Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 56 references

Optimization of Epitaxial Mn4N Thin Films Grown by Sputtering for Spintronic Applications

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Reactive sputtering produces epitaxial Mn4N films with strong perpendicular anisotropy and efficient spin-orbit torque switching, establishing a scalable rare-earth-free platform.

desk verdict Solid growth-optimization work on sputtered Mn4N, but the abstract overclaims 'efficient switching' and 'strong spin transparency' when the authors' own SI shows partial, thermally assisted reversal. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27419 v1 pith:LBT6TWW2 submitted 2026-07-29 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Teodor Apetrei , Emre Demiroglu , Caner Deger , Can Onur Avci , Silvia Damerio This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Mn4Nferrimagnetsperpendicularmagneticanisotropyspin-orbittorquesanomalousHalleffectmagnetotransportreactivemagnetronsputteringrare-earth-freespintronics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show that reactive magnetron sputtering, an industrially compatible deposition method, can produce high-quality Mn4N films for spintronics. It claims that epitaxial, single-crystalline Mn4N with strong perpendicular magnetic anisotropy forms on MgO(100) under optimized sputtering conditions, while SrTiO3(100) yields textured polycrystalline films. The authors argue that epitaxial strain tunes the magnetic anisotropy but is not the whole story: PMA persists even in largely relaxed films, and interfacial effects, especially with Pt capping, also stabilize the perpendicular easy axis. They demonstrate deterministic current-induced magnetization switching in Mn4N(30)/Pt(3) bilayers, which they take as evidence of strong interfacial spin transparency. A sympathetic reader would care because this points to a rare-earth-free, scalable material platform for energy-efficient spin-orbitronic devices.

What carries the argument

The central object is Mn4N, a ferrimagnetic antiperovskite in which nitrogen sits at the body center of a face-centered cubic Mn lattice and the two Mn sublattices align antiparallel, giving a low net magnetization and a strong anomalous Hall response. The growth control relies on reactive sputtering parameters, especially substrate temperature and Ar:N2 ratio, which suppress the competing α-Mn phase and stabilize the (100) orientation. The quantitative anisotropy argument uses DFT-computed magnetic anisotropy energy as a function of tetragonal a/c ratio: MgO-matching tensile strain gives a larger out-of-plane MAE than STO-matching strain, and the same trend appears in finite-slab calculatio

What would settle it

Grow a series of Mn4N films on MgO with systematically varied in-plane strain (for example, by thickness or buffer layers) while keeping the Pt interface and microstructure fixed, and measure the perpendicular anisotropy field; if BK does not increase with increasing in-plane strain, or if a fully relaxed film still shows BK≈700 mT, the strain-driven anisotropy trend would fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that Mn4N, a ferrimagnetic antiperovskite with low net magnetization and a large anomalous Hall response, can be grown by reactive sputtering into device-grade films. On MgO(100), 30-nm films are epitaxial and single-crystalline with square hysteresis loops, high remanence, tunable coercivity, and an anomalous Hall resistance of about 40 mΩ. On SrTiO3, growth is textured and polycrystalline, yet still ferrimagnetic with perpendicular anisotropy, though weaker. Combining transport measurements with density functional theory, the authors argue that tensile epitaxial strain, especially the MgO-matching strain state, raises the magnetic anisotropy energy and favors o

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the DFT-computed strain states for idealized, perfectly tetragonally strained bulk Mn4N represent the anisotropy of the real films, even though STEM shows the 30-nm films are largely relaxed (a≈c≈3.8 Å) and the STO films are polycrystalline.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Epitaxial Mn4N with strong PMA can be grown by sputtering, a scalable and industrially compatible method, removing the need for molecular beam epitaxy in this material class.
  • PMA persists in films thicker than the fully strained limit, so device stacks do not depend on maintaining extreme epitaxial strain.
  • The anisotropy field can be tuned by substrate and capping layer: MgO gives BK≈700 mT versus ≈300 mT on STO, and Pt capping gives a larger BK than V capping.
  • The large anomalous Hall response (~40 mΩ) is sufficient for electrical readout of the magnetization state in sputtered Mn4N.
  • Deterministic SOT switching works in a 30-nm-thick ferrimagnetic layer with Pt, and the switching polarity reverses with in-plane field, matching the symmetry of damping-like SOT.
  • The opposite switching polarity relative to Ta capping is consistent with the opposite spin Hall angle of Pt and Ta, indicating standard SOT physics in this system.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the interfacial spin-orbit contribution is as strong as indicated, then capping-layer engineering (e.g., Pt alloys or heavy-metal/oxide stacks) could push the anisotropy field higher and lower the switching current, potentially extending PMA to thinner films.
  • Beyond the paper: the MgO-versus-STO anisotropy comparison is partly confounded by microstructure, since STO films are textured polycrystalline rather than epitaxial; a cleaner test would compare epitaxial films on substrates with matched interface chemistry but different lattice constants.
  • Beyond the paper: the reported current density is an upper bound for partial, thermally assisted switching, not a clean measure of intrinsic spin-orbit torque efficiency; pulse-width and temperature-dependent measurements would separate thermal effects from torque-driven reversal.
  • Beyond the paper: explicit DFT models of the Pt/Mn4N interface, including the heavy metal, would likely quantify an additional interfacial PMA contribution that the current bulk- and slab-only calculations leave implicit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a systematic optimization of reactive sputtering growth of Mn4N thin films on MgO(100) and SrTiO3(100), correlating deposition temperature, N2 partial pressure, and film thickness with structural, magnetic, and magnetotransport properties. The central growth claim—that epitaxial, single-crystalline Mn4N films with strong PMA can be obtained on MgO, while STO yields textured polycrystalline films—is well supported by XRD, STEM, SQUID, and AHE data. The authors further use DFT to argue that tensile tetragonal strain promotes PMA and that interface effects contribute, and they demonstrate current-induced Hall switching in Mn4N(30)/Pt(3) bilayers. However, the abstract and conclusions go beyond the evidence by calling the switching 'efficient' and by claiming 'strong interfacial spin transparency,' whereas the SI acknowledges only partial, Joule-heating-assisted switching. The strain interpretation is also weakened by the largely relaxed state of the 30 nm films.

Significance. If the growth and PMA results stand, the paper provides a valuable scalable route to rare-earth-free ferrimagnetic Mn4N for spin-orbitronic devices. The strengths are the systematic parameter map, the combination of structural/magnetic/transport probes, the first-principles DFT MAE calculations that are not fitted to the measured anisotropy, and the transparency of the SI, which explicitly reports the partial switching and heating limitations. The remaining gap is quantitative proof of SOT efficiency (or switched volume) and a direct link between the measured anisotropy and the DFT strain states. With those issues addressed, the manuscript would be a solid contribution.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Conclusions; Fig. 7(f); SI S5] The abstract and Conclusions state 'efficient current-induced magnetization switching' and 'strong interfacial spin transparency'. The data and the authors' own SI do not support these terms. SI S5 explicitly states that 'the current induced switching is only partial' and that 'Joule heating plays an important role in facilitating it'; the Hall steps in Fig. 7(f) are much smaller than the field-driven AHE loop, the two switching polarities have different amplitudes, and no torque-efficiency measurement (harmonic Hall or ST-FMR) or switched-volume quantification is provided. The paper can demonstrate deterministic, symmetry-correct current-induced reversal, but not efficiency or interfacial spin transparency. Please rephrase the claims (e.g., 'thermally assisted current-induced switching') and either add a torque-efficiency measurement or remove the efficiency/transparency statements from
  2. [Section III.D; Fig. 6(c); Table S1] The DFT MAE calculation is presented as explaining the measured BK difference (≈700 mT on MgO vs ≈300 mT on STO) via epitaxial strain. However, the DFT uses bulk tetragonal cells coherently strained to the substrate lattice constants, whereas the actual 30 nm films are largely relaxed: Table S1 gives c≈3.86 Å and a≈3.8 Å for MgO and c≈3.8 Å, a≈3.8 Å for STO, all within ~1% of bulk, and STEM shows misfit dislocations on MgO and textured polycrystalline growth on STO. Thus the MgO-like and STO-like strain states in Fig. 6(c) are not the film states. The measured anisotropy difference could therefore be dominated by microstructure, defects, interface quality, or off-stoichiometry (the latter acknowledged as difficult to exclude in SI S1). To make the strain claim load-bearing, the authors should either relate MAE to experimentally measured strain states (e.g., the thickness series where XRD
  3. [Section III.E; SI S5] The reported critical current density jC ≈ 1.8×10^7 A/cm^2 is quoted for a process that is explicitly only partial switching. Because the switched volume is not determined, this value is not a material figure of merit for efficient SOT switching; it is an upper bound on the current needed to initiate reversal under strong Joule heating. The same issue affects the comparison with previous Mn4N/Ta bilayers in Ref. [24]: the sign comparison is meaningful, but the efficiency claim requires a measurement that separates the spin-torque contribution from heating. Please clarify this limitation in the main text, not only in the SI.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section II (Methods)] The unit '2.9 µΩ/cm' should be '2.9 µΩ·cm' (micro-ohm centimeter), as used elsewhere for resistivity.
  2. [Section III.A] The phrase 'tensile strain of approximately −8%' is confusing; a negative value usually denotes compressive strain. Please state the sign convention explicitly or use a magnitude with a clear direction.
  3. [Fig. 6(c)] The background color map representing 'relative elastic energy cost' has no colorbar or scale. Without a quantitative axis, the statement that the substrate-relevant strain states remain 'energetically accessible' is not verifiable from the figure.
  4. [Section III.E] The inference of spin Hall magnetoresistance from the Pt layer is based on a finite MR during the β rotation. This contribution is not unambiguously separated from other MR mechanisms; please clarify the assumption or provide supporting data.
  5. [SI S5 / Fig. S5] Several typographical issues: 'AHE loop measured at that highest possible temperature reached by our setup' has 'ne' for 'one'; Fig. S5(c) label 'up tp 45 mA' should be 'up to'; and in Fig. S5(b) the field axis is labeled HZ while the text uses BZ. Please harmonize notation.
  6. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption contains 'M−Bloops' without a space; it should read 'M−B loops'.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: DFT MAE is unfitted and independent; BK values are extracted by transparent fitting; same-author citations are corroborative, not load-bearing.

  1. other [Main text Sec. III.E (Magnetotransport and spintronics properties), sentence preceding Fig. 7(f); also Conclusions]
    "Moreover, the larger BK observed in MgO/Mn4N/Pt compared to MgO/Mn4N/V [24] further supports a contribution of interfacial SOC to the overall magnetic anisotropy."

    Citation flagged: Ref. [24] (Damerio/Apetrei/Avci) is by the present authors and is used as evidence that Pt capping raises BK relative to V capping, supporting interfacial SOC as a PMA contributor. This step is not load-bearing: the V-capped comparison is reproduced in the present paper's own SI (Sec. S3, Fig. S3(b): V-capped MgO film fitted with BK=300 mT), and the primary evidence for interfacial effects is the independent observation that strong PMA persists in >30-nm, largely relaxed films (Fig. 4; STEM c~a~3.8 A). The central claim does not reduce to the citation.

  2. other [SI Sec. S3 (micromagnetic simulations); Sec. II Methods (DFT MAE)]
    "For the simulations, we have used the micromagnetic code developed earlier by our group and run with Scilab open-source software ... The magnetic anisotropy energy was obtained from the total-energy difference between the in-plane and out-of-plane magnetization configurations, [40]"

    Methodological self-citations: the fitting code (Ref. [49]) and the MAE definition (Ref. [40]) are cited with authors in common. The code is fully specified in the present paper's SI (Eqs. S1-S3: torque balance plus first-harmonic Hall expression) and serves only to extract BK from measured RH(beta); the DFT MAE is an unfitted total-energy difference between OOP and IP spin configurations. No conclusion is imported unverified from the citations; these are transparent methodological pointers, not circular dependencies.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against its stated evidence. (i) Growth optimization is established by the paper's own XRD/STEM/SQUID data. (ii) The DFT MAE calculations are genuinely first-principles: tetragonal strain states corresponding to STO- and MgO-matching a/c ratios are imposed, and MAE is computed as a total-energy difference between out-of-plane and in-plane spin configurations; no parameter is fitted to the measured anisotropy fields, and the paper explicitly concedes a quantitative discrepancy between the DFT MAE ratio and the experimental BK ratio. (iii) The anisotropy fields (BK ~ 700 mT on MgO, ~300 mT on STO) are extracted by fitting the measured angular dependence of RH with a single-spin micromagnetic model fully written out in the SI (Eqs. S1-S3); this extraction does not presuppose the strain or interfacial conclusion. (iv) The claim that epitaxial strain is not the sole origin of PMA follows from the paper's own observation that strong PMA persists in thick (>30 nm), largely relaxed films (STEM gives c ~ a ~ 3.8 A), independent of any citation. The same-author citations ([24], [40], [49]) are either standard method pointers, a model fully described in the SI, or a Pt-vs-V comparison also shown in this paper's SI (Fig. S3(b)); none is load-bearing in the sense that a central result reduces to it. The use of idealized fully strained bulk DFT states to interpret largely relaxed films, and the overstatement of 'efficient switching / strong interfacial spin transparency' against the paper's own SI S5 (which states the switching 'is only partial' and that Joule heating 'plays an important role'), are evidence-sufficiency concerns, not circular reductions. Score 2 reflects only the minor same-author citations used as corroboration.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced. The central claims rest on standard DFT modeling, micromagnetic fitting, and assumptions about film stoichiometry and strain state. The only fitted values used in the argument are the anisotropy fields extracted from transport data.

free parameters (2)
  • Anisotropy field BK (MgO film) = ~700 mT
    Extracted by fitting angular Hall resistance data with a single-spin micromagnetic model (Fig. 7d and Supp. S3).
  • Anisotropy field BK (STO film) = ~300 mT
    Same fitting procedure as MgO; used to compare substrate-dependent anisotropy (Fig. 7e and Supp. S3).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption DFT-GGA-PBE with 400 eV cutoff and 2x2x2 k-mesh gives converged MAE trends for Mn4N.
    Calculations rely on standard DFT settings; no convergence tests are shown for MAE with respect to k-mesh/cutoff.
  • domain assumption Mn4N is stoichiometric with the antiperovskite ferrimagnetic ground state; off-stoichiometry and secondary phases are negligible.
    XRD shows only a small alpha-Mn peak under some conditions, and EDX/EELS sample a local volume; the authors acknowledge secondary phases can exist.
  • domain assumption Tetragonally distorted bulk Mn4N with a/c ratios mimicking MgO and STO is a valid proxy for the thin-film anisotropy.
    The measured 30-nm films are largely relaxed by STEM, so the imposed strain states are idealized, not the actual film states.
  • domain assumption The single-spin micromagnetic model captures the angular Hall response well enough to extract BK.
    Supp. S3 states hysteresis cannot be modeled in this approximation; fits are used on averaged forward/backward sweeps.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optimization of Epitaxial Mn4N Thin Films Grown by Sputtering for Spintronic Applications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LBT6TWW2

@misc{pith2026260727419,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optimization of Epitaxial Mn4N Thin Films Grown by Sputtering for Spintronic Applications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LBT6TWW2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27419}
}
read the original abstract

Ferrimagnetic Mn4N has recently emerged as a promising rare-earth-free platform for spintronic devices due to its low magnetization, high domain wall mobility, and strong anomalous Hall response. However, the realization of thin films with robust perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) and spin-orbit torque (SOT) functionality through scalable deposition techniques remains a significant challenge. In this work, we systematically investigate the growth of Mn4N thin films by reactive magnetron sputtering and determine the conditions required to achieve high-quality films suitable for SOT applications. We demonstrate that epitaxial, single-crystalline Mn4N films with strong PMA can be obtained on MgO(100), whereas films deposited on SrTiO3(100) exhibit a textured structure. The optimized films show square-shaped hysteresis loops with high remanence, large and tunable coercivity, and a pronounced anomalous Hall effect. By combining structural, magnetic, and magnetotransport characterization with density functional theory calculations, we reveal that epitaxial strain plays a key role in tuning magnetic anisotropy, while also showing that it is not the only contributing factor. In particular, our results emphasize the importance of interfacial effects in stabilizing PMA. Finally, we demonstrate efficient current-induced magnetization switching in Mn4N/Pt bilayers, confirming strong interfacial spin transparency. These findings establish sputtered Mn4N as a promising and versatile material platform for energy-efficient spin-orbitronic devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27419 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. XRD spectra of Mn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. STEM characterization of a 30 nm thick Mn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. STEM characterization of a 30 nm thick Mn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Ferrimagnetic properties. (a) Schematic representation of the Mn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Summary of the dependence of (a) saturation magnetization ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a,b) Spin configurations used for magnetic anisotropy calculations in Mn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Magnetotransport properties of Mn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references

  1. [24]

    Damerio, T

    S. Damerio, T. Apetrei, and C. O. Avci, Magneto-ionic control of perpendicular anisotropy in epitaxial Mn4N films, Applied Physics Letters127(2025)

    2025

  2. [1]

    Manchon, I

    A. Manchon, I. M. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 035004 (2019)

    2019

  3. [2]

    J. Ryu, S. Lee, K.-J. Lee, and B.-G. Park, Current-induced spin-orbit torques for spintronic applications, Advanced Materials32, 1907148 (2020)

    2020

  4. [3]

    Q. Shao, P. Li, L. Liu, H. Yang, S. Fukami, A. Razavi, H. Wu, K. Wang, F. Freimuth, Y. Mokrousov,et al., Roadmap of spin–orbit torques, IEEE transactions on magnetics57, 1 (2021)

    2021

  5. [4]

    S. N. Piramanayagam, Perpendicular recording media for hard disk drives, Journal of Applied Physics102, 011301 (2007)

    2007

  6. [5]

    Ikeda, K

    S. Ikeda, K. Miura, H. Yamamoto, K. Mizunuma, H. D. Gan, M. Endo, S. Kanai, J. Hayakawa, F. Matsukura, and H. Ohno, A perpendicular-anisotropy cofeb–mgo magnetic tunnel junction, Nature Materials9, 721 (2010)

    2010

  7. [6]

    Cubukcu, O

    M. Cubukcu, O. Boulle, M. Drouard, K. Garello, C. Onur Avci, I. Mihai Miron, J. Langer, B. Ocker, P. Gambardella, and G. Gaudin, Spin-orbit torque magnetization switching of a three-terminal perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction, Applied Physics Letters104, 042406 (2014)

    2014

  8. [7]

    I. M. Miron, T. Moore, H. Szambolics, L. D. Buda-Prejbeanu, S. Auffret, B. Rodmacq, S. Pizzini, J. Vogel, M. Bonfim, A. Schuhl,et al., Fast current-induced domain-wall motion controlled by the rashba effect, Nature materials10, 419 (2011)

    2011

Show all 56 references
  1. [8]

    Emori, U

    S. Emori, U. Bauer, S.-M. Ahn, E. Martinez, and G. S. D. Beach, Current-driven dynamics of chiral ferromagnetic domain walls, Nature Materials12, 611 (2013)

    2013

  2. [9]

    Finocchio, F

    G. Finocchio, F. B¨ uttner, R. Tomasello, M. Carpentieri, and M. Kl¨ aui, Magnetic skyrmions: from fundamental to appli- cations, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics49, 423001 (2016)

    2016

  3. [10]

    S. K. Kim, G. S. Beach, K.-J. Lee, T. Ono, T. Rasing, and H. Yang, Ferrimagnetic spintronics, Nature materials21, 24 (2022)

    2022

  4. [11]

    Finley and L

    J. Finley and L. Liu, Spintronics with compensated ferrimagnets, Applied Physics Letters116(2020)

    2020

  5. [12]

    Emori and P

    S. Emori and P. Li, Ferrimagnetic insulators for spintronics: Beyond garnets, Journal of Applied Physics129(2021)

    2021

  6. [13]

    C. O. Avci, Current-induced magnetization control in insulating ferrimagnetic garnets, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan90, 081007 (2021)

    2021

  7. [14]

    H.-A. Zhou, T. Xu, H. Bai, and W. Jiang, Efficient spintronics with fully compensated ferrimagnets, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan90, 081006 (2021)

    2021

  8. [15]

    Zhang, X

    Y. Zhang, X. Feng, Z. Zheng, Z. Zhang, K. Lin, X. Sun, G. Wang, J. Wang, J. Wei, P. Vallobra,et al., Ferrimagnets for spintronic devices: From materials to applications, Applied Physics Reviews10(2023)

    2023

  9. [16]

    K. Ito, S. Honda, and T. Suemasu, Transition metal nitrides and their mixed crystals for spintronics, Nanotechnology33, 062001 (2021)

    2021

  10. [17]

    Zhang and W

    Z. Zhang and W. Mi, Progress in ferrimagnetic Mn4N films and its heterostructures for spintronics applications, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics55, 013001 (2021)

    2021

  11. [18]

    X. Shen, A. Chikamatsu, K. Shigematsu, Y. Hirose, T. Fukumura, and T. Hasegawa, Metallic transport and large anomalous Hall effect at room temperature in ferrimagnetic Mn4N epitaxial thin film, Applied Physics Letters105(2014)

    2014

  12. [19]

    Gushi, M

    T. Gushi, M. Joviˇ cevi´ c Klug, J. Pe˜ na Garcia, S. Ghosh, J.-P. Attan´ e, H. Okuno, O. Fruchart, J. Vogel, T. Suemasu, S. Pizzini,et al., Large current driven domain wall mobility and gate tuning of coercivity in ferrimagnetic mn4n thin films, Nano Letters19, 8716 (2019)

    2019

  13. [20]

    H. Bai, T. Xu, Y. Dong, H.-A. Zhou, and W. Jiang, Spin-Torque Switching in Rare-Earth-Free Compensated Ferrimagnet Mn4N Films, Advanced Electronic Materials8, 2100772 (2022)

    2022

  14. [21]

    Ghosh, T

    S. Ghosh, T. Komori, A. Hallal, J. Pe˜ na Garcia, T. Gushi, T. Hirose, H. Mitarai, H. Okuno, J. Vogel, M. Chshiev,et al., Current-driven domain wall dynamics in ferrimagnetic nickel-doped Mn4N films: very large domain wall velocities and reversal of motion direction across the...

    2021

  15. [22]

    Mitarai, T

    H. Mitarai, T. Komori, T. Hirose, K. Ito, S. Ghosh, S. Honda, K. Toko, L. Vila, J.-P. Attan´ e, K. Amemiya,et al., Magnetic compensation at two different composition ratios in rare-earth-free Mn4-xCoxN ferrimagnetic films, Physical Review Materials4, 094401 (2020)

    2020

  16. [23]

    K. Ito, Y. Yasutomi, S. Zhu, M. Nurmamat, M. Tahara, K. Toko, R. Akiyama, Y. Takeda, Y. Saitoh, T. Oguchi,et al., Manipulation of saturation magnetization and perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in epitaxial CoxMn4-xN films with ferrimagnetic compensation, Physical Review B101, ...

    2020

  17. [25]

    H. Yang, H. Al-Brithen, E. Trifan, D. C. Ingram, and A. R. Smith, Crystalline phase and orientation control of manganese nitride grown on mgo (001) by molecular beam epitaxy, Journal of applied physics91, 1053 (2002)

    2002

  18. [26]

    Yasutomi, K

    Y. Yasutomi, K. Ito, T. Sanai, K. Toko, and T. Suemasu, Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy of Mn4N films on MgO (001) and SrTiO3 (001) substrates, Journal of Applied Physics115(2014). 13

    2014

  19. [27]

    K. Ito, Y. Yasutomi, K. Kabara, T. Gushi, S. Higashikozono, K. Toko, M. Tsunoda, and T. Suemasu, Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in CoxMn4-xN (x= 0 and 0.2) epitaxial films and possibility of tetragonal Mn4N phase, AIP Advances 6(2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    Komori, T

    T. Komori, T. Gushi, A. Anzai, L. Vila, J.-P. Attan´ e, S. Pizzini, J. Vogel, S. Isogami, K. Toko, and T. Suemasu, Magnetic and magneto-transport properties of Mn4N thin films by Ni substitution and their possibility of magnetic compensation, Journal of Applied Physics125(2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Kabara and M

    K. Kabara and M. Tsunoda, Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy of mn4n films fabricated by reactive sputtering method, Journal of Applied Physics117, 17B512 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    Isogami, K

    S. Isogami, K. Masuda, and Y. Miura, Contributions of magnetic structure and nitrogen to perpendicular magnetocrys- talline anisotropy in antiperovskiteε-mn4n, Physical Review Materials4, 014406 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    B. Xu, X. Song, R. Qin, X. Wang, B. Wang, P. Wang, L. Wang, F. Yang, C. Jin, and H. Bai, Orbital current induced angular-dependent magnetoresistance in mn4n/ti bilayers, Applied Physics Letters128(2026)

    2026

  24. [32]

    W. Zhou, C. Ma, T. Hartnett, P. Balachandran, and S. Poon, Rare-earth-free ferrimagnetic Mn4N sub-20 nm thin films as potential high-temperature spintronic material, AIP Advances11(2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    M. Meng, S. X. Wu, L. Z. Ren, W. Q. Zhou, Y. J. Wang, G. L. Wang, and S. W. Li, Extrinsic anomalous Hall effect in epitaxial Mn4N films, Applied Physics Letters106, 032407 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    N. P. Lu, T. Xu, Z. X. Cao, and A. L. Ji, Ternary Mn3NMn1-xAgx compound films of nearly constant electrical resistivity and their magnetic transport behaviour, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics49, 045308 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Physical review B47, 558 (1993)

    1993

  28. [36]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Physical review B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  29. [37]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Physical review b 59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  30. [38]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Physical review letters77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  31. [39]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces, Physical review letters100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  32. [40]

    Demiroglu, K

    E. Demiroglu, K. Hancioglu, I. Yavuz, C. O. Avci, and C. Deger, Oscillatory behavior of interlayer Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction by spacer thickness variation, Physical Review B109, 144422 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Takei, G

    W. Takei, G. Shirane, and B. Frazer, Magnetic structure of Mn4N, Physical Review119, 122 (1960)

    1960

  34. [42]

    Takei, R

    W. Takei, R. Heikes, and G. Shirane, Magnetic structure of Mn4N-type compounds, Physical review125, 1893 (1962)

    1962

  35. [43]

    Hirose, T

    T. Hirose, T. Komori, T. Gushi, A. Anzai, K. Toko, and T. Suemasu, Strong correlation between uniaxial magnetic anisotropic constant and in-plane tensile strain in Mn4N epitaxial films, AIP Advances10(2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    W. Li, X. Xu, T. Gao, T. Harumoto, Y. Nakamura, and J. Shi, Enhanced perpendicular magnetic anisotropy of ferrimag- netic mn4n films deposited on the glass substrate, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics55, 275004 (2022)

    2022

  37. [45]

    P. Aksu, C. Deger, I. Yavuz, and F. Yildiz, Strain-promoted perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in co–rh alloys, Applied Physics Letters116(2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    J. Kim, P. Sheng, S. Takahashi, S. Mitani, and M. Hayashi, Spin hall magnetoresistance in metallic bilayers, Physical review letters116, 097201 (2016)

    2016

  39. [47]

    A. Kobs, S. Heße, W. Kreuzpaintner, G. Winkler, D. Lott, P. Weinberger, A. Schreyer, and H. Oepen, Anisotropic interface magnetoresistance in Pt/Co/Pt sandwiches, Physical review letters106, 217207 (2011)

    2011

  40. [48]

    C. O. Avci, G. S. Beach, and P. Gambardella, Effects of transition metal spacers on spin-orbit torques, spin Hall magne- toresistance, and magnetic anisotropy of Pt/Co bilayers, Physical Review B100, 235454 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    Testa-Anta, C.-H

    M. Testa-Anta, C.-H. Lambert, and C. O. Avci, Leveraging symmetry for an accurate spin–orbit torques characterization in ferrimagnetic insulators, Advanced Electronic Materials9, 2300044 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    Roschewsky, C.-H

    N. Roschewsky, C.-H. Lambert, and S. Salahuddin, Spin-orbit torque switching of ultralarge-thickness ferrimagnetic GdFeCo, Physical Review B96, 064406 (2017)

    2017

  43. [51]

    H. Chen, G. Zhou, H. Ji, Q. Qin, S. Shi, Q. Shen, P. Yao, Y. Cao, J. Chen, Y. Liu,et al., Spin-orbit torque switching of magnetization in ultra-thick ferromagnetic layers, Advanced Functional Materials34, 2403107 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    Garello, I

    K. Garello, I. M. Miron, C. O. Avci, F. Freimuth, Y. Mokrousov, S. Bl¨ ugel, S. Auffret, O. Boulle, G. Gaudin, and P. Gambardella, Symmetry and magnitude of spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic heterostructures, Nature nanotechnology 8, 587 (2013)

    2013

  45. [53]

    C. O. Avci, K. Garello, C. Nistor, S. Godey, B. Ballesteros, A. Mugarza, A. Barla, M. Valvidares, E. Pellegrin, A. Ghosh, I. M. Miron, O. Boulle, S. Auffret, G. Gaudin, and P. Gambardella, Fieldlike and antidamping spin-orbit torques in as-grown and annealed Ta/CoFeB/MgO layer...

    2014

  46. [54]

    Nakagawa and M

    S. Nakagawa and M. Naoe, Preparation and magnetic properties of mn4n films by reactive facing targets sputtering, Journal of Applied Physics75, 6568 (1994)

    1994

  47. [55]

    Zhang, X

    Z. Zhang, X. Shi, X. Liu, X. Chen, and W. Mi, Microstructure, magnetic and electronic transport properties of reactively facing-target sputtered epitaxial mn4n films, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter34, 065802 (2022)

    2022

  48. [56]

    Optimization of Epitaxial Mn4N Thin Films Grown by Sputtering for Spintronic Applications

    W. Zhou, C. T. Ma, and S. J. Poon, Measurement of the dzyaloshinskii–moriya interaction in mn4n films that host skyrmions, Nanomaterials13(2023). 14 Supplementary Information for “Optimization of Epitaxial Mn4N Thin Films Grown by Sputtering for Spintronic Applications” Teodor...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.