Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 72 references

Tunable pairing with local spin-dependent Rydberg molecule potentials in an atomic Fermi superfluid

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Spin-dependent Rydberg molecule potentials can switch a Fermi superfluid's local spin populations from balanced to imbalanced and create a local FFLO-like state.

desk verdict Solid BdG study with a genuinely new spin-dependent Rydberg-molecule input; the main claims are plausible but the pure-spin approximation and its conservation-law implications need to be addressed before I'd trust the precise numbers. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.09836 v2 pith:LEHJNXUO submitted 2025-02-14 cond-mat.quant-gas physics.atom-phquant-ph

Chih-Chun Chien , Seth T. Rittenhouse , S. I. Mistakidis , H. R. Sadeghpour This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.atom-phquant-ph PACS 03.75.Ss67.85.-d
keywords ultra-long-rangeRydbergmoleculesFermisuperfluidBogoliubov-deGennesYu-Shiba-RusinovstatesFFLOpopulationimbalancespin-dependentpotentialsBCS-BECcrossover
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a Rydberg atom immersed in a two-component potassium Fermi superfluid acts as a local, tunable polarization defect. The ultra-long-range Rydberg molecule potentials felt by the two spin states are different, and that difference is an effective position-dependent Zeeman splitting. Solving the Bogoliubov-de Gennes equations, the authors find that once the pairing strength falls below a critical value, the system abruptly switches from equal spin populations to a population imbalance. The lowest special state is a local FFLO-like state whose out-of-phase wave functions make the gap function negative inside the Rydberg potential, and it is accompanied by in-gap Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states, spin-polarized bound states, and higher-energy clumpy states that partly restore balance. Depending on whether the potentials come from K(50S) or K(40S), this transition occurs on the BCS side or the BEC side, so the platform can be used to study both regimes.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the local polarization potential $(V_{\uparrow}-V_{\downarrow})(n_{\uparrow}-n_{\downarrow})/2$ that arises from the difference between the two spin-dependent ULRM potentials $V_{\mathrm{Ryd},\uparrow}$ and $V_{\mathrm{Ryd},\downarrow}$; the paper approximates each potential as a pure $\left|\uparrow\right\rangle$ or $\left|\downarrow\right\rangle$ channel. This position-dependent Zeeman term is what lowers Cooper-pair energy levels into in-gap YSR states and, when pairing weakens, produces the out-of-phase wave functions that make the gap negative. The BdG equations with this polarization term are solved self-consistently on a one-dimensional grid, and the resulting eigenstates are classified by which spin density they feed and by whether their energies lie below, inside, or above the bulk gap.

What would settle it

Repeat the same BdG calculation with the actual approximately 90% spin-admixed hyperfine potentials instead of pure spin channels: if the abrupt equal-to-imbalanced transition, the negative local gap, and the in-gap state ordering vanish or shift significantly, the purity assumption is the deciding premise. A direct check is to measure the Rydberg-molecule binding spectrum near K(40S) and K(50S) and see whether the predicted FFLO-like level is the lowest bound level on the imbalanced side.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a quasi-one-dimensional 40K Fermi superfluid placed in spin-dependent ultra-long-range Rydberg molecule potentials undergoes an abrupt transition from equal to imbalanced spin populations when the pairing strength is reduced by about one percent. In the imbalanced phase, the energetically lowest localized state has out-of-phase u and v wave functions, contributes a negative value to the pairing gap, and makes the local gap function negative inside the potentials; the authors classify it as a local FFLO-like state. Below the bulk energy gap there are also Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states whose energies are pulled down by the polarization potential formed by the difference of the two spin potentials, while higher-energy bound states and oscillatory clumpy states appear above the gap. The same qualitative behavior appears for K(50S) potentials on the BCS side and for K(40S) potentials on the BEC side, showing that the location of the transition can be chosen by selecting the Rydberg state.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes each ULRM potential is purely one spin state, although the underlying hyperfine states are about 90% pure; if that purity is not real, the polarization potential and the states it generates would be modified.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A roughly 1% change in pairing strength or a small shift in chemical potential flips the superfluid from equal to imbalanced populations, so Feshbach tuning provides an in-situ control knob.
  • The gap function changes sign inside the Rydberg potential in the imbalanced phase, giving a spatially localized signature that should be visible in spatially resolved rf spectroscopy.
  • The YSR states are tied to the potential difference rather than to the sign of the potentials, so the same mechanism should work for repulsive spin-dependent impurities.
  • On the BEC side the spin-dependent wells do not trap a Cooper pair as a triatomic molecule, in contrast to the spin-independent case, because the YSR and clumpy states occupy the relevant low-energy phase space.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the hyperfine mixing is included beyond the 90% pure approximation, the effective Zeeman term would acquire weak spin-flip components; these could hybridize the YSR and FFLO-like states, so the sharp classification found here is the limiting case to test.
  • Because the FFLO-like state is confined by the potential, a Rydberg atom could serve as a local probe of pairing susceptibility, letting experiments map the phase boundary by moving the Rydberg excitation while keeping the bulk superfluid fixed.
  • The same local-polarization mechanism should apply to other alkali species with spin-dependent ULRM potentials, suggesting a broader family of Rydberg-impurity probes for imbalanced superfluids.
  • Finite-temperature or dynamical quench studies could reveal whether the abrupt transition persists or becomes a smooth crossover, and whether the FFLO-like state forms on the timescale of a Rydberg excitation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a quasi-one-dimensional two-component atomic Fermi superfluid in the presence of spin-dependent ultra-long-range Rydberg molecule (ULRM) potentials. The ULRM potentials for 40K in the 50S and 40S Rydberg states are obtained from a scattering calculation, and the superfluid is described by the self-consistent Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) equations at fixed chemical potential μ↑=μ↓=μ. The central claims are: (i) a sharp transition from equal spin populations to a population imbalance (N↑≠N↓) as the pairing strength U is reduced by about 1%; (ii) the appearance of in-gap Yu-Shiba-Rusinov (YSR) states, a lowest-energy FFLO-like state with out-of-phase wavefunctions that makes the local gap negative, spin-polarized bound states, and higher-energy oscillatory clumpy states; and (iii) that the transition can lie on the BCS or BEC side depending on the Rydberg state. The authors also discuss experimental probes based on rf spectroscopy and molecular line spectroscopy.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper would provide a concrete atomic-physics platform for studying local spin polarization, YSR-like states, and FFLO-like phenomena in a tunable Fermi superfluid. The use of realistic spin-dependent ULRM potentials from published scattering parameters, the systematic BdG treatment, the verification that the results reduce to Ref. [41] when the spin-dependent potentials are equalized, and the qualitative check of the single-well versus four-well truncation are positive features. However, the central population-imbalance transition relies on two assumptions that are not adequately justified: the fixed-μ grand canonical treatment, which allows a global N↑−N↓ change forbidden in a closed system, and the neglect of the ~10% hyperfine admixture in the spin-resolved potentials. These issues are load-bearing for the main claims.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IV A / Sec. III (Eqs. (2) and (5))] The BdG Hamiltonian in Eq. (5) contains no spin-flip terms: the single-particle potentials are diagonal in spin, and the pairing term couples ↑ and ↓ as a pair. Hence [H, N̂↑−N̂↓]=0, so the difference of spin populations is conserved. The reported transition from N↑=N↓ to N↑−N↓=1 (e.g., N↑=11.5, N↓=10.5 in Fig. 2, and N↑=9.8, N↓=8.8 in Fig. 5) therefore cannot be realized in a closed Fermi gas prepared with equal populations; it is a level crossing between different sectors of the fixed-μ grand canonical ensemble. The paper should either impose the constraints N↑=N↓ by introducing independent Lagrange multipliers μ↑ and μ↓, or explicitly state that the global imbalance is a reservoir effect and avoid the language of a transition of the system. This also affects the physical interpretation of the FFLO-like state as the source of the imbalance.
  2. [Sec. II (after Eq. (1))] The manuscript states that the hyperfine-resolved ULRM potentials correspond to ~90% admixtures of the |↑⟩ or |↓⟩ states, and then assumes that each potential corresponds to a pure |↑⟩ or |↓⟩ state. This is a load-bearing assumption: the entire classification of YSR, FFLO-like, and bound states, as well as the local polarization potential V↑−V↓, relies on the potentials being diagonal in the spin basis. The omitted off-diagonal (hyperfine-mixing) terms are precisely the microscopic processes that can change N↑−N↓ in a closed system. With the diagonal-only approximation, the claimed global population imbalance is either forbidden (for a closed system) or relies on the reservoir in a way that is not physically motivated. The authors should include the off-diagonal terms (even at a perturbative level) or provide a quantitative justification for their neglect, for instance by estimating the size of the spin-flip matrix elements and their effect on the BdG spectrum.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. V A] The text states that the transition for the 40S case is pushed to the BEC side 'with µ>0', but the parameters in Fig. 5 are µ/E0=−800 (μ<0), consistent with the BEC side as defined by Eq. (8). This appears to be a typo and should be corrected to μ<0.
  2. [Sec. III] The iterative BdG solver is described without a convergence tolerance. Since the transition is identified by comparing U/(E0L) values differing by only 1% (Figs. 2 and 5), please specify the convergence criterion and demonstrate that the two sides of the transition are robust to tighter convergence and to different initial seeds.
  3. [Sec. I] The attribution of YSR states to the 'spin-exchange term of the polarization potential' could be confusing, because the BdG Hamiltonian in Eq. (5) has no spin-exchange operator; the in-gap states arise from the diagonal spin-dependent potentials V↑ and V↓. Please clarify that the polarization potential here means the difference V↑−V↓ acting as a local Zeeman field.
  4. [Figs. 3 and 6] The classification of the higher-energy states as 'clumpy' is based on qualitative visual inspection of the wavefunctions. Consider adding a quantitative criterion, such as the inverse participation ratio, to distinguish localized bound states and YSR states from the more delocalized clumpy states.
  5. [Sec. II] The paper claims that when the two ULRM potentials are set equal the results reduce to those of Ref. [41], but no comparison plot is shown. A brief figure or table comparing the energies or densities would strengthen this validation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the BdG-based imbalance/FFLO-like results are self-contained numerical outputs from physical inputs; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained: the spin-dependent ULRM potentials are built from published 40K hyperfine constants, polarizability, and singlet/triplet zero-energy scattering lengths, while U and mu are declared physical control parameters scanned in a fixed-mu BdG calculation rather than fitted to the target observables. The population-imbalance transition, negative local gap, YSR states, and FFLO-like states are numerical outputs of the self-consistent BdG equations, with explicit control checks (setting V_Ryd,up = V_Ryd,down removes the YSR states; equal potentials reproduce the spin-independent results of Ref. [41]). The only self-citations (Ref. [41] for the double-well approximation and spin-independent limit, Ref. [61] for the iterative solver) are not load-bearing for the new spin-dependent results, and no uniqueness theorem or fitted parameter is used to force the central claims. Concerns about the ~90% hyperfine purity of the assumed pure spin channels and about N_up - N_down conservation in a closed system are physical-validity or model-choice issues, not cases where an output reduces by definition to an input.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on physically motivated but largely unverified inputs: published scattering lengths and hyperfine constants, mean-field BdG theory, and truncated potentials. U and mu are scanned inputs, not fitted to the claimed phenomena. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced; YSR, bound, clumpy, and FFLO-like states are classifications of BdG eigenstates.

free parameters (2)
  • Pairing strength U/(E0L) = -60, -61 (50S); -150, -151 (40S)
    Scanned in 1% steps to demonstrate the sharp equal-population to imbalance transition. This is a Feshbach-tunable physical input, not fitted to the target result.
  • Chemical potential mu/E0 = 600, 601 (50S); -800, -801 (40S)
    Chosen to place the superfluid on the BCS or BEC side. The location of the transition shifts with mu, so the phase boundary depends on the scanned values.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Fermi contact pseudopotential and first-order degenerate perturbation theory yield accurate spin-dependent ULRM potentials.
    Section II uses scattering lengths from Ref. 51 and polarizability from Ref. 50; no experimental verification for K(40S/50S) with 40K hyperfine states is cited.
  • ad hoc to paper The hybrid hyperfine ULRM potentials may be treated as pure spin-up and spin-down channels.
    Section II: 'we will assume that each potential corresponds to a pure |↑⟩ or |↓⟩ state', although the calculation gives about 90% admixtures. This purity underlies all spin-polarized state classifications.
  • domain assumption BdG mean-field theory is adequate for the quasi-1D Fermi superfluid with local impurities.
    Section III adopts BCS-Leggett mean field. Quantum fluctuations and possible 1D pairing fluctuations are omitted, which could shift YSR and FFLO-like energies or broaden the sharp transition.
  • domain assumption A few Rydberg atoms do not alter the bulk chemical potential.
    Section III sets mu_sigma = mu for the bulk, which fixes the reference energy for classifying in-gap versus above-gap states.
  • domain assumption Double-well truncation of the ULRM potentials preserves the qualitative physics.
    Section II states that single-well and four-well approximations give qualitatively similar features, but truncating the oscillatory tail could still affect the quantitative spectrum and the local gap profile.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tunable pairing with local spin-dependent Rydberg molecule potentials in an atomic Fermi superfluid." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LEHJNXUO

@misc{pith2026250209836,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tunable pairing with local spin-dependent Rydberg molecule potentials in an atomic Fermi superfluid},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LEHJNXUO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.09836}
}
read the original abstract

We explore the energy spectrum and eigenstates of two-component atomic Fermi superfluids with tunable pairing interactions in the presence of spin-dependent ultra long-range Rydberg molecule (ULRM) potentials, within the Bogoliubov-de Gennes formalism. The attractive ULRM potentials lead to local density accumulation, while their difference results in a local polarization potential and induces the in-gap Yu-Shiba-Rusinov (YSR) states whose energies lie below the bulk energy gap. A transition from equal-population to population-imbalance occurs as the pairing strength falls below a critical value, accompanied by the emergence of local Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov (FFLO) like states characterized by out-of-phase wave functions and lower energies compared to the YSR states. The negative contribution emanating from the FFLO-like states also causes a sign change in the gap function within the ULRM potentials. Depending on the Rydberg state generating the ULRM potentials, the transition towards population-imbalance can be on either the BCS or the Bose-Einstein condensation side of the Fermi superfluid. Additionally, spin-polarized bound states arise along with oscillatory ``clumpy states" to compensate for the local density difference. Finally, we discuss possible experimental realizations and measurements of the composite Rydberg atom-Fermi superfluid system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.09836 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Spin-dependent ULRM potentials of (a) K(50 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Profiles of [(a), (b)] the gap function and [(c), (d)] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Population-imbalanced setting of the left column of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Equal-population setup shown in the right column [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Profiles of [(a), (b)] the gap function and [(c), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Equal-population setup on the BEC side correspond [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Profiles of [(a), (b)] the gap function and [(c), (d)] spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Energy spectrum and (b)-(m) wavefunctions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [41]

    A. A. T. Durst and M. T. Eiles, Phenomenology of a Rydberg impurity in an ideal Bose Einstein condensate (2024), arXiv: 2404.03980

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed

    M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York,NY, 1996)

    work page 1996

  3. [2]

    A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka, Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems (McGraw-Hill, Boston, 1971)

    1971

  4. [3]

    B. S. Chandrasekhar, A note on the maximum criti- cal field of high-field superconductors, Applied Physics Letters 1, 7 (1962), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article- pdf/1/1/7/18416028/7 1 online.pdf. 13

    work page 1962

  5. [4]

    Here the interaction between the Rydberg electron and the ground state atoms is given by the Fermi con- tact pseudopotential, Ve−40K = P S,MS 2πℏ2aS (k) me δ(⃗ r− ⃗ x) |SMS⟩ ⟨SMS|, where ⃗ rand ⃗ xare the positions of the Rydberg electron and the ground state atom respectively. Note that the interaction potential depends on the total 3 spin of the Rydberg...

    work page

  6. [5]

    A. M. Clogston, Upper limit for the critical field in hard superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 266 (1962)

    work page 1962

  7. [6]

    Fulde and R

    P. Fulde and R. A. Ferrell, Superconductivity in a strong spin-exchange field, Phys. Rev. 135, A550 (1964)

    1964

  8. [7]

    A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Nonuniform state of superconductors, Zh. Eksperim. Teor. Fiz. 47, (1964)

    1964

Show all 72 references
  1. [8]

    Dobrzyniecki, G

    J. Dobrzyniecki, G. Orso, and T. Sowi´ nski, Unconven- tional pairing in few-fermion systems tuned by external confinement, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043105 (2021)

    2021

  2. [9]

    Steglich, R

    F. Steglich, R. Modler, P. Gegenwart, M. Deppe, M. Wei- den, M. Lang, C. Geibel, T. L¨ uhmann, C. Paulsen, J. Tholence, Y. ¯Onuki, M. Tachiki, and S. Takahashi, Ex- perimental evidence for a generalized fflo state in clean type-ii superconductors with short coherence length an...

    1996

  3. [10]

    Imajo, T

    S. Imajo, T. Nomura, Y. Kohama, and K. Kindo, Emer- gent anisotropy in the fulde–ferrell–larkin–ovchinnikov state, Nature Communications 13, 5590 (2022)

    2022

  4. [11]

    Kinjo, M

    K. Kinjo, M. Manago, S. Kitagawa, Z. Q. Mao, S. Yonezawa, Y. Maeno, and K. Ishida, Superconducting spin smecticity evidencing the fulde-ferrell-larkin- ovchinnikov state in sr 2ruo4, Science 376, 397 (2022), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abb0332

    2022 doi

  5. [12]

    P. Wan, O. Zheliuk, N. F. Q. Yuan, X. Peng, L. Zhang, M. Liang, U. Zeitler, S. Wiedmann, N. E. Hussey, T. T. M. Palstra, and J. Ye, Orbital fulde–ferrell–larkin– ovchinnikov state in an ising superconductor, Nature 619, 46 (2023)

    2023

  6. [13]

    Y.-a. Liao, A. S. C. Rittner, T. Paprotta, W. Li, G. B. Partridge, R. G. Hulet, S. K. Baur, and E. J. Mueller, Spin-imbalance in a one-dimensional fermi gas, Nature 467, 567 (2010)

    2010

  7. [14]

    M. C. Revelle, J. A. Fry, B. A. Olsen, and R. G. Hulet, 1d to 3d Crossover of a Spin-Imbalanced Fermi Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 235301 (2016)

    2016

  8. [15]

    Dupuis, Larkin-ovchinnikov-fulde-ferrell state in quasi-one-dimensional superconductors, Phys

    N. Dupuis, Larkin-ovchinnikov-fulde-ferrell state in quasi-one-dimensional superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 51, 9074 (1995)

    1995

  9. [16]

    Matsuda and H

    Y. Matsuda and H. Shimahara, Fulde–ferrell–larkin–ovchinnikov state in heavy fermion superconductors, Journal of the Phys- ical Society of Japan 76, 051005 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.76.051005

    2007 doi

  10. [17]

    L. He, M. Jin, and P. Zhuang, Loff pairing vs breached pairing in asymmetric fermion superfluids, Phys. Rev. B 73, 214527 (2006)

    2006

  11. [18]

    Q. Chen, Y. He, C.-C. Chien, and K. Levin, Theory of su- perfluids with population imbalance: Finite-temperature and bcs-bec crossover effects, Phys. Rev. B 75, 014521 (2007)

    2007

  12. [19]

    Yu, Bound state in superconductors with paramag- netic impurities, Acta Physica Sinica 21, 75 (1965)

    L. Yu, Bound state in superconductors with paramag- netic impurities, Acta Physica Sinica 21, 75 (1965)

    1965

  13. [20]

    Shiba, Classical spins in superconduc- tors, Progress of Theoretical Physics 40, 435 (1968), https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article- pdf/40/3/435/5185550/40-3-435.pdf

    H. Shiba, Classical spins in superconduc- tors, Progress of Theoretical Physics 40, 435 (1968), https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article- pdf/40/3/435/5185550/40-3-435.pdf

    1968

  14. [21]

    A. I. Rusinov, Superconductivity near a paramagnetic impurity, JETP Lett. (USSR) 9, 85 (1969)

    1969

  15. [22]

    A. V. Balatsky, I. Vekhter, and J.-X. Zhu, Impurity- induced states in conventional and unconventional su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 373 (2006)

    2006

  16. [23]

    B. W. Heinrich, J. I. Pascual, and K. J. Franke, Sin- gle magnetic adsorbates on s-wave superconductors, Progress in Surface Science 93, 1 (2018)

    2018

  17. [24]

    Wang, X.-J

    J. Wang, X.-J. Liu, and H. Hu, Exact quasiparticle prop- erties of a heavy polaron in bcs fermi superfluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 175301 (2022)

    2022

  18. [25]

    Wang, X.-J

    J. Wang, X.-J. Liu, and H. Hu, Heavy polarons in ultra- cold atomic fermi superfluids at the bec-bcs crossover: Formalism and applications, Phys. Rev. A 105, 043320 (2022)

    2022

  19. [26]

    Vernier, D

    E. Vernier, D. Pekker, M. W. Zwierlein, and E. Demler, Bound states of a localized magnetic impurity in a su- perfluid of paired ultracold fermions, Phys. Rev. A 83, 033619 (2011)

    2011

  20. [27]

    C. H. Greene, A. S. Dickinson, and H. R. Sadeghpour, Creation of Polar and Nonpolar Ultra-Long-Range Ryd- berg Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2458 (2000)

    2000

  21. [28]

    M. I. Chibisov, A. A. Khuskivadze, and I. I. Fabrikant, Energies and dipole moments of long-range molecular Ry- dberg states, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35, L193 (2002)

    2002

  22. [29]

    E. L. Hamilton, C. H. Greene, and H. R. Sadeghpour, Shape-resonance-induced long-range molecular Rydberg states, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35, L199 (2002)

    2002

  23. [30]

    Bendkowsky, B

    V. Bendkowsky, B. Butscher, J. Nipper, J. P. Shaffer, R. L¨ ow, and T. Pfau, Observation of ultralong-range ry- dberg molecules, Nature 458, 1005 (2009)

    2009

  24. [31]

    Niederpr¨ um, O

    T. Niederpr¨ um, O. Thomas, T. Eichert, C. Lippe, J. P´ erez-R ´ ıos, C. H. Greene, and H. Ott, Observation of pendular butterfly Rydberg molecules, Nature Com- munications 7, 12820 (2016)

    2016

  25. [32]

    Alth¨ on, M

    M. Alth¨ on, M. Exner, R. Bl¨ attner, and H. Ott, Exploring the vibrational series of pure trilobite Rydberg molecules, Nature Communications 14, 8108 (2023)

    2023

  26. [33]

    Booth, S

    D. Booth, S. T. Rittenhouse, J. Yang, H. R. Sadegh- pour, and J. P. Shaffer, Production of trilobite Rydberg molecule dimers with kilo-Debye perma- nent electric dipole moments, Science 348, 99 (2015), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1260722

    2015 doi

  27. [34]

    J. D. Whalen, S. K. Kanungo, Y. Lu, S. Yoshida, J. Burgd¨ orfer, F. B. Dunning, and T. C. Killian, Het- eronuclear rydberg molecules, Phys. Rev. A 101, 060701 (2020)

    2020

  28. [35]

    J. P. Shaffer, S. T. Rittenhouse, and H. R. Sadeghpour, Ultracold Rydberg molecules, Nature Communications9, 1965 (2018)

    2018

  29. [36]

    F. H. Christian Fey and P. Schmelcher, Ultralong-range Rydberg molecules, Molecular Physics 118, e1679401 (2020)

    2020

  30. [37]

    Camargo, R

    F. Camargo, R. Schmidt, J. D. Whalen, R. Ding, G. Woehl, S. Yoshida, J. Burgd¨ orfer, F. B. Dunning, H. R. Sadeghpour, E. Demler, and T. C. Killian, Cre- ation of Rydberg Polarons in a Bose Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 083401 (2018)

    2018

  31. [38]

    Schmidt, H

    R. Schmidt, H. R. Sadeghpour, and E. Demler, Meso- scopic Rydberg Impurity in an Atomic Quantum Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 105302 (2016)

    2016

  32. [39]

    Schmidt, J

    R. Schmidt, J. D. Whalen, R. Ding, F. Camargo, G. Woehl, S. Yoshida, J. Burgd¨ orfer, F. B. Dunning, E. Demler, H. R. Sadeghpour, and T. C. Killian, Theory of excitation of Rydberg polarons in an atomic quantum gas, Phys. Rev. A 97, 022707 (2018)

    2018

  33. [40]

    J. Sous, H. R. Sadeghpour, T. C. Killian, E. Demler, and R. Schmidt, Rydberg impurity in a Fermi gas: Quan- tum statistics and rotational blockade, Phys. Rev. Res. 14 2, 023021 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Chien, S

    C.-C. Chien, S. I. Mistakidis, and H. R. Sadeghpour, Breaking and trapping cooper pairs by rydberg-molecule spectroscopy in atomic fermi superfluids, Phys. Rev. A 110, L051303 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    M. T. Eiles and C. H. Greene, Hamiltonian for the in- clusion of spin effects in long-range rydberg molecules, Phys. Rev. A 95, 042515 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    M. T. Eiles, Formation of long-range rydberg molecules in two-component ultracold gases, Phys. Rev. A 98, 042706 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    P. G. De Gennes, Superconductivity of Metals and Al- loys., 2nd ed., Advanced Books Classics (Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boulder, 2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    Zhu, Bogoliubov-de Gennes Method and Its Appli- cations, 1st ed., Lecture Notes in Physics, 924 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2016)

    J.-X. Zhu, Bogoliubov-de Gennes Method and Its Appli- cations, 1st ed., Lecture Notes in Physics, 924 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2016)

    2016

  39. [47]

    Boche´ nski, J

    M. Boche´ nski, J. Dobosz, and M. Semczuk, Magnetic trapping of an ultracold 39k-40k mixture with a versatile potassium laser system, Opt. Express 32, 48463 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    C.-H. Wu, I. Santiago, J. W. Park, P. Ahmadi, and M. W. Zwierlein, Strongly interacting isotopic bose-fermi mix- ture immersed in a fermi sea, Phys. Rev. A 84, 011601 (2011)

    2011

  41. [49]

    Touchard, P

    F. Touchard, P. Guimbal, S. B¨ uttgenbach, R. Klapisch, M. De Saint Simon, J. Serre, C. Thibault, H. Duong, P. Juncar, S. Liberman, J. Pinard, and J. Vialle, Isotope shifts and hyperfine structure of 38–47k by laser spec- troscopy, Physics Letters B 108, 169 (1982)

    1982

  42. [50]

    D. A. Anderson, S. A. Miller, and G. Raithel, Angular- momentum couplings in long-range Rb 2 Rydberg molecules, Phys. Rev. A 90, 062518 (2014)

    2014

  43. [51]

    M. T. Eiles, Trilobites, butterflies, and other exotic speci- mens of long-range rydberg molecules, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 52, 113001 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    Karule, Elastic scattering of low-energy electrons by alkali atoms, Physics Letters 15, 137 (1965)

    E. Karule, Elastic scattering of low-energy electrons by alkali atoms, Physics Letters 15, 137 (1965)

    1965

  45. [53]

    C. J. Lorenzen and K. Niemax, Quantum defects of the n2p1/2, 3/2 levels in 39k i and 85rb i, Physica Scripta 27, 300 (1983)

    1983

  46. [54]

    A. J. Leggett, Quantum Liquids : Bose condensation and Cooper pairing in condensed-matter systems, Oxford Graduate Texts (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2006)

    2006

  47. [55]

    C. J. Pethick and H. Smith, Bose–Einstein Condensation in Dilute Gases, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2008)

    2008

  48. [56]

    Olshanii, Atomic Scattering in the Presence of an Ex- ternal Confinement and a Gas of Impenetrable Bosons, Phys

    M. Olshanii, Atomic Scattering in the Presence of an Ex- ternal Confinement and a Gas of Impenetrable Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 938 (1998)

    1998

  49. [57]

    Mistakidis, A

    S. Mistakidis, A. Volosniev, R. Barfknecht, T. Fogarty, T. Busch, A. Foerster, P. Schmelcher, and N. Zinner, Few-body Bose gases in low dimensions—a laboratory for quantum dynamics, Phys. Rep. 1042, 1 (2023)

    2023

  50. [58]

    C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Fesh- bach resonances in ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1225 (2010)

    2010

  51. [59]

    Zwerger, ed., The BCS-BEC Crossover and the Uni- tary Fermi Gas (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2012)

    W. Zwerger, ed., The BCS-BEC Crossover and the Uni- tary Fermi Gas (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2012)

    2012

  52. [60]

    Bogoliubov, On the theory of superfluidity, J

    N. Bogoliubov, On the theory of superfluidity, J. Phys. 11, 23 (1947)

    1947

  53. [61]

    Ueda, Fundamentals and New Frontiers of Bose-Einstein Condensa- tion (World Scientific, Singapore, 2010) https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/7216

    M. Ueda, Fundamentals and New Frontiers of Bose-Einstein Condensa- tion (World Scientific, Singapore, 2010) https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/7216

    2010 doi

  54. [62]

    Parajuli and C.-C

    B. Parajuli and C.-C. Chien, Proximity effect and spa- tial Kibble-Zurek mechanism in atomic Fermi gases with inhomogeneous pairing interactions, Phys. Rev. A 107, 063314 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    Y. Shin, C. H. Schunck, A. Schirotzek, and W. Ketterle, Tomographic rf spectroscopy of a trapped fermi gas at unitarity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 090403 (2007)

    2007

  56. [64]

    P. A. Murthy, M. Neidig, R. Klemt, L. Bayha, I. Boettcher, T. Enss, M. Holten, G. Z¨ urn, P. M. Preiss, and S. Jochim, High- temperature pairing in a strongly interacting two- dimensional Fermi gas, Science 359, 452 (2018), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aan5950

    2018 doi

  57. [65]

    Exner, R

    M. Exner, R. Srikumar, R. Blattner, M. T. Eiles, P. Schmelcher, and H. Ott, High precision spectroscopy of trilobite rydberg molecules (2024), arxiv:2412.19710

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    D. V. Sheludko, S. C. Bell, R. Anderson, C. S. Hofmann, E. J. D. Vredenbregt, and R. E. Scholten, State-selective imaging of cold atoms, Phys. Rev. A 77, 033401 (2008)

    2008

  59. [67]

    Martinez-Dorantes, W

    M. Martinez-Dorantes, W. Alt, J. Gallego, S. Ghosh, L. Ratschbacher, and D. Meschede, State-dependent flu- orescence of neutral atoms in optical potentials, Phys. Rev. A 97, 023410 (2018)

    2018

  60. [68]

    Gierling, P

    M. Gierling, P. Schneeweiss, G. Visanescu, P. Federsel, M. H¨ affner, D. P. Kern, T. E. Judd, A. G¨ unther, and J. Fort´ agh, Cold-atom scanning probe microscopy, Na- ture Nanotechnology 6, 446 (2011)

    2011

  61. [69]

    S. Kuhr, Quantum-gas microscopes: a new tool for cold-atom quantum simulators, National Science Review 3, 170 (2016), https://academic.oup.com/nsr/article- pdf/3/2/170/31565423/nww023.pdf

    2016

  62. [70]

    Stecker, H

    M. Stecker, H. Schefzyk, J. Fort´ agh, and A. G¨ unther, A high resolution ion microscope for cold atoms, New Journal of Physics 19, 043020 (2017)

    2017

  63. [71]

    J. D. Whalen, S. K. Kanungo, R. Ding, M. Wagner, R. Schmidt, H. R. Sadeghpour, S. Yoshida, J. Burgd¨ orfer, F. B. Dunning, and T. C. Killian, Probing nonlocal spa- tial correlations in quantum gases with ultra-long-range rydberg molecules, Phys. Rev. A 100, 011402 (2019)

    2019

  64. [72]

    Hollerith, J

    S. Hollerith, J. Zeiher, J. Rui, A. Rubio-Abadal, V. Walther, T. Pohl, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Quantum gas microscopy of rydberg macrodimers, Science 364, 664 (2019), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aaw4150

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.