REVIEW 2 cited by
Decentralization in Bitcoin and Ethereum Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Blockchain-based cryptocurrencies have demonstrated how to securely implement traditionally centralized systems, such as currencies, in a decentralized fashion. However, there have been few measurement studies on the level of decentralization they achieve in practice. We present a measurement study on various decentralization metrics of two of the leading cryptocurrencies with the largest market capitalization and user base, Bitcoin and Ethereum. We investigate the extent of decentralization by measuring the network resources of nodes and the interconnection among them, the protocol requirements affecting the operation of nodes, and the robustness of the two systems against attacks. In particular, we adapted existing internet measurement techniques and used the Falcon Relay Network as a novel measurement tool to obtain our data. We discovered that neither Bitcoin nor Ethereum has strictly better properties than the other. We also provide concrete suggestions for improving both systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Eclipsing Ethereum Peers with False Friends
A low-resource 'false friends' attack can eclipse Geth nodes without a restart by inserting one fake peer per routing bucket and flooding lookups with precomputed node IDs.
-
Agent-based Simulation of Blockchains
This paper introduces LUNES-Blockchain, an agent-based PADS simulator for blockchains, and demonstrates it on a simplified Bitcoin model under a filtering DoS, but provides no parallel speedup measurements.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.