REVIEW 3 cited by
Evaluating Compositionality in Sentence Embeddings
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
An important challenge for human-like AI is compositional semantics. Recent research has attempted to address this by using deep neural networks to learn vector space embeddings of sentences, which then serve as input to other tasks. We present a new dataset for one such task, `natural language inference' (NLI), that cannot be solved using only word-level knowledge and requires some compositionality. We find that the performance of state of the art sentence embeddings (InferSent; Conneau et al., 2017) on our new dataset is poor. We analyze the decision rules learned by InferSent and find that they are consistent with simple heuristics that are ecologically valid in its training dataset. Further, we find that augmenting training with our dataset improves test performance on our dataset without loss of performance on the original training dataset. This highlights the importance of structured datasets in better understanding and improving AI systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Investigating BERT's Knowledge of Language: Five Analysis Methods with NPIs
BERT's apparent knowledge of English NPI licensing varies across five evaluation methods, from near-perfect on gradient minimal pairs to inconsistent on absolute judgments and scope probing.
-
Trust at Your Own Peril: A Mixed Methods Exploration of the Ability of Large Language Models to Generate Expert-Like Systems Engineering Artifacts and a Characterization of Failure Modes
Closed-source LLMs can produce systems engineering artifact text that scores nearly identically to a human expert benchmark on MAUVE text similarity, but expert review of the best-scoring outputs reveals three failure...
-
Higher-order Comparisons of Sentence Encoder Representations
Sentences that take humans longer to read also show larger disagreement between layers of pretrained language encoders.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.