REVIEW 2 cited by
Energy barriers for boundary nucleation in a two-well model without gauge invariance
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Energy barriers for boundary nucleation in a two-well model without gauge invariance
read the original abstract
We study energy scaling laws for a simplified, singularly perturbed, double-well nucleation problem confined in a half-space, in the absence of gauge invariance and for an inclusion of fixed volume. Motivated by models for boundary nucleation of a single-phase martensite inside a parental phase of austenite, our main focus in this nonlocal isoperimetric problem is how the relationship between the rank-1 direction and the orientation of the half-space influences the energy scaling with respect to the fixed volume of the inclusion. Up to prefactors depending on this relative orientation, the scaling laws coincide with the corresponding ones for bulk nucleation \cite{knupfer2011minimal} for all rank-1 directions, \textit{but} the ones normal to the confining hyperplane, where the scaling is as in a three-well problem in full space, resulting in a lower energy barrier \cite{Tribuzio-Rueland_1}.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
From Sinhala to Dhivehi: Cross-Lingual Transfer Learning for Low-Resource Speech Recognition
Continual pre-training on Sinhala followed by Dhivehi fine-tuning achieves 12.89% WER, but KenLM decoding contributes 27+ absolute WER points, dwarfing the 0.61-point transfer gain.
-
Advanced Image Generation: Negative Prompt Optimization and Latent Classifier Guidance
An automated negative-prompt plus latent-rollback pipeline yields a guidance classifier that scores below random (AUC ≈ 0.43–0.46) and no quantitative image-quality gain is established.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.