Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Semi-supervised inference using unlabeled summary statistics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.15691 v4 pith:LF2CBALG submitted 2024-11-24 stat.ME math.STstat.TH

classification stat.MEmath.STstat.TH
keywords unlabeledsemi-supervisedinferencedatalabeledmethodsstatisticssummary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Semi-supervised inference assumes access to a labeled dataset together with a large unlabeled dataset in which the outcome variable is missing, and it is widely used to improve statistical efficiency and support generalizability across populations. In many modern applications, however, individual-level unlabeled data may not be directly accessible due to privacy restrictions, data-sharing limits, or storage constraints, while summary statistics such as sample means and covariances from the unlabeled population are often available. In this work, we study this constrained semi-supervised setting where, in addition to labeled data with individualized observations, auxiliary information from the unlabeled population is available only through summary statistics. We propose new semi-supervised inference methods for mean estimation under both covariate-independent and covariate-dependent labeling and show that unlabeled summaries can still improve efficiency and help correct selection bias. The proposed methods apply in high dimensions and are robust to model misspecification. Valid inference is obtained under sparsity conditions comparable to those required by semi-supervised methods that assume access to individual-level unlabeled samples. Our approach relies on a specialized cross-fitting procedure, where sample splitting is applied only to the labeled data, which removes the need for individualized unlabeled covariates. We further extend this framework to average treatment effect estimation, enabling generalizability and transportability of causal conclusions in this constrained semi-supervised setting.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Is External Information Useful for Data Fusion? An Evaluation before Acquisition

    stat.ME 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A general method estimates the semiparametric efficiency-bound ratio that measures the maximum potential gain from external information, using only internal data and before acquisition.

  2. Externally Controlled Trials: A Review of Design and Borrowing Through a Causal Lens

    stat.ME 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A review organizes externally controlled trial methodology through causal estimands and identifiability assumptions for single-arm and hybrid designs with borrowing strategies.

Pith tools