REVIEW 2 cited by
A Battle of Network Structures: An Empirical Study of CNN, Transformer, and MLP
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Convolutional neural networks (CNN) are the dominant deep neural network (DNN) architecture for computer vision. Recently, Transformer and multi-layer perceptron (MLP)-based models, such as Vision Transformer and MLP-Mixer, started to lead new trends as they showed promising results in the ImageNet classification task. In this paper, we conduct empirical studies on these DNN structures and try to understand their respective pros and cons. To ensure a fair comparison, we first develop a unified framework called SPACH which adopts separate modules for spatial and channel processing. Our experiments under the SPACH framework reveal that all structures can achieve competitive performance at a moderate scale. However, they demonstrate distinctive behaviors when the network size scales up. Based on our findings, we propose two hybrid models using convolution and Transformer modules. The resulting Hybrid-MS-S+ model achieves 83.9% top-1 accuracy with 63M parameters and 12.3G FLOPS. It is already on par with the SOTA models with sophisticated designs. The code and models are publicly available at https://github.com/microsoft/SPACH.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Exploring Real&Synthetic Dataset and Linear Attention in Image Restoration
A complexity-balanced real-plus-synthetic image restoration dataset and a linear-attention RWKV-based network (with DC-shift and Cross-Bi-WKV) achieve competitive super-resolution performance.
-
DBF-Net: A Dual-Branch Network with Feature Fusion for Ultrasound Image Segmentation
DBF-Net, a dual-branch network with body and boundary supervision plus feature fusion, reports Dice scores of 81.05%, 76.41%, and 87.75% on BUSI, UNS, and UHES ultrasound datasets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.