REVIEW 2 cited by
ICSFuzz: Collision Detector Bug Discovery in Autonomous Driving Simulators
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
With the increasing adoption of autonomous vehicles, ensuring the reliability of autonomous driving systems (ADSs) deployed on autonomous vehicles has become a significant concern. Driving simulators have emerged as crucial platforms for testing autonomous driving systems, offering realistic, dynamic, and configurable environments. However, existing simulation-based ADS testers have largely overlooked the reliability of the simulators, potentially leading to overlooked violation scenarios and subsequent safety security risks during real-world deployment. In our investigations, we identified that collision detectors in simulators could fail to detect and report collisions in certain collision scenarios, referred to as ignored collision scenarios. This paper aims to systematically discover ignored collision scenarios to improve the reliability of autonomous driving simulators. To this end, we present ICSFuzz, a black-box fuzzing approach to discover ignored collision scenarios efficiently. Drawing upon the fact that the ignored collision scenarios are a sub-type of collision scenarios, our approach starts with the determined collision scenarios. Following the guidance provided by empirically studied factors contributing to collisions, we selectively mutate arbitrary collision scenarios in a step-wise manner toward the ignored collision scenarios and effectively discover them. We compare ICSFuzz with DriveFuzz, a state-of-the-art simulation-based ADS testing method, by replacing its oracle with our ignored-collision-aware oracle. The evaluation demonstrates that ICSFuzz outperforms DriveFuzz by finding 10-20x more ignored collision scenarios with a 20-70x speedup. All the discovered ignored collisions have been confirmed by developers with one CVE ID assigned.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Causality-aware Safety Testing for Autonomous Driving Systems
Causal-Fuzzer uses causal graphs of scene, action, and violation relationships to guide simulation fuzzing, and reports finding more diverse violations and better testing sufficiency than three baselines on Apollo.
-
MoDitector: Module-Directed Testing for Autonomous Driving Systems
MoDitector generates collision scenarios that are caused by errors in a user-specified ADS module, reporting 55.3, 75.3, 71.7, and 14.3 module-induced critical scenarios for perception, prediction, planning, and contr...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.