Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoising

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1805.06530 v2 pith:LH7OU644 submitted 2018-05-16 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords gaussianmechanismanalysisprivacyregimevarianceanalyticalcalibration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The Gaussian mechanism is an essential building block used in multitude of differentially private data analysis algorithms. In this paper we revisit the Gaussian mechanism and show that the original analysis has several important limitations. Our analysis reveals that the variance formula for the original mechanism is far from tight in the high privacy regime ($\varepsilon \to 0$) and it cannot be extended to the low privacy regime ($\varepsilon \to \infty$). We address these limitations by developing an optimal Gaussian mechanism whose variance is calibrated directly using the Gaussian cumulative density function instead of a tail bound approximation. We also propose to equip the Gaussian mechanism with a post-processing step based on adaptive estimation techniques by leveraging that the distribution of the perturbation is known. Our experiments show that analytical calibration removes at least a third of the variance of the noise compared to the classical Gaussian mechanism, and that denoising dramatically improves the accuracy of the Gaussian mechanism in the high-dimensional regime.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. What is the Cost of Differential Privacy for Deep Learning-Based Trajectory Generation?

    cs.CR 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    DP-SGD causes large utility loss in deep trajectory generation, a new DP mechanism for conditional inputs helps stabilize GANs, and GANs overtake diffusion models when formal privacy is required.

Pith tools