pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.13690 · v2 · pith:LNJXUWESnew · submitted 2025-04-18 · 💻 cs.CV

Analysing the Robustness of Vision-Language-Models to Common Corruptions

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords corruptionsrobustnessreasoningacrossanalysisblurcommonmodels
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in understanding and reasoning about visual and textual content. However, their robustness to common image corruptions remains under-explored. In this work, we present the first comprehensive analysis of VLM robustness across 19 corruption types from the ImageNet-C benchmark, spanning four categories: noise, blur, weather, and digital distortions. We introduce two new benchmarks, TextVQA-C and GQA-C, to systematically evaluate how corruptions affect scene text understanding and object-based reasoning, respectively. Our analysis reveals that transformer-based VLMs exhibit distinct vulnerability patterns across tasks: text recognition deteriorates most severely under blur and snow corruptions, while object reasoning shows higher sensitivity to corruptions such as frost and impulse noise. We connect these observations to the frequency-domain characteristics of different corruptions, revealing how transformers' inherent bias toward low-frequency processing explains their differential robustness patterns. Our findings provide valuable insights for developing more corruption-robust vision-language models for real-world applications.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. How Robust is OCR-Reasoning? Evaluating OCR-Reasoning Robustness of Vision-Language Models under Visual Perturbations

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces OCR-Robust benchmark and evaluates 18 VLMs showing clean accuracy does not guarantee robustness with charts and tables more fragile than documents under selected perturbations.

  2. Are Reasoning Vision-Language Models Robust to Semantic Visual Distractions?

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Reasoning VLMs show lower robustness to semantic visual distractions than to perceptual corruptions, with distractions entering their reasoning chains and causing errors.

  3. DUALVISION: RGB-Infrared Multimodal Large Language Models for Robust Visual Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DUALVISION is a new lightweight fusion module using localized cross-attention to integrate infrared with RGB data in MLLMs, improving robustness to degradations and supported by the new DV-204K training dataset and DV...

  4. RemoteShield: Enable Robust Multimodal Large Language Models for Earth Observation

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RemoteShield improves robustness of Earth observation MLLMs by training on semantic equivalence clusters of clean and perturbed inputs via preference learning to maintain consistent reasoning under noise.