [44], [45], [47]) provide measured inputs and prior modeling choices, but the central conclusion does not reduce to an unverified citation: the transport and heat equations are stated in the paper and solved numerically. The 2D geometry with 2 nm out-of-plane depth is an untested modeling idealization that affects the quantitative values, but an assumption about dimensionality is a robustness or correctness concern, not circularity. No specific Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction, and no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, was found. The paper is self-contained as a computational study: its outputs are conditional predictions of the stated model, not derivations that secretly assume the conclusions.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central simulation rests on a calibrated electrothermal transport model. Free parameters include resistivity fit coefficients, local EA disorder parameters, trap-barrier fitting parameters, and an assumed linear Fermi-level temperature dependence. The main assumptions are the equivalence of stable and metastable transport models, the ad hoc EA(T_melt) normalization, the 2D representation of a 3D device, and the validity of continuum electrothermal equations at threshold conditions.

free parameters (9)
  • rho_1 (resistivity pre-factor) = 35137 ohm cm
    Fit to metastable a-GST resistivity in Fig. 1a using Eq. (1); enters EA(T) through Eqs. (3) and (4).
  • alpha (exponential temperature coefficient) = 0.0202 K^-1
    Fit to metastable resistivity data in Eq. (1); used in Eqs. (3)-(4) to construct EA(T).
  • local EA distribution (mean and sigma) = 0.33 eV mean, 0.05 eV sigma
    Ad hoc representation of nanoscale disorder in Section IV; controls filament statistics and width.
  • b (crested barrier shape factor, d_peak/d_trap) = approximately 0.5 for T > 300 K
    Extracted by fitting Eq. (5) to low-field line-cell I-V data in Fig. 2; used to simplify Eq. (6).
  • omega (trap-related voltage scaling factor) = not reported numerically
    Extracted from fitting Eq. (5) to Fig. 2 data; determines J0 and the field dependence in Eqs. (5)-(9).
  • I0 (current scaling factor in Eq. 5) = not reported numerically
    Fitting parameter from line-cell I-V; required to set the absolute current scale before J0 is derived.
  • dEf0/dT (Fermi level temperature slope) = 0.32 meV/K
    Assumed linear interpolation of Ef0 from 300 K to T_metal because no measured Ef0(T); enters diffusion and thermoelectric corrections in Eq. (15).
  • interface EA at GST/TiN contacts (low and high cases) = not reported numerically
    Ad hoc values compared in Section IV and Figs. 11-12; changes V_snap for 20 nm devices and is stated to depend on fabrication and surface preparation.
  • EA disorder correlation length (2 nm block size, diffusion constant c, diffusion time) = not specified beyond 2 nm blocks
    Numerical construction of the random EA map in Eq. (17); affects percolation paths but claimed not to affect filament width strongly.
assumptions (8)
  • ad hoc to paper EA(T_melt) = 1.5 k_B T_melt
    Used in Eq. (3) to solve for rho_0 and thus define EA(T) in Eq. (4); no direct measurement is cited for this equality.
  • domain assumption Arrhenius resistivity relation rho = rho0 exp(EA/kBT)
    Standard thermally activated transport description used for metastable a-GST in Section II.
  • domain assumption Stable a-GST low-field transport model can be adapted to metastable a-GST
    Section II assumes the cell is recently reset and metastable, but parameters b, omega, I0 come from stabilized line-cell I-V measurements.
  • ad hoc to paper The random EA quilt with diffusion smoothing represents real nanoscale disorder
    Introduced in Section IV without experimental mapping of local activation energies.
  • ad hoc to paper Ef0(T) is linear from 300 K to T_metal
    Section II explicitly states there is no measured Ef0(T); linear interpolation is an approximation.
  • domain assumption Continuum electrothermal COMSOL model captures threshold switching and melting
    The paper relies on self-consistent solution of Eqs. (15) and (16) plus prior phase-change models (Refs. 38-41), without an atomistic switching model.
  • domain assumption 2D slice with 2 nm out-of-plane depth represents a 3D device
    Defines the simulation domain in Section IV; no 3D comparison or out-of-plane heat loss is included.
  • domain assumption Numerical noise can seed filament formation in perfectly uniform structures
    Used in Section IV to argue filaments are expected even without EA variation; extrapolated from simulation noise.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modeling Filamentary Conduction in Reset Phase Change Memory Devices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L5XWALYP

@misc{pith2026250200866,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modeling Filamentary Conduction in Reset Phase Change Memory Devices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L5XWALYP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.00866}
}
abstract

We performed a computational analysis on percolation transport and filament formation in amorphous $Ge_2Sb_2Te_5$ (a-GST) using 2D finite-element multi-physics simulations with 2 nm out-of-plane depth using an electric-field and temperature dependent electronic transport model with carrier activation energies that vary locally around 0.3 eV and as a function of temperature. We observe the snapback (threshold switching) behavior in the current-voltage (I-V) characteristics at ~50 MV/m electric field with 0.63 $\mu$A current for 300 K ambient temperature, where current collapses onto a single molten filament with ~ 2 nm diameter, aligned with the electric field, and the device switches from a high resistance state (108 $\Omega$) to a low resistance state (103 $\Omega$). Further increase in voltage across the device leads to widening of the molten filament. Snap-back current and electric field are strong functions of ambient temperature, ranging from ~ 0.53 $\mu$A at 200 K to ~ 16.93 $\mu$A at 800 K and ~ 85 MV/m at 150 K to 45 MV/m at 350 K, respectively. Snap-back electric-field decreases exponentially with increasing device length, converging to ~ 38 MV/m for devices longer than 200 nm.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nanomaterials for optical data storage,

    M. Gu, Q. Zhang, and S. Lamon, “Nanomaterials for optical data storage,” Nature Reviews Materials 2016 1:12, vol. 1, no. 12, pp. 1–14, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.70

    work page doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.70 2016

  2. [2]

    Designing crystallization in phase-change materials for universal memory and neuro-inspired computing,

    W. Zhang, R. Mazzarello, M. Wuttig, and E. Ma, “Designing crystallization in phase-change materials for universal memory and neuro-inspired computing,” Nat Rev Mater, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 150–168, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1038/S41578-018-0076-X

    work page doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0076-x 2019

  3. [3]

    Does AI have a hardware problem?,

    “Does AI have a hardware problem?,” Nature Electronics 2018 1:4, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 205–205, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41928-018-0068-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41928-018-0068-2 2018

  4. [4]

    Big data needs a hardware revolution,

    “Big data needs a hardware revolution,” Nature, vol. 554, no. 7691, pp. 145–146, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1038/D41586-018-01683-1

    work page doi:10.1038/d41586-018-01683-1 2018

  5. [5]

    Scalable high performance main memory system using phase-change memory technology,

    M. K. Qureshi, V. Srinivasan, and J. A. Rivers, “Scalable high performance main memory system using phase-change memory technology,” Proc Int Symp Comput Archit, pp. 24–33, 2009, doi: 10.1145/1555754.1555760

    work page arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    Perspectives of read head technology for 10 Tb/in2 recording,

    G. C. Han, J. J. Qiu, L. Wang, W. K. Yeo, and C. C. Wang, “Perspectives of read head technology for 10 Tb/in2 recording,” IEEE Trans Magn, vol. 46, no. 3 PART 1, pp. 709–714, 2010, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2009.2034866

    work page arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    Memory leads the way to better computing,

    H. S. P. Wong and S. Salahuddin, “Memory leads the way to better computing,” Nature Nanotechnology 2015 10:3, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 191–194, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.29

    work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.29 2015

  8. [8]

    Phase-change materials for rewriteable data storage,

    M. Wuttig and N. Yamada, “Phase-change materials for rewriteable data storage,” Nature Materials 2007 6:11, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 824–832, 2007, doi: 10.1038/nmat2009

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat2009 2007

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    Nanoionics-based resistive switching memories,

    R. Waser and M. Aono, “Nanoionics-based resistive switching memories,” Nature Materials 2007 6:11, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 833–840, Nov. 2007, doi: 10.1038/nmat2023. Fig. 14. Effective E A extracted from I -V characteristics obtained from the simulations (●) and E A from equation ...

    2007 doi

  2. [10]

    A new spin on magnetic memories,

    A. D. Kent and D. C. Worledge, “A new spin on magnetic memories,” Nat Nanotechnol, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 187–191, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1038/NNANO.2015.24

    2015 doi

  3. [11]

    Ferroelectric Memories,

    J. F. Scott and C. A. Paz De Araujo, “Ferroelectric Memories,” Science (1979), vol. 246, no. 4936, pp. 1400–1405, Dec. 1989, doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.246.4936.1400

    1979

  4. [12]

    Recent progress in resistive random access memories: Materials, switching mechanisms, and performance,

    F. Pan, S. Gao, C. Chen, C. Song, and F. Zeng, “Recent progress in resistive random access memories: Materials, switching mechanisms, and performance,” Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 1–59, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.MSER.2014.06.002

    2014 doi

  5. [13]

    Phase-Change Memory - Towards a Storage-Class Memory,

    S. W. Fong, C. M. Neumann, and H. S. P. Wong, “Phase-Change Memory - Towards a Storage-Class Memory,” IEEE Trans Electron Devices, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 4374–4385, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1109/TED.2017.2746342

    2017

  6. [14]

    Overview of candidate device technologies for storage-class memory,

    G. W. Burr, B. N. Kurdi, J. C. Scott, C. H. Lam, K. Gopalakrishnan, and R. S. Shenoy, “Overview of candidate device technologies for storage-class memory,” IBM J Res Dev, vol. 52, no. 4–5, pp. 449– 464, 2008, doi: 10.1147/RD.524.0449

    2008 doi

  7. [15]

    An overview of phase- change memory device physics,

    M. Le Gallo and A. Sebastian, “An overview of phase- change memory device physics,” J Phys D Appl Phys, vol. 53, no. 21, p. 213002, May 2020, doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab7794

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    Phase change materials and phase change memory,

    S. Raoux, F. Xiong, M. Wuttig, and E. Pop, “Phase change materials and phase change memory,” MRS Bull, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 703–710, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1557/MRS.2014.139

    2014 doi

  9. [17]

    Phase change memory technology,

    G. W. Burr, M. J. Breitwisch, M. Franceschini, D. Garetto, K. Gopalakrishnan, B. Jackson, B. Kurdi, C. Lam, L. A. Lastras, A. Padilla, B. Rajendran, S. Raoux, and R. S. Shenoy, “Phase change memory technology,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 22...

    2010 doi

  10. [18]

    Application of phase- change materials in memory taxonomy,

    L. Wang, L. Tu, and J. Wen, “Application of phase- change materials in memory taxonomy,” Sci Technol Adv Mater, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 406–429, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/14686996.2017.1332455

    2017

  11. [19]

    Compound materials for reversible, phase-change optical data storage,

    M. Chen, K. A. Rubin, and R. W. Barton, “Compound materials for reversible, phase-change optical data storage,” Appl Phys Lett, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 502–504, Dec. 1986, doi: 10.1063/1.97617

    1986 doi

  12. [20]

    High speed overwritable phase change optical disk material,

    N. Yamada, E. Ohno, N. Akahira, K. Nishiuchi, K. Nagata, and M. Takao, “High speed overwritable phase change optical disk material,” Jpn J Appl Phys, vol. 26, no. S4, pp. 61–66, Jan. 1987, doi: 10.7567/JJAPS.26S4.61/XML

    1987 doi

  13. [21]

    Rapid‐phase transitions of GeTe‐Sb2Te3 pseudobinary amorphous thin films for an optical disk memory,

    N. Yamada, E. Ohno, K. Nishiuchi, N. Akahira, and M. Takao, “Rapid‐phase transitions of GeTe‐Sb2Te3 pseudobinary amorphous thin films for an optical disk memory,” J Appl Phys, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 2849–2856, Mar. 1991, doi: 10.1063/1.348620

    1991 doi

  14. [22]

    Insights into the Structure of the Stable and Metastable (GeTe)m(Sb2Te3)n Compounds,

    J. L. F. Da Silva, A. Walsh, and H. Lee, “Insights into the Structure of the Stable and Metastable (GeTe)m(Sb2Te3)n Compounds,” Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys, vol. 78, no. 22, 2008, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVB.78.224111

    2008 doi

  15. [23]

    Electrical Transport in Crystalline and Amorphous Chalcogenide,

    D. Ielmini, “Electrical Transport in Crystalline and Amorphous Chalcogenide,” Phase Change Memory: Device Physics, Reliability and Applications, pp. 11– 39, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-69053-7_2

    2018 doi

  16. [24]

    Material Engineering for PCM Device Optimization,

    V. Sousa and G. Navarro, “Material Engineering for PCM Device Optimization,” Phase Change Memory: Device Physics, Reliability and Applications, pp. 181– 222, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-69053-7_7

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    Electrical resistivity of liquid Ge2Sb2Te5 based on thin-film and nanoscale device measurements,

    K. Cil, F. Dirisaglik, L. Adnane, M. Wennberg, A. King, A. Faraclas, M. B. Akbulut, Y. Zhu, C. Lam, A. Gokirmak, and H. Silva, “Electrical resistivity of liquid Ge2Sb2Te5 based on thin-film and nanoscale device measurements,” IEEE Trans Electron Devices, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 43...

    2013

  18. [26]

    Pressure tunes electrical resistivity by four orders of magnitude in amorphous Ge2Sb2Te5 phase-change memory alloy,

    M. Xu, Y. Q. Cheng, L. Wang, H. W. Sheng, Y. Meng, W. G. Yang, X. D. Han, and E. Ma, “Pressure tunes electrical resistivity by four orders of magnitude in amorphous Ge2Sb2Te5 phase-change memory alloy,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, vol. 109, no. 18, May 2012, doi: 10.1073/PNAS.1119754109

    2012 doi

  19. [27]

    Crystallization of germanium-antimony-tellurium amorphous thin film sandwiched between various dielectric protective films,

    Ohshima and Norikazu, “Crystallization of germanium-antimony-tellurium amorphous thin film sandwiched between various dielectric protective films,” JAP, vol. 79, no. 11, pp. 8357–8363, Jun. 1996, doi: 10.1063/1.362548

    1996 doi

  20. [28]

    Thickness dependence of the amorphous-cubic and cubic- hexagonal phase transition temperatures of GeSbTe thin films on silicon nitride,

    H. K. Peng, K. Cil, A. Gokirmak, G. Bakan, Y. Zhu, C. S. Lai, C. H. Lam, and H. Silva, “Thickness dependence of the amorphous-cubic and cubic- hexagonal phase transition temperatures of GeSbTe thin films on silicon nitride,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 520, no. 7, pp. 2976–2978, Ja...

    2012 doi

  21. [29]

    Modeling of thermoelectric effects in phase change memory cells,

    A. Faraclas, G. Bakan, L. Adnane, F. Dirisaglik, N. E. Williams, A. Gokirmak, and H. Silva, “Modeling of thermoelectric effects in phase change memory cells,” IEEE Trans Electron Devices, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 372– 378, 2014, doi: 10.1109/TED.2013.2296305

    2014

  22. [30]

    Disorder-induced localization in crystalline phase- change materials,

    T. Siegrist, P. Jost, H. Volker, M. Woda, P. Merkelbach, C. Schlockermann, and M. Wuttig, “Disorder-induced localization in crystalline phase- change materials,” Nat Mater, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 202– 208, 2011, doi: 10.1038/NMAT2934

    2011 doi

  23. [31]

    High temperature electrical resistivity and Seebeck coefficient of Ge2Sb2Te5 thin films,

    L. Adnane, F. Dirisaglik, A. Cywar, K. Cil, Y. Zhu, C. Lam, A. F. M. Anwar, A. Gokirmak, and H. Silva, “High temperature electrical resistivity and Seebeck coefficient of Ge2Sb2Te5 thin films,” J Appl Phys, vol. 122, no. 12, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1063/1.4996218

    2017 doi

  24. [32]

    High speed, high temperature electrical characterization of phase change materials: metastable phases, crystallization dynamics, and resistance drift,

    F. Dirisaglik, G. Bakan, Z. Jurado, S. Muneer, M. Akbulut, J. Rarey, L. Sullivan, M. Wennberg, A. King, L. Zhang, R. Nowak, C. Lam, H. Silva, and A. Gokirmak, “High speed, high temperature electrical characterization of phase change materials: metastable phases, crystallizatio...

    2015 doi

  25. [33]

    Phase change memory: Device physics, reliability and applications,

    A. Redaelli, “Phase change memory: Device physics, reliability and applications,” Phase Change Memory: Accepted in PSS Rapid Research Letters for Special Issue on phase change memory (EPCOS 2024) 11 Device Physics, Reliability and Applications, pp. 1– 330, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1...

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    An introduction to ovonic research,

    S. R. Ovshinsky, “An introduction to ovonic research,” J Non Cryst Solids, vol. 2, no. C, pp. 99– 106, Jan. 1970, doi: 10.1016/0022-3093(70)90125-0

    1970 doi

  27. [35]

    Modeling of set and reset operations of phase-change memory cells,

    A. Faraclas, N. Williams, A. Gokirmak, and H. Silva, “Modeling of set and reset operations of phase-change memory cells,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1737–1739, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1109/LED.2011.2168374

    2011

  28. [36]

    Operation dynamics in phase-change memory cells and the role of access devices,

    A. Faraclas, N. Williams, F. Dirisaglik, K. Cil, A. Gokirmak, and H. Silva, “Operation dynamics in phase-change memory cells and the role of access devices,” Proceedings - 2012 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI, ISVLSI 2012, pp. 78–83, 2012, doi: 10.1109/ISVLSI.2012.48

    2012 doi

  29. [37]

    Extracting the temperature distribution on a phase-change memory cell during crystallization,

    G. Bakan, B. Gerislioglu, F. Dirisaglik, Z. Jurado, L. Sullivan, A. Dana, C. Lam, A. Gokirmak, and H. Silva, “Extracting the temperature distribution on a phase-change memory cell during crystallization,” J Appl Phys, vol. 120, no. 16, p. 164504, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1063/1.4966...

    2016 doi

  30. [38]

    Modeling heterogeneous melting in phase change memory devices,

    J. Scoggin, Z. Woods, H. Silva, and A. Gokirmak, “Modeling heterogeneous melting in phase change memory devices,” Appl Phys Lett, vol. 114, no. 4, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1063/1.5067397/1022986

    2019 doi

  31. [39]

    Modeling and impacts of the latent heat of phase change and specific heat for phase change materials,

    J. Scoggin, R. S. Khan, H. Silva, and A. Gokirmak, “Modeling and impacts of the latent heat of phase change and specific heat for phase change materials,” Appl Phys Lett, vol. 112, no. 19, May 2018, doi: 10.1063/1.5025331/14143006/193502_1_ONLINE.P DF

    2018 doi

  32. [41]

    Modeling of Phase- Change Memory: Nucleation, Growth, and Amorphization Dynamics during Set and Reset: Part I- Effective Media Approximation,

    Z. Woods and A. Gokirmak, “Modeling of Phase- Change Memory: Nucleation, Growth, and Amorphization Dynamics during Set and Reset: Part I- Effective Media Approximation,” IEEE Trans Electron Devices, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 4466–4471, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1109/TED.2017.2745506

    2017

  33. [42]

    Higherature thermoelectric transport at small scales: Thermal generation, transport and recombination of minority carriers,

    G. Bakan, N. Khan, H. Silva, and A. Gokirmak, “Higherature thermoelectric transport at small scales: Thermal generation, transport and recombination of minority carriers,” Sci Rep, vol. 3, 2013, doi: 10.1038/SREP02724

    2013 doi

  34. [43]

    COMSOL 6.2 - COMSOL Multiphysics Reference Manual

    “COMSOL 6.2 - COMSOL Multiphysics Reference Manual.” https://doc.comsol.com/6.2/doc/com.comsol.help.com sol/html_COMSOL_ReferenceManual.html (accessed Nov. 29, 2024)

    2024

  35. [44]

    Accelerating and Stopping Resistance Drift in Phase Change Memory Cells via High Electric Field Stress,

    R. S. Khan, A. H. Talukder, F. Dirisaglik, H. Silva, and A. Gokirmak, “Accelerating and Stopping Resistance Drift in Phase Change Memory Cells via High Electric Field Stress,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.12487, 2020

    2002 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Stopping Resistance Drift in Phase Change Memory Cells,

    R. S. Khan, A. B. M. H. Talukder, F. Dirisaglik, A. Gokirmak, and H. Silva, “Stopping Resistance Drift in Phase Change Memory Cells,” in 2020 Device Research Conference (DRC), 2020, pp. 1–2

    2020

  37. [46]

    Activation energy of metastable amorphous Ge2Sb2Te5 from room temperature to melt,

    S. Muneer, J. Scoggin, F. Dirisaglik, L. Adnane, A. Cywar, G. Bakan, K. Cil, C. Lam, H. Silva, and A. Gokirmak, “Activation energy of metastable amorphous Ge2Sb2Te5 from room temperature to melt,” AIP Adv, vol. 8, no. 6, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1063/1.5035085/311035

    2018 doi

  38. [47]

    Electronic transport in amorphous Ge2Sb2Te5 phase-change memory line cells and its response to photoexcitation,

    A. Talukder, M. Kashem, M. Hafiz, R. Khan, F. Dirisaglik, H. Silva, and A. Gokirmak, “Electronic transport in amorphous Ge2Sb2Te5 phase-change memory line cells and its response to photoexcitation,” Appl Phys Lett, vol. 124, no. 26, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1063/5.0196842

    2024 doi

  39. [48]

    Electronic properties of amorphous and crystalline Ge2Sb 2Te5 films,

    T. Kato and K. Tanaka, “Electronic properties of amorphous and crystalline Ge2Sb 2Te5 films,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 1: Regular Papers and Short Notes and Review Papers, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 7340–7344, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1143/JJAP.44.7340

    2005 doi

  40. [49]

    Investigation of the optical and electronic properties of Ge 2Sb 2Te 5 phase change material in its amorphous, cubic, and hexagonal phases,

    B. S. Lee, J. R. Abelson, S. G. Bishop, D. H. Kang, B. K. Cheong, and K. B. Kim, “Investigation of the optical and electronic properties of Ge 2Sb 2Te 5 phase change material in its amorphous, cubic, and hexagonal phases,” J Appl Phys, vol. 97, no. 9, May 2005, doi: 10.1063/1....

    2005 doi

  41. [50]

    Work function contrast and energy band modulation between amorphous and crystalline Ge2Sb2Te5 films,

    H. Tong, Z. Yang, N. N. Yu, L. J. Zhou, and X. S. Miao, “Work function contrast and energy band modulation between amorphous and crystalline Ge2Sb2Te5 films,” Appl Phys Lett, vol. 107, no. 8, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1063/1.4929369

    2015 doi

  42. [51]

    Carrier transport mechanisms of titanium nitride and titanium oxynitride electron- selective contact in silicon heterojunction solar cells,

    C. Liu, Y. Wang, J. Liu, R. Ma, H. Liu, Q. Wang, Y. Fu, Q. Liu, and D. He, “Carrier transport mechanisms of titanium nitride and titanium oxynitride electron- selective contact in silicon heterojunction solar cells,” Communications Physics 2024 7:1, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–9, Jul...

    2024 doi

  43. [52]

    Atomistic Modeling of Charge‐Trapping Defects in Amorphous Ge‐Sb‐Te Phase‐Change Memory Materials,

    K. Konstantinou and S. R. Elliott, “Atomistic Modeling of Charge‐Trapping Defects in Amorphous Ge‐Sb‐Te Phase‐Change Memory Materials,” physica status solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Letters, vol. 17, no. 8, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1002/pssr.202200496

    2023 doi

  44. [53]

    Inherent electron and hole trapping in amorphous phase-change memory materials: Ge 2 Sb 2 Te 5,

    K. Konstantinou, S. R. Elliott, and J. Akola, “Inherent electron and hole trapping in amorphous phase-change memory materials: Ge 2 Sb 2 Te 5,” J Mater Chem C Mater, vol. 10, no. 17, pp. 6744–6753, 2022, doi: 10.1039/D2TC00486K

    2022 doi

  45. [54]

    Electric-field-induced annihilation of localized gap defect states in amorphous phase-change memory materials,

    K. Konstantinou, F. C. Mocanu, J. Akola, and S. R. Elliott, “Electric-field-induced annihilation of localized gap defect states in amorphous phase-change memory materials,” Acta Mater, vol. 223, p. 117465, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117465

    2022

  46. [55]

    X. Yang, W. Liu, M. De Bastiani, T. Allen, J. Kang, H. Xu, E. Aydin, L. Xu, Q. Bi, H. Dang, E. AlHabshi, K. Kotsovos, A. AlSaggaf, I. Gereige, Y. Wan, J. Peng, C. Samundsett, A. Cuevas, and S. De Wolf, “Dual-Function Electron-Conductive, Hole-Blocking Titanium Nitride Contacts...

    2024 doi

  47. [56]

    Threshold switching mechanism by high- field energy gain in the hopping transport of chalcogenide glasses,

    D. Ielmini, “Threshold switching mechanism by high- field energy gain in the hopping transport of chalcogenide glasses,” Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys, vol. 78, no. 3, Jul. 2008, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.035308

    2008 doi

  48. [57]

    (Digital Presentation) Finite Element Modeling of Thermoelectric Effects in Phase Change Memory Cells,

    M. T. Bin Kashem, J. Scoggin, H. Silva, and A. Gokirmak, “(Digital Presentation) Finite Element Modeling of Thermoelectric Effects in Phase Change Memory Cells,” ECS Trans, vol. 108, no. 1, p. 3, May 2022, doi: 10.1149/10801.0003ECST

    2022 arXiv

  49. [58]

    High temperature setup for measurements of Seebeck coefficient and electrical resistivity of thin films using inductive heating,

    L. Adnane, N. Williams, H. Silva, and A. Gokirmak, “High temperature setup for measurements of Seebeck coefficient and electrical resistivity of thin films using inductive heating,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 86, no. 10, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1063/1.4934577/15874753/1...

    2015 doi

  50. [59]

    Stopping Resistance Drift in Phase Change Memory Cells and Analysis of Charge Transport in Stable Amorphous Ge2Sb2Te5,

    M. Tashfiq, B. Kashem, R. Sayeed Khan, A. Hasan Talukder, F. Dirisaglik, and A. Gokirmak, “Stopping Resistance Drift in Phase Change Memory Cells and Analysis of Charge Transport in Stable Amorphous Ge2Sb2Te5,” arXiv: 2210.14035, Oct. 2022, Accessed: Jan. 26, 2025. [Online]. A...

    arXiv

  51. [60]

    Amorphous silicon thin film transistors,

    J. L. Lin and S. C. Lee, “Amorphous silicon thin film transistors,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 451–460, 1995, doi: 10.1080/02533839.1995.9677710

    1995

  52. [61]

    Measurements of charge carrier mobilities and drift velocity saturation in bulk silicon of <111> and <100> crystal orientation at high electric fields,

    J. Becker, E. Fretwurst, and R. Klanner, “Measurements of charge carrier mobilities and drift velocity saturation in bulk silicon of <111> and <100> crystal orientation at high electric fields,” Solid State Electron, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 104–110, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.sse.2...

    2010 doi

  53. [62]

    Electron velocity in Si and GaAs at very high electric fields,

    P. M. Smith, M. Inoue, and J. Frey, “Electron velocity in Si and GaAs at very high electric fields,” Appl Phys Lett, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 797–798, 1980, doi: 10.1063/1.92078

    1980 doi

  54. [63]

    The impact of heater-recess and load matching in phase change memory mushroom cells,

    A. Cywar, J. Li, C. Lam, and H. Silva, “The impact of heater-recess and load matching in phase change memory mushroom cells,” Nanotechnology, vol. 23, no. 22, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1088/0957- 4484/23/22/225201

    2012 doi

  55. [64]

    Ovonic threshold switching characteristics,

    R. R. Shanks, “Ovonic threshold switching characteristics,” J Non Cryst Solids, vol. 2, pp. 504– 514, Jan. 1970, doi: 10.1016/0022-3093(70)90164-X

    1970 doi

  56. [65]

    Electrothermal Modeling of Ovonic Threshold Switches and Phase Change Memory Devices,

    J. Scoggin, A. Gokirmak, R. S. Khan, Z. Woods, A. Cywar, L. Adnane, S. Muneer, G. Bakan, F. Dirisaglik, and H. Silva, “Electrothermal Modeling of Ovonic Threshold Switches and Phase Change Memory Devices,” 2019

    2019

  57. [66]

    Invited paper: Thin- film Ovonic threshold switch: Its operation and application in modern integrated circuits,

    W. Czubatyj and S. J. Hudgens, “Invited paper: Thin- film Ovonic threshold switch: Its operation and application in modern integrated circuits,” Electronic Materials Letters, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 157–167, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s13391-012-2040-z

    2012 doi

  58. [67]

    Field dependent conductivity and threshold switching in amorphous chalcogenides—Modeling and simulations of ovonic threshold switches and phase change memory devices,

    J. Scoggin, H. Silva, and A. Gokirmak, “Field dependent conductivity and threshold switching in amorphous chalcogenides—Modeling and simulations of ovonic threshold switches and phase change memory devices,” J Appl Phys, vol. 128, no. 23, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1063/5.0027671

    2020 doi

  59. [68]

    Thermal environment impact on HfOx RRAM operation: A nanoscale thermometry and modeling study,

    M. P. West, G. Pavlidis, R. H. Montgomery, F. F. Athena, M. S. Jamil, A. Centrone, S. Graham, and E. M. Vogel, “Thermal environment impact on HfOx RRAM operation: A nanoscale thermometry and modeling study,” J Appl Phys, vol. 133, no. 18, May 2023, doi: 10.1063/5.0145201

    2023 doi

  60. [69]

    Memristive switching mechanism for metal/oxide/metal nanodevices,

    J. J. Yang, M. D. Pickett, X. Li, D. A. A. Ohlberg, D. R. Stewart, and R. S. Williams, “Memristive switching mechanism for metal/oxide/metal nanodevices,” Nat Nanotechnol, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 429–433, 2008

    2008

  61. [70]

    Thermal characterization of gallium nitride p-i-n diodes,

    J. Dallas, G. Pavlidis, B. Chatterjee, J. S. Lundh, M. Ji, J. Kim, T. Kao, T. Detchprohm, R. D. Dupuis, S. Shen, S. Graham, and S. Choi, “Thermal characterization of gallium nitride p-i-n diodes,” Appl Phys Lett, vol. 112, no. 7, p. 073503, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1063/1.5006796

    2018 doi

  62. [71]

    Analysis of self-heating of thermally assisted spin-transfer torque magnetic random access memory,

    A. Deschenes, S. Muneer, M. Akbulut, A. Gokirmak, and H. Silva, “Analysis of self-heating of thermally assisted spin-transfer torque magnetic random access memory,” Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, vol. 7, no. 1, 2016, doi: 10.3762/bjnano.7.160

    2016 doi

  63. [72]

    Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling,

    B. D. Josephson, “Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling,” Physics Letters, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 251–253, Jul. 1962, doi: 10.1016/0031- 9163(62)91369-0

    1962 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.