Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

CERTIFAI: Counterfactual Explanations for Robustness, Transparency, Interpretability, and Fairness of Artificial Intelligence models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.07857 v1 pith:LPE5D4EA submitted 2019-05-20 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords modelrobustnesscertifaifairnessinterpretabilitymethodsmodelstransparency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

As artificial intelligence plays an increasingly important role in our society, there are ethical and moral obligations for both businesses and researchers to ensure that their machine learning models are designed, deployed, and maintained responsibly. These models need to be rigorously audited for fairness, robustness, transparency, and interpretability. A variety of methods have been developed that focus on these issues in isolation, however, managing these methods in conjunction with model development can be cumbersome and timeconsuming. In this paper, we introduce a unified and model-agnostic approach to address these issues: Counterfactual Explanations for Robustness, Transparency, Interpretability, and Fairness of Artificial Intelligence models (CERTIFAI). Unlike previous methods in this domain, CERTIFAI is a general tool that can be applied to any black-box model and any type of input data. Given a model and an input instance, CERTIFAI uses a custom genetic algorithm to generate counterfactuals: instances close to the input that change the prediction of the model. We demonstrate how these counterfactuals can be used to examine issues of robustness, interpretability, transparency, and fairness. Additionally, we introduce CERScore, the first black-box model robustness score that performs comparably to methods that have access to model internals.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Explainable Gaussian Process Auto-encoder for Tabular Data

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Gaussian-process autoencoder with a latent-space density estimator generates counterfactual examples for tabular data, with competitive or better scores on several evaluation metrics.

  2. Efficient computation of counterfactual explanations of LVQ models

    cs.LG 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Counterfactual explanations for LVQ classifiers can be computed by solving closed-form linear, quadratic, or non-convex QCQP programs derived from the nearest-prototype rule, yielding faster and closer counterfactuals...

Pith tools