Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 48 references

OPAL: Omnidirectional Path-efficient Aerial 3D expLoration

T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read OPAL uses deliberate 360-degree yaw rotations at branch points to achieve shorter travel distances in aerial 3D exploration than global planning methods.

desk verdict OPAL shows distance cuts up to 25% via yaw rotations at branches versus FALCON, but real tests skip the time cost that simulations already flag as higher. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.25423 v1 pith:LEMIQU6W submitted 2026-05-25 cs.RO

Yoga Satwik Chappidi , Avideh Zakhor This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.RO
keywords aerialrobotexploration3Dmappingpathplanningfrontierselectiondronenavigationomnidirectionalyawefficiency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces OPAL, an exploration method for aerial robots that performs deliberate 360-degree yaw rotations at points where the best direction is unclear. This gathers omnidirectional information to select better frontiers for mapping, avoiding the computational cost of global tour planning used in other approaches. Simulations against EDEN and FALCON show OPAL travels shorter distances with higher coverage per distance, though total time is longer due to rotations. Real-world tests on a drone in indoor spaces confirm a variant travels as much as 25% less distance than FALCON. Variants differ in how they choose frontiers after the rotation, including using LLMs or VLMs, and the search radius can be tuned for distance versus time tradeoffs.

What carries the argument

Deliberate 360-degree yaw rotation at ambiguous branch points to obtain omnidirectional views for improved local frontier selection.

What would settle it

A test in the same environments showing that OPAL does not achieve lower traveled distance than FALCON or higher coverage per distance despite the added rotation time.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

By centering exploration on in-place 360-degree yaw rotations at ambiguous branch points rather than compute-heavy global tour planning, OPAL variants achieve shorter travel distances and higher coverage-versus-distance area under the curve in simulations, with real drone experiments showing up to 25% lower traveled distance than FALCON.

Load-bearing premise

That the extra time for 360-degree yaw rotations is offset by sufficiently improved frontier choices that reduce overall travel distance compared to more complex planners.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Adjusting the vicinity search radius allows trading off travel distance against total exploration time.
  • OPAL is computationally simpler than baselines like EDEN and FALCON while maintaining shorter paths.
  • Model-free, LLM-based, and VLM-based frontier selection all leverage the yaw rotation for better performance.
  • Real-world validation on a Modal AI drone in two indoor environments confirms the distance reductions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This local rotation strategy may suit resource-limited drones where global optimization exceeds onboard compute.
  • The approach could extend to other platforms where rotation costs less than translation.
  • Testing in larger or outdoor spaces would reveal whether branch-point rotations still yield net distance savings.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces OPAL, an aerial 3D exploration framework that performs deliberate 360° in-place yaw rotations at ambiguous branch points to gather additional information for frontier selection, rather than relying on compute-intensive global tour planning. Multiple variants are presented (model-free, LLM-based, VLM-based) with a tunable vicinity search radius; simulations compare against EDEN and FALCON on distance, coverage-vs-distance AUC, and total time, while real-world tests on a Modal AI drone in two indoor environments report up to 25% lower traveled distance for one OPAL variant versus FALCON.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold, OPAL demonstrates that a lightweight local strategy with occasional rotations can achieve shorter paths than global planners while remaining computationally simpler, which is valuable for resource-constrained aerial robots. The simulation results on distance and AUC metrics, plus the real-world distance comparison, provide concrete evidence of the tradeoff; the ability to tune the search radius for distance-vs-time balance is a practical contribution.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / real-world experiments] Abstract (hardware verification paragraph) and real-world experiments section: only traveled distance (up to 25% lower than FALCON) is reported for the Modal AI drone trials in two indoor environments; total exploration time, coverage completion time, or yaw-rotation overhead are omitted. This is load-bearing for the central claim because the abstract and simulation results explicitly note that yaw rotations increase total time relative to baselines, yet the practical net benefit (distance savings outweighing rotation duration) cannot be assessed without the corresponding time metrics in hardware.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the sentence 'find that the traveled distance for a variant of OPAL to be as much as 25% lower than FALCON' is grammatically incomplete (missing 'is').

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on the real-world experiments. The point regarding missing time metrics is well-taken and directly addressed below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / real-world experiments] Abstract (hardware verification paragraph) and real-world experiments section: only traveled distance (up to 25% lower than FALCON) is reported for the Modal AI drone trials in two indoor environments; total exploration time, coverage completion time, or yaw-rotation overhead are omitted. This is load-bearing for the central claim because the abstract and simulation results explicitly note that yaw rotations increase total time relative to baselines, yet the practical net benefit (distance savings outweighing rotation duration) cannot be assessed without the corresponding time metrics in hardware.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of time metrics in the hardware section limits assessment of the net benefit, given the simulation results explicitly note increased total time from yaw rotations. The hardware trials prioritized verification of the distance savings (the paper's core path-efficiency claim) on the Modal AI platform, and quantitative timing data including rotation overhead was not recorded. We will revise the abstract's hardware paragraph and the real-world experiments section to explicitly state this limitation, clarify that distance is the primary reported metric, and note that time-distance tradeoffs were characterized via the tunable search radius in simulation. This revision will be made without altering the reported distance results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; empirical validation against external baselines

full rationale

The paper presents OPAL as a new algorithmic framework for aerial exploration using deliberate yaw rotations at branch points, with variants using model-free, LLM, or VLM frontier selection. All performance claims (shorter travel distance, higher coverage AUC, 25% distance reduction vs FALCON) rest on direct simulation and hardware comparisons to independent external methods (EDEN, FALCON). No equations, fitted parameters, self-citations, or uniqueness theorems are invoked; the method is a design choice whose benefits are measured empirically rather than derived by construction from its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method relies on standard domain assumptions about sensor visibility during yaw and environment structure; the only tunable element is the search radius. No new physical entities or complex fitted constants are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • vicinity search radius
    Varied during experiments to control which frontiers are considered, creating an explicit tradeoff between travel distance and total time.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption A 360-degree yaw rotation at branch points supplies sufficient visual data for improved frontier selection relative to global planning.
    This premise is invoked as the central mechanism distinguishing OPAL from baselines.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of OPAL: Omnidirectional Path-efficient Aerial 3D expLoration." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LEMIQU6W

@misc{pith2026260525423,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: OPAL: Omnidirectional Path-efficient Aerial 3D expLoration},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LEMIQU6W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.25423}
}
read the original abstract

Autonomous exploration is critical for robot mapping unknown environments. Desirable characteristics of exploration algorithms include compute efficiency and small traversed distance during the exploration process. Motivated by these, we present Omnidirectional Path-efficient Aerial 3D expLoration (OPAL), an exploration framework centered on deliberate 360-degree yaw rotation at ambiguous branch points rather than compute-heavy global tour planning. We devise multiple variants of OPAL to determine the frontier-selection strategy once the yaw pan is completed. One variant is model-free, while others use large language models (LLMs) or vision-language models (VLMs). We characterize the performance of these variants while varying the vicinity search radius to include frontiers in the selection process. Through simulations we find that although the time-consuming in-place yaw rotation increases total exploration time relative to more computationally complex baselines such as EDEN and FALCON, OPAL is computationally simpler and achieves shorter travel distances and higher coverage-versus-distance area under the curve. We also show that adjusting the frontier-selection search radius enables a tradeoff between travel distance and total exploration time. We verify our results on a Modal AI drone in two indoor environments by comparing OPAL against FALCON, and find that the traveled distance for a variant of OPAL to be as much as 25% lower than FALCON.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.25423 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of OPAL with exploration stack inherited from FALCON. The orange group is the onboard sensing layer, the cyan group is the base [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Example OPAL decision point map slab after reachable-vicinity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. OPAL-V prompt template and sample JSON response. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Map 666 from the HM3D benchmark. (a) The raw HM3D scene [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: OPAL selector and geometric-policy comparison. (a) Coverage [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Reachable-vicinity radius rv sweep across the OPAL-NFP family and SoTA baselines. (a) Coverage-distance AUC, where higher is better. (b) Total traversed distance to full coverage, where lower is better, with reference values ranging from 115 m to 266 m. (c) Average ela…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Hardware-validation setup. (a) The ModalAI Starling 2 platform [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Representative voxel maps from hardware runs in Indoor Layout 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A frontier-based approach for autonomous exploration,

    B. Yamauchi, “A frontier-based approach for autonomous exploration,” inProceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Com- putational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation (CIRA), 1997, pp. 146–151

    1997

  2. [2]

    FALCON: Fast autonomous aerial exploration using coverage path guidance,

    Y . Zhang, X. Chen, C. Feng, B. Zhou, and S. Shen, “FALCON: Fast autonomous aerial exploration using coverage path guidance,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2024

    2024

  3. [3]

    EDEN: Efficient dual-layer exploration planning for fast UA V autonomous ex- ploration in large 3-D environments,

    Q. Dong, X. Zhang, S. Zhang, Z. Wang, Z. Ma, and H. Xi, “EDEN: Efficient dual-layer exploration planning for fast UA V autonomous ex- ploration in large 3-D environments,”IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2025

    2025

  4. [4]

    Lantern-explorer: A collision-avoidance autonomous exploration drone system based on laser slam with optimized hardware and software,

    L. Zhu, R. Zhong, D. Xie, and X. Yuan, “Lantern-explorer: A collision-avoidance autonomous exploration drone system based on laser slam with optimized hardware and software,”ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. X-G-2025, pp. 1077–1084, 2025

    2025

  5. [5]

    Autonomous frontier-based exploration with high-level vlm guidance,

    A. Aitha, “Autonomous frontier-based exploration with high-level vlm guidance,” Master’s thesis, University of California, Berkeley, August 2025, https://www-video.eecs.berkeley.edu/papers/aarushaitha/aarush thesis.pdf

    2025

  6. [6]

    Autonomous frontier-based exploration with high-level VLM guidance,

    A. Aitha and A. Zakhor, “Autonomous frontier-based exploration with high-level VLM guidance,” June 2026, accepted to the CVPR 2026 2nd Workshop on 3D-LLM/VLA: Bridging Language, Vision and Action in 3D Environments

    2026

  7. [7]

    Receding horizon “next-best-view

    A. Bircher, M. Kamel, K. Alexis, H. Oleynikova, and R. Siegwart, “Receding horizon “next-best-view” planner for 3D exploration,” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2016, pp. 1462–1468

    2016

  8. [8]

    Efficient autonomous exploration planning of large-scale 3-d environments,

    M. Selin, M. Tiger, D. Duberg, F. Heintz, and P. Jensfelt, “Efficient autonomous exploration planning of large-scale 3-d environments,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1699–1706, 2019

    2019

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Informed sampling exploration path planner for 3d reconstruction of large scenes,

    Y . Kompis, L. Bartolomei, R. Mascaro, L. Teixeira, and M. Chli, “Informed sampling exploration path planner for 3d reconstruction of large scenes,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 7894–7901, 2021

    2021

  2. [10]

    A shadowcasting-based next-best-view planner for autonomous 3d ex- ploration,

    A. Batinovic, A. Ivanovic, T. Petrovic, and S. Bogdan, “A shadowcasting-based next-best-view planner for autonomous 3d ex- ploration,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 2969–2976, 2022

    2022

  3. [11]

    Fuel: Fast uav exploration using incremental frontier structure and hierarchical planning,

    B. Zhou, Y . Zhang, X. Chen, and S. Shen, “Fuel: Fast uav exploration using incremental frontier structure and hierarchical planning,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 779–786, 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    Fsmp: A frontier-sampling-mixed planner for fast autonomous exploration of complex and large 3-d environments,

    S. Zhang, X. Zhang, Q. Dong, Z. Wang, H. Xi, and J. Yuan, “Fsmp: A frontier-sampling-mixed planner for fast autonomous exploration of complex and large 3-d environments,”IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 74, pp. 1–14, 2025

    2025

  5. [13]

    Flare: Fast large-scale autonomous exploration guided by unknown regions,

    X. Liu, M. L. Lin, S. Li, G. Xu, Z. Wang, H. Wu, and Y . Liu, “Flare: Fast large-scale autonomous exploration guided by unknown regions,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 12 197– 12 204, 2025

    2025

  6. [14]

    Ptplanner: Efficient autonomous uav exploration via prior-enhanced and topology-aware hierarchical planning,

    C. Zhao, Z. Deng, Z. Zhang, and X. Guo, “Ptplanner: Efficient autonomous uav exploration via prior-enhanced and topology-aware hierarchical planning,”Drones, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 217, 2026

    2026

  7. [15]

    Receding horizon path planning for 3d exploration and surface inspection,

    A. Bircher, M. Kamel, K. Alexis, H. Oleynikova, and R. Siegwart, “Receding horizon path planning for 3d exploration and surface inspection,”Autonomous Robots, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 291–306, 2018

    2018

  8. [16]

    Efficient autonomous exploration with incrementally built topological map in 3-d environments,

    C. Wang, H. Ma, W. Chen, L. Liu, and M. Q.-H. Meng, “Efficient autonomous exploration with incrementally built topological map in 3-d environments,”IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 9853–9865, 2020

    2020

  9. [17]

    Graph-based topological exploration planning in large-scale 3d environments,

    F. Yang, D.-H. Lee, J. Keller, and S. Scherer, “Graph-based topological exploration planning in large-scale 3d environments,” in2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2021, pp. 12 730–12 736

    2021

  10. [18]

    A multi-resolution frontier-based planner for autonomous 3d explo- ration,

    A. Batinovic, T. Petrovic, A. Ivanovic, F. Petric, and S. Bogdan, “A multi-resolution frontier-based planner for autonomous 3d explo- ration,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 4528– 4535, 2021

    2021

  11. [19]

    Tare: A hierarchical framework for efficiently exploring complex 3d environments,

    C. Cao, H. Zhu, H. Choset, and J. Zhang, “Tare: A hierarchical framework for efficiently exploring complex 3d environments,” in Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), 2021

    2021

  12. [20]

    Autonomous UA V exploration of dynamic environments via incremental sampling and probabilistic roadmap,

    Z. Xu, D. Deng, and K. Shimada, “Autonomous UA V exploration of dynamic environments via incremental sampling and probabilistic roadmap,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1679–1686, 2021

    2021

  13. [21]

    Autonomous 3d exploration in large-scale environments with dynamic obstacles,

    E. Wiman, L. Widen, M. Tiger, and F. Heintz, “Autonomous 3d exploration in large-scale environments with dynamic obstacles,” in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2024, pp. 2389–2395

    2024

  14. [22]

    Autonomous exploration method for fast unknown environment mapping by using uav equipped with limited fov sensor,

    Y . Zhao, L. Yan, H. Xie, J. Dai, and P. Wei, “Autonomous exploration method for fast unknown environment mapping by using uav equipped with limited fov sensor,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02293, 2023

    2023

  15. [23]

    Autonomous exploration of unknown 3d environments using a frontier-based collector strategy,

    I. D. Changoluisa Caiza, A. Milas, M. A. Montes Grova, F. J. Perez- Grau, and T. Petrovic, “Autonomous exploration of unknown 3d environments using a frontier-based collector strategy,” in2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2024, pp. 13 566–13 572

    2024

  16. [24]

    Efficient uav exploration for large-scale 3d environments using low-memory map,

    J. Huang, Z. Fan, Z. Yan, P. Duan, R. Mei, and H. Cheng, “Efficient uav exploration for large-scale 3d environments using low-memory map,”Drones, vol. 8, no. 9, p. 443, 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Pipe planner: Pathwise information gain with map predictions for indoor robot exploration,

    S. Baek, B. Moon, S. Kim, M. Cao, C. Ho, S. Scherer, and J. H. Jeon, “Pipe planner: Pathwise information gain with map predictions for indoor robot exploration,” in2025 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Oct. 2025

    2025

  18. [26]

    Path planner for autonomous exploration of underground mines by aerial vehicles,

    C. Rubio-Sierra, D. Dominguez, J. Gonzalo, and A. Escapa, “Path planner for autonomous exploration of underground mines by aerial vehicles,”Sensors, vol. 20, no. 15, p. 4259, 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    Optimal frontier-based au- tonomous exploration in unconstructed environment using RGB-D sensor,

    L. Lu, C. Redondo, and P. Campoy, “Optimal frontier-based au- tonomous exploration in unconstructed environment using RGB-D sensor,”Sensors, vol. 20, no. 22, p. 6507, 2020

    2020

  20. [28]

    Surface-driven next-best-view planning for exploration of large-scale 3d environments,

    G. Hardouin, F. Morbidi, J. Moras, J. Marzat, and E. M. Mouaddib, “Surface-driven next-best-view planning for exploration of large-scale 3d environments,” inIF AC-PapersOnLine, vol. 53, no. 2, 2020, pp. 15 501–15 507

    2020

  21. [29]

    Topological map-based autonomous exploration in large-scale scenes for unmanned vehicles,

    Z. Cao, Z. Du, and J. Yang, “Topological map-based autonomous exploration in large-scale scenes for unmanned vehicles,”Drones, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 124, 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    Topological frontier- based exploration and map-building using semantic information,

    C. Gomez, A. C. Hernandez, and R. Barber, “Topological frontier- based exploration and map-building using semantic information,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 20, p. 4595, 2019

    2019

  23. [31]

    Asep: An autonomous seman- tic exploration planner with object labeling,

    A. Milas, A. Ivanovic, and T. Petrovic, “Asep: An autonomous seman- tic exploration planner with object labeling,”IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 107 169–107 183, 2023

    2023

  24. [32]

    Do as I can, not as I say: Grounding language in robotic affordances,

    M. Ahn, A. Brohan, N. Brown, Y . Chebotar, O. Cortes, B. David, C. Finn, C. Fu, K. Gopalakrishnan, K. Hausman, A. Herzog, D. Ho, J. Hsu, J. Ibarz, B. Ichter, A. Irpan, E. Jang, R. J. Ruano, K. Jeffrey, S. Jesmonth, N. J. Joshi, R. Julian, D. Kalashnikov, Y . Kuang, K. Lee, S. ...

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    PaLM- E: An embodied multimodal language model,

    D. Driess, F. Xia, M. S. M. Sajjadi, C. Lynch, A. Chowdhery, B. Ichter, A. Wahid, J. Tompson, Q. Vuong, T. Yu, W. Huang, Y . Chebotar, P. Sermanet, D. Duckworth, S. Levine, V . Vanhoucke, K. Hausman, M. Toussaint, K. Greff, A. Zeng, I. Mordatch, and P. Florence, “PaLM- E: An e...

    2023

  26. [34]

    Depth-first search and linear graph algorithms,

    R. Tarjan, “Depth-first search and linear graph algorithms,”SIAM Journal on Computing, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 146–160, 1972

    1972

  27. [35]

    Sensor-based exploration for general robotic systems,

    L. Freda, G. Oriolo, and F. Vecchioli, “Sensor-based exploration for general robotic systems,” in2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2008, pp. 2157–2164

    2008

  28. [36]

    Exploring unstructured environment with frontier trees,

    R. Korb and A. Sch ¨ottl, “Exploring unstructured environment with frontier trees,”Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 617–628, 2018

    2018

  29. [37]

    Habitat-Matterport 3D dataset (HM3D): 1000 large-scale 3D environments for embodied AI,

    S. K. Ramakrishnan, A. Gokaslan, E. Wijmans, O. Maksymets, A. Clegg, J. M. Turner, E. Undersander, W. Galuba, A. Westbury, A. X. Chang, M. Savva, Y . Zhao, and D. Batra, “Habitat-Matterport 3D dataset (HM3D): 1000 large-scale 3D environments for embodied AI,” inAdvances in Neu...

    2021

  30. [38]

    Accessed May 19,

    Blender Foundation,Blender, Blender Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2026, open-source 3D creation suite. Accessed May 19,

    2026

  31. [39]

    Available: https://www.blender.org/

    [Online]. Available: https://www.blender.org/

  32. [40]

    Gleam: Learning generalizable exploration policy for active mapping in com- plex 3d indoor scenes,

    X. Chen, T. Wang, Q. Li, T. Huang, J. Pang, and T. Xue, “Gleam: Learning generalizable exploration policy for active mapping in com- plex 3d indoor scenes,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20294, 2025

    2025

  33. [41]

    Gennbv: Generalizable next-best-view policy for active 3d reconstruction,

    X. Chen, Q. Li, T. Wang, T. Xue, and J. Pang, “Gennbv: Generalizable next-best-view policy for active 3d reconstruction,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion (CVPR), June 2024, pp. 16 436–16 445

    2024

  34. [42]

    Hestia: V oxel-face-aware hierarchical next- best-view acquisition for efficient 3d reconstruction,

    C.-Y . Lu, Z. Zhuang, N. T. T. Le, D. Xiao, Y .-C. Chang, T. Do, S. Sridhar, and C.-T. Lin, “Hestia: V oxel-face-aware hierarchical next- best-view acquisition for efficient 3d reconstruction,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision ...

    2026

  35. [43]

    VOXL 2 - D0014 Architecture (Starling 2),

    ModalAI, “VOXL 2 - D0014 Architecture (Starling 2),” https://docs. modalai.com/voxl2-d0014/, 2026, accessed April 30, 2026

    2026

  36. [44]

    VOXL 2 Coax Camera Bundles,

    ——, “VOXL 2 Coax Camera Bundles,” https://docs.modalai.com/ voxl2-coax-camera-bundles/, 2026, accessed April 30, 2026

    2026

  37. [45]

    VOXL Open-VINS Server,

    ——, “VOXL Open-VINS Server,” https://docs.modalai.com/ voxl-open-vins-server/, 2026, accessed April 30, 2026

    2026

  38. [46]

    Modal Pipe Architecture,

    ——, “Modal Pipe Architecture,” https://docs.modalai.com/mpa/, 2026, accessed April 30, 2026

    2026

  39. [47]

    VOXL Vision Hub,

    ——, “VOXL Vision Hub,” https://docs.modalai.com/ voxl-vision-hub/, 2026, accessed April 30, 2026

    2026

  40. [48]

    VOXL PX4,

    ——, “VOXL PX4,” https://docs.modalai.com/voxl-px4/, 2026, ac- cessed April 30, 2026

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.