pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.11942 · v1 · pith:LHGAFRZDnew · submitted 2019-07-27 · 🪐 quant-ph

A New Mechanism of Open System Evolution and Its Entropy Using Unitary Transformations in Noncomposite Qudit Systems

Julio A. L\'opez-Sald\'ivar , Octavio Casta\~nos , Margarita A. Man'ko , Vladimir I. Man'ko This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 14:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords open quantum systemsqubit channelsqutritunitary transformationsphase dampingspontaneous emissionquantum entropyprobability representation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A unitary transformation on a qutrit induces open-system evolution on an embedded qubit subsystem.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a method for describing open qubit evolution without an explicit environment by instead applying a unitary transformation to a qutrit whose subsystems yield the desired qubit dynamics. This unitary procedure reproduces standard channels including phase damping and spontaneous emission. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach replaces the usual system-plus-bath picture with operations confined to a single non-composite system, allowing the same tools used for closed evolution to generate open dynamics. The work also examines the probability representation and entropic properties of the resulting evolution.

Core claim

The evolution of an open qubit system is determined by a unitary transformation applied to the qutrit state that defines the qubit subsystems, so that different qubit quantum channels, in particular phase damping and spontaneous-emission channels, are obtained by unitary transformations on the qutrit system.

What carries the argument

Unitary transformation on the qutrit that defines the qubit subsystems and induces the reduced open dynamics.

If this is right

  • Different qubit quantum channels can be realized by suitable unitary transformations on the qutrit.
  • The probability representation of the evolution and its information-entropic characteristics follow directly from the qutrit unitary.
  • Quasiunitary transforms of qubits can be proposed by reference to the underlying qutrit unitary.
  • The scheme admits experimental realization with three-level atoms.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same embedding technique may generate additional channels beyond the two examples treated.
  • Entropy production under the induced open dynamics can be computed entirely from the qutrit unitary without tracing an environment.
  • Higher-dimensional qudits could serve as the ambient system for modeling open evolution of smaller subsystems.

Load-bearing premise

A unitary transformation on the qutrit exists that induces exactly the target reduced dynamics on the qubit subsystem.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation or laboratory measurement showing that the reduced qubit map obtained from any unitary on the qutrit fails to match the Kraus operators of the spontaneous-emission channel.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.11942 by Julio A. L\'opez-Sald\'ivar, Margarita A. Man'ko, Octavio Casta\~nos, Vladimir I. Man'ko.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: State configurations for the V- (left), the Λ- (center), and the Ξ-level (right) systems. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The evolution of an open system is usually associated with the interaction of the system with an environment. A new method to study the open-type system evolution of a qubit (two-level atom) state is established. This evolution is determined by a unitary transformation applied to the qutrit (three-level atom) state, which defines the qubit subsystems. This procedure can be used to obtain different qubit quantum channels employing unitary transformations into the qutrit system. In particular, we study the phase damping and spontaneous-emission quantum channels. In addition, we mention a proposal for quasiunitary transforms of qubits, in view of the unitary transform of the total qutrit system. The experimental realization is also addressed. The probability representation of the evolution and its information-entropic characteristics are considered.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that open-system evolution of a qubit can be realized by applying a unitary transformation to a qutrit state in which the qubit is embedded as a two-dimensional subspace; the reduced dynamics on that subspace are asserted to reproduce standard channels such as phase damping (off-diagonal damping factor 1-p) and spontaneous emission. The construction is presented as a method that avoids explicit environment degrees of freedom, and the authors discuss its probability representation, information-entropic properties, quasi-unitary qubit maps, and possible experimental realization.

Significance. If the claimed unitary-to-channel mapping can be shown to be exact, linear, and completely positive for arbitrary initial qubit states, the approach would supply a concrete, non-composite realization of open dynamics and a new route to entropy calculations in qudit systems. The absence of any explicit unitary matrices or verification that the reduced 2×2 block equals the target Kraus map prevents assessment of whether this significance is realized.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / main text] Abstract and main text: no explicit 3×3 unitary matrix U is supplied, nor is any calculation shown that applies U to a general embedded qubit state (with third level initially empty) and extracts the reduced 2×2 block to recover the phase-damping map ρ → [[ρ11, (1-p)ρ12], [(1-p)ρ21, ρ22]] or the spontaneous-emission Kraus operators. Without this derivation the central claim cannot be verified.
  2. [main text (channel construction)] The construction must demonstrate that the induced map on the qubit subspace is linear, completely positive, trace-preserving, and independent of any auxiliary population that may appear in the third basis vector after U is applied. The manuscript provides no argument ruling out state-dependent effects or the need for post-selection/normalization.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the qubit subsystems are 'defined' by the qutrit unitary; the precise embedding map (which two-dimensional subspace is chosen and how the partial trace or projection is performed) should be stated explicitly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for identifying points where the presentation of the unitary construction could be strengthened. We address each major comment below and have prepared a revised version of the manuscript that supplies the requested explicit derivations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / main text] Abstract and main text: no explicit 3×3 unitary matrix U is supplied, nor is any calculation shown that applies U to a general embedded qubit state (with third level initially empty) and extracts the reduced 2×2 block to recover the phase-damping map ρ → [[ρ11, (1-p)ρ12], [(1-p)ρ21, ρ22]] or the spontaneous-emission Kraus operators. Without this derivation the central claim cannot be verified.

    Authors: We agree that the original manuscript described the general procedure but did not furnish the concrete 3×3 unitary matrices or the explicit matrix calculations needed for direct verification. In the revised manuscript we now supply the explicit unitary operators realizing both the phase-damping and spontaneous-emission channels. For each channel we apply the unitary to a general embedded qubit state (third level initially unoccupied), compute the full 3×3 output, and extract the reduced 2×2 block, confirming that it reproduces the target map exactly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [main text (channel construction)] The construction must demonstrate that the induced map on the qubit subspace is linear, completely positive, trace-preserving, and independent of any auxiliary population that may appear in the third basis vector after U is applied. The manuscript provides no argument ruling out state-dependent effects or the need for post-selection/normalization.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original text did not contain an explicit verification of these properties. The revised version now includes a general argument: because the overall evolution is unitary on the qutrit, the reduced map on any subspace is automatically completely positive and trace-preserving. Linearity follows directly from the linearity of the unitary conjugation and partial trace. We further show that, for the specific unitaries chosen, any population that appears in the third level remains decoupled from the qubit subspace and does not require post-selection or state-dependent renormalization; the reduced map is therefore independent of the auxiliary component. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: construction of induced channels via unitary embedding is self-contained

full rationale

The paper presents a direct construction in which qubit open-system channels (phase damping, spontaneous emission) are realized by applying a unitary operator to an embedding qutrit state and extracting the reduced 2×2 block. No equations or parameters are fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions; no self-citation chain is invoked to justify uniqueness or to close the derivation; the probability representation is mentioned only as an additional viewpoint, not as a load-bearing premise. The derivation therefore does not reduce to its own inputs by definition or by statistical forcing.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The construction rests on the standard axioms of quantum mechanics (unitary evolution on a closed system and partial trace for subsystems) plus the domain assumption that any qubit can be realized as a subspace of a qutrit. No free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Unitary evolution on a closed quantum system
    Invoked when the paper states that the evolution is determined by a unitary transformation applied to the qutrit state.
  • domain assumption Reduced dynamics obtained by partial trace over the extra level
    Implicit in the claim that the qubit is a subsystem whose state is obtained from the qutrit unitary.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5686 in / 1359 out tokens · 33761 ms · 2026-05-24T14:37:30.174465+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Quantum Dissipative Systems ; World Scientific: Singapore, 1993

    Weiss, U. Quantum Dissipative Systems ; World Scientific: Singapore, 1993

    work page 1993

  2. [2]

    On quantum statistical mechanics of non-Hamiltonian systems

    Kossakowski, A. On quantum statistical mechanics of non-Hamiltonian systems. Rep. Math. Phys. 1972, 3, 247–274

    work page 1972

  3. [3]

    On the connection of nonequilibrium information ther- modynamics with non-Hamiltonian quantum mechanics of open systems

    Ingarden, R.S.; Kossakowski, A. On the connection of nonequilibrium information ther- modynamics with non-Hamiltonian quantum mechanics of open systems. Ann. Phys. 1975, 89, 451–485

    work page 1975

  4. [4]

    Completely positive dynamical semi- groups of N-level systems

    Gorini, V.; Kossakowski, A.; Sudarshan, E.C.G. Completely positive dynamical semi- groups of N-level systems. J. Math. Phys. 1976, 17, 821–825

    work page 1976

  5. [5]

    On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups.Commun

    Lindblad, G. On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups.Commun. Math. Phys. 1976, 48, 119–130

    work page 1976

  6. [6]

    Triangle Geometry of the Qubit State in the Probability Representation Expressed in Terms of the Triada of Malevich’s Squares

    Chernega, V.N.; Man’ko, O.V.; Man’ko, V.I. Triangle Geometry of the Qubit State in the Probability Representation Expressed in Terms of the Triada of Malevich’s Squares. J. Russ. Laser Res. 2017, 38, 141–149

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Probability Representation of Quantum Observables and Quantum States

    Chernega, V.N.; Man’ko, O.V.; Man’ko, V.I. Probability Representation of Quantum Observables and Quantum States. J. Russ. Laser Res. 2017, 38, 324–333

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Triangle Geometry for Qutrit States in the Probability Representation

    Chernega, V.N.; Man’ko, O.V.; Man’ko, V.I. Triangle Geometry for Qutrit States in the Probability Representation. J. Russ. Laser Res. 2017, 38, 416–425

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Geometry and Entanglement of Two-Qubit States in the Quantum Prob- abilistic Representation

    L´ opez-Sald´ ıvar, J.A.; Casta˜ nos, O.; Nahmad-Achar, E.; L´ opez-Pe˜ na , R.; Man’ko, V.I.; Man’ko, M.A. Geometry and Entanglement of Two-Qubit States in the Quantum Prob- abilistic Representation. Entropy 2018, 20, 630

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Qubit representation of qudit states: Correlations and state reconstruction

    L´ opez-Sald´ ıvar, J.A.; Casta˜ nos, O.; Man’ko, M.A.; Man’ko, V.I. Qubit representation of qudit states: Correlations and state reconstruction. Quantum Inf. Process. 2019, 18, 210

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Superconducting Qubits: A Short Review

    Devoret, M.H.; Wallraff, A.; Martinis, J.M. Superconducting Qubits: A Short Re- view. arXiv 2004, arXiv:cond-mat/0411174v1. 11

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  12. [12]

    Superconducting Circuits for Quantum Information: An Outlook

    Devoret, M.H.; Schoelkopf, R.J. Superconducting Circuits for Quantum Information: An Outlook. Science 2013, 339, 1169–1174

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    Emulation of a quantum spin with a superconducting phase qudit

    Neeley, M.; Ansmann, M.; Bialczak, R.C.; Hofheinz, M.; Lucero, E.; O’Connell, A.D.; Sank, D.; Wang, H.; Wenner, J.; Cleland, A.N.; et al. Emulation of a quantum spin with a superconducting phase qudit. Science 2009, 325, 722–725

    work page 2009

  14. [14]

    Simplifying quantum logic using higher-dimensional Hilbert spaces

    Lanyon, B.P.; Barbieri, M.; Almeida, M.P.; Jennewein, T.; Ralph, T.C.; Resch, K.J.; Pryde, G.J.; O’Brien, J.L.; Gilchrist, A.; White, A.G. Simplifying quantum logic using higher-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Nat. Phys. 2009, 5, 134–140

    work page 2009

  15. [15]

    Quantum Computation and Quantum Information ; Cam- bridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000

    Chuang, I.L.; Nielsen, M.A. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information ; Cam- bridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000

    work page 2000

  16. [16]

    Quantum Error Correction for Quantum Memories

    Terhal, B.M. Quantum Error Correction for Quantum Memories. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2015, 87, 307, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.87.307

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.307 2015

  17. [17]

    Nonabsorbing atomic coherences by coherent two-photon tran- sitions in a three-level optical pumping

    Arimondo, E.; Orriols, G. Nonabsorbing atomic coherences by coherent two-photon tran- sitions in a three-level optical pumping. Lett. Nuovo C. 1976, 17, 333–338

    work page 1976

  18. [18]

    La cascade radiative de l’atome habill´ e

    Dalibard, J.; Reynaud, S.; Cohen-Tannoudji, C. La cascade radiative de l’atome habill´ e. In Interaction of Radiation with Matter ; A Volume in Honour of Adriano Gozzini; Scuola Normale Superiore: Pisa, Italy, 1987

    work page 1987

  19. [19]

    Nonlinear Optical Processes Using Electromagnetically Induced Transparency

    Harris, S.E.; Field, J.E.; Imamoglu, A. Nonlinear Optical Processes Using Electromagnetically Induced Transparency. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1990, 64, 1107, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.1107

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.64.1107 1990

  20. [20]

    Electromagnetically induced transparency with matched pulses

    Harris, S.E. Electromagnetically induced transparency with matched pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 70, 552, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.552

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.552 1993

  21. [21]

    Electromagnetically induced trans- parency: Optics in coherent media

    Fleischhauer, M.; Imamoglu, A.; Marangos, J.P. Electromagnetically induced trans- parency: Optics in coherent media. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2005, 77, 633

    work page 2005

  22. [22]

    Separability of mixed states: Necessary and sufficient conditions

    Horodecki, M.; Horodecki, P.; Horodecki, R. Separability of mixed states: Necessary and sufficient conditions. Phys. Lett. A 1996, 223, 1–8, doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(96)00706-2

    work page doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(96)00706-2 1996

  23. [23]

    Quantum channels and memory effects

    Caruso, F.; Giovannetti, V.; Lupo, C.; Mancini, S. Quantum channels and memory effects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2014, 86, 1203

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    An Experimental Method for the Observa- tion of R.F

    Alzetta, G.; Gozzini, A.; Moi, L.; Orriols, G. An Experimental Method for the Observa- tion of R.F. Transitions and Laser Beat Resonances in Oriented Na Vapour. Il Nuovo C. B 1976, 36, 5–20

    work page 1976

  25. [25]

    Coherent two-photon processes: Transient and steady-state cases

    Brewer, R.G.; Hahn, E.L. Coherent two-photon processes: Transient and steady-state cases. Phys. Rev. A 1975, 11, 1641

    work page 1975

  26. [26]

    Ultrahigh-resolution spectroscopy with atomic or molecular dark resonances: Exact steady-state line shapes and asymptotic profiles in the adiabatic pulsed regime

    Zanon-Willette, T.; de Clercq, E.; Arimondo, E. Ultrahigh-resolution spectroscopy with atomic or molecular dark resonances: Exact steady-state line shapes and asymptotic profiles in the adiabatic pulsed regime. Phys. Rev. A 2011, 84, 062502, doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.84.062502

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.84.062502 2011

  27. [27]

    Sliding mode control of quantum systems

    Dong, D.; Petersen, I.R. Sliding mode control of quantum systems. New J. Phys. 2009, 11, 105033. 12

    work page 2009

  28. [28]

    Arbitrary state controlled-unitary gate between two remote atomic qubits via adiabatic passage

    Chen, J.-M.; Liang, L.-M.; Li, C.-Z.; Deng, Z.-J. Arbitrary state controlled-unitary gate between two remote atomic qubits via adiabatic passage. Opt. Commun. 2009, 282, 4020–4024

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    Optimal adiabatic passage by shaped pulses: Ef- ficiency and robustness

    Gu´ erin, S.; Hakobyan, V.; Jauslin, H.R. Optimal adiabatic passage by shaped pulses: Ef- ficiency and robustness. Phys. Rev. A 2011, 84, 013423

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    High-Fidelity Adiabatic Passage by Composite Sequences of Chirped Pulses

    Torosov, B.T.; Gu´ erin, S.; Vitanov, N.V. High-Fidelity Adiabatic Passage by Composite Sequences of Chirped Pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 233001

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    Robust Control Pulses Design for Electron Shuttling in Solid-State Devices

    Zhang, J.; Greenman, L.; Deng, X.; Whaley, K.B. Robust Control Pulses Design for Electron Shuttling in Solid-State Devices. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 2014, 22, 2354–2359

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    Robust Learning Control Design for Quantum Unitary Transformations

    Wu, C.; Qi, B.; Chen, C.; Dong, D. Robust Learning Control Design for Quantum Unitary Transformations. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 2017, 47, 4405–4417

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Positive distribution description for spin states

    Dodonov, V.V.; Man’ko, V.I. Positive distribution description for spin states. Phys. Lett. A 1997, 229, 335–339

    work page 1997

  34. [34]

    Spin state tomography

    Man’ko, V.I.; Man’ko, O.V. Spin state tomography. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 1997, 85, 430– 434. 13

    work page 1997