Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Fully Automated Pipeline for Conversational Discourse Annotation: Tree Scheme Generation and Labeling with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.08961 v2 pith:L7QRVYYK submitted 2025-04-11 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords annotationdiscoursemodelsschemesautomatedfullylanguagelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in automating discourse annotation for conversations. While manually designing tree annotation schemes significantly improves annotation quality for humans and models, their creation remains time-consuming and requires expert knowledge. We propose a fully automated pipeline that uses LLMs to construct such schemes and perform annotation. We evaluate our approach on speech functions (SFs) and the Switchboard-DAMSL (SWBD-DAMSL) taxonomies. Our experiments compare various design choices, and we show that frequency-guided decision trees, paired with an advanced LLM for annotation, can outperform previously manually designed trees and even match or surpass human annotators while significantly reducing the time required for annotation. We release all code and resultant schemes and annotations to facilitate future research on discourse annotation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Intent Matters: Enhancing AI Tutoring with Fine-Grained Pedagogical Intent Annotation

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning a math tutor model on 11 fine-grained pedagogical intents instead of 4 broad ones gave better automatic scores and a modest human preference in a small evaluation.

  2. Analyzing Biases in Political Dialogue: Tagging U.S. Presidential Debates with an Extended DAMSL Framework

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The authors annotate the 2024 Trump-Biden and Trump-Harris debates with a new bias-focused dialogue tagset and report that Trump led his opponents in five adversarial and bias categories.

Pith tools