REVIEW 3 cited by
Vortex Structure vs. Monopole Dominance in Abelian-Projected Gauge Theory
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We find that Polyakov lines, computed in abelian-projected SU(2) lattice gauge theory in the confined phase, have finite expectation values for lines corresponding to two units of the abelian electric charge. This means that the abelian-projected lattice has at most Z(2), rather than U(1), global symmetry. We also find a severe breakdown of the monopole dominance approximation, as well as positivity, in this charge-2 case. These results imply that the abelian-projected lattice is not adequately represented by a monopole Coulomb gas; the data is, however, consistent with a center vortex structure. Further evidence is provided, in lattice Monte Carlo simulations, for collimation of confining color-magnetic flux into vortices.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Monopoles, Center Vortices, Confinement in (3+1)d, and the Lens-Space Twisted Partition Function
Proposes torus and lens-space twisted partition functions as criteria for center-vortex and monopole condensation and proves vortex condensation implies monopole condensation in gapped phases.
-
A $T_2 \times R^2$ roadmap to Confinement in SU(2) Yang-Mills theory
Lattice simulations show that on T2 x R2 with twisted boundary conditions, the SU(2) vacuum is a Poissonian 2D gas of fractional instantons, with string tension proportional to the gas density and approaching the infi...
-
Cartan Fluxes in $SU(3)$ Lattice Gauge Theory
A root-lattice based DeGrand-Toussaint algorithm detects SU(3) monopoles with a density about 15% lower than the standard U(1)^3 method and yields Weyl-symmetric charge counts.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.