Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Real Face Foundation Representation Learning for Generalized Deepfake Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.08439 v1 pith:LNG3K25B submitted 2023-03-15 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords realfacerffrdeepfakedistributionfacesartifactsfake
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The emergence of deepfake technologies has become a matter of social concern as they pose threats to individual privacy and public security. It is now of great significance to develop reliable deepfake detectors. However, with numerous face manipulation algorithms present, it is almost impossible to collect sufficient representative fake faces, and it is hard for existing detectors to generalize to all types of manipulation. Therefore, we turn to learn the distribution of real faces, and indirectly identify fake images that deviate from the real face distribution. In this study, we propose Real Face Foundation Representation Learning (RFFR), which aims to learn a general representation from large-scale real face datasets and detect potential artifacts outside the distribution of RFFR. Specifically, we train a model on real face datasets by masked image modeling (MIM), which results in a discrepancy between input faces and the reconstructed ones when applying the model on fake samples. This discrepancy reveals the low-level artifacts not contained in RFFR, making it easier to build a deepfake detector sensitive to all kinds of potential artifacts outside the distribution of RFFR. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method brings about better generalization performance, as it significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in cross-manipulation evaluations, and has the potential to further improve by introducing extra real faces for training RFFR.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Contrastive Desensitization Learning for Cross Domain Face Forgery Detection

    cs.CV 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    CDN mixes feature statistics of genuine face images and reconstructs them to reduce false alarms in cross-domain deepfake detection, but the supporting theory is flawed and the artifacts are missing.

Pith tools