Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Integrating Large Language Model for Improved Causal Discovery

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.16902 v2 pith:LER2ZLNO submitted 2023-06-29 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords causaldiscoverystructureanalysisexpertinaccuraciesllm-derivedaddress
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recovering the structure of causal graphical models from observational data is an essential yet challenging task for causal discovery in scientific scenarios. Domain-specific causal discovery usually relies on expert validation or prior analysis to improve the reliability of recovered causality, which is yet limited by the scarcity of expert resources. Recently, Large Language Models (LLM) have been used for causal analysis across various domain-specific scenarios, suggesting its potential as autonomous expert roles in guiding data-based structure learning. However, integrating LLMs into causal discovery faces challenges due to inaccuracies in LLM-based reasoning on revealing the actual causal structure. To address this challenge, we propose an error-tolerant LLM-driven causal discovery framework. The error-tolerant mechanism is designed three-fold with sufficient consideration on potential inaccuracies. In the LLM-based reasoning process, an accuracy-oriented prompting strategy restricts causal analysis to a reliable range. Next, a knowledge-to-structure transition aligns LLM-derived causal statements with structural causal interactions. In the structure learning process, the goodness-of-fit to data and adherence to LLM-derived priors are balanced to further address prior inaccuracies. Evaluation of eight real-world causal structures demonstrates the efficacy of our LLM-driven approach in improving data-based causal discovery, along with its robustness to inaccurate LLM-derived priors. Codes are available at https://github.com/tyMadara/LLM-CD.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Automated Synthesis and Adversarial Validation of Executable Causal Research Pipelines

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ARA's adversarial protocol-validation pipeline reduced silent causal claims (no sign flips in 33 cases) at the cost of producing more conservative, withheld, or incomplete estimates than a vanilla LLM baseline.

  2. LLM Cannot Discover Causality, and Should Be Restricted to Non-Decisional Support in Causal Discovery

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs are unreliable causal reasoners, so they should be limited to non-decisional search support in causal discovery algorithms.

  3. Paths to Causality: Finding Informative Subgraphs Within Knowledge Graphs for Knowledge-Based Causal Discovery

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A learning-to-rank model chooses informative knowledge-graph paths between entity pairs, and adding the top path to zero-shot prompts improves LLM causal classification by up to 44.4 F1 points.

Pith tools