Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

IFIR: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Instruction-Following in Expert-Domain Information Retrieval

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.04644 v1 pith:LD73EV73 submitted 2025-03-06 cs.CL cs.IR

classification cs.CLcs.IR
keywords retrievalifirinstructionsinstruction-followingbenchmarkcomprehensivedomain-specificdomains
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce IFIR, the first comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate instruction-following information retrieval (IR) in expert domains. IFIR includes 2,426 high-quality examples and covers eight subsets across four specialized domains: finance, law, healthcare, and science literature. Each subset addresses one or more domain-specific retrieval tasks, replicating real-world scenarios where customized instructions are critical. IFIR enables a detailed analysis of instruction-following retrieval capabilities by incorporating instructions at different levels of complexity. We also propose a novel LLM-based evaluation method to provide a more precise and reliable assessment of model performance in following instructions. Through extensive experiments on 15 frontier retrieval models, including those based on LLMs, our results reveal that current models face significant challenges in effectively following complex, domain-specific instructions. We further provide in-depth analyses to highlight these limitations, offering valuable insights to guide future advancements in retriever development.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Diffusion vs. Autoregressive Language Models: A Text Embedding Perspective

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Diffusion-language-model embeddings beat LLM embeddings on long-document and reasoning retrieval benchmarks, but the paper overstates some gains and releases no code or data.

  2. LLMs are Also Effective Embedding Models: An In-depth Overview

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A structured survey of using decoder-only LLMs as text embedding models, covering prompting, fine-tuning, data construction, benchmarks, and open problems.

Pith tools