Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 101 references

A compact, low-mass Green Pea galaxy hosts two supermassive black holes accreting simultaneously, making it the first confirmed dual active galactic nucleus in such a system.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 17:05 UTC pith:LGU62GSN

load-bearing objection First confirmed dual AGN in a Green Pea; the two Chandra sources carry the discovery, the optical decomposition is the soft spot. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.17729 v1 pith:LGU62GSN submitted 2026-07-20 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE

Two Peas in a Pod: The First Confirmed Dual Active Galactic Nucleus within a Green Pea Galaxy System

Konstantinos Kouroumpatzakis , Peter G. Boorman , Ji\v{r}\'i Svoboda , Ryan Pfeifle , Abhijeet Borkar , Maitrayee Gupta , Daniel Stern , Andreas Zezas This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE
keywords dual AGNGreen Pea galaxiessupermassive black holesgalaxy mergersX-ray astronomyactive galactic nucleiSDSS J162209.41+352107.5broad-line region
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper claims to have found the first confirmed dual active galactic nucleus (AGN) inside a Green Pea galaxy, a class of compact, intensely star-forming, low-metallicity galaxies regarded as nearby stand-ins for early-Universe galaxies. Using Chandra X-ray imaging, the authors resolve two luminous hard X-ray sources separated by 8.4 kpc in SDSS J162209.41+352107.5, showing two supermassive black holes accreting at the same time. Keck spectroscopy then shows the two optical nuclei share a common redshift and each independently shows broad Balmer emission and high-ionization lines such as [NeV] and [FeVII], placing both in the AGN region of diagnostic diagrams. If correct, this is the first direct demonstration that simultaneous black-hole growth can occur in a compact, low-mass, merging galaxy of the kind thought to dominate early galaxy assembly.

Core claim

The paper establishes J1622+3521 as a bona fide dual AGN: two actively accreting supermassive black holes within a single Green Pea galaxy system. Chandra splits the nucleus into two hard X-ray sources with intrinsic 2–10 keV luminosities log L ≈ 43.9 and 43.6 erg/s and substantial line-of-sight obscuration. Keck/DEIMOS spectra extracted separately for the two optical components show they share redshift z ≈ 0.267, and each exhibits broad Hα (FWHM ≈ 1900 and 1700 km/s), high-ionization coronal lines, and narrow-line ratios firmly in the AGN region of the BPT diagram. Virial estimates give black hole masses log(M_BH/M_sun) ≈ 7.3 for both, with Eddington ratios ≈ 0.7 and ≈ 0.3. The authors argu

What carries the argument

The central evidence is the combination of spatially resolved X-ray and optical spectroscopy. Chandra's sub-arcsecond point-spread function resolves two physically separate hard X-ray sources, proving two obscured accreting engines. Keck/DEIMOS long-slit spectroscopy, extracted in separate apertures for the two nuclei, independently yields broad Balmer lines, coronal lines such as [NeV] and [FeVII], and BPT-diagnostic positions. Together these rule out a single AGN with outflow or complex kinematics, the usual degeneracy that plagues double-peaked emission-line candidates.

Load-bearing premise

The two optical nuclei were cleanly separated in 0.88-arcsecond seeing with extraction apertures only 1.9 arcseconds apart, so Source 2's broad Balmer and coronal lines are not dominated by spill-over from Source 1.

What would settle it

An adaptive-optics integral-field spectrum with sub-arcsecond resolution that isolates Source 2 and shows its broad Hα and [NeV] emission disappearing once scattered light from Source 1 is excluded would falsify the optical dual-AGN claim; likewise, a deeper Chandra observation showing Source 2 is a PSF artifact of Source 1 would falsify the X-ray claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Green Pea galaxies now join the population of confirmed dual-AGN hosts, extending dual-AGN demographics into compact, low-mass, metal-poor systems rather than only massive gas-rich mergers.
  • Simultaneous accretion onto two supermassive black holes can be triggered by interactions in small, intensely star-forming galaxies, supporting merger-driven fueling as a route to rapid black-hole growth.
  • The high Eddington ratios (~0.7 and ~0.3) show that both black holes are growing efficiently in the pre-coalescence phase, not just one.
  • The system provides a local, observable analog for the compact, obscured, rapidly accreting AGN populations found at high redshift, including Little Red Dots.
  • The agreement between He II and soft X-ray luminosities for both nuclei strengthens the case that narrow He II can serve as a proxy for AGN power in compact, partially obscured systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If compact dwarf mergers commonly host dual AGN, then the known population of Green Peas with double-peaked [OIII] lines may be hiding many more binary accretion systems than previously assumed, not just outflows or rotating gas.
  • A targeted X-ray survey of merging Green Pea galaxies with Chandra could turn up additional dual AGN; the 8.4 kpc separation seen here is well within Chandra's resolving power at these redshifts.
  • The same He II–soft X-ray scaling used in this paper might be applied to unresolved systems to flag candidates for dual activity, then confirm them with high-spatial-resolution X-ray or optical observations.
  • If confirmed in more systems, the existence of dual AGN in low-mass compact galaxies could revise estimates of how often close black-hole pairs form in the early-Universe-like environments that JWST is now revealing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery of a dual active galactic nucleus (AGN) in the Green Pea galaxy system SDSS J162209.41+352107.5 (J1622+3521), based on 42.7 ks of new Chandra imaging and Keck/DEIMOS long-slit spectroscopy. Chandra resolves two hard X-ray point sources separated by 8.4 kpc, with absorption-corrected 2–10 keV luminosities log L ≈ 43.93 and 43.55 for Source 1 and Source 2. The Keck spectra show two optical nuclei at a common redshift z = 0.2667, both with broad Hα/Hβ components, high-ionization lines ([NeV], [FeVII]), and BPT ratios in the AGN region. From single-epoch virial scaling the authors derive log M_BH ≈ 7.3 for both nuclei and Eddington ratios of ~0.66 and ~0.29. They argue this is the first confirmed dual AGN in a Green Pea system and that such compact, low-mass, low-metallicity, intensely star-forming hosts are local analogs to rapid SMBH growth in the early Universe.

Significance. If the dual-AGN identification holds, the paper extends the known dual-AGN population into a previously unrepresented host-galaxy regime: a compact, low-stellar-mass, low-metallicity, intensely star-forming system. It would provide direct evidence that simultaneous SMBH accretion can be triggered in environments analogous to those thought to dominate early galaxy assembly, strengthening the merger-driven growth picture and connecting Green Pea galaxies to compact high-redshift AGN such as Little Red Dots. The work benefits from public Chandra/Keck data, a simultaneous Bayesian X-ray spectral fit that treats contamination and background explicitly, and a generally candid discussion of model caveats. The main weakness is that the optical confirmation of Source 2 as an independent broad-line AGN rests on a two-aperture extraction at only 1.9 arcsec separation with 0.88 arcsec seeing, without a quantitative PSF-decomposition, which affects the derived black-hole mass and Eddington ratio for that source.

major comments (3)
  1. [§1.1, Table 2, Fig. 3] The independent optical AGN signatures of Source 2 are the least secure part of the analysis. With a slit separation of 1.9 arcsec and seeing of 0.88 arcsec, spill-over between the two DEIMOS extraction apertures is unavoidable, as the authors acknowledge. Table 2 shows Source 2's broad Hα flux (1.76 ± 0.05 in 10^-15 erg/s/cm^2) is nearly equal to Source 1's (2.06 ± 0.13), whereas Source 2's narrow Hβ and [OIII] fluxes are factors of ~4–5 lower than Source 1's. A modest fraction of Source 1's broad Hα wings leaking into the Source 2 aperture could therefore create or substantially enhance Source 2's broad component. The spatial-profile argument in §1.1 is qualitative; no PSF-convolved two-source forward model or equivalent quantitative contamination budget is provided. Because the broad-line detection drives the BLR extinction, M_BH, and λ_Edd for Source 2 in §1.8–1.9, those derived quan
  2. [§1.4–1.5, Fig. 4] The reported intrinsic X-ray parameters depend on a specific physical model. The photon-index posteriors for both sources (Γ = 1.76+0.20/-0.21 and 1.79+0.25/-0.23) are essentially the adopted Gaussian prior 1.80 ± 0.15, so the data do not independently constrain the coronal continuum shape. The intrinsic 2–10 keV luminosities and column densities rely on the BNsphere spherical-obscurer geometry, variable iron and other-metal abundances, contamination mixing constants, and a soft powerlaw. While the two-source detection itself is robust, the quantitative luminosity/accretion-rate statements depend on these choices. The manuscript would be materially strengthened by a robustness check with an alternative physical model (e.g., a torus or slab absorber) and/or fixed solar abundance to demonstrate that log L_2-10 ≈ 43.5–44 and the AGN classification are not artifacts of the assumed geometry.
  3. [§1.11, refs [103,104]] The claim that J1622+3521 is 'the first confirmed dual AGN' in this host-galaxy regime should be benchmarked against existing low-mass dual-AGN candidates. The text calls systems from [103,104] 'candidate dual AGN systems' without stating the specific criteria that J1622+3521 meets and these do not. In particular, ref. [104] is titled as an X-ray-detected minor-merger dual AGN; if that system is confirmed, the novelty statement in the abstract and §1.11 needs to be narrowed explicitly to Green Pea hosts or to the specific combination of compactness, low mass, and low metallicity. A short, explicit paragraph defining 'confirmed' (e.g., spatially resolved X-ray sources at z-consistent optical nuclei, with AGN luminosities above the ULX/stellar-remnant regime) would resolve this.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction, §1.3] The phrase 'Chandra spectroscopy reveals two luminous hard X-ray sources' is imprecise; the detection is imaging, and the spectra are extracted later. Suggest rewording to 'Chandra imaging and spectral fitting'.
  2. [Fig. 2] The upper panel of the two-dimensional spectrum would benefit from axis labels (spatial position and observed wavelength) and perhaps an indication of the extraction apertures, so the reader can directly assess the 1.9-arcsec separation relative to the PSF.
  3. [§1.2, Fig. 3] The broad Hβ FWHM uncertainties are very large (1200 ± 350 and 1000 ± 300 km/s), and the broad Hβ-to-Hα ratio is used to infer BLR reddening. Given the weakness of broad Hβ, consider presenting the broad Hβ parameters as relatively unconstrained or providing an upper-limit treatment in the Balmer-decrement analysis.
  4. [§1.5] The sentence 'our X-ray spectral fitting unambiguously confirms their AGN nature' is stronger than the later caveat (§1.13) that heavily obscured geometries cannot be completely excluded. Softening 'unambiguously' would better match the overall caveat level of the paper.
  5. [§1.4] The sentence describing the six extracted spectra ('source + background circular regions for the West and East sources, respectively') is confusing; it should clarify that each of the three observations yields one spectrum for each source plus a shared background spectrum.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the dual-AGN detection rests on independent Chandra and Keck data; the one self-cited scaling relation is a non-load-bearing consistency check.

full rationale

The central claim—two accreting SMBHs in J1622+3521—is established directly from raw observations, not from the authors' own derived relations. Chandra resolves two hard X-ray sources with intrinsic 2–10 keV luminosities log L ~ 43.9 and 43.6, and Keck/DEIMOS spatially separates two optical nuclei at common z=0.267 with independent broad Balmer components, coronal lines, and BPT AGN classifications. Black-hole masses use the external Reines et al. (2013) virial calibration; bolometric corrections and the BNsphere X-ray model are external; the X-ray–HeII comparison uses Kouroumpatzakis & Svoboda (2025), which overlaps with the present authors, but only as a post-hoc consistency check (Fig. 6), not as the basis for the dual-AGN conclusion. Removing that comparison leaves the detection intact. The acknowledged 1.9-arcsec aperture spill-over (Sec. 1.1) is a measurement robustness issue, not a circular reduction; it could affect the strength of Source 2's optical AGN signatures but does not erase the two resolved X-ray sources. There is no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no self-citation chain forbidding alternatives, and no ansatz imported via the authors' prior work. Minor self-citations appear in the contextual references, but none are load-bearing.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

12 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central dual-AGN identification depends on raw Chandra/Keck detections and standard classification diagnostics; the model-dependent free parameters mainly affect derived luminosities, masses, and Eddington ratios rather than the existence of two accreting nuclei. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (12)
  • X-ray photon index Gamma, Source 1 = 1.76 (+0.20/-0.21)
    Prior 1.80±0.15; correlated with column density and metallicity in BNsphere fit; affects intrinsic luminosity via spectral extrapolation.
  • X-ray photon index Gamma, Source 2 = 1.79 (+0.25/-0.23)
    Same prior; posterior consistent with prior, indicating limited spectral leverage.
  • Line-of-sight column density log N_H, Source 1 = 22.8 (+0.5/-0.2)
    Fitted absorption column; directly sets obscuration-corrected 2-10 keV luminosity.
  • Line-of-sight column density log N_H, Source 2 = 23.6 (+0.4/-0.5)
    Fitted absorption column; larger uncertainty because Source 2 is sub-dominant to background at soft energies.
  • Iron abundance (BNsphere), Source 1/2 = not quoted (prior log-uniform 0.1-1 Zsun)
    Nuisance parameter for photoelectric absorption in low-metallicity gas; affects N_H and L_X.
  • Other-metal abundance (BNsphere), Source 1/2 = not quoted (prior log-uniform 0.1-1 Zsun)
    Nuisance parameter; same as iron.
  • Soft X-ray powerlaw normalisation = not quoted (≤10% of primary continuum)
    Models residual X-ray binaries/leaked primary; allowed to vary.
  • Background scaling normalisation = not quoted (log-uniform ±2 decades)
    Scales PCA background template to each observed background spectrum.
  • Contamination mixing constants = not quoted
    Account for cross-PSF flux from Source 1 into Source 2 aperture and vice versa.
  • E(B-V)_BLR, Source 1 = 0.65±0.26
    Derived from broad Balmer decrement assuming intrinsic Halpha/Hbeta=3.1; used to extinction-correct Halpha for M_BH.
  • E(B-V)_BLR, Source 2 = 0.92±0.32
    Same procedure; large value drives redder SED and extinction correction.
  • Bolometric correction k_bol = 20 (adopted)
    Chosen from NLS1 studies to convert 2-10 keV luminosity to L_bol; Eddington ratios shift ~0.2 dex if 10-30.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption BNsphere fully-covering spherical obscurer is an adequate description of the circumnuclear absorber
    X-ray spectral fits in Sections 1.4-1.5; paper notes this geometry is difficult to sustain but uses it as the simplest self-consistent model. Alternative geometries could shift N_H and intrinsic luminosities.
  • domain assumption Intrinsic broad Balmer decrement Halpha/Hbeta = 3.1
    Used in Section 1.8 to compute BLR extinction; paper notes ~2.7 values exist and would modestly change extinctions, not conclusions.
  • domain assumption Single-epoch virial Halpha scaling relation of Reines+13 applies to these low-mass NLS1-like nuclei
    Used in Section 1.8 to derive M_BH ~10^7.3; intrinsic scatter 0.4-0.5 dex acknowledged but not included in quoted errors.
  • domain assumption Bolometric correction k_bol=20 for rapidly accreting NLS1-like AGN
    Adopted in Section 1.9 to get L_bol and Eddington ratios; range 10-30 shifts log lambda_Edd by ~0.2 dex.
  • domain assumption BPT boundary lines (Kewley+01, Kauffmann+03, Schawinski+07) remain valid classifiers at low metallicity
    Used in Section 1.7 to place both nuclei in AGN region; low-metallicity AGN can shift line ratios, but X-ray and coronal lines provide independent support.
  • domain assumption SDSS/MPA-JHU redshift z=0.2665 is the correct systemic frame for luminosity distances
    Used in Section 1.2 to set rest frame and distances (1399/872 Mpc); small redshift errors do not affect dual-AGN identification.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 31564 in / 17297 out tokens · 194134 ms · 2026-08-01T17:05:26.903762+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The growth of galaxies in the early Universe is thought to be dominated by compact, intensely star-forming systems, yet the corresponding growth of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) within such environments remains poorly constrained. Green Pea galaxies are nearby analogs of rapidly assembling galaxies in the early Universe owing to their compact morphologies, intense star formation, low metallicities, and extreme ionization conditions. Although galaxy interactions are thought to trigger episodes of rapid SMBH growth, direct observations of simultaneous accretion onto multiple SMBHs in compact, intensely star-forming galaxies are lacking. Here we report the discovery of the first confirmed dual active galactic nucleus (AGN) in a Green Pea system, SDSS J162209.41+352107.5. Chandra imaging resolves two luminous hard X-ray sources separated by 8.4 kpc in projection, demonstrating simultaneous accretion onto two SMBHs. Follow-up Keck spectroscopy confirms that the two optical nuclei share a common redshift and independently exhibit broad Balmer emission and high-ionization AGN emission lines. Unlike most known dual AGN, which are typically found in massive mergers, J162209.41+352107.5 is a compact low-mass system analogous to galaxies thought to dominate early phases of galaxy assembly. These findings demonstrate that efficient growth of multiple SMBHs can occur in such environments and establish Green Pea galaxies as nearby laboratories for investigating the interplay between galaxy interactions, star formation, and black-hole growth under conditions analogous to those prevalent in the young Universe.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Astrophys

    Harikane, Y., Ouchi, M., Oguri, M., Ono, Y., Nakajima, K., Isobe, Y., Umeda, H., Mawatari, K., Zhang, Y.: A Comprehensive Study of Galaxies at z 9-16 Found in the Early JWST Data: Ultraviolet Luminosity Functions and Cosmic Star Formation History at the Pre-reionization Epoch. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 265(1), 5 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ac...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Astrophys

    Greene, J.E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A.D., Furtak, L.J., Chemerynska, I., Kokorev, V., Dayal, P., Volonteri, M., Williams, C.C., Wang, B., Setton, D.J., Bur- gasser, A.J., Bezanson, R., Atek, H., Brammer, G., Cutler, S.E., Feldmann, R., Fujimoto, S., Glazebrook, K., de Graaff, A., Khullar, G., Leja, J., March- esini, D., Maseda, M.V., Matthee, J., Miller, T...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  3. [4]

    Green Pea

    Amor ´ ın, R.O., P´ erez-Montero, E., V ´ ılchez, J.M.: On the Oxygen and Nitrogen Chemical Abundances and the Evolution of the “Green Pea” Galaxies. Astro- phys. J. Lett.715(2), 128–132 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/715/ 2/L128 arXiv:1004.4910 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  4. [5]

    Astrophys

    Izotov, Y.I., Guseva, N.G., Thuan, T.X.: Green Pea Galaxies and Cohorts: Luminous Compact Emission-line Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Astrophys. J.728(2), 161 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/728/2/161 arXiv:1012.5639 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  5. [6]

    Astrophys

    Yang, H., Malhotra, S., Rhoads, J.E., Leitherer, C., Wofford, A., Jiang, T., Wang, J.: Lyαand UV Sizes of Green Pea Galaxies. Astrophys. J.838(1), 4 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa6337 arXiv:1610.05767 [astro- ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  6. [7]

    Astrophys

    Kim, K.J., Malhotra, S., Rhoads, J.E., Yang, H.: The Compact UV Size of Green Pea Galaxies As Local Analogs of High-redshift Lyα-Emitters. Astrophys. J.914(1), 2 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abf833 arXiv:2104.08282 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  7. [8]

    Kouroumpatzakis, K., Svoboda, J., Zezas, A., Borkar, A., Kyritsis, E., Boorman, P.G., Daoutis, C., Adamcov´ a, B., Grossov´ a, R.: Blueberry galaxies up to 200 Mpc and their optical and infrared properties. Astron. Astrophys.688, 159 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449766 arXiv:2405.03391 [astro- ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  8. [9]

    Astrophys

    Svoboda, J., Douna, V., Orlitov´ a, I., Ehle, M.: Green Peas in X-Rays. Astrophys. J.880(2), 144 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab2b39 arXiv:1810.09318 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  9. [10]

    Lin, R., Zheng, Z.-Y., Wang, J.-X., Yuan, F.-T., Rhoads, J.E., Malhotra, S., An, T., Jiang, C., Zhu, S., Rahna, P.T., Ji, X., Singha, M.: Discovery of five Green pea galaxies with double-peaked narrow [O III] lines. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.524(2), 2224–2236 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1857 arXiv:2304.08284 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [11]

    Astrophys

    Lin, R., Zheng, Z.-Y., Jiang, C., Yuan, F.-T., Ho, L.C., Wang, J., Jiang, L., Rhoads, J.E., Malhotra, S., Barrientos, L.F., Wold, I., Infante, L., Zhu, S., Ji, X., Fu, X.: Discovery of Local Analogs to JWST’s Little Red Dots. Astrophys. J. Lett.980(2), 34 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/adaaf1 24 arXiv:2412.08396 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [12]

    Astrophys

    Boorman, P.G., Svoboda, J., Stern, D., Lehmer, B.D., Borkar, A., Bright- man, M., Earnshaw, H.P., Harrison, F.A., Kouroumpatzakis, K., Adamcov´ a, B., Assef, R.J., Ehle, M., Grefenstette, B., Grossov´ a, R., Gupta, M., Kammoun, E., Kawamuro, T., Marcotulli, L., Mikuˇ sincov´ a, R., Middleton, M.J., Nathan, E., Piotrowska, J.M., Somalwar, J.J., Torres-Alb`...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [13]

    De Rosa, A., Vignali, C., Bogdanovi´ c, T., Capelo, P.R., Charisi, M., Dotti, M., Husemann, B., Lusso, E., Mayer, L., Paragi, Z., Runnoe, J., Sesana, A., Steinborn, L., Bianchi, S., Colpi, M., del Valle, L., Frey, S., Gab´ anyi, K. ´E., Giustini, M., Guainazzi, M., Haiman, Z., Herrera Ruiz, N., Herrero-Illana, R., Iwasawa, K., Komossa, S., Lena, D., Loise...

    arXiv 2019

  13. [14]

    Chen, N., Di Matteo, T., Ni, Y., Tremmel, M., DeGraf, C., Shen, Y., Holgado, A.M., Bird, S., Croft, R., Feng, Y.: Properties and evolution of dual and offset AGN in the ASTRID simulation at z 2. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.522(2), 1895– 1913 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad834 arXiv:2208.04970 [astro- ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1913

  14. [15]

    Astrophys

    Pfeifle, R.W., Weaver, K.A., Secrest, N.J., Rothberg, B., Patton, D.R.: Super- size Me: The Big Multi-AGN Catalog (The Big MAC) Data Release 1: The Source Catalog. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.281(1), 25 (2025) https://doi.org/10. 3847/1538-4365/adf845 arXiv:2411.12799 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  15. [16]

    Shen, Y., Liu, X., Greene, J.E., Strauss, M.A.: Type 2 Active Galactic Nuclei with Double-peaked [O III] Lines. II. Single AGNs with Complex Narrow-line Region Kinematics are More Common than Binary AGNs. Astrophys. J.735(1), 48 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/735/1/48 arXiv:1011.5246 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  16. [17]

    Astrophys

    Satyapal, S., Secrest, N.J., Ricci, C., Ellison, S.L., Rothberg, B., Blecha, L., Con- stantin, A., Gliozzi, M., McNulty, P., Ferguson, J.: Buried AGNs in Advanced Mergers: Mid-infrared Color Selection as a Dual AGN Candidate Finder. Astrophys. J.848(2), 126 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa88ca arXiv:1707.03921 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [18]

    De Rosa, A., Vignali, C., Severgnini, P., Bianchi, S., Bogdanovi´ c, T., Charisi, M., Guainazzi, M., Haiman, Z., Komossa, S., Paragi, Z., Perez-Torres, M., Piconcelli, E., Ducci, L., Parvatikar, M., Serafinelli, R.: The X-ray view of optically selected dual AGN. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.519(4), 5149–5160 (2023) https://doi. 25 org/10.1093/mnras/stac3664 a...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  18. [19]

    Astrophys

    Fu, H., Myers, A.D., Djorgovski, S.G., Yan, L.: Mergers in Double-peaked [O III] Active Galactic Nuclei. Astrophys. J.733(2), 103 (2011) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0004-637X/733/2/103 arXiv:1009.0767 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  19. [20]

    Astrophys

    Fu, H., Yan, L., Myers, A.D., Stockton, A., Djorgovski, S.G., Aldering, G., Rich, J.A.: The Nature of Double-peaked [O III] Active Galactic Nuclei. Astrophys. J.745(1), 67 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/67 arXiv:1107.3564 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  20. [21]

    Astrophys

    Crenshaw, D.M., Schmitt, H.R., Kraemer, S.B., Mushotzky, R.F., Dunn, J.P.: Radial Velocity Offsets Due to Mass Outflows and Extinction in Active Galac- tic Nuclei. Astrophys. J.708(1), 419–426 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0004-637X/708/1/419 arXiv:0911.0675 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  21. [23]

    Astrophys

    Pacucci, F., Narayan, R.: Mildly Super-Eddington Accretion onto Slowly Spin- ning Black Holes Explains the X-Ray Weakness of the Little Red Dots. Astrophys. J.976(1), 96 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad84f7 arXiv:2407.15915 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  22. [24]

    Astrophys

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R.P., Brammer, G., Chisholm, J., Eilers, A.-C., Goulding, A., Greene, J., Kashino, D., Labbe, I., Lilly, S.J., Mackenzie, R., Oesch, P.A., Weibel, A., Wuyts, S., Xiao, M., Bordoloi, R., Bouwens, R., van Dokkum, P., Illingworth, G., Kramarenko, I., Maseda, M.V., Mason, C., Meyer, R.A., Nel- son, E.J., Reddy, N.A., Shivaei, I., Simcoe, R...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [25]

    26 Astrophys

    Kocevski, D.D., Finkelstein, S.L., Barro, G., Taylor, A.J., Calabr` o, A., Laloux, B., Buchner, J., Trump, J.R., Leung, G.C.K., Yang, G., Dickinson, M., P´ erez- Gonz´ alez, P.G., Pacucci, F., Inayoshi, K., Somerville, R.S., McGrath, E.J., Akins, H.B., Bagley, M.B., Bowler, R.A.A., Bisigello, L., Carnall, A., Casey, C.M., Cheng, Y., Cleri, N.J., Costantin...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [26]

    Schaerer, D., Marques-Chaves, R., Barrufet, L., Oesch, P., Izotov, Y.I., Naidu, R., Guseva, N.G., Brammer, G.: First look with JWST spectroscopy: Resem- blance among z∼8 galaxies and local analogs. Astron. Astrophys.665, 4 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244556 arXiv:2207.10034 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  25. [27]

    Astrophys

    Rhoads, J.E., Wold, I.G.B., Harish, S., Kim, K.J., Pharo, J., Malhotra, S., Gabrielpillai, A., Jiang, T., Yang, H.: Finding Peas in the Early Universe with JWST. Astrophys. J. Lett.942(1), 14 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 2041-8213/acaaaf arXiv:2207.13020 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [28]

    Astro- phys

    Comerford, J.M., Gerke, B.F., Newman, J.A., Davis, M., Yan, R., Cooper, M.C., Faber, S.M., Koo, D.C., Coil, A.L., Rosario, D.J., Dutton, A.A.: Inspi- ralling Supermassive Black Holes: A New Signpost for Galaxy Mergers. Astro- phys. J.698(1), 956–965 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/956 arXiv:0810.3235 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  27. [30]

    Nature563(7730), 214–216 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-018-0652-7 arXiv:1811.03641 [astro-ph.GA]

    Koss, M.J., Blecha, L., Bernhard, P., Hung, C.-L., Lu, J.R., Trakhtenbrot, B., Treister, E., Weigel, A., Sartori, L.F., Mushotzky, R., Schawinski, K., Ricci, C., Veilleux, S., Sanders, D.B.: A population of luminous accreting black holes with hidden mergers. Nature563(7730), 214–216 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-018-0652-7 arXiv:1811.03641 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [31]

    Ellison, S.L., Viswanathan, A., Patton, D.R., Bottrell, C., McConnachie, A.W., Gwyn, S., Cuillandre, J.-C.: A definitive merger-AGN connection at z∼0 with CFIS: mergers have an excess of AGN and AGN hosts are more frequently disturbed. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.487(2), 2491–2504 (2019) https://doi.org/ 10.1093/mnras/stz1431 arXiv:1905.08830 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  29. [32]

    Astrophys

    Pfeifle, R.W., Weaver, K., Satyapal, S., Ricci, C., Secrest, N.J., Gliozzi, M., Blecha, L., Rothberg, B.: NuSTAR Observations of Four Mid-IR-Selected Dual AGN Candidates in Galaxy Mergers. Astrophys. J.954(2), 116 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ace2c0 arXiv:2306.16437 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [33]

    arXiv e-prints, 2603–22277 (2026) https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.22277 arXiv:2603.22277 [astro-ph.GA] 27

    Scholtz, J., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., Brazzini, M., ¨Ubler, H., Ji, X., Perna, M., Sun, F., Brocchi, G., Carniani, S., Cresci, G., Ivey, L.R., Juodˇ zbalis, I., Marconi, A., Mazzolari, G., Risaliti, G., Trefoloni, B.: Little Red and Blue Dots: simply stratified Broad Line Regions. arXiv e-prints, 2603–22277 (2026) https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603....

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.22277 2026

  31. [34]

    arXiv e-prints, 2605–27903 (2026) https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.27903 arXiv:2605.27903 [astro-ph.GA]

    Barger, A.J., Cowie, L.L.: Double Dots: Compact Pairs Mark Little Red Dots and High-Redshift Broad-line AGNs. arXiv e-prints, 2605–27903 (2026) https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.27903 arXiv:2605.27903 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.27903 2026

  32. [35]

    AJ157(5), 168 (2019) https://doi.org/ 10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d arXiv:1804.08657 [astro-ph.IM]

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D.J., Lang, D., Blum, R., Burleigh, K., Fan, X., Findlay, J.R., Finkbeiner, D., Herrera, D., Juneau, S., Landriau, M., Levi, M., McGreer, I., Meisner, A., Myers, A.D., Moustakas, J., Nugent, P., Patej, A., Schlafly, E.F., Walker, A.R., Valdes, F., Weaver, B.A., Y` eche, C., Zou, H., Zhou, X., Abareshi, B., Abbott, T.M.C., Abolfathi, B.,...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  33. [36]

    The Journal of Open Source Software5(56), 2308 (2020) https://doi

    Prochaska, J., Hennawi, J., Westfall, K., Cooke, R., Wang, F., Hsyu, T., Davies, F., Farina, E., Pelliccia, D.: PypeIt: The Python Spectroscopic Data Reduction Pipeline. The Journal of Open Source Software5(56), 2308 (2020) https://doi. org/10.21105/joss.02308 arXiv:2005.06505 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  34. [37]

    Spectral population synthesis through genetic optimization under self-consistency boundary conditions

    Gomes, J.M., Papaderos, P.: Fitting Analysis using Differential evolution Opti- mization (F ADO):. Spectral population synthesis through genetic optimization under self-consistency boundary conditions. Astron. Astrophys.603, 63 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628986 arXiv:1704.03922 [astro-ph.GA] 28

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  35. [39]

    Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., White, S.D.M., Tremonti, C., Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T., Brinkmann, J.: The physical properties of star-forming galaxies in the low-redshift Universe. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 351(4), 1151–1179 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07881.x https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/351/4/1151...

    arXiv 2004

  36. [40]

    The Astrophysical Journal613(2), 898–913 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1086/423264

    Tremonti, C.A., Heckman, T.M., Kauffmann, G., Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., White, S.D.M., Seibert, M., Peng, E.W., Schlegel, D.J., Uomoto, A., Fukugita, M., Brinkmann, J.: The origin of the mass-metallicity relation: Insights from 53,000 star-forming galaxies in the sloan digital sky survey. The Astrophysical Journal613(2), 898–913 (2004) https://doi.org/...

    doi:10.1086/423264 2004

  37. [41]

    In: Starck, J.-L., Murtagh, F.D

    Freeman, P., Doe, S., Siemiginowska, A.: Sherpa: a mission-independent data analysis application. In: Starck, J.-L., Murtagh, F.D. (eds.) Astronomical Data Analysis. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Confer- ence Series, vol. 4477, pp. 76–87 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.447161

    doi:10.1117/12.447161 2001

  38. [42]

    In: Varoquaux, G., Walt, S., Millman, J

    Refsdal, B.L., Doe, S.M., Nguyen, D.T., Siemiginowska, A.L., Bonaventura, N.R., Burke, D., Evans, I.N., Evans, J.D., Fruscione, A., Galle, E.C., Houck, J.C., Karovska, M., Lee, N.P., Nowak, M.A.: Sherpa: 1d/2d modeling and fit- ting in python. In: Varoquaux, G., Walt, S., Millman, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th Python in Science Conference. http://confe...

    2009

  39. [43]

    Astrophys

    Freeman, P.E., Kashyap, V., Rosner, R., Lamb, D.Q.: A Wavelet-Based Algo- rithm for the Spatial Analysis of Poisson Data. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 138(1), 185–218 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1086/324017 arXiv:astro-ph/0108429 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  40. [44]

    Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences11, 29 1335459 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2024.1335459 arXiv:2311.04949 [astro-ph.HE]

    Boorman, P.G., Torres-Alb` a, N., Annuar, A., Marchesi, S., Pfeifle, R.W., Stern, D., Civano, F., Balokovi´ c, M., Buchner, J., Ricci, C., Alexander, D.M., Brandt, W.N., Brightman, M., Chen, C.T., Creech, S., Gandhi, P., Garc ´ ıa, J.A., Har- rison, F., Hickox, R., Kammoun, E., LaMassa, S., Lanzuisi, G., Marcotulli, L., Madsen, K., Matt, G., Matzeu, G., N...

    arXiv 2024

  41. [45]

    Wilman, R.J., Fabian, A.C.: Fitting the spectrum of the X-ray background: the effects ofhigh-metallicity absorption. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.309(4), 862–870 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02949.x arXiv:astro- ph/9907204 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 1999

  42. [46]

    X-ray data

    Brightman, M., Nandra, K.: An XMM-Newton spectral survey of 12µm selected galaxies - I. X-ray data. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.413(2), 1206– 1235 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18207.x arXiv:1012.3345 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2011

  43. [47]

    Ricci, C., Bauer, F.E., Treister, E., Schawinski, K., Privon, G.C., Blecha, L., Arevalo, P., Armus, L., Harrison, F., Ho, L.C., Iwasawa, K., Sanders, D.B., Stern, D.: Growing supermassive black holes in the late stages of galaxy mergers are heavily obscured. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.468(2), 1273–1299 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx173 arXiv:1701...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  44. [48]

    Blecha, L., Snyder, G.F., Satyapal, S., Ellison, S.L.: The power of infrared AGN selection in mergers: a theoretical study. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.478(3), 3056–3071 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1274 arXiv:1711.02094 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [49]

    AGN obscuration along the merger sequence

    Ricci, C., Privon, G.C., Pfeifle, R.W., Armus, L., Iwasawa, K., Torres-Alb` a, N., Satyapal, S., Bauer, F.E., Treister, E., Ho, L.C., Aalto, S., Ar´ evalo, P., Barcos- Mu˜ noz, L., Charmandaris, V., Diaz-Santos, T., Evans, A.S., Gao, T., Inami, H., Koss, M.J., Lansbury, G., Linden, S.T., Medling, A., Sanders, D.B., Song, Y., Stern, D., U, V., Ueda, Y., Ya...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  46. [50]

    Nature649(8097), 574–579 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09900-4 arXiv:2503.16595 [astro-ph.GA]

    Rusakov, V., Watson, D., Nikopoulos, G.P., Brammer, G., Gottumukkala, R., Harvey, T., Heintz, K.E., Damgaard, R., Sim, S.A., Sneppen, A., Vijayan, A.P., Adams, N., Austin, D., Conselice, C.J., Goolsby, C.M., Toft, S., Witstok, J.: Little red dots as young supermassive black holes in dense ionized cocoons. Nature649(8097), 574–579 (2026) https://doi.org/10...

    arXiv 2026

  47. [51]

    In: Jacoby, G.H., Barnes, J

    Arnaud, K.A.: XSPEC: The First Ten Years. In: Jacoby, G.H., Barnes, J. (eds.) Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, vol. 101, p. 17 (1996)

    1996

  48. [52]

    Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2101.014 (2021) 30

    Gordon, C., Arnaud, K.: PyXspec: Python interface to XSPEC spectral-fitting program. Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2101.014 (2021) 30

    2021

  49. [53]

    Astrophys

    Cash, W.: Parameter estimation in astronomy through application of the likelihood ratio. Astrophys. J.228, 939–947 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1086/ 156922

    1979

  50. [54]

    Buchner, J., Georgakakis, A., Nandra, K., Hsu, L., Rangel, C., Brightman, M., Merloni, A., Salvato, M., Donley, J., Kocevski, D.: X-ray spectral modelling of the AGN obscuring region in the CDFS: Bayesian model selection and cata- logue. Astron. Astrophys.564, 125 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/ 201322971 arXiv:1402.0004 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  51. [55]

    The Journal of Open Source Software6(60), 3001 (2021) https://doi.org/10

    Buchner, J.: UltraNest - a robust, general purpose Bayesian inference engine. The Journal of Open Source Software6(60), 3001 (2021) https://doi.org/10. 21105/joss.03001 arXiv:2101.09604 [stat.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  52. [57]

    The Open Journal of Astrophysics2(1), 10 (2019) https://doi.org/10.21105/astro.1306.2144 arXiv:1306.2144 [astro-ph.IM]

    Feroz, F., Hobson, M.P., Cameron, E., Pettitt, A.N.: Importance Nested Sam- pling and the MultiNest Algorithm. The Open Journal of Astrophysics2(1), 10 (2019) https://doi.org/10.21105/astro.1306.2144 arXiv:1306.2144 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  53. [58]

    The Open Journal of Astrophysics 7, 79 (2024) https://doi.org/10.33232/001c.123872 arXiv:2404.16928 [astro- ph.IM]

    Dittmann, A.: Notes on the Practical Application of Nested Sampling: Multi- Nest, (Non)convergence, and Rectification. The Open Journal of Astrophysics 7, 79 (2024) https://doi.org/10.33232/001c.123872 arXiv:2404.16928 [astro- ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  54. [59]

    Willingale, R., Starling, R.L.C., Beardmore, A.P., Tanvir, N.R., O’Brien, P.T.: Calibration of X-ray absorption in our Galaxy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 431(1), 394–404 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt175 arXiv:1303.0843 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  55. [60]

    Astrophys

    Wilms, J., Allen, A., McCray, R.: On the Absorption of X-Rays in the Interstellar Medium. Astrophys. J.542(2), 914–924 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1086/317016 arXiv:astro-ph/0008425 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  56. [61]

    In: Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, p

    Buchner, J., Boorman, P.: Statistical Aspects of X-ray Spectral Analysis. In: Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, p. 150 (2023). https://doi. org/10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0 175-1

    doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0 2023

  57. [62]

    Simmonds, C., Buchner, J., Salvato, M., Hsu, L.-T., Bauer, F.E.: XZ: Deriv- ing redshifts from X-ray spectra of obscured AGN. Astron. Astrophys.618, 66 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833412 arXiv:1807.01782 [astro- ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  58. [63]

    Ricci, C., Trakhtenbrot, B., Koss, M.J., Ueda, Y., Delvecchio, I., Treister, 31 E., Schawinski, K., Paltani, S., Oh, K., Lamperti, I., Berney, S., Gandhi, P., Ichikawa, K., Bauer, F.E., Ho, L.C., Asmus, D., Beckmann, V., Soldi, S., Balokovi´ c, M., Gehrels, N., Markwardt, C.B.: BAT AGN Spectroscopic Sur- vey. V. X-Ray Properties of the Swift/BAT 70-month ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  59. [64]

    Boorman, P.G., Gandhi, P., Buchner, J., Stern, D., Ricci, C., Balokovi´ c, M., Asmus, D., Harrison, F.A., Svoboda, J., Greenwell, C., Koss, M.J., Alexan- der, D.M., Annuar, A., Bauer, F.E., Brandt, W.N., Brightman, M., Civano, F., Chen, C.-T.J., Farrah, D., Forster, K., Grefenstette, B., H¨ onig, S.F., Hill, A.B., Kammoun, E., Lansbury, G., Lanz, L., LaMa...

    arXiv 2025

  60. [65]

    Wright, E.L., Eisenhardt, P.R.M., Mainzer, A.K., Ressler, M.E., Cutri, R.M., Jarrett, T., Kirkpatrick, J.D., Padgett, D., McMillan, R.S., Skrutskie, M., Stan- ford, S.A., Cohen, M., Walker, R.G., Mather, J.C., Leisawitz, D., Gautier, I. Thomas N., McLean, I., Benford, D., Lonsdale, C.J., Blain, A., Mendez, B., Irace, W.R., Duval, V., Liu, F., Royer, D., H...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  61. [66]

    Astrophys

    Jarrett, T.H., Cohen, M., Masci, F., Wright, E., Stern, D., Benford, D., Blain, A., Carey, S., Cutri, R.M., Eisenhardt, P., Lonsdale, C., Mainzer, A., Marsh, K., Padgett, D., Petty, S., Ressler, M., Skrutskie, M., Stanford, S., Surace, J., Tsai, C.W., Wheelock, S., Yan, D.L.: The Spitzer-WISE Survey of the Eclip- tic Poles. Astrophys. J.735(2), 112 (2011)...

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/ 2011

  62. [67]

    Stern, D., Assef, R.J., Benford, D.J., Blain, A., Cutri, R., Dey, A., Eisen- hardt, P., Griffith, R.L., Jarrett, T.H., Lake, S., Masci, F., Petty, S., Stanford, S.A., Tsai, C.-W., Wright, E.L., Yan, L., Harrison, F., Madsen, K.: Mid- infrared Selection of Active Galactic Nuclei with the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer. I. Characterizing WISE-selected ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  63. [69]

    Astrophys

    Satyapal, S., Abel, N.P., Secrest, N.J.: Star-forming Galaxies as AGN Imposters? A Theoretical Investigation of the Mid-infrared Colors of AGNs and Extreme Starbursts. Astrophys. J.858(1), 38 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ aab7f8 arXiv:1803.05980 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [70]

    Astrophys

    Hainline, K.N., Reines, A.E., Greene, J.E., Stern, D.: Mid-infrared Col- ors of Dwarf Galaxies: Young Starbursts Mimicking Active Galactic Nuclei. Astrophys. J.832(2), 119 (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/119 arXiv:1609.06721 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  65. [71]

    PASP93, 5–19 (1981) https:// doi.org/10.1086/130766

    Baldwin, J.A., Phillips, M.M., Terlevich, R.: Classification parameters for the emission-line spectra of extragalactic objects. PASP93, 5–19 (1981) https:// doi.org/10.1086/130766

    doi:10.1086/130766 1981

  66. [72]

    Astrophys

    Kewley, L.J., Dopita, M.A., Sutherland, R.S., Heisler, C.A., Trevena, J.: The- oretical Modeling of Starburst Galaxies. Astrophys. J.556(1), 121–140 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1086/321545 arXiv:astro-ph/0106324 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  67. [73]

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T.M., Tremonti, C., Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., White, S.D.M., Ridgway, S.E., Brinkmann, J., Fukugita, M., Hall, P.B., Ivezi´ c, ˇZ., Richards, G.T., Schneider, D.P.: The host galaxies of active galactic nuclei. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.346(4), 1055–1077 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1365-2966.2003.07154.x arXiv:astro-ph/03042...

    arXiv 2003

  68. [75]

    Groves, B.A., Heckman, T.M., Kauffmann, G.: Emission-line diagnos- tics of low-metallicity active galactic nuclei. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 371(4), 1559–1569 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10812.x arXiv:astro-ph/0607311 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2006

  69. [76]

    Mazzalay, X., Rodr ´ ıguez-Ardila, A., Komossa, S.: Demystifying the coronal-line region of active galactic nuclei: spatially resolved spectroscopy with the Hubble Space Telescope. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.405(2), 1315–1338 (2010) https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16533.x arXiv:1002.3152 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2010

  70. [77]

    J.976(1), 130 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad7a79 arXiv:2408.15229 [astro-ph.GA] 33

    McKaig, J.D., Satyapal, S., Laor, A., Abel, N.P., Doan, S.M., Ricci, C., Cann, J.M.: Why Are Optical Coronal Lines Faint in Active Galactic Nuclei? Astrophys. J.976(1), 130 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad7a79 arXiv:2408.15229 [astro-ph.GA] 33

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  71. [78]

    Astrophys

    Greene, J.E., Ho, L.C.: Estimating Black Hole Masses in Active Galaxies Using the HαEmission Line. Astrophys. J.630(1), 122–129 (2005) https://doi.org/ 10.1086/431897 arXiv:astro-ph/0508335 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  72. [79]

    Astrophys

    Greene, J.E., Ho, L.C.: A New Sample of Low-Mass Black Holes in Active Galaxies. Astrophys. J.670(1), 92–104 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1086/522082 arXiv:0707.2617 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  73. [80]

    Astrophys

    Reines, A.E., Greene, J.E., Geha, M.: Dwarf Galaxies with Optical Signatures of Active Massive Black Holes. Astrophys. J.775(2), 116 (2013) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/116 arXiv:1308.0328 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  74. [82]

    Lu, K.-X., Zhao, Y., Bai, J.-M., Fan, X.-L.: Reddening of the BLR and NLR in AGNs from a systematic analysis of Balmer decrement. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.483(2), 1722–1730 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty3229 arXiv:1811.11063 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  75. [83]

    Astrophys

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R.C., Kinney, A.L., Koornneef, J., Storchi- Bergmann, T.: The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-forming Galaxies. Astrophys. J.533(2), 682–695 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1086/308692 arXiv:astro-ph/9911459 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  76. [84]

    Gaskell, C.M.: The case for cases B and C: intrinsic hydrogen line ratios of the broad-line region of active galactic nuclei, reddenings, and accretion disc sizes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.467(1), 226–238 (2017) https://doi.org/10. 1093/mnras/stx094 arXiv:1512.09291 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  77. [85]

    ARA&A51(1), 511–653 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-astro-082708-101811 arXiv:1304.7762 [astro-ph.CO]

    Kormendy, J., Ho, L.C.: Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies. ARA&A51(1), 511–653 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-astro-082708-101811 arXiv:1304.7762 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  78. [86]

    Astrophys

    Stickley, N.R., Canalizo, G.: Stellar Velocity Dispersion in Dissipative Galaxy Mergers with Star Formation. Astrophys. J.786(1), 12 (2014) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/12 arXiv:1310.6827 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  79. [87]

    Vasudevan, R.V., Fabian, A.C.: Piecing together the X-ray background: bolomet- ric corrections for active galactic nuclei. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.381(3), 1235– 1251 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12328.x arXiv:0708.4308 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2007

  80. [88]

    Vasudevan, R.V., Fabian, A.C.: Simultaneous X-ray/optical/UV snapshots of active galactic nuclei from XMM-Newton: spectral energy distributions for 34 the reverberation mapped sample. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.392(3), 1124– 1140 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14108.x arXiv:0810.3777 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2009

Showing first 80 references.