Continuous Aperture Array-Assisted Integrated Communication and Navigation in LEO Satellite Constellations

Qiao Qi; Qi Wang; Xiaoming Chen; Yuanwei Liu; Zhaolin Wang

Continuous Aperture Array-Assisted Integrated Communication and Navigation in LEO Satellite Constellations

T0 review · 2 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-07-13 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Continuous aperture arrays on cooperating LEO satellites cut navigation error while meeting communication rates better than discrete phased arrays, via dual-function beamformers optimized in a finite channel subspace.

desk verdict Solid multi-satellite CAPA ICAN formulation with a clean optimality-preserving subspace reduction; the headline CRB gains are real under the paper’s model but rest on a standard (and here load-bearing) freeze of σ²_eff. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.09030 v1 pith:LN7IBUHW submitted 2026-07-10 cs.IT math.IT

Qi Wang , Xiaoming Chen , Qiao Qi , Zhaolin Wang , Yuanwei Liu This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.ITmath.IT

keywords continuousaperturearrayintegratedcommunicationandnavigationLEOsatelliteconstellationelectromagneticinformationtheoryCramér-Raoboundbeamforming6Gchannelsubspace

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper builds an integrated communication-and-navigation system for LEO constellations in which multiple satellites, each fitted with a continuous aperture array, radiate both user data and navigation reference signals on the same spectrum. It derives the users’ achievable rates and the Cramér–Rao bound on position error, making explicit how the continuous dual-function beamformers couple the two services. The design problem—minimize average navigation CRB subject to per-satellite power limits and minimum rate floors—is infinite-dimensional; the authors prove that optimal beamformers live in a finite “ICAN channel subspace” spanned by the conjugate channel responses, convert the problem into a tractable SDP, and solve it by an iterative convex algorithm. Simulations show the resulting CAPA design substantially outperforms same-size discrete phased arrays and several other baselines on positioning accuracy while still satisfying the rate constraints. A reader who expects mega-constellations to deliver both connectivity and high-precision PNT cares because the continuous-aperture approach claims more spatial degrees of freedom and better dual-function performance without enlarging the physical aperture or spectrum.

What carries the argument

The ICAN channel subspace (Theorem 1): the finite-dimensional span, on each satellite aperture, of the conjugates of the continuous communication and navigation channel responses. Restricting the continuous beamformers to this subspace leaves rates, navigation means, CRBs and power unchanged or improved, converting the original infinite-dimensional functional design into a finite-dimensional SDP solved by block-coordinate descent and successive convex approximation.

What would settle it

Re-optimize and re-evaluate the CRB (or run Monte-Carlo position MSE) when the effective noise variance is fully differentiated with respect to both position and the beamformer coefficients; check whether the CAPA advantage over discrete phased arrays under the same power and rate constraints shrinks or vanishes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Equipping a cooperative group of LEO satellites with continuous aperture arrays and jointly designing their dual-function continuous beamformers—after an optimality-preserving projection onto the finite-dimensional ICAN channel subspace—yields a lower average navigation CRB than conventional discrete phased-array architectures under identical per-satellite power budgets and minimum communication-rate constraints.

Load-bearing premise

The navigation error bound treats the effective interference-plus-noise variance as only weakly dependent on user position and beamformers, so that variance is held fixed or lightly damped-updated rather than differentiated jointly with the signal mean.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

CAPA-based multi-satellite ICAN can achieve lower average navigation CRB than same-aperture discrete phased arrays while still meeting CUE rate floors.
Adding more cooperating satellites in the service group further reduces average CRB through spatial diversity and extra design degrees of freedom.
Larger CAPA area and denser or lower-altitude constellations improve positioning accuracy, with diminishing returns that should guide payload size and constellation density.
The explicit rate–CRB trade-off is tunable: raising the minimum rate increases CRB, yet the CAPA design degrades more slowly than zero-forcing or discrete-array baselines.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same channel-subspace reduction is likely reusable for other multi-platform continuous-aperture dual-function problems (e.g., multi-satellite ISAC) that share the linear integral structure of the observation model.
If the weak-dependence approximation for effective noise variance fails under dense multi-user interference, jointly differentiating the CRB with respect to both mean and variance could alter the optimized beamformers and the reported gains.
Any practical CAPA realization (continuous current control or dense metasurface) that cannot match the idealized continuous current distribution will erode the simulated advantage over discrete arrays.
Perfect real-time CSI and ephemeris exchange over inter-satellite links is assumed; latency or estimation error would couple into both rate and CRB and remains an open implementation gap.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The useful delta here is the multi-satellite LEO ICAN setting: cooperative CAPAs radiating shared-spectrum data streams plus per-satellite navigation PRNs, with rates and CRBs derived from the same continuous currents, plus a joint CUE–NUE channel subspace that turns the infinite-dimensional design into a finite SDP without losing optimality (Theorem 1 / Appendix B). That is incremental relative to the single-platform CAPA multiuser and CAPA-ISAC line they cite, but it is a real systems step for NTN ICAN.

What they do well is the electromagnetic scaffolding. Far-field dyadic Green’s functions, polarization, rain, the power integral, the SINR decomposition, and the stacked DPE observation model are standard and internally consistent. The orthogonal-complement argument is correct: anything outside the span of the conjugate channels does not affect rates or CRB and only burns power, so the reduction is not a redefinition of the objective. Algorithm 1 (BCD + SCA penalty + damped σ²_eff) is ordinary SDP engineering and converges in the reported plots. Simulations under a Walker-like constellation show CAPA beating DPA, Fourier, ZF-oriented, and sitting close to the navigation-centric lower bound across power, rate, and aperture sweeps. Self-citations are to prior CAPA work, not circular.

Soft spots, in proportion. The weakest modeling choice is the one the stress-test flags: after (24) they treat σ²_eff as only weakly position/beamformer-dependent and freeze or damp-update it inside the FIM and the SDP objective, even though (22)/(43)/(52) make it an explicit quadratic in the same communication coefficients that appear in the rate constraints. In a multi-satellite shared-spectrum setup that residual can be non-negligible, so the optimized “CRB” is not always the true CRB and absolute numbers (and possibly ranking vs DPA) can shift. That is a common approximation in the literature, not a derivation error, but it is load-bearing for the outperformance claim and should be stress-tested or jointly differentiated. Everything else is the usual idealization stack: perfect continuous current control, far-field LoS, perfect CSI/ephemeris, Gauss-Legendre integrals, simulation-only. No hardware or non-ideal evidence.

Who it is for: people already working on CAPA / holographic MIMO or LEO ICAN who want a multi-satellite dual-function formulation and a workable optimizer. Not a foundational result. I would send it to peer review; a serious referee can demand a sensitivity check on σ²_eff and clearer limits of the ideal CAPA model. Worth engaging if that is your subfield; not urgent otherwise.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper develops a continuous-aperture array (CAPA) ICAN framework for multi-satellite LEO constellations. It models collaborative dual-function transmission via continuous surface currents and far-field dyadic Green’s functions, derives CUE rates and NUE CRBs under shared-spectrum interference, and formulates joint beamforming to minimize average CRB subject to per-satellite power and minimum-rate constraints. Theorem 1 shows that an optimal solution lies in a finite ICAN channel subspace spanned by the conjugate communication/navigation channel responses; the resulting finite-dimensional problem is solved by SDR, BCD, and SCA (Algorithm 1). Simulations on a Walker Delta constellation report lower average CRB than discrete phased-array, Fourier, ZF-oriented, and navigation-centric baselines under the same power and rate constraints.

Significance. If the modeling and optimization claims hold, the work is a solid systems contribution at the intersection of electromagnetic information theory, LEO ICAN, and continuous-aperture beamforming. Strengths include an explicit multi-satellite CAPA model, a clean optimality-preserving subspace reduction (Theorem 1 / Appendix B), and a practical iterative SDP algorithm with convergence and complexity discussion. The numerical comparisons against DPA and other natural baselines under fixed Table I parameters make the performance claim falsifiable. The main novelty is the multi-satellite ICAN setting rather than a wholly new mathematical technique; the result is still of clear interest for 6G NTN dual-function design.

major comments (2)

Section II-D after (24) and the FIM/CRB in (29)–(30) treat σ^{2}_eff,l as weakly dependent on ql and the beamformers, freezing or damped-updating it (III-C, (55)) while optimizing over {Am} and B. Yet (22)/(43)/(52) make σ^{2}_eff,l an explicit quadratic function of the same communication coefficients that enter the rate constraints and residual leakage. When residual communication interference is non-negligible (shared-spectrum multi-satellite ICAN), the true score includes ∇_q log σ^{2}_eff terms, so the optimized objective is not the exact CRB and absolute numbers / ranking versus DPA in Figs. 4–6 can shift. Please either (i) derive/optimize the full FIM including the variance dependence, or (ii) quantify the approximation error (e.g., relative contribution of residual terms and sensitivity of reported CRB gaps) under the operating points of Table I.
The headline claim that CAPA “significantly outperforms conventional discrete phased array architectures” (Abstract; §IV) rests on the DPA baseline in Figs. 4–6. The manuscript only briefly states that DPA uses the same aperture with half-wavelength spacing and optimized per-element weights [30]. Please specify the DPA element count, polarization model, and whether the same ICAN subspace / SDR-SCA solver (or an equivalent discrete formulation) is used, so that the gap is attributable to continuous aperture rather than unequal optimization effort or modeling assumptions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: rates, FIM/CRB, and the subspace optimality reduction are self-contained; outperformance is from simulation under fixed external metrics, not forced by fit or self-citation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is standard and non-circular. Communication rates follow Shannon SINR from the continuous-aperture EM model (11)–(15). Navigation performance uses the classical complex-Gaussian FIM/CRB (23)–(30); treating σ²_eff as weakly dependent and freezing/damping it (after (24); (55)) is an explicit approximation, not a redefinition that makes the optimized objective equal its inputs by construction. Theorem 1 and Appendix B prove that an optimal beamformer exists in the finite ICAN channel span by showing orthogonal components contribute zero to all linear observations and only increase power—this is a dimensionality-reduction equivalence proof, not a self-definitional loop. The finite-dimensional SDP (56) and Algorithm 1 are standard SDR/BCD/SCA machinery applied to that reduced problem. Numerical claims (Figs. 4–6) compare the same CRB objective under identical power/rate constraints against DPA, Fourier, ZF, and navigation-centric baselines with fixed Table I parameters; nothing is fitted to data and then re-predicted. Self-citations to prior CAPA/ISAC work supply modeling and algorithmic building blocks, not a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that forces the present CRB ranking. The skeptic concern about σ²_eff dependence is a correctness/approximation risk, not circularity under the stated patterns.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central performance claim rests on ideal continuous-aperture control, far-field LoS dyadic Green’s functions with simple rain/Doppler handling, perfect cooperative CSI, Gaussianized residual interference after PRN matched filtering, and treating σ²_eff as quasi-constant in the CRB/DPE loop. Free parameters are algorithmic and scenario knobs (penalty, damping, constellation geometry, noise, rain stats), not fits to measured dual-function CAPA data. The ICAN channel subspace is a methodological construct proven not to lose optimality under the model, not a new physical entity.

free parameters (5)

penalty factor ρ (and amplification ι)
Hand-chosen SCA rank-penalty schedule (Table I: ρ=1, ι=1.2) that shapes how hard rank-one is enforced; affects attained beamformers but is not derived from physics.
damping factor λ′ for σ²_eff updates
Algorithmic step-size (Table I: 0.2) for BCD stability when freezing effective noise variance; chosen for numerical behavior.
Walker constellation and service-group selection parameters
h*, P*, N*, i*, F*, elevation-priority selection, and K (Table I / §IV) define geometry and thus CRB levels; scenario design choices, not estimated from data.
noise variance and rain attenuation (μ_r, σ_r²)
Fixed simulation values (σ²=5.6e-3 V²/m²; μ_r=-2.6 dB, σ_r²=1.63 dB) that set absolute CRB scale.
P_max_k and R_min_m operating points
Constraint levels swept in figures; determine the reported trade-off surface.

assumptions (7)

domain assumption Far-field LoS dyadic Green’s function with rain amplitude-phase and Doppler omitted after compensation (8).
Propagation kernel for all rates and CRBs; multipath, near-field, and residual Doppler are excluded.
domain assumption Uni-polarized CAPA (y′-directed current) and uni-polarized users; continuous scalar current j(s′) is freely synthesizable (3)–(4).
Ideal continuous aperture control is assumed throughout the optimization.
domain assumption After PRN matched filtering, residual communication interference is complex Gaussian with variance (22), enabling the FIM (29).
Central-limit modeling step for navigation observations and CRB.
domain assumption Perfect real-time CSI and ephemeris exchange over ISLs for cooperative beamforming.
Stated in system model; no robust/outdated CSI analysis.
ad hoc to paper σ²_eff,l depends only weakly on ql and beamformers, so it may be fixed or damped-updated inside CRB/DPE iterations.
Explicit approximation after (24) and in BCD update (55); load-bearing for tractable CRB objective.
standard math Optimal continuous beamformers may be restricted to the finite ICAN channel subspace without loss (Theorem 1).
Orthogonal decomposition under L2 inner product; proved in Appendix B under the linear observation model.
domain assumption SDR + SCA rank penalty + Gaussian randomization yields a high-quality feasible solution to the nonconvex beamforming problem.
Standard optimization practice; global optimality not claimed.

invented entities (1)

ICAN channel subspace C_k
purpose: Finite span of conjugate communication and navigation continuous channel responses used to parameterize CAPA beamformers without optimality loss.
Methodological construct for dimensionality reduction (Theorem 1, (32)–(35)); not a new physical field or particle. independent_evidence false as a physical entity, but the math claim is internal and checkable.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Continuous Aperture Array-Assisted Integrated Communication and Navigation in LEO Satellite Constellations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LN7IBUHW

@misc{pith2026260709030,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Continuous Aperture Array-Assisted Integrated Communication and Navigation in LEO Satellite Constellations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LN7IBUHW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.09030}
}

read the original abstract

This paper proposes a novel continuous aperture array (CAPA)-assisted integrated communication and navigation (ICAN) framework for low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite constellations. Within this framework, an electromagnetic-based collaborative transmission model is developed, in which multiple satellites equipped with CAPAs simultaneously radiate downlink data streams and navigation reference signals over shared spectrum. Building upon this, the achievable communication rate and the navigation Cramer-Rao bound (CRB) are derived, which explicitly characterize the intrinsic coupling between the dual-function beamformers and system performance. To improve the positioning accuracy with communication quality of service guarantee, a joint beamforming optimization problem is formulated to minimize the average CRB subject to transmit power budgets and minimum rate constraints. To tackle the inherent infinite-dimensionality of the CAPA beamformer design, an ICAN channel subspace is introduced to equivalently transform the formulation into a tractable finite-dimensional problem, which is then efficiently solved via an iterative convex optimization algorithm. Finally, numerical results demonstrate that the proposed CAPA-assisted beamforming design algorithm significantly outperforms conventional discrete phased array architectures and other benchmark schemes, yielding notable improvements in ICAN performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09030 by the authors.

**Figure 4.** Average CRB versus the maximum transmit power budget [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Convergence behavior of the proposed algorithm. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Average CRB versus the required minimum achievable r [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Average CRB versus the effective radiating area of th [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

[30]

Pattern-division multiplexing fo r multi-user continuous-aperture MIMO,

Z. Zhang and L. Dai, “Pattern-division multiplexing fo r multi-user continuous-aperture MIMO,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 2350-2366, Aug. 2023

2023
[1]

Researc h on the application of LEO satellite in IoT,

L. Jin, L. Wang, X. Jin, J. Zhu, K. Duan, and Z. Li, “Researc h on the application of LEO satellite in IoT,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Electron. Technol., Commun. Inf. , 2022, pp. 739-741

2022
[2]

QoS-driven satelli te constel- lation design for LEO satellite internet of things,

M. Ying, X. Chen, Q. Qi, and Z. Zhang, “QoS-driven satelli te constel- lation design for LEO satellite internet of things,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., doi: 10.1109/TWC.2025.3605220

work page doi:10.1109/twc.2025.3605220 2025
[3]

Fused low-Earth-orb it GNSS,

P . A. Iannucci and T. E. Humphreys, “Fused low-Earth-orb it GNSS,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. , vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 3730-3749, Aug. 2024

2024
[4]

Integrated communica tions and localization for massive MIMO LEO satellite systems,

L. Y ou, X. Qiang, Y . Zhu, F. Jiang, C. G. Tsinos, W. Wang, H. Wymeersch, X. Gao, and B. Ottersten, “Integrated communica tions and localization for massive MIMO LEO satellite systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 11061-11075, Sep. 2024

2024
[5]

A join t time- frequency channel estimation method for ICAN-enabled LEO s atellites,

J. Liu, Z. Chen, S. Wang, X. Tang, F. Wang, and W. Xu, “A join t time- frequency channel estimation method for ICAN-enabled LEO s atellites,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 18140-18145, Nov. 2025

2025
[6]

Two-way pattern grating lobe c ontrol for distributed digital subarray antennas,

B. -K. Feng and D. C. Jenn, “Two-way pattern grating lobe c ontrol for distributed digital subarray antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 4375-4383, Oct. 2015

2015
[7]

Achiev able rate of linear holographic MIMO with arbitrary aperture-length ,

L. Jin, X. Xu, S. Han, X. Chi, P . Zhang, and C. Y uen, “Achiev able rate of linear holographic MIMO with arbitrary aperture-length ,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 16742-16756, Nov. 2024

2024

Show all 32 references

[8]

Dynamic metasurface antennas for MIMO-OFDM receiv ers with bit-limited ADCs,

H. Wang, N. Shlezinger, Y . C. Eldar, S. Jin, M. F. Imani, I. Y oo, and D. R. Smith, “Dynamic metasurface antennas for MIMO-OFDM receiv ers with bit-limited ADCs,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 2643-2659, Apr. 2021

2021
[9]

Analytical framework for effective degrees of fre edom in near-ﬁeld XL-MIMO,

Z. Wang, J. Zhang, W. Yi, H. Xiao, H. Du, D. Niyato, B. Ai, an d D. W. K. Ng, “Analytical framework for effective degrees of fre edom in near-ﬁeld XL-MIMO,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 3465-3482, Apr. 2025

2025
[10]

Capacity of the continuo us-space electromagnetic channel,

M. A. Jensen and J. W. Wallace, “Capacity of the continuo us-space electromagnetic channel,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 524-531, Feb. 2008

2008
[11]

On the performance of co ntinuous aperture array (CAPA)-based wireless communications,

C. Ouyang, Y . Liu, and X. Zhang, “On the performance of co ntinuous aperture array (CAPA)-based wireless communications,” in Proc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM) , Cape Town, South Africa, 2024, pp. 193-198

2024
[12]

CAPA : Continuous-aperture arrays for revolutionizing 6G wirele ss communica- tions,

Y . Liu, C. Ouyang, Z. Wang, J. Xu, X. Mu, and Z. Ding, “CAPA : Continuous-aperture arrays for revolutionizing 6G wirele ss communica- tions,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.00894 , 2024

2024 arXiv
[13]

Optimal beamforming for multi-user continuous aperture array (CAPA) systems,

Z. Wang, C. Ouyang, and Y . Liu, “Optimal beamforming for multi-user continuous aperture array (CAPA) systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 73, no. 10, pp. 9207-9221, Oct. 2025

2025
[14]

Downli nk and uplink ISAC in continuous-aperture array (CAPA) system s,

B. Zhao, C. Ouyang, X. Zhang, H. Shin, and Y . Liu, “Downli nk and uplink ISAC in continuous-aperture array (CAPA) system s,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.06967, 2025

2025
[15]

Continuous-aperture array for integrated sensing and com muni- cation: Rate-CRB tradeoff,

Y . Zhang, H. Shan, C. Ouyang, Y . Liu, Z. Shi, and D. Lin, “Continuous-aperture array for integrated sensing and com muni- cation: Rate-CRB tradeoff,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , doi: 10.1109/TWC.2025.3609401

2025 doi
[16]

Wavenumb er-division multiplexing in line-of-sight holographic MIMO communica tions,

L. Sanguinetti, A. A. D’Amico, and M. Debbah, “Wavenumb er-division multiplexing in line-of-sight holographic MIMO communica tions,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2186-2201, Apr. 2023

2023
[17]

Beamforming design for c on- tinuous aperture array (CAPA)-based MIMO systems,

Z. Wang, C. Ouyang, and Y . Liu, “Beamforming design for c on- tinuous aperture array (CAPA)-based MIMO systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.00181, 2025

2025 arXiv
[18]

Communicating with large intelligent sur faces: Fundamen- tal limits and models,

D. Dardari, “Communicating with large intelligent sur faces: Fundamen- tal limits and models,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2526-2537, Nov. 2020

2020
[19]

Beamforming optimizati on for continuous aperture array (CAPA)-based communications,

Z. Wang, C. Ouyang, and Y . Liu, “Beamforming optimizati on for continuous aperture array (CAPA)-based communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 5099-5113, Jun. 2025

2025
[20]

Deep learnin g-based joint channel prediction and multibeam precoding for LEO satelli te internet of things,

M. Ying, X. Chen, Q. Qi, and W. Gerstacker, “Deep learnin g-based joint channel prediction and multibeam precoding for LEO satelli te internet of things,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 13946-13960, Oct. 2024

2024
[21]

Downlink transmit design for massive MIMO LEO s atellite communications,

K. -X. Li, L. Y ou, J. Wang, X. Gao, C. G. Tsinos, S. Chatzin otas, and B. Ottersten, “Downlink transmit design for massive MIMO LEO s atellite communications,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 1014-1028, Feb. 2022

2022
[22]

Cram´ er- Rao bound analysis of positioning approaches in GNSS receiv ers,

P . Closas, C. Fernandez-Prades, and J. A. Fernandez-Ru bio, “Cram´ er- Rao bound analysis of positioning approaches in GNSS receiv ers,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 3775-3786, Oct. 2009

2009
[23]

Maximum likelihood estimation of position in GNSS,

P . Closas, C. Fernandez-Prades, and J. A. Fernandez-Ru bio, “Maximum likelihood estimation of position in GNSS,” IEEE Signal Process Lett. , vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 359-362, May 2007

2007
[24]

STARS enabled integrated sen sing and communications,

Z. Wang, X. Mu, and Y . Liu, “STARS enabled integrated sen sing and communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 6750-6765, Oct. 2023

2023
[25]

Contin uous aperture array (CAPA)-based secure wireless communicatio ns,

J. Zhao, H. Song, X. Mu, K. Cai, Y . Zhu, and Y . Liu, “Contin uous aperture array (CAPA)-based secure wireless communicatio ns,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.11114, 2025

2025 arXiv
[26]

V . A. Zorich and O. Paniagua, Mathematical analysis II . Berlin, Ger- many: Springer, 2016

2016
[27]

Outage cons trained robust transmit optimization for multiuser MISO downlinks : Tractable approximations by conic optimization,

K. Wang, A. M. So, T. Chang, W. Ma, and C. Chi, “Outage cons trained robust transmit optimization for multiuser MISO downlinks : Tractable approximations by conic optimization,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 62, no. 21, pp. 5690-5705, Nov. 2014

2014
[28]

Session duration between handovers in dense LEO satellite networks,

A. Al-Hourani, “Session duration between handovers in dense LEO satellite networks,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 2810-2814, Dec. 2021

2021
[29]

F. W. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C. W. Clark, NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions . Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010

2010
[31]

Exploiting continuous-aperture arrays in integrated sensing and comm unication systems,

Y . Zhang, C. Ouyang, H. Shan, Y . Liu, Y . Zhou, and Z. Shi, “ Exploiting continuous-aperture arrays in integrated sensing and comm unication systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 9539-9555, Nov. 2025. 14

2025
[32]

Physical layer se- curity for continuous-aperture array (CAPA) systems,

B. Zhao, C. Ouyang, X. Zhang, and Y . Liu, “Physical layer se- curity for continuous-aperture array (CAPA) systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13748, 2024

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed July 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [30]

Pattern-division multiplexing fo r multi-user continuous-aperture MIMO,

Z. Zhang and L. Dai, “Pattern-division multiplexing fo r multi-user continuous-aperture MIMO,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 2350-2366, Aug. 2023

2023

[2] [1]

Researc h on the application of LEO satellite in IoT,

L. Jin, L. Wang, X. Jin, J. Zhu, K. Duan, and Z. Li, “Researc h on the application of LEO satellite in IoT,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Electron. Technol., Commun. Inf. , 2022, pp. 739-741

2022

[3] [2]

QoS-driven satelli te constel- lation design for LEO satellite internet of things,

M. Ying, X. Chen, Q. Qi, and Z. Zhang, “QoS-driven satelli te constel- lation design for LEO satellite internet of things,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., doi: 10.1109/TWC.2025.3605220

work page doi:10.1109/twc.2025.3605220 2025

[4] [3]

Fused low-Earth-orb it GNSS,

P . A. Iannucci and T. E. Humphreys, “Fused low-Earth-orb it GNSS,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. , vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 3730-3749, Aug. 2024

2024

[5] [4]

Integrated communica tions and localization for massive MIMO LEO satellite systems,

L. Y ou, X. Qiang, Y . Zhu, F. Jiang, C. G. Tsinos, W. Wang, H. Wymeersch, X. Gao, and B. Ottersten, “Integrated communica tions and localization for massive MIMO LEO satellite systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 11061-11075, Sep. 2024

2024

[6] [5]

A join t time- frequency channel estimation method for ICAN-enabled LEO s atellites,

J. Liu, Z. Chen, S. Wang, X. Tang, F. Wang, and W. Xu, “A join t time- frequency channel estimation method for ICAN-enabled LEO s atellites,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 18140-18145, Nov. 2025

2025

[7] [6]

Two-way pattern grating lobe c ontrol for distributed digital subarray antennas,

B. -K. Feng and D. C. Jenn, “Two-way pattern grating lobe c ontrol for distributed digital subarray antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 4375-4383, Oct. 2015

2015

[8] [7]

Achiev able rate of linear holographic MIMO with arbitrary aperture-length ,

L. Jin, X. Xu, S. Han, X. Chi, P . Zhang, and C. Y uen, “Achiev able rate of linear holographic MIMO with arbitrary aperture-length ,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 16742-16756, Nov. 2024

2024