pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18124 · v1 · pith:LJ3XBUZJnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 🪐 quant-ph

Integrated time-bin entangled quantum light source on a 4H-SiC microring chip

Hong Zeng , Bing-Cheng Yang , Yun-Ru Fan , Li-Ping Zhou , Cheng-Li Wang , Bo-Wen Chen , Ai-Lun Yi , Yong Geng
show 11 more authors
Guang-Wei Deng You Wang Hai-Zhi Song Jun-Tao Zhang Hao Li Li-Xing You Zi-Hao Zhan Kai Guo Xin Ou Guang-Can Guo Qiang Zhou
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 10:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords time-bin entanglementintegrated photonicssilicon carbidemicroring resonatorphoton pair generationBell inequalityquantum light sourcecavity-enhanced nonlinearity
0
0 comments X

The pith

A 4H-SiC microring produces time-bin entangled photon pairs at 1.35 × 10^7 s⁻¹ mW⁻² with 95.55% visibility.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes that a microring resonator fabricated in 4H-silicon carbide can generate time-bin entangled photon pairs while maintaining both high generation efficiency and a usable 1 GHz bandwidth. The authors achieve this by jointly optimizing the material nonlinearity and the resonator geometry to reduce the usual cavity trade-off between confinement and speed. With double-pulse pumping at 160 MHz, the source delivers entangled pairs at a high rate, shows interference visibility high enough to violate Bell's inequality by more than 138 standard deviations, and reconstructs a quantum state with 94% fidelity. These metrics indicate that the device can serve as a compact, integrable building block for time-bin-based quantum communication links that require both brightness and temporal resolution.

Core claim

The paper reports an integrated time-bin-entangled photon-pair source on a 4H-SiC microring chip. Operating at a loaded quality factor of 1.9 × 10^5 (1.0 GHz spectral bandwidth) and pumped with 300-ps double pulses separated by 1.25 ns at 160 MHz repetition rate, the device reaches a pair generation rate of 1.35 × 10^7 s⁻¹ mW⁻². Raw visibility of 95.55 ± 0.18% is measured, violating Bell's inequality by more than 138 standard deviations, together with a quantum-state tomography fidelity of 94.37 ± 0.22%.

What carries the argument

The 4H-SiC microring resonator, whose geometry and material properties are tuned to strengthen the nonlinear four-wave-mixing process while preserving sufficient spectral bandwidth for 1 GHz photon pairs.

If this is right

  • The source supports 160 MHz clock rates without bandwidth bottlenecks, enabling faster time-bin protocols than typical narrowband cavity sources.
  • High raw visibility allows direct use in Bell tests or quantum key distribution without heavy error correction overhead.
  • The platform offers a route to monolithically integrate the entangled source with other 4H-SiC photonic components for larger quantum circuits.
  • The reported rate per milliwatt suggests the device can operate at modest pump powers compatible with on-chip laser sources.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar geometry optimization may extend to other wide-bandgap materials that also support both quantum emitters and nonlinear optics.
  • The 138-sigma violation margin leaves headroom for additional loss when the source is placed inside a larger photonic network.
  • Testing the same resonator at elevated repetition rates or cryogenic temperatures could reveal whether further bandwidth or efficiency gains remain available.

Load-bearing premise

The measured visibility, Bell violation, and fidelity values directly reflect the generated quantum state rather than being limited by unaccounted timing jitter, detector inefficiency, or post-selection artifacts.

What would settle it

A repeat measurement of the same source using independent timing electronics or detectors that yields a two-photon interference visibility below 70% would falsify the claimed entanglement quality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18124 by Ai-Lun Yi, Bing-Cheng Yang, Bo-Wen Chen, Cheng-Li Wang, Guang-Can Guo, Guang-Wei Deng, Hai-Zhi Song, Hao Li, Hong Zeng, Jun-Tao Zhang, Kai Guo, Li-Ping Zhou, Li-Xing You, Qiang Zhou, Xin Ou, Yong Geng, You Wang, Yun-Ru Fan, Zi-Hao Zhan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Device design and characterization. (a) Cross-section of 4H-SiC MRR with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Experimental setup for the generation and characterization of integrated time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Correlated photon pair generation in SiC microring. (a) Single side count rate of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Characterization of time-bin entanglement. (a) and (b) Interference fringes as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Integrated time-bin-entangled photon-pair source with cavity-enhanced nonlinear optical processes is essential for quantum information technologies. However, microcavities with a high quality factor inherently introduce a trade-off between generation efficiency and photon bandwidth, which hinders the development of high-speed quantum networks with an integrated source. Here, we address this challenge by optimizing the nonlinearity property of the material and the geometry of the integrated microring resonator with a 4H-silicon carbide platform. Operating at a loaded quality factor of 1.9 $\times$ 10^5 - spectral bandwidth of 1.0 GHz and pumped with 300-ps double pulses separated by 1.25 ns at a repetition rate of 160 MHz, the device achieves a time-bin-entangled photon-pair generation rate of 1.35 $\times$ 10^7 s^-1 mW^-2. A raw visibility of 95.55 $\pm$ 0.18% is measured, showing a violation of Bell's inequality by more than 138 standard deviations, and a fidelity of 94.37 $\pm$ 0.22% is obtained by quantum state tomography. These results provide a scalable pathway to an efficient and broadband time-bin entangled quantum light source, overcoming intrinsic limitations of cavity-based designs and advancing integrated platforms for future quantum communication networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the demonstration of an integrated time-bin entangled photon-pair source fabricated on a 4H-SiC microring resonator. By optimizing material nonlinearity and resonator geometry, the device operates at a loaded quality factor of 1.9 × 10^5 with 1.0 GHz spectral bandwidth. Pumped by 300-ps double pulses separated by 1.25 ns at 160 MHz repetition rate, it achieves a pair generation rate of 1.35 × 10^7 s^{-1} mW^{-2}, a raw visibility of 95.55 ± 0.18% that violates Bell's inequality by more than 138 standard deviations, and a quantum state tomography fidelity of 94.37 ± 0.22%.

Significance. If the headline metrics accurately reflect the intrinsic generated state, the work provides a scalable integrated platform that mitigates the usual high-Q versus bandwidth trade-off in cavity-enhanced sources. The direct experimental measurements, including a very strong Bell violation and high tomography fidelity, constitute a clear strength and support the claim of advancing high-speed quantum networks on chip.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and Results] Abstract and main results: The reported raw visibility (95.55 ± 0.18%) and fidelity (94.37 ± 0.22%) are presented without an explicit error budget that separates source properties from measurement imperfections. Given the 300 ps pump duration, 1.25 ns bin separation, and 1 GHz cavity bandwidth, contributions from detector timing jitter, finite unbalanced Mach-Zehnder visibility, or post-selection on coincidence time windows could reduce observed contrast; the manuscript must quantify these effects to substantiate that the quoted numbers are not inflated by unaccounted setup limitations.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Experimental methods] Provide the exact coincidence time window used for visibility and tomography calculations and state whether all detected events or only post-selected subsets are included.
  2. [Supplementary information] Add a supplementary table or paragraph detailing the measured interferometer visibility, detector jitter, and any filtering applied to the raw coincidence data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the constructive major comment. We address the point on the error budget below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Results] Abstract and main results: The reported raw visibility (95.55 ± 0.18%) and fidelity (94.37 ± 0.22%) are presented without an explicit error budget that separates source properties from measurement imperfections. Given the 300 ps pump duration, 1.25 ns bin separation, and 1 GHz cavity bandwidth, contributions from detector timing jitter, finite unbalanced Mach-Zehnder visibility, or post-selection on coincidence time windows could reduce observed contrast; the manuscript must quantify these effects to substantiate that the quoted numbers are not inflated by unaccounted setup limitations.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit error budget would improve the manuscript by clarifying the separation between source-intrinsic properties and setup limitations. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection that quantifies the relevant contributions using our measured setup parameters and modeling of the time-bin generation process. This will include analysis of detector timing jitter, the unbalanced Mach-Zehnder interferometer visibility, and the coincidence-window post-selection, together with estimates of their impact on the observed raw visibility and fidelity. The addition will substantiate that the reported values primarily reflect the quality of the generated state. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct experimental measurements

full rationale

The paper reports fabrication and characterization of a 4H-SiC microring device, with all headline numbers (generation rate 1.35e7 s^-1 mW^-2, raw visibility 95.55%, Bell violation >138 sigma, tomography fidelity 94.37%) obtained from direct coincidence counting, interference fringes, and state tomography under the stated pump conditions. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are invoked to derive these quantities from prior results; the metrics are raw or post-processed experimental observables. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and contains no self-definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation reductions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard quantum optics assumptions and device characterization rather than new theoretical constructs; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced to support the headline numbers.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard assumptions of quantum mechanics, linear optics, and Bell inequality tests apply to the photon-pair generation and detection process.
    Invoked implicitly when interpreting visibility as entanglement witness and tomography as state fidelity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5839 in / 1232 out tokens · 38323 ms · 2026-05-20T10:48:51.767494+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Long-distance teleportation of qubits at telecommunication wavelengths,

    I. Marcikic, H. De Riedmatten, W. Tittel,et al., “Long-distance teleportation of qubits at telecommunication wavelengths,” Nature421, 509–513 (2003)

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    Classical-decisive quantum internet by integrated photonics,

    Y. Zhang, R. Broberg, A. Zhu,et al., “Classical-decisive quantum internet by integrated photonics,” Science389, 940–944 (2025)

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Demonstrating the viability of universal quantum computation using teleportation and single-qubit operations,

    D. Gottesman and I. L. Chuang, “Demonstrating the viability of universal quantum computation using teleportation and single-qubit operations,” Nature402, 390–393 (1999)

    work page 1999

  4. [4]

    A manufacturable platform for photonic quantum computing,

    P. team, “A manufacturable platform for photonic quantum computing,” Nature641, 876–883 (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Scaling and networking a modular photonic quantum computer,

    H. Aghaee Rad, T. Ainsworth, R. Alexander,et al., “Scaling and networking a modular photonic quantum computer,” Nature638, 912–919 (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    High-noon states by mixing quantum and classical light,

    I. Afek, O. Ambar, and Y. Silberberg, “High-noon states by mixing quantum and classical light,” Science328, 879–881 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Multi-qubit gates and schrödinger cat states in an optical clock,

    A. Cao, W. J. Eckner, T. Lukin Yelin,et al., “Multi-qubit gates and schrödinger cat states in an optical clock,” Nature 634, 315–320 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Universal quantum operations and ancilla-based read-out for tweezer clocks,

    R. Finkelstein, R. B.-S. Tsai, X. Sun,et al., “Universal quantum operations and ancilla-based read-out for tweezer clocks,” Nature634, 321–327 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Multidimensional quantum entanglement with large-scale integrated optics,

    J. Wang, S. Paesani, Y. Ding,et al., “Multidimensional quantum entanglement with large-scale integrated optics,” Science360, 285–291 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Experimental entanglement distillation and ‘hidden’non- locality,

    P. G. Kwiat, S. Barraza-Lopez, A. Stefanov, and N. Gisin, “Experimental entanglement distillation and ‘hidden’non- locality,” Nature409, 1014–1017 (2001)

    work page 2001

  11. [11]

    Twisted photons: new quantum perspectives in high dimensions,

    M. Erhard, R. Fickler, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, “Twisted photons: new quantum perspectives in high dimensions,” Light. Sci. & Appl.7, 17146–17146 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Generationandconfirmationofa(100 ×100)-dimensionalentangledquantum system,

    M.Krenn,M.Huber,R.Fickler,et al.,“Generationandconfirmationofa(100 ×100)-dimensionalentangledquantum system,” Proc. National Acad. Sci.111, 6243–6247 (2014)

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    On-chip generation of high-dimensional entangled quantum states and their coherent control,

    M. Kues, C. Reimer, P. Roztocki,et al., “On-chip generation of high-dimensional entangled quantum states and their coherent control,” Nature546, 622–626 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Bell inequality for position and time,

    J. D. Franson, “Bell inequality for position and time,” Phys. review letters62, 2205 (1989)

    work page 1989

  15. [15]

    Time-bin entangled qubits for quantum communication created by femtosecond pulses,

    I. Marcikic, H. de Riedmatten, W. Tittel,et al., “Time-bin entangled qubits for quantum communication created by femtosecond pulses,” Phys. Rev. A66, 062308 (2002)

    work page 2002

  16. [16]

    Distribution of time-bin entangled qubits over 50 km of optical fiber,

    I. Marcikic, H. De Riedmatten, W. Tittel,et al., “Distribution of time-bin entangled qubits over 50 km of optical fiber,” Phys. review letters93, 180502 (2004)

    work page 2004

  17. [17]

    Generation of multiphoton entangled quantum states by means of integrated frequency combs,

    C. Reimer, M. Kues, P. Roztocki,et al., “Generation of multiphoton entangled quantum states by means of integrated frequency combs,” Science351, 1176–1180 (2016)

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    Quantum key distribution implemented with d-level time-bin entangled photons,

    H. Yu, S. Sciara, M. Chemnitz,et al., “Quantum key distribution implemented with d-level time-bin entangled photons,” Nat. Commun.16, 171 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Time-encoded photonic quantum states: Generation, processing, and applications,

    H. Yu, A. O. Govorov, H.-Z. Song, and Z. Wang, “Time-encoded photonic quantum states: Generation, processing, and applications,” Appl. Phys. Rev.11(2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Photonicquantuminformationwithtime-bins: Principlesandapplications,

    A.Singh,A.Sethia,L.Esmaeilifar,et al.,“Photonicquantuminformationwithtime-bins: Principlesandapplications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.08102 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Compact and reconfigurable silicon nitride time-bin entanglement circuit,

    C. Xiong, X. Zhang, A. Mahendra,et al., “Compact and reconfigurable silicon nitride time-bin entanglement circuit,” Optica2, 724–727 (2015)

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Integrated silicon nitride time-bin entanglement circuits,

    X. Zhang, B. A. Bell, A. Mahendra,et al., “Integrated silicon nitride time-bin entanglement circuits,” Opt. letters43, 3469–3472 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Integrated sources of photon quantum states based on nonlinear optics,

    L. Caspani, C. Xiong, B. J. Eggleton,et al., “Integrated sources of photon quantum states based on nonlinear optics,” Light. Sci. & Appl.6, e17100–e17100 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Integrated photonic quantum technologies,

    J. Wang, F. Sciarrino, A. Laing, and M. G. Thompson, “Integrated photonic quantum technologies,” Nat. Photonics 14, 273–284 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Hybrid integrated quantum photonic circuits,

    A. W. Elshaari, W. Pernice, K. Srinivasan,et al., “Hybrid integrated quantum photonic circuits,” Nat. photonics14, 285–298 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    Fully on-chip photonic turnkey quantum source for entangled qubit/qudit state generation,

    H. Mahmudlu, R. Johanning, A. Van Rees,et al., “Fully on-chip photonic turnkey quantum source for entangled qubit/qudit state generation,” Nat. Photonics17, 518–524 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Scalable photonic quantum technologies,

    H. Wang, T. C. Ralph, J. J. Renema,et al., “Scalable photonic quantum technologies,” Nat. Mater. pp. 1–15 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Scalable feedback stabilization of quantum light sources on a cmos chip,

    D. Kramnik, I. Wang, A. Ramesh,et al., “Scalable feedback stabilization of quantum light sources on a cmos chip,” Nat. Electron. pp. 1–11 (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Parametricdown-conversionphoton-pairsourceonananophotonicchip,

    X.Guo, C.-l.Zou, C.Schuck,et al., “Parametricdown-conversionphoton-pairsourceonananophotonicchip,” Light. Sci. & Appl.6, e16249–e16249 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    High-dimensional one-way quantum processing implemented on d-level cluster states,

    C. Reimer, S. Sciara, P. Roztocki,et al., “High-dimensional one-way quantum processing implemented on d-level cluster states,” Nat. Phys.15, 148–153 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Ultrabright quantum photon sources on chip,

    Z. Ma, J.-Y. Chen, Z. Li,et al., “Ultrabright quantum photon sources on chip,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 263602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Ultrabrightentangled-photon-pairgenerationfromanalgaas-on-insulator microring resonator,

    T.J.Steiner,J.E.Castro,L.Chang,et al.,“Ultrabrightentangled-photon-pairgenerationfromanalgaas-on-insulator microring resonator,” Prx Quantum2, 010337 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Multi-wavelength quantum light sources on silicon nitride micro-ring chip,

    Y.-R. Fan, C. Lyu, C.-Z. Yuan,et al., “Multi-wavelength quantum light sources on silicon nitride micro-ring chip,” Laser & Photonics Rev.17, 2300172 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Ultralow-loss integrated photonics enables bright, narrowband, photon-pair sources,

    R. Chen, Y.-H. Luo, J. Long,et al., “Ultralow-loss integrated photonics enables bright, narrowband, photon-pair sources,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 083803 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Quantum light generation based on gan microring toward fully on-chip source,

    H. Zeng, Z.-Q. He, Y.-R. Fan,et al., “Quantum light generation based on gan microring toward fully on-chip source,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 133603 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Entangled photon pair generation in an integrated sic platform,

    A. Rahmouni, R. Wang, J. Li,et al., “Entangled photon pair generation in an integrated sic platform,” Light. Sci. & Appl.13, 110 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Versatile chip-scale platform for high-rate entanglement generation using an al ga as microresonator array,

    Y. Pang, J. E. Castro, T. J. Steiner,et al., “Versatile chip-scale platform for high-rate entanglement generation using an al ga as microresonator array,” PRX Quantum6, 010338 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    On-chipsecond-harmonicgenerationandbroadbandparametricdown-conversion in a lithium niobate microresonator,

    R.Luo,H.Jiang,S.Rogers,et al.,“On-chipsecond-harmonicgenerationandbroadbandparametricdown-conversion in a lithium niobate microresonator,” Opt. Express25, 24531–24539 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    Quantum states of higher-order whispering gallery modes in a silicon micro-disk resonator,

    R. R. Kumar, Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, and H. K. Tsang, “Quantum states of higher-order whispering gallery modes in a silicon micro-disk resonator,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B37, 2231–2237 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Spectrally multiplexed and bright entangled photon pairs in a lithium niobate microresonator,

    B.-Y. Xu, L.-K. Chen, J.-T. Lin,et al., “Spectrally multiplexed and bright entangled photon pairs in a lithium niobate microresonator,” Sci. China Physics, Mech. & Astron.65, 294262 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Submegahertz spectral width photon-pair source based on fused silica microspheres,

    E. O. Ricardo, C. Bertoni-Ocampo, M. Maldonado-Terrón,et al., “Submegahertz spectral width photon-pair source based on fused silica microspheres,” Photonics Res.9, 110 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Silicon-Nitride Platform for Narrowband Entangled Photon Generation

    S. Ramelow, A. Farsi, S. Clemmen,et al., “Silicon-nitride platform for narrowband entangled photon generation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.04358 (2015)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  43. [43]

    High-rate photon pairs and sequential time-bin entanglement with si3n4 microring resonators,

    F. Samara, A. Martin, C. Autebert,et al., “High-rate photon pairs and sequential time-bin entanglement with si3n4 microring resonators,” Opt. express27, 19309–19318 (2019)

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Quantum light sources with configurable lifetime leveraging parity-time symmetry,

    N. Chen, W.-X. Li, Y.-R. Fan,et al., “Quantum light sources with configurable lifetime leveraging parity-time symmetry,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.01413 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Pushing photon-pair generation rate in microresonators by q factor manipulation,

    N. Chen, Z. Wang, J. Wu,et al., “Pushing photon-pair generation rate in microresonators by q factor manipulation,” Opt. Lett.48, 5355–5358 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Measurement of the kerr nonlinear refractive index and its variation among 4 h-si c wafers,

    J. Li, R. Wang, L. Cai, and Q. Li, “Measurement of the kerr nonlinear refractive index and its variation among 4 h-si c wafers,” Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 034083 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Strong third-order nonlinearity in amorphous silicon carbide waveguides,

    Y. Lu, X. Shi, A. Ali Afridi,et al., “Strong third-order nonlinearity in amorphous silicon carbide waveguides,” Opt. Lett.49, 4389–4392 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Octave-spanning microcomb generation in 4h-silicon-carbide-on-insulator photonics platform,

    L. Cai, J. Li, R. Wang, and Q. Li, “Octave-spanning microcomb generation in 4h-silicon-carbide-on-insulator photonics platform,” Photonics Res.10, 870–876 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    Integrated photon pairs source in silicon carbide based on micro-ring resonators for quantum storage at telecom wavelengths,

    P. T. Ramírez, J. D. Gómez, G. R. Becerra,et al., “Integrated photon pairs source in silicon carbide based on micro-ring resonators for quantum storage at telecom wavelengths,” Sci. Reports14, 17755 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    High-q microresonators on 4h-silicon-carbide-on-insulator platform for nonlinear photonics,

    C. Wang, Z. Fang, A. Yi,et al., “High-q microresonators on 4h-silicon-carbide-on-insulator platform for nonlinear photonics,” Light. Sci. & Appl.10, 139 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Integrated photon-pair sources with nonlinear optics,

    Y. Wang, K. D. Jöns, and Z. Sun, “Integrated photon-pair sources with nonlinear optics,” Appl. Phys. Rev.8(2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Photon pair generation in a silicon micro-ring resonator with reverse bias enhancement,

    E. Engin, D. Bonneau, C. M. Natarajan,et al., “Photon pair generation in a silicon micro-ring resonator with reverse bias enhancement,” Opt. express21, 27826–27834 (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    Chip-scale nonlinear photonics for quantum light generation,

    G. Moody, L. Chang, T. J. Steiner, and J. E. Bowers, “Chip-scale nonlinear photonics for quantum light generation,” AVS Quantum Sci.2(2020)

    work page 2020