Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

String breaking dynamics in Ising chain with local vibrations

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Coupling each spin to a local vibration slows the breaking of a confined string, and stronger coupling switches the dynamics to string contraction.

desk verdict A clean numerical study of string breaking in an Ising-Holstein chain where the observed weak-coupling slowdown is real but the abstract overgeneralizes it beyond the resonant, shallow-well case. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00604 v2 pith:LELAQJRD submitted 2024-12-31 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gas

Arindam Mallick , Maciej Lewenstein , Jakub Zakrzewski , Marcin P{l}odzień This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.quant-gas
keywords ising-holsteinmodelstringbreakingphononslatticegaugetheoryquantumsimulationmatrixproductstatespolarontransformationdomainwalls
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what happens to the string-breaking dynamics of a quantum Ising chain when every spin is also coupled to a local harmonic vibration, a phonon. The authors show by matrix-product-state simulations that for shallow traps and weak coupling the presence of phonons increases the string-breaking time compared with the isolated chain: the initial domain-wall pair stays confined longer. For stronger coupling the dominant channel changes qualitatively from string breaking to string contraction, so the pair does not separate. The result matters for quantum simulators built from Rydberg atoms or trapped ions, where the physical positions of the particles vibrate and can no longer be treated as fixed lattice sites.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the Ising–Holstein Hamiltonian $\hat H = \hat H_0 + \hat H_{\rm ph} + \hat H_{\rm int}$, where each $\hat\sigma^z_j$ couples to a local oscillator $\hat a_j^\dagger + \hat a_j$. A Lang–Firsov polaron transformation removes the linear coupling and renormalizes the transverse field to $h_x e^{-2\gamma^2}$ in the phonon vacuum, showing analytically how phonons suppress spin-flip processes. The numerical dynamics is obtained with the time-dependent variational principle on matrix product states with a phonon-number cutoff, and the string-breaking time $\tau$ is defined through domain-wall counts inside and at the edges of the initial string, with a confidence parameter $\lambda$.

What would settle it

Compute the string-breaking time as a function of $g$ for a non-resonant initial string (for example, width $w = 3$ or a shifted longitudinal field $h_z = 1.2$) at $\omega_0 = 0.2$. If $\tau(g)$ does not increase monotonically from $g = 0$, or if breaking is observed at $g = 0.08$ within the same time window, the claimed phonon stabilization would be an artifact of the degenerate initial condition rather than a general mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that spin–phonon coupling suppresses string breaking in an experimentally realistic parameter window. For shallow harmonic wells ($\omega_0 = 0.2$) and weak coupling ($g = 0.04$ and $0.08$), the string-breaking time $\tau$ grows with $g$; at $g = 0.08$ the gap between the number of domain walls inside the string and at its boundaries stays so large that no breaking is seen on the studied time scale. For strong coupling ($g = 0.23$–$0.28$) the local magnetization profile shows that string contraction overtakes breaking, and for deep wells ($\omega_0 = 1$) weak $g$ leaves $\tau$ unchanged while stronger $g$ accelerates the dynamics and selects contraction or expansion depending on the sign of the longitudinal field.

Load-bearing premise

The result assumes a resonant initial condition—the initial string and the broken-string configurations have equal energy under the spin Hamiltonian—and a hand-picked definition of string-breaking time with a confidence threshold; change either and the phonon-induced slowdown could weaken or disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In shallow traps, the string-breaking time increases monotonically with weak spin–phonon coupling, so phonons act as a stabilizer of confined strings.
  • The polaron renormalization of the transverse field directly suppresses the spin-flip events that create the new domain-wall pair, which is the microscopic origin of the slowdown.
  • At strong coupling, string contraction replaces string breaking, meaning the particle–antiparticle pair drawn apart by the string does not separate.
  • For deep traps, weak coupling has no effect on string-breaking time, while strong coupling speeds up string dynamics and the sign of $h_z$ chooses between contraction and expansion.
  • The model supplies a controlled numerical baseline for interpreting string-breaking experiments in Rydberg or trapped-ion simulators where vibrational motion of sites is unavoidable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the phonon coupling effectively dials the string-breaking rate, local vibrations could be used as an in-situ control knob for confinement dynamics, not just a perturbation to be suppressed.
  • The crossover from breaking to contraction with increasing $g$ suggests an effective reduction of the gauge-field-induced interaction; mapping $\tau$ versus $g$ at several $h_x$ values could reveal whether the transition is a sharp boundary or a smooth crossover.
  • For experimental platforms, the results imply that site-position fluctuations should be included as a tunable parameter when extracting string-breaking rates, since even weak residual vibrations can shift the observed time scale.
  • The unitary spin–phonon dynamics studied here points toward a natural extension: coupling the string to a dissipative phonon bath should produce a similar or stronger deceleration, which could be tested in open-system simulators.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies string-breaking dynamics in a one-dimensional Ising chain with local phonon modes (Ising-Holstein model). After reviewing the polaron (Lang-Firsov) transformation and a semiclassical coherent-state ansatz, the authors prepare a two-domain-wall initial state and simulate real-time dynamics with the TDVP/MPS method. They define a string-breaking time (SBT) via a crossing criterion involving domain-wall observables and a confidence parameter λ, and they supplement this with magnetization profiles to distinguish string breaking from string contraction. The central numerical findings are: for shallow traps (ω0=0.2), weak spin-phonon coupling increases the SBT compared with g=0; at intermediate coupling the domain walls appear frozen on the studied time scale; at strong coupling a string-contraction channel dominates; and for deep traps (ω0=1), weak coupling does not change τ, while strong coupling shortens it and drives contraction. The paper concludes that phonons stabilize the string in the weak-coupling shallow-well regime.

Significance. If the claims are correct, the paper provides a clean numerical demonstration that local vibrational modes can suppress string breaking in a quantum spin chain, which is relevant to analog quantum simulators based on Rydberg tweezers and trapped ions. The study is transparent: the raw observables Din(t), Dbd(t), and local magnetizations are shown for all regimes, so the qualitative trends do not depend on parameter fitting. The main value is the quantitative MPS investigation in the strong-coupling regime where semiclassical treatments fail, and the identification of a string-contraction channel. However, the central weak-coupling statement follows already from the Lang-Firsov renormalization hx→hx exp(−2g^2/ω0^2), and the numerical support is limited to a single resonant parameter point; this restricts the significance relative to what the abstract claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. 5.1; Sec. 5.4] The abstract and Sec. 5.1 state that for weak coupling string breaking is slowed down relative to the isolated Ising string. The only numerical support is Fig. 6 for ω0=0.2, hz=1, hx=0.2, w=4, L=24, and Sec. 5 explicitly notes that for this choice the initial and string-broken configurations have equal ⟨H0⟩, i.e., the g=0 transition is resonant. Sec. 5.4 then shows that for ω0=1, weak coupling does not change τ. The slowdown therefore appears to be a detuning effect specific to a resonant initial configuration, not a generic property of weak spin-phonon coupling. Either scan hz, hx, and w (or at least one non-resonant initial string) to test the claim, or restrict the abstract and conclusions to the resonant case.
  2. [Sec. 5 (numerical methods)] No MPS bond-dimension convergence checks are reported; the only convergence discussed is with respect to the local phonon cutoff nmax. Because the central result is the quantitative function τ(g), and because the statement in Sec. 5.1 that for g=0.08 the gap between Dbd and Din is so large that string breaking is unreasonable depends on truncation error, the authors should report the maximum MPS bond dimension and show that τ and the relevant observables are converged in D (e.g., a plot of τ vs D for representative couplings).
  3. [Eq. (16); Fig. 6] The string-breaking time is defined with the confidence parameter λ=0.25, and the paper notes that larger λ gives shorter τ. Although Fig. 6 shows λ=0 and λ=0.25, the text does not establish the quantitative and qualitative dependence of τ(g) on λ beyond a footnote stating that λ∈[0.2,0.3] is similar. Since τ(g) is the main quantitative output, show τ(g) for a broader range of λ (e.g., λ=0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5) or otherwise demonstrate that the reported monotonic increase is not an artifact of the chosen tolerance.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Page 1, Introduction] The phrase 'fundamental forceresponsible' is missing a space; it should read 'force responsible'. Please proofread the text.
  2. [Sec. 5.4] In the discussion of Fig. 11, 'significant photonic excitations' should read 'phononic excitations'.
  3. [Sec. 4, after Eq. (16)] The phrase 'the parameter λ limits the error or controls the confidence level' is misleading; λ is a tolerance parameter in a measurement convention, not an error bar. Please rephrase.
  4. [Fig. 13 caption] The phrase 'closed boundary conditions' is nonstandard; if periodic boundary conditions are intended, please state this explicitly.
  5. [Sec. 5 (numerical details)] The manuscript does not state the total evolution time or the TDVP time step used in the simulations; please add these numerical details in the main text or in a caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central string-breaking slowdown is obtained from a full MPS simulation with no fitted parameters, and the Lang-Firsov picture is used only for interpretation.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that weak spin-phonon coupling slows string breaking, while strong coupling dissolves the domain-wall character. The evidence for this claim comes from time-dependent MPS simulations of the Ising-Holstein Hamiltonian (Eqs. 1-2) with no free parameters fitted to the target observable. The string-breaking time is defined in Eq. (16) in terms of the raw domain-wall observables Din and Dbd; the confidence parameter lambda is chosen a priori (lambda = 0.25) and the paper explicitly discloses that larger lambda shortens tau. This is a diagnostic convention, not a fitted input renamed as a prediction. The observed increase of tau with g in Fig. 6 is visible in the underlying Din and Dbd curves shown in Figs. 4-5, so the conclusion does not reduce to the definition of tau. The Lang-Firsov transformation in Sec. 3 is a standard, independently established tool; the renormalized transverse field hx exp(-2g^2/omega0^2) is used to interpret the slowdown, but the slowdown itself is confirmed by the full quantum simulation rather than derived solely from the transformation. The semiclassical Davydov ansatz is explicitly stated to break down in the strong-coupling regime and is not the basis of the main numerical results. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no load-bearing self-citation is used. The unusual reference [80] attached to 'the presence of the phonon enhances the string stabilization' is actually a footnote about the lambda convention, which is a referencing oddity rather than circular reasoning. The manuscript also identifies the parameter regime (hz = 1, w = 4) as a resonant transition and notes that the slowdown is specific to the studied near-resonant initial string; this is a scope limitation, not circularity. The derivation chain is self-contained: a well-defined model, an observable, and numerical evolution produce the reported trend without any fitted output masquerading as a prediction. Therefore no circular step of any enumerated kind is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim does not introduce new physical entities. The main non-standard input is the SBT diagnostic with a hand-picked lambda; this is a measuring convention rather than a physical parameter.

free parameters (1)
  • lambda (SBT confidence parameter) = 0.25
    Controls the confidence interval in Eq. (16) for defining string-breaking time; the authors state results do not change significantly for lambda in [0.2,0.3], but tau itself depends on lambda, and larger lambda gives shorter tau.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The 1D transverse-field Ising chain with a longitudinal field maps to Z2 lattice gauge theory, where domain walls are particles and the spin-down domain is the confining string.
    Used to motivate string breaking; cited from [64].
  • domain assumption The initial state is a product state with a block of w=4 down spins surrounded by up spins, and phonons initially in the vacuum (Eq. 9).
    Specific prepared initial state; all results are for this state only.
  • standard math The Lang-Firsov transformation (Eqs. 3-4) is a valid canonical transformation that removes the linear spin-phonon coupling.
    Standard polaron transformation; not in dispute.
  • domain assumption The time-dependent variational principle with matrix product states accurately approximates the unitary evolution for the studied parameters.
    Numerical method; convergence is checked with phonon cutoff nmax, but no bond-dimension convergence or exact benchmark is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper String breaking is identified by the crossing criterion Eq. (16) with lambda=0.25.
    This is a constructed diagnostic; the choice of lambda affects the numerical value of tau, though the qualitative trends are visible in raw observable curves.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of String breaking dynamics in Ising chain with local vibrations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LELAQJRD

@misc{pith2026250100604,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: String breaking dynamics in Ising chain with local vibrations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LELAQJRD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00604}
}
read the original abstract

We consider the dynamics in the one-dimensional quantum Ising model in which each spin coherently interacts with its phononic mode. The model is motivated by quantum simulators based on Rydberg atoms in tweezers or trapped ions. The configuration of two domain walls simulates the particle-antiparticle connecting string. We concentrate on the effect the local vibrations have on the dynamics of this initial state. Our study supplements recent investigations of string breaking, traditionally studied within quantum chromodynamics (QCD), to quantum many-body systems. Two regimes are identified depending on the strength of the coupling with local vibrations. For weak coupling, the string breaking is slowed down as compared to the dynamics in an isolated Ising string. The strong coupling leads to complicated dynamics in which the domain wall character of excitation is dissolved among many coupled states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.00604 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Top: Exemplary initial state as defined in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Exemplary states representing schematically: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Time dynamics for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Time dynamics in presence of spin-phonon couplings [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. String-breaking time (SBT), denoted as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. String-contraction time vs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Time dynamics in the presence of strong spin-phonon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The phonon dynamics for results in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The dynamics for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. String-breaking/contraction time as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. The left [(a), (c)] and right [(b), (d)] columns rep [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum simulation of scattering amplitudes and interferences in perturbative QCD

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A quantum circuit encodes QCD colour factors and diagram interferences in a measurement probability, with permuted identical-particle diagrams generated by swap sorting networks.

  2. Quantum simulation of bubble nucleation across a quantum phase transition

    quant-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A programmable trapped-ion Ising simulator resolves bubble-nucleation dynamics across a discontinuous quantum phase transition and shows a generalized Kibble-Zurek scaling collapse with exponent 0.56.

  3. Nonlocal Nonstabilizerness from Holographic Schwinger Pair Production

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    In holographic Schwinger pair production, the excess capacity of entanglement is √λ(d−2)/(d−1)³ — positive for d>2, zero for d=2 — so the produced pair carries nonlocal magic for d>2.

  4. String Breaking in a $2+1$D $\mathbb{Z}_2$ Lattice Gauge Theory

    quant-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a 2+1D Z2 lattice gauge theory, strings between static charges in the confined phase map to free fermions on an open chain, and magnetic fluctuations stabilize the strings against breaking.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    location

    INTRODUCTION Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) is a non-Abelian gauge theory formulated on the SU(3) symmetry group, describing the strong interaction, which is a fundamental forceresponsibleforthebindingofquarksandgluonsinto protons, neutrons, and other hadrons [1–3]. The theory’s complexity is attributed to features such as asymptotic freedom [4, 5] and colo...

    arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    MODEL We consider the one-dimensional spin- 1/2 chain of length L interacting with dispersionless local vibrations, namely the Ising-Holstein model described by the Hamil- tonian ˆH = ˆH0 + ˆHph + ˆHint, (1) with ˆH0 =− L−1∑ j=1 ˆσz j ˆσz j+1−hx L∑ j=1 ˆσx j−hz L∑ j=1 ˆσz j, ˆHph =ω0 ∑ j ˆa† jˆaj, ˆHint =g L∑ j=1 (ˆa† j + ˆaj)ˆσz j, (2) where ˆσβ i , β = ...

  3. [3]

    In the following we perform the polaron transformation of the Ising-Holstein model, and discuss the effective semi- classicaldescriptionassumingcoherentstatesofphonons

    SPIN-DRESSED PICTURE The Ising-Holstein model can be transformed to an effective Hamiltonian when spin-phonon coupling term is removed, by the cost of spin-dressed operators. In the following we perform the polaron transformation of the Ising-Holstein model, and discuss the effective semi- classicaldescriptionassumingcoherentstatesofphonons. 3.1. Polaron ...

  4. [4]

    any real value≤ 2

    INITIAL ST A TE OF THE SYSTEM As the initial state, we consider the product state of spins, with the leftmostl spins pointing up, followed by w spins pointing down, eventually containingL− (l +w) spin pointing up, see Fig. 1 top panel. String length is equivalent tow. In the presence of phonons, the initial state is formally expressed as |Ψini⟩ = l∏ j=1 |...

  5. [5]

    (1) with the help of the time-dependent variational principle (TDVP) technique representing the wavefunction as a Matrix Product state

    RESUL TS We numerically study the dynamics resulting from the Hamiltonian Eq. (1) with the help of the time-dependent variational principle (TDVP) technique representing the wavefunction as a Matrix Product state. We use the two- site time evolution scheme as described in Ref. [76, 77]. For time evolution we use ITensor Julia library [78, 79]. We introduc...

  6. [6]

    string-breaking

    All other parameters are the same as in Fig. 4. FIG. 9. (a) Time dynamics forDj[Eq. (11)], (b) comparison of average domain walls inside the initial string =Din and at its boundary =Dbd, (c) longitudinal magnetization⟨ˆσz j⟩ as a function of time, (d) dynamics of magnetization [calculated according to Eq. (17)] at the edgesSed and core Scr of the initial ...

  7. [7]

    European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR

    DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS We have considered the dynamics of the initial string in a modified Ising chain. We assume that each site vi- brates with a specific frequency. The dynamics of the initial string is significantly modified by the coupling of sites to phononic modes. Such a model mimics a realistic 9 (a) (b) (c) (d) FIG. 13. The left [(a), (c)] an...

    arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Gell-Mann, A schematic model of baryons and mesons, Physics Letters8, 214–215 (1964)

    M. Gell-Mann, A schematic model of baryons and mesons, Physics Letters8, 214–215 (1964)

    1964

Show all 87 references
  1. [9]

    Marciano and H

    W. Marciano and H. Pagels, Quantum chromodynamics, Nature 279, 479–483 (1979)

    1979

  2. [10]

    Bazavov, D

    A. Bazavov, D. Toussaint, C. Bernard, J. Laiho, C. De- Tar, L. Levkova, M. B. Oktay, S. Gottlieb, U. M. Heller, J.E.Hetrick, P.B.Mackenzie, R.Sugar,andR.S.Vande Water, Nonperturbative qcd simulations with2 + 1 fla- vors of improved staggered quarks, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1349 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Ultraviolet behavior of non- abelian gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 1343 (1973)

    1973

  4. [12]

    H. D. Politzer, Reliable perturbative results for strong interactions?, Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 1346 (1973)

    1973

  5. [13]

    Polyakov, Quark confinement and topology of gauge theories, Nuclear Physics B120, 429 (1977)

    A. Polyakov, Quark confinement and topology of gauge theories, Nuclear Physics B120, 429 (1977)

    1977

  6. [14]

    K. G. Wilson, Confinement of quarks, Phys. Rev. D10, 2445 (1974)

    1974

  7. [15]

    ’t Hooft, On the phase transition towards permanent quark confinement, Nuclear Physics B138, 1 (1978)

    G. ’t Hooft, On the phase transition towards permanent quark confinement, Nuclear Physics B138, 1 (1978)

    1978

  8. [16]

    C. G. Allan, R. Dashen, and D. J. Gross, A mechanism for quark confinement, Physics Letters B66, 375 (1977)

    1977

  9. [17]

    Philipsen and H

    O. Philipsen and H. Wittig, String breaking in non- abelian gauge theories with fundamental matter fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 4056 (1998)

    1998

  10. [18]

    F. Knechtli, String breaking and lines of constant physics in the su(2) higgs model, Nuclear Physics B - Proceed- ings Supplements 83-84, 673 (2000), proceedings of the XVIIth International Symposium on Lattice Field The- ory

    2000

  11. [19]

    Antonov, L

    D. Antonov, L. D. Debbio, and A. D. Giacomo, A model for string-breaking in qcd, Journal of High Energy Physics 2003, 011 (2003)

    2003

  12. [20]

    Y. A. Simonov, Relativistic theory of string breaking in qcd, Phys. Rev. D84, 065013 (2011)

    2011

  13. [21]

    Greensite,An Introduction to the Confinement Prob- lem (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011)

    J. Greensite,An Introduction to the Confinement Prob- lem (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011)

    2011

  14. [22]

    Banerjee, M

    D. Banerjee, M. Dalmonte, M. Müller, E. Rico, P. Ste- bler, U.-J. Wiese, and P. Zoller, Atomic quantum simula- tion of dynamical gauge fields coupled to fermionic mat- ter: From string breaking to evolution after a quench, Physical review letters109, 175302 (2012)

    2012

  15. [23]

    Wiese, Towards quantum simulating qcd, Nuclear Physics A 931, 246 (2014), qUARK MATTER 2014

    U.-J. Wiese, Towards quantum simulating qcd, Nuclear Physics A 931, 246 (2014), qUARK MATTER 2014

    2014

  16. [24]

    M. C. Banuls, R. Blatt, J. Catani, A. Celi, J. I. Cirac, M. Dalmonte, L. Fallani, K. Jansen, M. Lewenstein, S. Montangero, et al., Simulating lattice gauge theo- ries within quantum technologies, The European physical journal D 74, 1 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Aidelsburger, L

    M. Aidelsburger, L. Barbiero, A. Bermudez, T. Chanda, A. Dauphin, D. González-Cuadra, P. R. Grzybowski, S. Hands, F. Jendrzejewski, J. Jünemann, G. Juzeli¯ unas, V. Kasper, A. Piga, S.-J. Ran, M. Rizzi, G. Sierra, L. Tagliacozzo, E. Tirrito, T. V. Zache, J. Zakrzewski, E. Zoha...

    2021

  18. [26]

    Y. Y. Atas, J. F. Haase, J. Zhang, V. Wei, S. M.- L. Pfaendler, R. Lewis, and C. A. Muschik, Simulating one-dimensional quantum chromodynamics on a quan- tum computer: Real-time evolutions of tetra- and pen- taquarks, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033184 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    A. N. Ciavarella, Quantum simulation of lattice qcd with improved hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. D108, 094513 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Argüello-Luengo, U

    J. Argüello-Luengo, U. Bhattacharya, A. Celi, R. W. Chhajlany, T. Grass, M. Płodzień, D. Rakshit, T. Sala- mon, P. Stornati, L. Tarruell, and M. Lewenstein, Syn- thetic dimensions for topological and quantum phases, Communications Physics 7, 10.1038/s42005-024-01636-3 (2024)

    2024 doi

  21. [29]

    J. C. Halimeh and P. Hauke, Reliability of lattice gauge theories, Physical Review Letters 125, 10.1103/phys- revlett.125.030503 (2020)

    2020 doi

  22. [30]

    J. C. Halimeh, I. P. McCulloch, B. Yang, and P. Hauke, Tuning the topological θ-angle in cold-atom quantum simulators of gauge theories, PRX Quantum3, 040316 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    J. C. Halimeh and P. Hauke, Stabilizing gauge theories in quantum simulators: A brief review (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Halimeh, Large-scale 2 + 1d U(1) gauge theory with dy- namicalmatterinacold-atomquantumsimulator(2022)

    J.Osborne, I.P.McCulloch, B.Yang, P.Hauke,andJ.C. Halimeh, Large-scale 2 + 1d U(1) gauge theory with dy- namicalmatterinacold-atomquantumsimulator(2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    J. C. Halimeh, M. Aidelsburger, F. Grusdt, P. Hauke, and B. Yang, Cold-atom quantum simulators of gauge theories (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    H. A. Chawdhry and M. Pellen, Quantum simulation of colour in perturbative quantum chromodynamics, Sci- Post Phys. 15, 205 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    P. P. Popov, M. Meth, M. Lewestein, P. Hauke, M. Ring- bauer, E. Zohar, and V. Kasper, Variational quantum simulation of u(1) lattice gauge theories with qudit sys- tems, Physical Review Research 6, 10.1103/physrevre- search.6.013202 (2024)

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    Zhang, Y

    W.-Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, Y. Cheng, M.-G. He, H.-Y. Wang, T.-Y. Wang, Z.-H. Zhu, G.-X. Su, Z.-Y. Zhou, Y.-G. Zheng, H. Sun, B. Yang, P. Hauke, W. Zheng, J. C. Halimeh, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.-W. Pan, Observation of mi- croscopic confinement dynamics by a tunable topologi- cal θ-angle, N...

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    Calajó, G

    G. Calajó, G. Magnifico, C. Edmunds, M. Ringbauer, S. Montangero, and P. Silvi, Digital quantum simulation of a (1+1)d su(2) lattice gauge theory with ion qudits, PRX Quantum5, 10.1103/prxquantum.5.040309 (2024)

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    Feldmeier, N

    J. Feldmeier, N. Maskara, N. U. Köylüoğlu, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum simulation of dynamical gauge theo- ries in periodically driven rydberg atom arrays (2024), arXiv:2408.02733 [quant-ph]. 11

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    A. N. Ciavarella and C. W. Bauer, Quantum simulation ofsu(3)latticeyang-millstheoryatleadingorderinlarge- Nc expansion, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 111901 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    A. N. Ciavarella and C. W. Bauer, Quantum simulation of large n lattice gauge theories (2024), arXiv:2411.16704 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    D. M. Grabowska, C. F. Kane, and C. W. Bauer, A fully gauge-fixed su(2) hamiltonian for quantum simulations (2024), arXiv:2409.10610 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    E. A. Martinez, C. A. Muschik, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, A. Erhard, M. Heyl, P. Hauke, M. Dalmonte, T. Monz, P. Zoller,et al., Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge the- ories with a few-qubit quantum computer, Nature534, 516 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    N. H. Nguyen, M. C. Tran, Y. Zhu, A. M. Green, C. H. Alderete, Z. Davoudi, and N. M. Linke, Digital quantum simulation of the schwinger model and symmetry protec- tion with trapped ions, PRX Quantum3, 020324 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    R. C. Farrell, M. Illa, A. N. Ciavarella, and M. J. Savage, Scalable circuits for preparing ground states on digital quantum computers: The schwinger model vacuum on 100 qubits, PRX Quantum5, 020315 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Verdel, F

    R. Verdel, F. Liu, S. Whitsitt, A. V. Gorshkov, and M. Heyl, Real-time dynamics of string breaking in quan- tum spin chains, Phys. Rev. B102, 014308 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Banerjee, M

    D. Banerjee, M. Dalmonte, M. Müller, E. Rico, P. Ste- bler, U.-J. Wiese, and P. Zoller, Atomic quantum simula- tion of dynamical gauge fields coupled to fermionic mat- ter: From string breaking to evolution after a quench, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 175302 (2012)

    2012

  39. [47]

    Verdel, G.-Y

    R. Verdel, G.-Y. Zhu, and M. Heyl, Dynamical localiza- tion transition of string breaking in quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 230402 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    K. Lee, J. Mulligan, F. Ringer, and X. Yao, Liouvillian dynamics of the open schwinger model: String breaking and kinetic dissipation in a thermal medium, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094518 (2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    F. M. Surace, A. Lerose, O. Katz, E. R. Bennewitz, A. Schuckert, D. Luo, A. De, B. Ware, W. Morong, K. Collins, C. Monroe, Z. Davoudi, and A. V. Gorshkov, String-breaking dynamics in quantum adiabatic and di- abatic processes (2024), arXiv:2411.10652 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Bacciconi, H

    Z. Bacciconi, H. B. Xavier, M. Marinelli, D. S. Bhakuni, and M. Dalmonte, Meson-polariton and string dynam- ics via cavity coupling in rydberg atom array (2025), arXiv:2501.04634 [quant-ph]

    2025

  43. [51]

    A. De, A. Lerose, D. Luo, F. M. Surace, A. Schuckert, E. R. Bennewitz, B. Ware, W. Morong, K. S. Collins, Z. Davoudi, A. V. Gorshkov, O. Katz, and C. Monroe, Observation of string-breaking dynamics in a quantum simulator (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    F. M. Surace, P. P. Mazza, G. Giudici, A. Lerose, A. Gambassi, and M. Dalmonte, Lattice gauge theories and string dynamics in rydberg atom quantum simula- tors, Phys. Rev. X10, 021041 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    Gonzalez-Cuadra, M

    D. Gonzalez-Cuadra, M. Hamdan, T. V. Zache, B. Braverman, M. Kornjaca, A. Lukin, S. H. Cantu, F. Liu, S.-T. Wang, A. Keesling, M. D. Lukin, P. Zoller, andA.Bylinskii,Observationofstringbreakingona(2+ 1)d rydberg quantum simulator (2024), arXiv:2410.16558 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    A.Crippa, K.Jansen,andE.Rinaldi,Analysisofthecon- finement string in (2 + 1)-dimensional quantum electro- dynamics with a trapped-ion quantum computer (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    A. N. Ciavarella, String breaking in the heavy quark limit with scalable circuits (2024), arXiv:2411.05915 [quant- ph]

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Liu, W.-Y

    Y. Liu, W.-Y. Zhang, Z.-H. Zhu, M.-G. He, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.-W. Pan, String breaking mechanism in a lat- tice schwinger model simulator (2024), arXiv:2411.15443 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Wüster, C

    S. Wüster, C. Ates, A. Eisfeld, and J. M. Rost, Excita- tion transport through rydberg dressing, New Journal of Physics 13, 073044 (2011)

    2011

  50. [58]

    J. P. Hague and C. MacCormick, Quantum simulation of electron–phonon interactions in strongly deformable materials, New Journal of Physics14, 033019 (2012)

    2012

  51. [59]

    J. P. Hague, S. Downes, C. MacCormick, and P. E. Ko- rnilovitch, Cold rydberg atoms for quantum simulation of exotic condensed matter interactions, Journal of Super- conductivity and Novel Magnetism27, 937–940 (2013)

    2013

  52. [60]

    Barredo, H

    D. Barredo, H. Labuhn, S. Ravets, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, and C. S. Adams, Coherent excitation transfer in a spin chain of three rydberg atoms, Phys- ical Review Letters114, 10.1103/physrevlett.114.113002 (2015)

    2015 doi

  53. [61]

    Płodzień, T

    M. Płodzień, T. Sowiński, and S. Kokkelmans, Simulat- ing polaron biophysics with rydberg atoms, Scientific Re- ports 8, 10.1038/s41598-018-27232-4 (2018)

    2018 doi

  54. [62]

    Camargo, R

    F. Camargo, R. Schmidt, J. Whalen, R. Ding, G. Woehl, S. Yoshida, J. Burgdörfer, F. Dunning, H. Sadegh- pour, E. Demler, and T. Killian, Creation of rydberg polarons in a bose gas, Physical Review Letters 120, 10.1103/physrevlett.120.083401 (2018)

    2018 doi

  55. [63]

    Jachymski and A

    K. Jachymski and A. Negretti, Quantum simulation of extended polaron models using compound atom-ion sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033326 (2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    J. P. Mendonça and K. Jachymski, Quantum simula- tion of extended electron-phonon-coupling models in a hybrid rydberg atom setup, Physical Review A 107, 10.1103/physreva.107.032808 (2023)

    2023 doi

  57. [65]

    Magoni, P

    M. Magoni, P. Mazza, and I. Lesanovsky, Phonon dressing of a facilitated one-dimensional rydberg lat- tice gas, SciPost Physics Core 5, 10.21468/scipost- physcore.5.3.041 (2022)

    2022 doi

  58. [66]

    Di Liberto, A

    M. Di Liberto, A. Kruckenhauser, P. Zoller, and M. A. Baranov,Topologicalphononsinarraysofultracolddipo- lar particles, Quantum6, 731 (2022)

    2022

  59. [67]

    Kosior, S

    A. Kosior, S. Kokkelmans, M. Lewenstein, J. Zakrzewski, and M. Płodzień, Phonon-assisted coherent transport of excitations in rydberg-dressed atom arrays, Physical Re- view A 108, 10.1103/physreva.108.043308 (2023)

    2023 doi

  60. [68]

    Magoni, R

    M. Magoni, R. Joshi, and I. Lesanovsky, Molecular dy- namics in rydberg tweezer arrays: Spin-phonon entangle- ment and jahn-teller effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 093002 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    Knörzer, T

    J. Knörzer, T. Shi, E. Demler, and J. Cirac, Spin-holstein models in trapped-ion systems, Physical Review Letters 128, 10.1103/physrevlett.128.120404 (2022)

    2022 doi

  62. [70]

    Magoni, C

    M. Magoni, C. Nill, and I. Lesanovsky, Coherent spin- phonon scattering in facilitated rydberg lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 133401 (2024)

    2024

  63. [71]

    F. M. Surace,Lattice gauge theories and constrained sys- tems: from quantum simulation to non-equilibrium dy- namics (SISSA, PhD thesis, 2021)

    2021

  64. [72]

    I. G. Lang and Y. A. Firsov, Kinetic theory of semicon- ductors with low mobility, Sov. Phys. JETP 16, 1301 (1963). 12

    1963

  65. [73]

    P. A. M. Dirac, The lagrangian in quantum mechanics, Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion3, 64 (1933)

    1933

  66. [74]

    Frenkel,Wave Mechanics: Advanced General Theory (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1934)

    J. Frenkel,Wave Mechanics: Advanced General Theory (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1934)

    1934

  67. [75]

    McLachlan, A variational solution of the time- dependent schrodinger equation, Molecular Physics 8, 39–44 (1964)

    A. McLachlan, A variational solution of the time- dependent schrodinger equation, Molecular Physics 8, 39–44 (1964)

    1964

  68. [76]

    Y. Zhao, D. W. Brown, and K. Lindenberg, A vari- ational approach to nonlocal exciton–phonon coupling, The Journal of Chemical Physics106, 2728–2740 (1997)

    1997

  69. [77]

    Raab, On the dirac–frenkel/mclachlan variational principle, Chemical Physics Letters319, 674–678 (2000)

    A. Raab, On the dirac–frenkel/mclachlan variational principle, Chemical Physics Letters319, 674–678 (2000)

    2000

  70. [78]

    C. A. Perroni, E. Piegari, M. Capone, and V. Cataudella, Polaron formation for nonlocal electron-phonon coupling: Avariationalwave-functionstudy,PhysicalReviewB 69, 10.1103/physrevb.69.174301 (2004)

    2004 doi

  71. [79]

    N. Wu, L. Duan, X. Li, and Y. Zhao, Dynamics of the sub-ohmic spin-boson model: A time-dependent vari- ational study, The Journal of Chemical Physics 138, 10.1063/1.4792502 (2013)

    2013 doi

  72. [80]

    X. Yuan, S. Endo, Q. Zhao, Y. Li, and S. C. Benjamin, Theory of variational quantum simulation, Quantum3, 191 (2019)

    2019

  73. [81]

    Davydov, Solitons and energy transfer along protein molecules, Journal of Theoretical Biology 66, 379–387 (1977)

    A. Davydov, Solitons and energy transfer along protein molecules, Journal of Theoretical Biology 66, 379–387 (1977)

    1977

  74. [82]

    V. M. Stojanović and M. Vanević, Quantum- entanglement aspects of polaron systems, Physical Review B 78, 10.1103/physrevb.78.214301 (2008)

    2008 doi

  75. [83]

    Haegeman, C

    J. Haegeman, C. Lubich, I. Oseledets, B. Vandereycken, and F. Verstraete, Unifying time evolution and optimiza- tion with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B94, 165116 (2016)

    2016

  76. [84]

    Verstraete, Time-dependent variational principle for quantum lattices, Phys

    J.Haegeman, J.I.Cirac, T.J.Osborne, I.Pižorn, H.Ver- schelde, and F. Verstraete, Time-dependent variational principle for quantum lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 070601 (2011)

    2011

  77. [85]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calcula- tions, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 4 (2022)

    2022

  78. [86]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, Code- base release 0.3 for ITensor, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 4 (2022)

    2022

  79. [87]

    (16), larger errorλ = 0.25 reduces the timeτ com- paredtothe λ = 0 case.Weassume λ = 0.25fromnowon (the results do not change significantly forλ∈ [0.2, 0.3])

    As described in the definition of the string-breaking time, Eq. (16), larger errorλ = 0.25 reduces the timeτ com- paredtothe λ = 0 case.Weassume λ = 0.25fromnowon (the results do not change significantly forλ∈ [0.2, 0.3])

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.