Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

Decoding Matters: Addressing Amplification Bias and Homogeneity Issue for LLM-based Recommendation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.14900 v3 pith:LLK5JVCZ submitted 2024-06-21 cs.IR

Decoding Matters: Addressing Amplification Bias and Homogeneity Issue for LLM-based Recommendation

classification cs.IR
keywords decodingtokensamplificationbiashomogeneityitemsllmsrecommendation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Adapting Large Language Models (LLMs) for recommendation requires careful consideration of the decoding process, given the inherent differences between generating items and natural language. Existing approaches often directly apply LLMs' original decoding methods. However, we find these methods encounter significant challenges: 1) amplification bias -- where standard length normalization inflates scores for items containing tokens with generation probabilities close to 1 (termed ghost tokens), and 2) homogeneity issue -- generating multiple similar or repetitive items for a user. To tackle these challenges, we introduce a new decoding approach named Debiasing-Diversifying Decoding (D3). D3 disables length normalization for ghost tokens to alleviate amplification bias, and it incorporates a text-free assistant model to encourage tokens less frequently generated by LLMs for counteracting recommendation homogeneity. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate the method's effectiveness in enhancing accuracy and diversity. The code is available at https://github.com/SAI990323/DecodingMatters.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Objective Shaping with Hard Negatives: Windowed Partial AUC Optimization for RL-based LLM Recommenders

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Beam-search negatives induce partial AUC optimization in GRPO for LLM recommenders; Windowed Partial AUC and TAWin improve Top-K alignment on four datasets.

  2. Break the Optimization Barrier of LLM-Enhanced Recommenders: A Theoretical Analysis and Practical Framework

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    TF-LLMER resolves optimization barriers in LLM-enhanced recommenders through embedding normalization and Rec-PCA that aligns semantic representations with collaborative co-occurrence graphs.

  3. LBR: Towards Mitigating Length Bias in Large Language Models for Recommendation

    cs.IR 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5

    LBR removes length bias in LLM recommenders via length-aware attention offsets and Trie-branching information-length normalization, improving accuracy and fairness with negligible cost.

  4. Beyond Fixed Depths and Widths: Optimizing Textual Decoding Tries in LLM-based Generative Recommendation

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    BONSAI constructs variable-depth, low-branching decoding tries for LLM-based generative recommendation and reports 16–22% relative gains over state-of-the-art baselines.

  5. RRCM: Ranking-Driven Retrieval over Collaborative and Meta Memories for LLM Recommendation

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RRCM trains an LLM to dynamically retrieve from collaborative and meta memories using group relative policy optimization driven by final top-k recommendation quality.

  6. Goal-Conditioned Supervised Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    GCSL reframes LLM fine-tuning as supervised pursuit of quality thresholds using natural-language goals, outperforming SFT and DPO on toxicity, code, and recommendation tasks.

  7. Reinforced Preference Optimization for Reasoning-Augmented Recommendations

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    RPORec unifies LLM reasoning with a recommendation head through reasoning-augmented modeling and reinforced preference optimization to improve recommendation accuracy and interpretability.