Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Comparing Retrieval-Augmentation and Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Privacy-Preserving Personalization of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.09510 v2 pith:LG2RT4RC submitted 2024-09-14 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords peftdatapersonalizationapproachavailableeffectivenessexplorationfine-tuning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite its substantial impact on various search, recommendation, and question answering tasks, privacy-preserving methods for personalizing large language models (LLMs) have received relatively limited exploration. There is one primary approach in this area through retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), which generates personalized outputs by enriching the input prompt with information retrieved from the user's personal data. This paper studies an orthogonal approach to RAG that involves learning user-dependent LLM parameters through parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT). This paper presents the first systematic study for exploration of PEFT for LLM personalization and provides an extensive comparisons between RAG- and PEFT-based solutions, across a broad set of seven diverse datasets from the LaMP benchmark. Our results demonstrate that, on average, both RAG- and PEFT-based personalization methods yield 14.92% and 1.07% improvements over non-personalized LLMs, respectively. When combining RAG with PEFT, we observe a further improvement of 15.98%, highlighting the effectiveness of their integration in enhancing personalized text generation. Additionally, we identify a positive correlation between the amount of user data available and the effectiveness of PEFT. This finding suggests that RAG is particularly beneficial for cold-start users -- users with limited personal data -- while PEFT performs better when more user-specific data is available.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Frustratingly Simple Black-Box Adaptation of Language Models via Logit Bias

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A fixed logit-bias vector estimated from black-box rollouts gives small accuracy gains and modest length compression, far below LoRA fine-tuning.

  2. Systematic Optimization of Open Source Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning

    cs.LG 2025-09 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A hyperparameter search for LLM math reasoning that reports simulated, not measured, performance gains.

Pith tools