Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 62 references

Simultaneous mapping of the ultrafast time and fluence dependence of the laser-induced insulator-to-metal transition in magnetite

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A tilted pump-probe geometry with imaging readout maps delay and fluence onto two detector axes, recording a 7 ps delay range and more than fivefold fluence range in one static acquisition.

desk verdict A credible proof-of-principle for simultaneous delay-fluence mapping, with an extrapolated single-shot claim that should be softened to avoid overstatement. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.10149 v2 pith:LGIKOOKO submitted 2025-01-17 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

J.O. Schunck , P.S. Miedema , R.Y. Engel , S. Dziarzhytski , G. Brenner , N. Ekanayake , C.-F. Chang , P. Bougiatioti
show 5 more authors
F. Döring B. Rösner C. David C. Schü{ss}ler-Langeheine M. Beye
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords time-to-spacemappingpump-probeultrafastdynamicsVerweytransitionmagnetiteresonantsoftX-raydiffractionsingle-shotfluence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces an imaging scheme that records a range of pump-probe delays and pump-laser fluences simultaneously, without scanning either parameter. A non-collinear pump-probe geometry imprints the time delay onto a horizontal spatial coordinate, while the vertical coordinate images the laser spot profile, so each detector position corresponds to a known (delay, fluence) pair. The authors demonstrate the method on the optically driven insulator-to-metal Verwey transition in a magnetite thin film, probed by resonant soft X-ray diffraction at the iron L3 edge. They obtain five fluence-dependent delay traces spanning 0.7 to 4.1 mJ/cm² and a 7 ps delay window in a static geometry, and argue that at higher-energy FELs the same information could be collected in a single shot, enabling damage-free studies of non-reversible or destroyed samples.

What carries the argument

The central object is the time-to-space mapping geometry: the pump (800 nm) and probe (soft X-ray FEL) arrive at the sample under a relative angle of 73.25°, so the relative arrival time varies linearly along the horizontal sample coordinate; an off-axis Fresnel zone plate (a diffractive lens) images the scattering with magnification 4.1 onto a CCD, converting the delay axis to 23.6 fs per pixel. In the orthogonal direction the same image carries the vertical profile of the pump-laser spot, which maps local fluence. The work this does is to replace parameter scanning with spatial encoding: every pixel of a single image is a separate (delay, fluence) measurement, provided the sample is homogeneous over the probed area.

What would settle it

Scan a conventional point-focused pump-probe measurement across exactly the same magnetite film and compare the delay traces at the sample position mapped to x ≈ 90 with the time-to-space trace at that pixel; if the two disagree by more than the quoted one-sigma errors, local sample inhomogeneity is being folded into the delay axis.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a time-to-space mapping imaging scheme—using a Fresnel zone plate to image resonant diffraction while the pump and probe beams cross at 73.25°—can simultaneously encode a pump-probe delay axis and a pump-fluence axis onto two orthogonal spatial dimensions of a two-dimensional detector. The demonstrated data cover a delay range of 7 ps and a fluence range of more than a factor of five in a single static acquisition, with each detector row sorted into one of five fluence bins. For magnetite, the resulting traces reproduce the known biexponential decay of the charge-orbital-order superstructure peak, with amplitudes growing linearly with fluence and a slow time constant between 1 and 2 ps. The authors further show, by scaling to mJ-level X-ray pulse energies available at higher-energy FELs, that a complete delay–fluence dataset could in principle be captured in one X-ray probe shot, turning repeated pump-probe scans into a single-shot experiment.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes the sample responds identically everywhere over the probed area, so that a signal recorded at a given pixel is determined solely by the delay and fluence mapped to that pixel rather than by local sample variations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A static, non-scanned geometry yields fluence-resolved ultrafast traces: the demonstrated data cover a 7 ps delay window and a fluence range of more than a factor of five in one acquisition, with no mechanical delay or attenuation scans.
  • The same imaging principle can be transferred to other soft X-ray probe modalities—non-resonant scattering, transmission or reflectivity absorption, and potentially X-ray magnetic circular dichroism—where feasibility is set by signal strength.
  • At X-ray free-electron lasers with mJ-level pulse energies, the identical dataset would reach single-shot quality, enabling measure-before-destroy studies of samples that are destroyed or permanently altered by one pump-probe pair.
  • The delay mapping factor (23.6 fs per pixel here) can be tuned through the beam angles, zone-plate magnification, and detector pixel size, so the temporal window and resolution can be adapted to the dynamics of interest.
  • The approach also suits laboratory high-harmonic-generation sources, where source stability combined with the non-scanning readout could yield high-quality averaged data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If sample uniformity holds, the per-pixel correlation could be used not only to bin by fluence but to bin by shot-to-shot X-ray pulse properties, since each single-image trace carries its own internal delay axis.
  • The hinted slower dynamics near one sample position suggest the method could work in reverse: scanning the delay stage while holding the geometry fixed localizes spatial variations in dynamics, at the cost of losing parallel parameter acquisition.
  • The projected six-orders-of-magnitude signal gain could alternatively be spent on finer fluence binning or a wider delay window (about 21 ps for a 6 mm overlap), rather than only on reaching single-shot operation.
  • For samples that cannot be prepared as large homogeneous films, the 3–4 µm imaging resolution implies the scheme could be applied to patterned samples by scanning the two spatial dimensions while keeping delay and fluence parallelized.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a non-collinear time-to-space mapping setup for soft X-ray pump-probe experiments at FLASH. The horizontal coordinate encodes the pump-probe delay, the vertical coordinate encodes the local pump fluence, and a Fresnel zone plate images the resonant (00\u00bd) diffraction signal of a magnetite thin film. From about 230,000 X-ray shots accumulated over 12 h at 0.54 counts/shot, the authors extract five fluence-resolved delay traces covering roughly 7 ps and a fluence range from 0.7 to 4.1 mJ/cm\u00b2; double-exponential fits yield a resolution-limited fast component and a slow component of 1\u20132 ps. The dynamics are compared with prior single-crystal results, and the paper projects that with higher-energy FELs the same dataset could be recorded in a single shot.

Significance. If the central claim is accepted, this is a useful methodological contribution: it removes the need for mechanical delay and fluence scans, parallelizes data acquisition, and is in principle suited to non-reversible or damage-limited samples. The delay-axis calibration via the delay-stage scan (Fig. 2d) and the fluence-axis calibration via independent knife-edge data (Fig. 2c) are sensible, and the agreement with previous single-crystal behavior supports the basic validity of the extracted dynamics. The claimed single-shot capability is not, however, demonstrated in the present data; it is an order-of-magnitude extrapolation. The homogeneity requirement is acknowledged but not quantitatively verified, and these two points are the main risks to the paper's headline claims.

major comments (2)
  1. [\u00a74, Figures 2 and 3] The central assumption that the sample response is homogeneous over the probed area is not established. The Methods state that \u201cthis scheme introduces a correlation of signals recorded with different delays and fluences with sample position,\u201d and the Results note \u201ca hint towards a small sample position dependence\u201d with the region mapped onto x \u2248 90 exhibiting slower dynamics. Because the delay traces in Fig. 3 are produced by averaging over the mapped positions (Fig. 2e), a real x-dependent response would be mixed into the apparent time and fluence dependence, directly affecting the fitted \u03c4_B and amplitudes. The manuscript reports no quantitative test of whether the x \u2248 90 deviation is statistically significant or spatially localized. I request an explicit position-dependence analysis, such as per-position delay traces or a comparison of early-delay intensity versus x after the delay-stage calibration, together with either a correction for this effect or a clear restriction of the claims to the spatially homogeneous component.
  2. [Abstract and \u00a75 Discussion] The paper describes the present 12 h, 0.54 counts/shot dataset as demonstrating that \u201cthe presented data could be recorded in a single shot.\u201d This overstates what is shown: no single-shot acquisition is demonstrated, and the statement depends on extrapolated gains (third-harmonic fraction, larger FEL pulse energy, larger spot size, damage-threshold assumptions) rather than on a direct measurement. The claim should be reworded as an extrapolated projection, with the underlying assumptions and their uncertainties stated explicitly, and the abstract's use of \u201cdemonstrate\u201d for this step should be removed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [\u00a72 Methods] The sentence beginning \u201cBoth the FEL and the probe laser illuminate an extended area\u201d appears to refer to the FEL and the pump laser; the wording should be corrected to avoid confusion.
  2. [\u00a74 Results] The text states that \u03c4_A was fixed to 10 fs, but the figure caption says only that it is \u201cset to be much faster than the temporal resolution\u201d; the fixed value and the reason for fixing it should be stated consistently in both places.
  3. [\u00a72 Methods] The estimate of the spatial resolution (3\u20134 \u03bcm) is cited to an earlier paper; a short explanation of how this estimate applies to the present geometry would help readers assess the homogeneity limitation.
  4. [General] The manuscript contains several typographical artifacts from the text layout, such as split words and irregular spacing; the final version should be carefully copy-edited.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: delay and fluence calibrations are independent, physics compared to external results, and the single-shot claim is a forward scaling estimate.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The delay axis is not defined by the measured dynamics; it is calibrated independently by scanning the mechanical delay stage and measuring the slope of t0 versus x (Fig. 2(d), Methods: 'the slope of this diagonal line yields the delay mapping factor on our detector (here 23.6 fs/px)'). The fluence axis is calibrated by an independent knife-edge scan of the laser profile (Fig. 2(c)) and by sorting detector rows vertically; no fit parameter is recycled as a prediction. The physics results (biexponential decay, fluence-dependent amplitudes, tau_B) are compared to external single-crystal measurements (refs 42, 43, 57), not derived from them. The single-shot statement in the abstract is explicitly an extrapolation from a counting-rate estimate ('a total gain of about six orders of magnitude could be realized in an optimized experiment'), not a fitted prediction. The acknowledged sample-homogeneity limitation (the 'hint towards a small sample position dependence' at x approximately 90) is a correctness risk, not a circular step. Self-citations (refs 16, 52, 57, 58) concern established instrumentation and prior characterization and are not load-bearing for the mapping principle. No equation is observed to reduce to its own input, so no circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central method rests on standard experimental calibrations rather than on fitted parameters that would need to be derived from the target data. The only hand-set parameter is tau_A, which is fixed below the temporal resolution. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • tau_A (fast decay time constant) = 10 fs (fixed)
    Set to a value much faster than the 120 fs temporal resolution so the fitted fast amplitude A absorbs the unresolved sub-picosecond process (Fig. 3 caption). This choice affects the decomposition into amplitudes A and B.
  • tau_B (slow decay time constant) = 1-2 ps (fluence dependent)
    Fitted parameter of the double exponential decay model for each fluence bin (Fig. 3b).
  • Amplitude A (fast process) = linear slope 0.08 rel. u./(mJ/cm2)
    Fitted amplitude of the fast decay component; slope determined from fluence dependence (Fig. 3c).
  • Amplitude B (slow process) = linear slope 0.16 rel. u./(mJ/cm2)
    Fitted amplitude of the slow decay component; slope determined from fluence dependence (Fig. 3d).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The (00 1/2) superstructure reflection intensity is a direct measure of the degree of charge and orbital order in magnetite.
    Invoked in the Discussion to interpret the diffraction signal; supported by prior citations (refs 29, 30, 39, 40, 58).
  • domain assumption The sample is spatially homogeneous over the probed area, so delay and fluence can be mapped to spatial position without mixing.
    Stated in Methods: the scheme 'works best with samples that are spatially homogeneous over the probed area.' The authors note a hint of position-dependent dynamics at x approximately 90 that they cannot resolve.
  • domain assumption The delay varies linearly with horizontal position on the sample.
    Geometric consequence of the non-collinear pump-probe angle; calibrated with the delay stage scan giving 23.6 fs/pixel (Fig. 2d).
  • domain assumption The vertical laser profile maps linearly to local fluence, and the horizontal pump profile is flat-top over the sample.
    Used to sort detector rows into five fluence bins; calibrated with an independent knife-edge scan (Fig. 2c).
  • domain assumption The sample completely recovers to the initial state between successive pump shots.
    Necessary for the 5 Hz pump / 10 Hz FEL normalization scheme; the authors state they verified recovery (Experimental setup).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Simultaneous mapping of the ultrafast time and fluence dependence of the laser-induced insulator-to-metal transition in magnetite." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LGIKOOKO

@misc{pith2026250110149,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Simultaneous mapping of the ultrafast time and fluence dependence of the laser-induced insulator-to-metal transition in magnetite},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LGIKOOKO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.10149}
}
read the original abstract

Pump-probe methods are a ubiquitous tool in the field of ultrafast dynamic measurements. In recent years, x-ray free-electron laser experiments have gained importance due to their ability to probe with high chemical selectivity and at atomic length scales. Measurements are typically repeated many thousands of times to collect sufficient statistics and vary parameters like delay or fluence, necessitating that initial conditions are restored each time. An alternative is presented by experiments which measure the relevant parameters in a single shot. Here, we present a time-to-space mapping imaging scheme that enables us to record a range of delays and laser fluences in any single shot of the x-ray probe. We demonstrate the use of this scheme by mapping the ultrafast dynamics of the optically induced insulator-to-metal Verwey transition in a magnetite thin film, probed by soft x-ray resonant diffraction. By extrapolating our results toward the conditions found at x-ray free-electron lasers with higher photon energy, we demonstrate that the presented data could be recorded in a single shot.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.10149 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Time-to-space mapping setup. Soft X￾ray pulses from FLASH resonant to the Fe L3 edge (blue) probe the resonant scattering of Fe3O4 upon pumping with 800 nm pulses (red). The horizontal scattering plane is shown in yellow. The incidence and scattering angle θ is 32.75° with respect to the sample surface and the pump laser is incident onto the sample under an angle α of 16° with respect to the sample surface normal. D… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Small regions of the sample imaged at delay stage positions Δ𝐷𝑆 of 0 ± 0.5 ps and 2 ± 0.5 ps are shown in panels (a) and (b), respectively. In both panels, the depicted pump signal has been normalized to the unpumped signal. The part of the sample where the COO was pumped away by the laser is visible as blue area. The horizontal position where both pulses cross the surface at the same time (time overlap, t0) can be … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Ultrafast fluence-dependent response of a 40 nm thin magnetite film to 800 nm laser excitation. Panel (a): The intensity of the (00½) superstructure peak decreases on a few-picosecond time scale upon irradiation with the pump laser for fluences between 0.7 mJ/cm² and 4.1 mJ/cm². The data was normalized to 1 for negative delays and fit curves were offset by 0.5 relative units (rel. u.) for clarity, and the dashed lin… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    This scan also Figure 1: Time-to-space mapping setup

    back and forth by 3 ps using a movable delay stage, thereby moving the entire 7 ps delay window horizontally over the sample surface . This scan also Figure 1: Time-to-space mapping setup. Soft X- ray pulses from FLASH resonant to the Fe L3 edge (blue) probe the resonant scattering of Fe 3O4 upon pumping with 800 nm pulses (red). The horizontal scattering...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Keimer, S

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, J. Zaanen, From quantum matter to high- temperature superconductivity in copper oxides. Nature 518, 179–186 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    J. G. Bednorz, K. A. Müller, Possible High Tc Superconductivity in the Ba-La-Cu-O System. Zeitschrift für Phys. B Condens. Matter 64, 189–193 (1986)

    work page 1986

  4. [4]

    Dagotto, Complexity in strongly correlated electronic systems

    E. Dagotto, Complexity in strongly correlated electronic systems. Science 309, 257–262 (2005)

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    Dagotto, T

    E. Dagotto, T. Hotta, A. Moreo, Colossal magnetoresistant materials: the key role of phase separation. Phys. Rep. 344, 1–153 (2001)

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    P. W. Phillips, N. E. Hussey, P. Abbamonte, Stranger than metals. Science 377 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Takagi, B

    H. Takagi, B. Batlogg, H. L. Kao, J. Kwo, R. J. Cava, J. J. Krajewski, W. F. Peck, Systematic evolution of temperature-dependent resistivity in La2−xSrxCuO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2975–2978 (1992)

    work page 1992

  8. [8]

    Orenstein, Ultrafast spectroscopy of quantum materials

    J. Orenstein, Ultrafast spectroscopy of quantum materials. Phys. Today 65, 44–50 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 62 references
  1. [9]

    Imada, A

    M. Imada, A. Fujimori, Y. Tokura, Metal-insulator transitions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 1039–1263 (1998)

    1998

  2. [10]

    de la Torre, D

    A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, M. A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonthermal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 041002 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    Mitrano, Y

    M. Mitrano, Y. Wang, Probing light-driven quantum materials with ultrafast resonant inelastic X-ray scattering. Commun. Phys. 3, 184 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    A. M. Kondratenko, E. L. Saldin, Generation of Coherent Radiation by a Relativistic Electron Beam in an Ondulator. Part. Accel. 10, 207–216 (1980)

    1980

  5. [13]

    A. Zong, B. R. Nebgen, S.-C. Lin, J. A. Spies, M. Zuerch, Emerging ultrafast techniques for studying quantum materials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 8, 224–240 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Rönsch-Schulenburg, E

    J. Rönsch-Schulenburg, E. Hass, N. M. Lockmann, T. Plath, M. Rehders, J. Roßbach, G. Brenner, S. Dziarzhytski, T. Golz, H. Schlarb, B. Schmidt, E. Schneidmiller, S. Schreiber, B. Steffen, N. Stojanovic, S. Wunderlich, M. Yurkov, Operation of FLASH with short SASE-FEL radiation...

    2014

  7. [15]

    S. V. Milton, E. Gluskin, N. D. Arnold, C. Benson, W. Berg, S. G. Biedron, M. Borland, Y.-C. Chae, R. J. Dejus, P. K. Den Hartog, B. Deriy, M. Erdmann, Y. I. Eidelman, M. W. Hahne, Z. Huang, K.-J. Kim, J. W. Lewellen, Y. Li, A. H. Lumpkin, O. Makarov, E. R. Moog, A. Nassiri, V...

    2001

  8. [16]

    J. O. Schunck, F. Döring, B. Rösner, J. Buck, R. Y. Engel, P. S. Miedema, S. K. Mahatha, M. Hoesch, A. Petraru, H. Kohlstedt, C. Schüßler-Langeheine, K. Rossnagel, C. David, M. Beye, Soft x-ray imaging spectroscopy with micrometer resolution. Optica 8, 156 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Marschall, Z

    F. Marschall, Z. Yin, J. Rehanek, M. Beye, F. Döring, K. Kubiček, D. Raiser, S. T. Veedu, J. Buck, A. Rothkirch, B. Rösner, V. A. Guzenko, J. Viefhaus, C. David, S. Techert, Transmission zone plates as analyzers for efficient parallel 2D RIXS-mapping. Sci. Rep. 7, 8849 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    David, P

    C. David, P. Karvinen, M. Sikorski, S. Song, I. Vartiainen, C. J. Milne, A. Mozzanica, Y. Kayser, A. Diaz, I. Mohacsi, G. A. Carini, S. Herrmann, E. Färm, M. Ritala, D. M. Fritz, A. Robert, Following the dynamics of matter with femtosecond precision using the X-ray streaking m...

    2015

  11. [19]

    V. N. Strocov, Concept of a spectrometer for resonant inelastic X-ray scattering with parallel detection in 10 incoming and outgoing photon energies. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 17, 103–106 (2010)

    2010

  12. [20]

    E. Jal, M. Makita, B. Rösner, C. David, F. Nolting, J. Raabe, T. Savchenko, A. Kleibert, F. Capotondi, E. Pedersoli, L. Raimondi, M. Manfredda, I. Nikolov, X. Liu, A. E. D. Merhe, N. Jaouen, J. Gorchon, G. Malinowski, M. Hehn, B. Vodungbo, J. Lüning, Single-shot time-resolved ...

    2019

  13. [21]

    Buzzi, M

    M. Buzzi, M. Makita, L. Howald, A. Kleibert, B. Vodungbo, P. Maldonado, J. Raabe, N. Jaouen, H. Redlin, K. Tiedtke, P. M. Oppeneer, C. David, F. Nolting, J. Lüning, Single-shot Monitoring of Ultrafast Processes via X-ray Streaking at a Free Electron Laser. Sci. Rep. 7, 7253 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    Maltezopoulos, S

    T. Maltezopoulos, S. Cunovic, M. Wieland, M. Beye, A. Azima, H. Redlin, M. Krikunova, R. Kalms, U. Frühling, F. Budzyn, W. Wurth, A. Föhlisch, M. Drescher, Single-shot timing measurement of extreme- ultraviolet free-electron laser pulses. New J. Phys. 10, 033026 (2008)

    2008

  15. [23]

    W. F. Schlotter, J. Lüning, R. Rick, K. Chen, A. Scherz, S. Eisebitt, C. M. Günther, W. Eberhardt, O. Hellwig, J. Stöhr, Extended field of view soft x-ray Fourier transform holography: toward imaging ultrafast evolution in a single shot. Opt. Lett. 32, 3110 (2007)

    2007

  16. [24]

    H. N. Chapman, C. Li, S. Bajt, M. Butola, J. L. Dresselhaus, D. Egorov, H. Fleckenstein, N. Ivanov, A. Kiene, B. Klopprogge, V. Kremling, P. Middendorf, D. Oberthuer, M. Prasciolu, T. E. S. Scheer, J. Sprenger, J. C. Wong, O. Yefanov, M. Zakharova, W. Zhang, Convergent-beam at...

    2025

  17. [25]

    M. Beye, O. Krupin, G. Hays, A. H. Reid, D. Rupp, S. De Jong, S. Lee, W. S. Lee, Y. D. Chuang, R. Coffee, J. P. Cryan, J. M. Glownia, A. Föhlisch, M. R. Holmes, A. R. Fry, W. E. White, C. Bostedt, A. O. Scherz, H. A. Durr, W. F. Schlotter, X-ray pulse preserving single-shot op...

    2012

  18. [26]

    Mercurio, J

    G. Mercurio, J. Chalupský, I.-T. Nistea, M. Schneider, V. Hájková, N. Gerasimova, R. Carley, M. Cascella, L. Le Guyader, L. Mercadier, J. Schlappa, K. Setoodehnia, M. Teichmann, A. Yaroslavtsev, T. Burian, V. Vozda, L. Vyšín, J. Wild, D. Hickin, A. Silenzi, M. Stupar, J. Torbe...

    2022

  19. [27]

    Schneider, C

    M. Schneider, C. M. Günther, B. Pfau, F. Capotondi, M. Manfredda, M. Zangrando, N. Mahne, L. Raimondi, E. Pedersoli, D. Naumenko, S. Eisebitt, In situ single-shot diffractive fluence mapping for X- ray free-electron laser pulses. Nat. Commun. 9, 214 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    E. J. W. Verwey, P. W. Haayman, Electronic conductivity and transition point of magnetite (“Fe3O4”). Physica 8, 979–987 (1941)

    1941

  21. [29]

    E. J. W. Verwey, Electronic Conduction of Magnetite (Fe3O4) and its Transition Point at Low Temperatures. Nature 144, 327 (1939)

    1939

  22. [30]

    Tanaka, C

    A. Tanaka, C. F. Chang, M. Buchholz, C. Trabant, E. Schierle, J. Schlappa, D. Schmitz, H. Ott, P. Metcalf, L. H. Tjeng, C. Schüßler-Langeheine, Analysis of charge and orbital order in Fe3O4 by Fe L2,3 resonant x- ray diffraction. Phys. Rev. B 88, 195110 (2013)

    2013

  23. [31]

    Tanaka, C

    A. Tanaka, C. F. Chang, M. Buchholz, C. Trabant, E. Schierle, J. Schlappa, D. Schmitz, H. Ott, P. Metcalf, L. H. Tjeng, C. Schüßler-Langeheine, Symmetry of Orbital Order in Fe3O4 Studied by Fe L2,3 Resonant X- Ray Diffraction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 227203 (2012)

    2012

  24. [32]

    Bosak, D

    A. Bosak, D. Chernyshov, M. Hoesch, P. Piekarz, M. Le Tacon, M. Krisch, A. Kozłowski, A. M. Oleś, K. Parlinski, Short-Range Correlations in Magnetite above the Verwey Temperature. Phys. Rev. X 4, 011040 (2014). 11

    2014

  25. [33]

    Hoesch, P

    M. Hoesch, P. Piekarz, A. Bosak, M. Le Tacon, M. Krisch, A. Kozłowski, A. M. Oleś, K. Parlinski, Anharmonicity due to Electron-Phonon Coupling in Magnetite. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 207204 (2013)

    2013

  26. [34]

    J. P. Wright, J. P. Attfield, P. G. Radaelli, Long Range Charge Ordering in Magnetite Below the Verwey Transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 266401 (2001)

    2001

  27. [35]

    S. K. Park, T. Ishikawa, Y. Tokura, Charge-gap formation upon the Verwey transition in Fe3O4. Phys. Rev. B 58, 3717–3720 (1998)

    1998

  28. [36]

    J. P. Wright, J. P. Attfield, P. G. Radaelli, Charge ordered structure of magnetite Fe3O4 below the Verwey transition. Phys. Rev. B 66, 214422 (2002)

    2002

  29. [37]

    Walz, The Verwey transition - A topical review

    F. Walz, The Verwey transition - A topical review. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14, 285–340 (2002)

    2002

  30. [38]

    Leonov, A

    I. Leonov, A. N. Yaresko, V. N. Antonov, M. A. Korotin, V. I. Anisimov, Charge and Orbital Order in Fe3O4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 146404 (2004)

    2004

  31. [39]

    García, G

    J. García, G. Subías, The Verwey transition—a new perspective. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 16, R145–R178 (2004)

    2004

  32. [40]

    Schlappa, C

    J. Schlappa, C. Schüßler-Langeheine, C. F. Chang, H. Ott, A. Tanaka, Z. Hu, M. W. Haverkort, E. Schierle, E. Weschke, G. Kaindl, L. H. Tjeng, Direct Observation of t2g Orbital Ordering in Magnetite. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 026406 (2008)

    2008

  33. [41]

    D. J. Huang, H.-J. Lin, J. Okamoto, K. S. Chao, H.-T. Jeng, G. Y. Guo, C.-H. Hsu, C.-M. Huang, D. C. Ling, W. B. Wu, C. S. Yang, C. T. Chen, Charge-Orbital Ordering and Verwey Transition in Magnetite Measured by Resonant Soft X-Ray Scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 096401 (2006)

    2006

  34. [42]

    Pontius, T

    N. Pontius, T. Kachel, C. Schüßler-Langeheine, W. F. Schlotter, M. Beye, F. Sorgenfrei, C. F. Chang, A. Föhlisch, W. Wurth, P. Metcalf, I. Leonov, A. Yaresko, N. Stojanovic, M. Berglund, N. Guerassimova, S. Düsterer, H. Redlin, H. A. Dürr, Time-resolved resonant soft x-ray dif...

    2011

  35. [43]

    M. S. Senn, J. P. Wright, J. P. Attfield, Charge order and three-site distortions in the Verwey structure of magnetite. Nature 481, 173–176 (2012)

    2012

  36. [44]

    Randi, I

    F. Randi, I. Vergara, F. Novelli, M. Esposito, M. Dell’Angela, V. A. M. Brabers, P. Metcalf, R. Kukreja, H. A. Dürr, D. Fausti, M. Grüninger, F. Parmigiani, Phase separation in the nonequilibrium Verwey transition in magnetite. Phys. Rev. B 93, 054305 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    de Jong, R

    S. de Jong, R. Kukreja, C. Trabant, N. Pontius, C. F. Chang, T. Kachel, M. Beye, F. Sorgenfrei, C. H. Back, B. Bräuer, W. F. Schlotter, J. J. Turner, O. Krupin, M. Doehler, D. Zhu, M. A. Hossain, A. O. Scherz, D. Fausti, F. Novelli, M. Esposito, W. S. Lee, Y. D. Chuang, D. H. ...

    2013

  38. [46]

    W. Wang, J. Li, Z. Liang, L. Wu, P. M. Lozano, A. C. Komarek, X. Shen, A. H. Reid, X. Wang, Q. Li, W. Yin, K. Sun, I. K. Robinson, Y. Zhu, M. P. M. Dean, J. Tao, Verwey transition as evolution from electronic nematicity to trimerons via electron-phonon coupling. Sci. Adv. 9, e...

    2023

  39. [47]

    Baldini, C

    E. Baldini, C. A. Belvin, M. Rodriguez-Vega, I. O. Ozel, D. Legut, A. Kozłowski, A. M. Oleś, K. Parlinski, P. Piekarz, J. Lorenzana, G. A. Fiete, N. Gedik, Discovery of the soft electronic modes of the trimeron order in magnetite. Nat. Phys. 16, 541–545 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    Liu, C.-F

    X. Liu, C.-F. Chang, A. D. Rata, A. C. Komarek, L. H. Tjeng, Fe3O4 thin films: controlling and manipulating an elusive quantum material. npj Quantum Mater. 1, 16027 (2016)

    2016

  41. [49]

    B. Truc, P. Usai, F. Pennacchio, G. Berruto, R. Claude, I. Madan, V. Sala, T. LaGrange, G. M. Vanacore, S. Benhabib, F. Carbone, Ultrafast generation of hidden phases via energy-tuned electronic photoexcitation in magnetite. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 121, e2316438121 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Feldhaus, FLASH—the first soft x-ray free electron laser (FEL) user facility

    J. Feldhaus, FLASH—the first soft x-ray free electron laser (FEL) user facility. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 43, 194002 (2010)

    2010

  43. [51]

    Tiedtke, A

    K. Tiedtke, A. Azima, N. von Bargen, L. Bittner, S. Bonfigt, S. Düsterer, B. Faatz, U. Frühling, M. Gensch, C. Gerth, N. Guerassimova, U. Hahn, T. Hans, M. Hesse, K. Honkavaar, U. Jastrow, P. Juranic, S. Kapitzki, B. Keitel, T. Kracht, M. Kuhlmann, W. B. Li, M. Martins, T. Núñ...

    2009

  44. [52]

    M. Beye, R. Y. Engel, J. O. Schunck, S. Dziarzhytski, G. Brenner, P. S. Miedema, Non-linear soft x-ray methods on solids with MUSIX—the multi-dimensional spectroscopy and inelastic x-ray scattering endstation. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 31, 014003 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    Toleikis, The FLASH facility current status in 2018 and future upgrade plans

    S. Toleikis, The FLASH facility current status in 2018 and future upgrade plans. AIP Conf. Proc. 2054, 030015 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    Düsterer, P

    S. Düsterer, P. Radcliffe, G. Geloni, U. Jastrow, M. Kuhlmann, E. Plönjes, K. Tiedtke, R. Treusch, J. Feldhaus, P. Nicolosi, L. Poletto, P. Yeates, H. Luna, J. T. Costello, P. Orr, D. Cubaynes, M. Meyer, Spectroscopic characterization of vacuum ultraviolet free electron laser ...

    2006

  47. [55]

    E. L. Saldin, E. A. Schneidmiller, M. V. Yurkov, Properties of the third harmonic of the radiation from self-amplified spontaneous emission free electron laser. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Accel. Beams 9, 030702 (2006)

    2006

  48. [56]

    Redlin, A

    H. Redlin, A. Al-Shemmary, A. Azima, N. Stojanovic, F. Tavella, I. Will, S. Düsterer, The FLASH pump– probe laser system: Setup, characterization and optical beamlines. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers, Detect. Assoc. Equip. 635, S88–S93 (2011)

    2011

  49. [57]

    Ackermann, G

    W. Ackermann, G. Asova, V. Ayvazyan, A. Azima, N. Baboi, J. Bähr, V. Balandin, B. Beutner, A. Brandt, A. Bolzmann, R. Brinkmann, O. I. Brovko, M. Castellano, P. Castro, L. Catani, E. Chiadroni, S. Choroba, A. Cianchi, J. T. Costello, D. Cubaynes, J. Dardis, W. Decking, H. Dels...

    2007

  50. [58]

    C. F. Chang, J. Schlappa, M. Buchholz, A. Tanaka, E. Schierle, D. Schmitz, H. Ott, R. Sutarto, T. Willers, P. Metcalf, L. H. Tjeng, C. Schüßler-Langeheine, Intrinsic and extrinsic x-ray absorption effects in soft x- ray diffraction from the superstructure in magnetite. Phys. R...

    2011

  51. [59]

    Pontius, M

    N. Pontius, M. Beye, C. Trabant, R. Mitzner, F. Sorgenfrei, T. Kachel, M. Wöstmann, S. Roling, H. Zacharias, R. Ivanov, R. Treusch, M. Buchholz, P. Metcalf, C. Schüßler-Langeheine, A. Föhlisch, Probing the non-equilibrium transient state in magnetite by a jitter-free two-color...

    2018

  52. [60]

    R. Y. Engel, O. Alexander, K. Atak, U. Bovensiepen, J. Buck, R. Carley, M. Cascella, V. Chardonnet, G. S. Chiuzbaian, C. David, F. Döring, A. Eschenlohr, N. Gerasimova, F. de Groot, L. Le Guyader, O. S. Humphries, M. Izquierdo, E. Jal, A. Kubec, T. Laarmann, C.-H. Lambert, J. ...

    2023

  53. [61]

    Tschentscher, C

    T. Tschentscher, C. Bressler, J. Grünert, A. Madsen, A. Mancuso, M. Meyer, A. Scherz, H. Sinn, U. Zastrau, Photon Beam Transport and Scientific Instruments at the European XFEL. Appl. Sci. 7, 592 (2017)

    2017

  54. [1105]

    We acknowledge DESY (Hamburg, Germany), a member of the Helmholtz Association HGF, for the provision of experimental facilities

    CSL acknowledges funding by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)– Project-ID 328545488 – TRR 227. We acknowledge DESY (Hamburg, Germany), a member of the Helmholtz Association HGF, for the provision of experimental facilities. Parts of this res...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.