Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 59 references

A peeling-and-t-cover method determines the largest cross t-intersecting set families and their t-diversity for large n.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 03:19 UTC pith:LI3X4B4C

load-bearing objection Solid combinatorial paper that actually delivers the natural t≥2 max-min, product, and diversity extensions of the classical Hilton–Milner / Mörs–Füredi / Frankl results, with a usable fingerprint+t-cover method and explicit (if quadratic) n-thresholds.

arxiv 2607.03315 v1 pith:LI3X4B4C submitted 2026-07-03 math.CO

A unified approach to cross-intersection problems with applications to Hilton--Milner type theorems and stability

Jie Wen , Benjian Lv This is my paper
classification math.CO MSC 05D05
keywords cross t-intersecting familiesHilton–Milner theoremt-diversityfingerprint iterationt-cover methodspread approximationErdős–Ko–Radostability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper supplies a single iterative procedure that turns any pair of cross t-intersecting families into a short sequence of "fingerprints" (minimal t-covers). Those fingerprints feed classical t-cover estimates and immediately yield sharp upper bounds on both the min-size and the product of sizes of the original families, once n is large enough relative to k and t. The same machinery produces a stability theory measured by a new parameter called t-diversity: the number of sets that avoid the most popular t-set. As corollaries one recovers Hilton–Milner-type theorems for every t≥2, an improved product version of the Hilton–Milner theorem, and a large-n form of a stability conjecture of Ellis–Keller–Lifshitz. The method also works for any ambient family that is sufficiently "spread," giving product Erdős–Ko–Rado theorems for signed sets and for partitions.

Core claim

For k≥t+2≥4 and n larger than a quadratic threshold in k and t, every pair of cross t-intersecting k-uniform families with no common t-set satisfies min{|F|,|G|}≤ max{|A(n,k,t)|,|H(n,k,t)|}, with equality only for the classical Hilton–Milner pairs or the Ahlswede–Khachatrian family A(Z). Parallel statements hold for the product |F||G| and for the new t-diversity measure.

What carries the argument

The fingerprint iteration: starting from a maximal cross t-intersecting pair, one repeatedly replaces each family by a fingerprint of its minimal t-covers of successive sizes; the resulting layers are small by spread estimates, and the terminal fingerprint is simple enough that classical t-cover degree bounds finish the proof.

Load-bearing premise

All main theorems need n to grow at least quadratically with k (or linearly in (k-t) times a polynomial in t); the degree bounds fail once n drops below roughly (k-t)^{2}.

What would settle it

Exhibit, for some fixed t≥2 and infinitely many k, a pair of cross t-intersecting k-uniform families on n=O(kt) elements whose min-size strictly exceeds both |A(n,k,t)| and |H(n,k,t)|.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a unified combinatorial framework for cross t-intersecting families, combining an iterative fingerprint algorithm (inspired by Kupavskii–Zakharov peeling) with the t-cover method. For k-subsets of [n] it proves, under explicit quadratic n-thresholds, a max-min theorem (Thm 1.5) generalizing Mörs–Füredi, a product Hilton–Milner theorem with equality characterization that improves Frankl–Wang (Thm 1.7), and several t-diversity stability results (Thms 1.10, 1.12, 1.14), the last of which gives a large-n form of a conjecture of Ellis–Keller–Lifshitz and a t-analogue of Frankl’s degree theorem. A product EKR statement for weakly (r,t)-spread families (Thm 1.3) is also obtained and applied to signed sets and k-partitions.

Significance. The work supplies the first systematic treatment of cross t-intersecting problems for t≥2 that yields both extremal sizes and structural characterizations, together with a natural t-diversity parameter that unifies several stability statements. The fingerprint algorithm is flexible enough to recover classical Hilton–Milner theorems as special cases and to produce new product and diversity results under fully explicit n-conditions. The proofs are self-contained combinatorial arguments; all binomial inequalities are derived rather than black-boxed, and equality cases are completely classified. The quadratic n-thresholds are a genuine limitation (already noted by the authors in §5.2), but they do not undermine the correctness of the theorems as stated.

minor comments (5)
  1. The n-thresholds appearing in Theorems 1.5, 1.7, 1.10 and 1.12 (the constants 30, 15, 18, 7, 10, …) are obtained by successive crude estimates; a short remark collecting the precise places where each constant is forced would help the reader track possible improvements.
  2. In the statement of Conjecture 1 the authors already note a minor slip in the printed formulation of Ellis–Keller–Lifshitz; it would be cleaner to restate the corrected form once and then refer only to that version.
  3. Lemma 3.5 lists three concrete pairs of 2-uniform families; a one-line verification that these pairs are indeed cross t-intersecting antichains of minimal t-covers would make the subsequent case analysis easier to follow.
  4. The applications in §5.1 (signed sets, k-partitions) are short and correct, but the precise range of q or n for which the classical EKR thresholds are improved could be highlighted more explicitly.
  5. A few typographical inconsistencies appear (e.g., “crosst-intersecting” versus “cross t-intersecting”, occasional missing spaces around “t-cover”). These are purely cosmetic.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: pure combinatorial derivation from definitions of cross t-intersection, maximality and the fingerprint algorithm; extremal constructions are exhibited independently and proved optimal under explicit n-thresholds.

full rationale

The paper develops an iterative fingerprint algorithm (Section 2) that produces sequences of minimal t-covers from a maximal cross t-intersecting pair, then applies elementary union bounds, binomial estimates (Lemmas 3.1–3.2) and the classical t-cover degree bound (Lemma 3.3) to control the sizes of successive layers. All main theorems (1.5, 1.7, 1.10, 1.12, 1.14) are proved by exhaustive case analysis on the termination index N of the algorithm, comparing the resulting size or diversity bounds against the independently defined constructions A(Z), H(X,K,L) and L(X,U,V). Equality cases are characterized by forcing the fingerprints to coincide with those of the constructions. No parameter is fitted to data; no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors’ prior work as a hidden premise; the self-citations (to their earlier t-cover paper on partitions) appear only as applications of the new Theorem 1.3. The quadratic n-thresholds are explicit hypotheses of the statements and are used transparently in the estimates; they do not create a definitional loop. The derivation is therefore self-contained and non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 4 axioms · 2 invented entities

The paper is pure extremal combinatorics. It rests on standard binomial arithmetic, the classical EKR theorem (cited), maximality of cross-intersecting pairs, and the definition of weak (r,t)-spreadness. No empirical free parameters appear; the numerical thresholds on n are proof artifacts chosen so that certain geometric series and AM-GM comparisons close. The only invented notions are the fingerprint algorithm and t-diversity, both defined explicitly and used only inside the paper’s own arguments.

free parameters (1)
  • n-threshold constants (30, 15, 18, 7, 10, …) = e.g. 30, 15, 18, 7, 10
    Numerical factors such as 30(t+2), 15(t+2)², 7(k−t+1)k² are chosen by hand so that the estimates δ≤0.3(t+1), f(j)<(1−ε)², etc., hold; they are not forced by a uniqueness theorem and could in principle be improved.
axioms (4)
  • standard math Classical Erdős–Ko–Rado theorem (Theorem 1.1) and Hilton–Milner / Ahlswede–Khachatrian non-trivial intersection theorems for the comparison constructions A and H.
    Invoked as background size benchmarks; proofs of the new theorems do not re-derive EKR.
  • domain assumption A pair of cross t-intersecting families may be enlarged to a maximal pair without decreasing sizes or t-diversities.
    Used throughout Sections 3–4 to justify starting the algorithm from (M(G),M(F)).
  • domain assumption Weak (r,t)-spreadness of the ambient family implies the degree bounds needed for the product EKR (Theorem 1.3).
    Definition taken from Kupavskii; verified for signed sets and k-partitions in Section 5.
  • ad hoc to paper Lemma 3.3 (t-cover size bound) holds whenever n≥(k−t+1)(ℓ−t+1)+t.
    Proved in the paper but is the bottleneck that forces quadratic n; if the lemma could be sharpened the main n-thresholds would improve.
invented entities (2)
  • fingerprint of a cross t-intersecting pair no independent evidence
    purpose: Canonical pair of minimal t-covers that seeds the iterative peeling algorithm and encodes structural information.
    Defined in Lemma 2.2; no external independent evidence required because it is a purely combinatorial construction.
  • t-diversity γ_t(F) no independent evidence
    purpose: Quantitative distance from a family to the nearest full t-star; used for stability statements.
    Natural generalization of ordinary diversity (t=1); defined and studied only inside this paper.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 54993 in / 3285 out tokens · 30839 ms · 2026-07-12T03:19:37.836338+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A unified approach to cross-intersection problems with applications to Hilton--Milner type theorems and stability." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LI3X4B4C

@misc{pith2026260703315,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A unified approach to cross-intersection problems with applications to Hilton--Milner type theorems and stability},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LI3X4B4C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.03315}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We develop a new approach to cross-intersection problems in extremal set theory. The method builds on the iterative procedure introduced by Kupavskii and Zakharov (2024) and the $t$-cover method. It provides a flexible framework for deriving extremal and stability results for cross $t$-intersecting families. Our approach applies to a variety of combinatorial objects. As an application, we prove a product version of the seminal Erd\H{o}s--Ko--Rado theorem for sufficiently spread set systems. Two families $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{G}$ of $k$-subsets of $[n]$ are called cross $t$-intersecting if $|F\cap G|\geq t$ for all $F\in\mathcal{F}$ and $G\in\mathcal{G}$. We determine the families maximizing $\min\{|\mathcal{F}|, |\mathcal{G}|\}$ for large $n$ and all $t\ge2$, generalizing results of M\"{o}rs (1985) and F\"{u}redi (1995) for cross $1$-intersecting families. We then determine the families maximizing $|\mathcal{F}||\mathcal{G}|$ under the condition $\max\{|\cap_{F\in\mathcal{F}}F|,|\cap_{G\in\mathcal{G}}G|\}<t$ for large $n$. This improves the bound obtained by Frankl and Wang (2024), and provides a characterization of extremal configurations. For a family $\mathcal{F}$ of subsets of $[n]$, we introduce its $t$-diversity $\gamma_t(\mathcal{F})$, defined as the minimum number of sets from $\mathcal{F}$ not containing a fixed $t$-subset. This serves as a natural generalization of the important notion of diversity for $t=1$. We obtain a stability result via $\gamma_t$, and determine the maximum of $\min\{\gamma_t(\mathcal{F}),\gamma_t(\mathcal{G})\}$ for cross $t$-intersecting families $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{G}$. These yield new results for $t$-intersecting families, including a stability theorem towards a conjecture of Ellis, Keller and Lifshitz (2019), which may also be regarded as a $t$-intersection version, for large $n$, of an influential theorem of Frankl (1987).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03315 by Benjian Lv, Jie Wen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The first round of the algorithm for the families in (2.2)–(2.4). The following lemma records the basic properties of the output of the algorithm. It gives a decomposition of the input families into successive layers and a terminal fingerprint, together with estimates on the sizes of these layers. These properties serve as an important ingredient in our approach. Lemma 2.3. The following hold for i = 0, 1,… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 6 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Ahlswede and L.H

    R. Ahlswede and L.H. Khachatrian, The complete nontrivial-intersection theorem for sys- tems of finite sets, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 76 (1996) 121–138

    1996

  2. [2]

    Ahlswede and L.H

    R. Ahlswede and L.H. Khachatrian, The complete intersection theorem for systems of finite sets, European J. Combin. 18 (1997) 125–136

    1997

  3. [3]

    Alweiss, S

    R. Alweiss, S. Lovett, K. Wu, J. Zhang, Improved bounds for the sunflower lemma, Ann. of Math. 194 (3) (2021) 795–815

    2021

  4. [4]

    Balogh and D

    J. Balogh and D. Mubayi, A new short proof of a theorem of Ahlswede and Khachatrian, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 115 (2008) 326–330

    2008

  5. [5]

    Blokhuis, A

    A. Blokhuis, A. Brouwer, A. Chowdhury, P. Frankl, T. Mussche, B. Patk´ os and T. Sz˝ onyi, A Hilton–Milner theorem for vector spaces, Electron. J. Combin. 17 (2010) #R71

    2010

  6. [6]

    Bollob´ as and I

    B. Bollob´ as and I. Leader, An Erd˝ os–Ko–Rado theorem for signed sets, Comput. Math. Appl. 34 (1997) 9–13

    1997

  7. [7]

    Borg, Ont-intersecting families of signed sets and permutations, Discrete Math

    P. Borg, Ont-intersecting families of signed sets and permutations, Discrete Math. 309 (2009) 3310–3317

    2009

  8. [8]

    Borg and I

    P. Borg and I. Leader, Multiple cross-intersecting families of signed sets, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 117 (2010) 583–588

    2010

  9. [9]

    M. Cao, B. Lv and K. Wang, The structure of large non-trivialt-intersecting families of finite sets, European J. Combin. 97 (2021) 103373

    2021

  10. [10]

    M. Cao, M. Lu, B. Lv and K. Wang, Nearly extremal non-trivial crosst-intersecting families andr-wiset-intersecting families, European J. Combin. 120 (2024) 103958

    2024

  11. [11]

    Deza and P

    M. Deza and P. Frankl, The Erd˝ os–Ko–Rado theorem–22 years later, SIAM J. Algebraic Discrete Methods 4 (1983) 419–431

    1983

  12. [12]

    Dinur and E

    I. Dinur and E. Friedgut, Intersecting families are essentially contained in juntas, Combin. Probab. Comput. 18 (2009) 107–122

    2009

  13. [13]

    Ellis, N

    A. Ellis, N. Keller and N. Lifshitz, Stability versions of Erd˝ os–Ko–Rado type theorems via isoperimetry, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 21 (2019) 3857–3902

    2019

  14. [14]

    Ellis, Intersection problems in extremal combinatorics: theorems, techniques and ques- tions old and new, in: Surveys in Combinatorics 2022, in: London Math

    D. Ellis, Intersection problems in extremal combinatorics: theorems, techniques and ques- tions old and new, in: Surveys in Combinatorics 2022, in: London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 481, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2022, pp. 115–173

    2022

  15. [15]

    Ellis, N

    D. Ellis, N. Keller and N. Lifshitz, Stability for the complete intersection theorem, and the forbidden intersection problem of Erd˝ os and S´ os, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 26 (2024) 1611–1654

    2024

  16. [16]

    Erd˝ os, C

    P. Erd˝ os, C. Ko and R. Rado, Intersection theorems for systems of finite sets, Quart. J. Math. Oxf. 2 (12) (1961) 313–320

    1961

  17. [17]

    Erd˝ os and L.A

    P.L. Erd˝ os and L.A. Sz´ ekely, Erd˝ os–Ko–Rado theorems of higher order, in: I. Alth¨ ofer, N. Cai, G. Dueck, L. Khachatrian, M.S. Pinsker, A. S´ ark¨ ozy, I. Wegener and Z. Zhang (Eds.), Numbers, Information and Complexity, Springer US, Boston, MA, 2000, 117–124

    2000

  18. [18]

    Frankl, The Erd˝ os–Ko–Rado theorem is true forn=ckt, in: Combinatorics, Vol

    P. Frankl, The Erd˝ os–Ko–Rado theorem is true forn=ckt, in: Combinatorics, Vol. I, Proc. Fifth Hungarian Colloq., Keszthely, 1976, in: Colloq. Math. Soc. J´ anos Bolyai, vol. 18, North-Holland, 1978, 365–375

    1976

  19. [19]

    Frankl, On intersecting families of finite sets, J

    P. Frankl, On intersecting families of finite sets, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 24 (1978) 146– 161. 43

    1978

  20. [20]

    Frankl, Erd˝ os–Ko–Rado theorem with conditions on the maximal degree, J

    P. Frankl, Erd˝ os–Ko–Rado theorem with conditions on the maximal degree, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 46 (1987) 252–263

    1987

  21. [21]

    Frankl, The shifting technique in extremal set theory, in: Surveys in Combinatorics, in: London Math

    P. Frankl, The shifting technique in extremal set theory, in: Surveys in Combinatorics, in: London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 123, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1987, pp. 81–110

    1987

  22. [22]

    Frankl, Antichains of fixed diameter, Moscow J

    P. Frankl, Antichains of fixed diameter, Moscow J. Combin. Number Theory 7 (2017) 189– 219

    2017

  23. [23]

    Frankl, Maximum degree and diversity in intersecting hypergraphs, J

    P. Frankl, Maximum degree and diversity in intersecting hypergraphs, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 144 (2020) 81–94

    2020

  24. [24]

    Frankl and Z

    P. Frankl and Z. F¨ uredi, Beyond the Erd˝ os–Ko–Rado theorem, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 56 (1991) 182–194

    1991

  25. [25]

    Frankl and A

    P. Frankl and A. Kupavskii, Sharp results concerning disjoint cross-intersecting families, European J. Combin. 86 (2020) 103089

    2020

  26. [26]

    Frankl and A

    P. Frankl and A. Kupavskii, Diversity, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 182 (2021) 105468

    2021

  27. [27]

    Frankl and A

    P. Frankl and A. Kupavskii, The Hajnal and Rothschild problem, arXiv:2502.06699

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    Frankl and N

    P. Frankl and N. Tokushige, Invitation to intersection problems for finite sets, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 144 (2016) 157–211

    2016

  29. [29]

    Frankl and N

    P. Frankl and N. Tokushige, Extremal Problems for Finite Sets, American Mathematical Society, 2018

    2018

  30. [30]

    Frankl and J

    P. Frankl and J. Wang, A product version of the Hilton–Milner theorem, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 200 (2023) 105791

    2023

  31. [31]

    Frankl and J

    P. Frankl and J. Wang, A product version of the Hilton–Milner–Frankl theorem, Sci. China Math. 67 (2024) 455–474

    2024

  32. [32]

    Frankl and J

    P. Frankl and J. Wang, Improved bounds on the maximum diversity of intersecting families, European J. Combin. 118 (2024) 103885

    2024

  33. [33]

    Frankl and J

    P. Frankl and J. Wang, A product version of the Hilton–Milner theorem II, arXiv:2605.09246

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    F¨ uredi, Cross-intersecting families of finite sets, J

    Z. F¨ uredi, Cross-intersecting families of finite sets, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 72 (1995) 332–339

    1995

  35. [35]

    Godsil and K

    C. Godsil and K. Meagher, Erd˝ os–Ko–Rado Theorems: Algebraic Approaches, Cambridge University Press, 2015

    2015

  36. [36]

    Hajnal and B

    A. Hajnal and B. Rothschild, A generalization of the Erd˝ os–Ko–Rado theorem on finite set systems, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 15 (1973), 359–362

    1973

  37. [37]

    Hilton, The Erd˝ os–Ko–Rado theorem with valency conditions, Unpublished Manuscript, 1976

    A.J.W. Hilton, The Erd˝ os–Ko–Rado theorem with valency conditions, Unpublished Manuscript, 1976

    1976

  38. [38]

    Hilton, An intersection theorem for a collection of families of subsets of a finite set, J

    A.J.W. Hilton, An intersection theorem for a collection of families of subsets of a finite set, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 15 (1977) 369–376

    1977

  39. [39]

    Hilton and E.C

    A.J.W. Hilton and E.C. Milner, Some intersection theorems for systems of finite sets, Quart. J. Math. Oxf. 2 (18) (1967) 369–384

    1967

  40. [40]

    Huang, Two extremal problems on intersecting families, European J

    H. Huang, Two extremal problems on intersecting families, European J. Combin. 76 (2019) 1–9

    2019

  41. [41]

    Keevash, Shadows and intersections: Stability and new proofs, Adv

    P. Keevash, Shadows and intersections: Stability and new proofs, Adv. Math. 218 (2008) 1685–1703. 44

    2008

  42. [42]

    Keevash and E

    P. Keevash and E. Long, Stability for vertex isoperimetry in the cube, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 145 (2020) 113–144

    2020

  43. [43]

    Keevash, N

    P. Keevash, N. Lifshitz, E. Long and D. Minzer, Global hypercontractivity and its applica- tions, arXiv:2103.04604

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Keevash, N

    P. Keevash, N. Lifshitz, E. Long and D. Minzer, Forbidden intersections for codes, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 108 (2023) 2037–2083

    2023

  45. [45]

    Keevash, N

    P. Keevash, N. Lifshitz, E. Long and D. Minzer, Hypercontractivity for global functions and sharp thresholds, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 37 (2024) 245–279

    2024

  46. [46]

    Keller, A

    N. Keller, A. Kupavskii, N. Lifshitz and O. Sheinfeld, A complete intersection theorem for large permutation groups, arXiv:2607.00318

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    Keller and N

    N. Keller and N. Lifshitz, The junta method for hypergraphs and the Erd˝ os–Chv´ atal simplex conjecture, Adv. Math. 392 (2021) 107991

    2021

  48. [48]

    Keller, D

    N. Keller, D. Minzer, E. Long and O. Sheinfeld, Ont-intersecting families of permutations, Adv. Math. 445 (2024) 109650

    2024

  49. [49]

    Kupavskii, Diversity of uniform intersecting families, European J

    A. Kupavskii, Diversity of uniform intersecting families, European J. Combin. 74 (2018) 39–47

    2018

  50. [50]

    Kupavskii, An almost completet-intersection theorem for permutations

    A. Kupavskii, An almost completet-intersection theorem for permutations. arXiv:2405.07843

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Kupavskii, Erd˝ os–Ko–Rado type results for partitions via spread approximations, Eu- ropean J

    A. Kupavskii, Erd˝ os–Ko–Rado type results for partitions via spread approximations, Eu- ropean J. Combin. 132 (2026) 104288

    2026

  52. [52]

    Kupavskii and D

    A. Kupavskii and D. Zakharov, Regular bipartite graphs and intersecting families, J. Com- bin. Theory Ser. A 155 (2018) 180–189

    2018

  53. [53]

    Kupavskii and D

    A. Kupavskii and D. Zakharov, Spread approximations for forbidden intersections problems, Adv. Math. 445 (2024) 109653

    2024

  54. [54]

    Lemons and C

    N. Lemons and C. Palmer, The unbalance of set systems, Graphs Combin. 24 (2008) 361– 365

    2008

  55. [55]

    M¨ ors, A generalization of a theorem of Kruskal, Graphs Combin

    M. M¨ ors, A generalization of a theorem of Kruskal, Graphs Combin. 1 (N1) (1985) 167–183

    1985

  56. [56]

    Saengrungkongka, extremalt-intersecting families of permutations for larget, arXiv:2605.26051

    P. Saengrungkongka, extremalt-intersecting families of permutations for larget, arXiv:2605.26051

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    Wen and B

    J. Wen and B. Lv, Erd˝ os–Ko–Rado theorem and Hilton–Milner type theorem fork- partitions, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 223 (2026) 106219

    2026

  58. [58]

    Wilson, The exact bound in the Erd˝ os–Ko–Rado theorem, Combinatorica 4 (1984) 247–257

    R.M. Wilson, The exact bound in the Erd˝ os–Ko–Rado theorem, Combinatorica 4 (1984) 247–257

    1984

  59. [59]

    T. Yao, B. Lv and K. Wang, Large non-trivialt-intersecting families of signed sets, Aus- tralas. J. Combin. 89 (2024) 32–48. 45

    2024