Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Machine Learning of Coq Proof Guidance: First Experiments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1410.5467 v1 pith:LAAHYNQ7 submitted 2014-10-20 cs.LO cs.LG

classification cs.LOcs.LG
keywords learningdependenciesexperimentsfirstproofmachinemethodproofs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We report the results of the first experiments with learning proof dependencies from the formalizations done with the Coq system. We explain the process of obtaining the dependencies from the Coq proofs, the characterization of formulas that is used for the learning, and the evaluation method. Various machine learning methods are compared on a dataset of 5021 toplevel Coq proofs coming from the CoRN repository. The best resulting method covers on average 75% of the needed proof dependencies among the first 100 predictions, which is a comparable performance of such initial experiments on other large-theory corpora.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools