Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 72 references

Malleable Robots

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The workspace of a 2-DOF malleable robot is a quartic algebraic surface that degenerates to a sphere, plane, or torus under topology constraints, and its kinematics follow from interpoint distances alone.

desk verdict A useful tutorial synthesis with a solid distance-geometry workspace derivation, but the SCARA reduction overstates the reachable workspace and the control claims rest on prior work rather than evidence in the chapter. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04012 v1 pith:LPN72IBS submitted 2025-02-06 cs.RO

Angus B. Clark , Xinran Wang , Alex Ranne , Nicolas Rojas This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.RO MSC 70B1551K99
keywords malleablerobotsvariablestiffnesslinklayerjammingdistancegeometryworkspacecomputationquarticalgebraicsurfaceCayley-Mengerdeterminantskinematicsofserial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This chapter argues that a new class of low-actuation robot arms, malleable robots, can match the task versatility of high-degree-of-freedom cobots by changing the geometry of a stiffness-variable link between two joints. Its central claim is that the workspace of a 2-DOF malleable robot is exactly the quartic algebraic surface $\Gamma(x,y,z)=0$ of Eq. (7.12), obtained purely from interpoint distances, and that this surface degenerates to a sphere, a plane, or a torus-like surface under specific topology constraints. If that is right, designers of lower-mobility arms no longer need Denavit-Hartenberg frames or extra actuated joints to guarantee reachability: the reachable set is written down directly from measured distances. The chapter also provides a complete fabrication recipe for a layer-jamming malleable link and shows how the same distance-geometry machinery supports forward and inverse kinematics, AR-guided reconfiguration, and data-efficient control.

What carries the argument

The bar-and-joint framework of six points and twelve edges shown in Fig. 7.12: points $P_1,P_2$ define the first revolute axis, $P_3,P_4$ the second, $P_5$ is the end-effector, and $P_0$ is an auxiliary fixed point used for kinematics. The workspace condition is the vanishing of the Cayley-Menger determinant $D(1,2,3,4,5)=0$, which after a block-determinant factorization becomes $\det(A-BCB^T)=0$ with three $3\times3$ matrices whose entries are squared distances; substituting the coordinates of $P_5$ and expanding yields the quartic $\Gamma(x,y,z)=0$. The same squared distances feed the trilateration operator $W_{i,j,k,l}$ and the dihedral-angle formula that together implement forward and inverse kinematics.

What would settle it

Rigidify a 2-DOF malleable robot in a fixed non-special topology, measure the four topology distances ($s_{1,3}, s_{1,4}, s_{2,3}, s_{2,4}$) and the axis distances with motion capture, then actuate both joints over their full range and record end-effector positions: any measured position that does not satisfy Eq. (7.12) within sensor noise would falsify the workspace claim. A cheaper check in the spherical topology is whether every reachable position obeys $x^2+y^2+z^2-s_{3,5}=0$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that for a 2-DOF malleable robot, the locus of end-effector positions is the quartic algebraic surface $\Gamma(x,y,z)=0$ given by Eq. (7.12). The coefficients $q_i$, $i=0,\ldots,5$, are polynomials in the squared interpoint distances $s_{1,2}, s_{1,3}, s_{1,4}, s_{2,3}, s_{2,4}, s_{3,4}, s_{3,5}, s_{4,5}$, so the workspace is completely determined by distances between points on the joint axes, with no coordinate frames attached to the links. Under the topology constraints defining its configuration classes the surface collapses to special forms: $x^2+y^2+z^2-s_{3,5}=0$ in the spherical case, $x^2+y^2+(z-d_{1,2})^2-s_{4,5}=0$ in the PUMA-like case, a plane $z-z_5=0$ in the SCARA case, and the full quartic for the general articulated case. The same distance-geometry setting yields forward and inverse kinematics by trilateration and by the cosine of the dihedral angle between adjacent triangles, using only the interpoint distances.

Load-bearing premise

The kinematic and workspace derivations assume that a rigidified malleable link is exactly captured by four variable distances between two points on each joint axis; if real bending, twisting, or off-axis deformation of the layer-jammed structure adds shape information those distances cannot encode, the quartic surface will misstate the reachable workspace.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The workspace of a 2-DOF malleable robot can be computed analytically from distance measurements alone, without Denavit-Hartenberg parameters or joint-frame sensors.
  • Topology reconfiguration becomes a parameter choice: selecting the four distances $s_{1,3}, s_{1,4}, s_{2,3}, s_{2,4}$ moves the quartic surface so that it covers the desired task region.
  • The same distance-geometry formulation gives closed-form forward and inverse kinematics, so the malleable link does not need internal joint-angle sensors.
  • The spherical, PUMA-like, and SCARA degenerations give designers simple closed-form workspace conditions that they can target directly when bending the link into a configuration.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The quartic-surface characterization suggests a natural extension to $n$-DOF malleable arms, where each malleable link contributes one Cayley-Menger condition and the workspace becomes an intersection of such surfaces.
  • Because the workspace equation is a function of distances only, a motion-capture calibration pass could feed measured distances directly into the equation, making online topology estimation possible without a kinematic model of the joint frames.
  • The degenerations encourage an inverse-design workflow in which the topology parameters are solved for to best fit a given task workspace, turning reconfiguration into an algebraic-geometry selection problem.
  • The linear stiffness law $F=\mu n P W L$ for the layered link, if combined with the workspace parametrization, suggests stiffness could be modulated during motion to expand or contract the reachable surface; the chapter does not pursue this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. This chapter presents a survey and tutorial treatment of malleable robots: variable-stiffness robotic arms whose link geometry can be reconfigured. The central technical contribution is a distance-geometry formulation in which a 2-DOF malleable robot is modeled as a five-point, twelve-edge bar-and-joint framework; the workspace of the end effector is claimed to be the quartic algebraic surface Gamma(x,y,z)=0 in Eq. (7.12), derived from the vanishing of the Cayley-Menger determinant D(1,2,3,4,5). Special cases are claimed to reduce to a sphere (spherical topology), a sphere with variable center (PUMA-like topology), and a plane (SCARA topology). The chapter also gives forward and inverse kinematics in interpoint-distance form, describes an augmented-reality reconfiguration workflow, and outlines a data-efficient control framework for a compressible-spine continuum robot based on a Cosserat rod model, a neural-network inverse model, and Gaussian process regression.

Significance. The distance-geometry derivation is self-contained and elegant, and it is genuinely parameter-free for the workspace equation: Eq. (7.12) is expressed entirely in terms of interpoint distances and does not require calibration. The fabrication tutorial and the stated availability of CAD/DXF/3MF files are useful resources. The forward and inverse kinematics in distance space are a nice alternative to Denavit-Hartenberg conventions for variable-geometry arms. However, the main exactness claim for the workspace is overstated: Eq. (7.10) is a necessary but not sufficient condition for physical realizability, and the SCARA reduction in Sec. 7.3.2.3 produces the Zariski closure rather than the actual workspace. These are internal correctness concerns, not disagreements with the robotics community's consensus. The control section's headline claim of data-efficiency with only 100 real-world points is not supported by any experiment reported in this document. If the workspace claims are reformulated with the missing inequalities and the control section is repositioned as a summary of prior work, the chapter would be a solid contribution for a book or survey venue.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 7.3.2, Eq. (7.10)] The statement that Eq. (7.10) is 'solely satisfied' at the points where a 2-DOF malleable robot can physically exist is too strong. Vanishing of the Cayley-Menger determinant D(1,2,3,4,5) is necessary for five points to be embeddable in E3, but it is not sufficient: the distance matrix must also satisfy the triangle inequalities and the non-negativity of the principal Cayley-Menger minors, or equivalently the associated Gram matrix must be positive semidefinite with rank at most three. Consequently, the algebraic surface Gamma(x,y,z)=0 in Eq. (7.12) is generally an algebraic superset of the reachable workspace, not the workspace itself. The derivation should be restated as giving the Zariski closure of the workspace, or supplemented with the missing realizability inequalities.
  2. [Sec. 7.3.2.3, Eq. (7.15)] The projective-limit argument for the SCARA case is not a valid Euclidean limit of the Cayley-Menger construction. A point at infinity cannot be used in Eq. (7.10) because the interpoint distances d1,2, d2,3, and similar quantities are not finite in that limit, and the text's simultaneous use of P2=P4=P-infinity with finite constraints such as s2,4=0 and d1,4=d1,2 mixes infinite and finite quantities. Concretely, for a 2R arm with parallel axes whose offset is R and whose distal radius about the second axis is rho, the reachable set in the plane z=z5 is the annulus |R-rho| <= sqrt(x^2+y^2) <= R+rho, not the entire plane. The plane obtained in Eq. (7.15) therefore overstates the workspace and is only its Zariski closure. This is an internal mathematical issue and does not depend on physical compliance of the malleable link.
  3. [Sec. 7.5, esp. Secs. 7.5.1 and 7.5.5] The chapter's headline claim of a control framework requiring 'only 100 real-world data' is not supported by any experimental evaluation in this document. The abstract and Sec. 7.5.1 make this claim, and Sec. 7.5.5 concludes that the method 'has been demonstrated' and is 'fast, data-efficient and accurate,' but no plots, tables, or error statistics are provided for the reader. The only supporting evidence is a citation to the authors' prior paper [68]. Because data-efficiency is precisely the contribution claimed for the control framework, this is a load-bearing validation gap. The chapter should either include the experimental results that justify the 100-point claim or explicitly state that those results are presented in [68] and that the present chapter is a tutorial summary of that work.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Sec. 7.5.2, Eq. (7.27)] The sentence 'Iyy = Ixx + Iyy' after the definition of Kbt appears to be a typo; for a circular cross-section the intended relation is likely Izz = Ixx + Iyy.
  2. [Sec. 7.3.2, Eq. (7.12)] The displayed equation for Gamma(x,y,z) is missing plus signs between the q1 and q2 terms, which makes the polynomial difficult to parse; please fix the typesetting.
  3. [Sec. 7.4.4.5] The workflow summary refers to points 'P5 and P6', but the distance-geometry model of Fig. 7.12 defines P1 through P5 only; P6 is never introduced, and P5 already denotes the end effector.
  4. [Sec. 7.4.4.4] The text contains an unresolved placeholder, 'section (insert Angus’ section on distance geometry)', which should be replaced with the actual cross-reference.
  5. [Sec. 7.5.3.3] There are minor typographical errors: 'Kennel function' should be 'kernel function', 'GBP' should be 'GPR', and 'Jupiter notebook' should be 'Jupyter notebook'.
  6. [Sec. 7.2.2.2, Eq. (7.1)] The geometric variables in Eq. (7.1), such as g, Ds, B, Gc, and w, are introduced in the text but not collected in a notation table; because the same symbols reappear in later sections, a short glossary or unit list would improve readability.
  7. [Sec. 7.3.2.3] The symbol z5 is introduced as 'the distance between the end effector and the xy-plane' while Eq. (7.11) uses z as the end-effector coordinate; the relation z5 = z should be stated explicitly to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the quartic workspace equation is a parameter-free algebraic consequence of the bar-and-joint distance model; self-citations are supporting rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The central workspace derivation is self-contained. Equation (7.12) is obtained by substituting Eq. (7.11) into Eq. (7.10) and fully expanding, as the paper states: "Substituting equation (7.11) into equation (7.10), fully expanding the result and rearranging terms, we get Γ(x,y,z)..." The only input is the Cayley-Menger condition D(1,2,3,4,5)=0 for five points in E3, which is a standard distance-geometry identity. The special-case surfaces (7.13)-(7.15) follow by substituting topology constraints into the same quartic, so they are algebraic consequences rather than fitted predictions. The control section uses a Cosserat model whose Young's modulus is calibrated and a GPR error model trained on 100 real samples; this is model fitting and learning, not a prediction forced by construction. The control performance claim is cited to the authors' prior work [68], but that is a peer-reviewed external result and the chapter does not reduce its central derivation to that citation. The genuine weakness in the paper is mathematical correctness, not circularity: D(1,2,3,4,5)=0 is necessary but not sufficient for Euclidean realizability, and the SCARA limiting argument in Sec. 7.3.2.3 yields the plane (7.15), whereas the physically reachable set is a planar annulus. This over-inclusiveness would make Eq. (7.12) too large as a workspace description, but it is not an equivalence-by-construction between input and output. Unresolved placeholders such as "section (insert Angus' section on distance geometry)" and "Section x" in Secs. 7.4.4.4-7.4.4.5 are missing-reference artifacts with no circular import.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central workspace derivation depends on distance-geometry axioms and the bar-and-joint abstraction of the link. The control section adds a calibrated Cosserat model and a learned GPR error term, with the compression coefficient fitted from data. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Spine compression coefficient c_spine = 0.2 mm/N
    Fitted from compression experiments on a two-section spine specimen (Sec 7.5.2.4), used in Eq (7.31) to update segment lengths in the Cosserat shooting method.
  • Young's modulus E of the continuum robot spine = not stated
    Calibrated using 'a small number of real position data' via fminsearch (Sec 7.5.3.2) to minimize simulated vs real end-effector error.
  • Policy C error threshold e_c = 0.015 m
    Set to policy A's average goal-reaching error (Sec 7.5.4.4) to decide when to switch from policy A to policy B.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Cayley-Menger determinants and distance geometry provide a valid metric-based formulation of Euclidean embeddings (Eqs 7.2-7.9).
    Used throughout Sec 7.3 to derive workspace and kinematics; standard results in distance geometry.
  • domain assumption A rigidified malleable link and the attached revolute joints can be modeled as a bar-and-joint framework with fixed interpoint distances along the joint axes and variable distances between axes (Sec 7.3.2, Fig 7.12).
    This abstraction converts the robot's topology into distance parameters; if the physical link has unmodeled compliance, the workspace equation may not hold.
  • domain assumption The static Cosserat rod model with linear constitutive laws and the tendon force model (Eqs 7.26-7.29) accurately describes the continuum robot's deformation.
    The control framework is built on this model; the authors assume no friction between tendons and their paths (Sec 7.5.2.1).
  • ad hoc to paper The compressible spine shortens linearly with the internal normal force magnitude with a single fitted coefficient c_spine (Eq 7.31).
    This linear relation is fitted from experiments on a two-section specimen and applied to all 11 sections; extrapolation to the full robot is assumed.
  • ad hoc to paper In the SCARA workspace derivation, points at infinity can be used to model parallel axes via projective limits (δ → ∞, d1,2 → ∞).
    The derivation in Sec 7.3.2.3 uses informal limits to obtain the planar workspace equation, without a rigorous projective-geometry justification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Malleable Robots." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LPN72IBS

@misc{pith2026250204012,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Malleable Robots},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LPN72IBS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04012}
}
read the original abstract

This chapter is about the fundamentals of fabrication, control, and human-robot interaction of a new type of collaborative robotic manipulators, called malleable robots, which are based on adjustable architectures of varying stiffness for achieving high dexterity with lower mobility arms. Collaborative robots, or cobots, commonly integrate six or more degrees of freedom (DOF) in a serial arm in order to allow positioning in constrained spaces and adaptability across tasks. Increasing the dexterity of robotic arms has been indeed traditionally accomplished by increasing the number of degrees of freedom of the system; however, once a robotic task has been established (e.g., a pick-and-place operation), the motion of the end-effector can be normally achieved using less than 6-DOF (i.e., lower mobility). The aim of malleable robots is to close the technological gap that separates current cobots from achieving flexible, accessible manufacturing automation with a reduced number of actuators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04012 by the authors.

Figure 7.1
Figure 7.1. A two-degree-of-freedom (DOF) malleable robot arm, sho [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_7_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7.2
Figure 7.2. Double-sided flap pattern specifications for layer jamming s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_7_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7.3
Figure 7.3. Cut-away malleable link highlighting individual components. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (19 more)
Figure 7.4
Figure 7.4. Figure 7.4: Neutral spine position (a), compressed spine (b), and extended spine (c). that the spine did not impact the existing bending performance of the malleable link. The spine is defined by the parameters neutral gap (Gn), compressed gap (Gc), extended gap (Ge), ligament b…
Figure 7.5
Figure 7.5. Figure 7.5: Sectional view of 2-segment spine with integrated flexible liga [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7_5.png]
Figure 7.6
Figure 7.6. Figure 7.6: Motion of the flexible spine. Compression [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7_6.png]
Figure 7.7
Figure 7.7. Figure 7.7: Diagram highlighting the key elements that compose the layer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7_7.png]
Figure 7.8
Figure 7.8. Figure 7.8: Cleanup options when exporting a DXF from SOLIDWORKS. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7_8.png]
Figure 7.9
Figure 7.9. Figure 7.9: Diagram showing the sewing route (green) for the layer jam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7_9.png]
Figure 7.10
Figure 7.10. Figure 7.10: The parts of the spine: (a) the rigid component, (b) the fl [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7_10.png]
Figure 7.11
Figure 7.11. Figure 7.11: A dihedral angle φ of the tetrahedron i,j,k,l defined by the two triangles i,j,k and i,k,l. Base vectors pi,j and pi,k and output vectors pi,l, pj,l, and pk,l are shown. In this case, Vi,j,k,l > 0. as the technique has been shown to simplify the computation of the w…
Figure 7.12
Figure 7.12. Figure 7.12: The 2-DOF malleable robot arm can be modelled as a bar-and- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7_12.png]
Figure 7.13
Figure 7.13. Figure 7.13: Simulated example workspaces for each type of robot top [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7_13.png]
Figure 7.14
Figure 7.14. Figure 7.14: The developed augmented reality-assisted reconfigurat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7_14.png]
Figure 7.15
Figure 7.15. Figure 7.15: The previously developed 2-DOF malleable robot to be recon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7_15.png]
Figure 7.16
Figure 7.16. Figure 7.16: Key AR components anchor (or origin point) is used to define their positions. In order to make the position definitions as easy as possible, it is often convenient to define the world anchor with respect to a fixed object of interest, for example the base joint of a…
Figure 7.17
Figure 7.17. Figure 7.17: The Coordinate system of the scene, where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_7_17.png]
Figure 7.18
Figure 7.18. Figure 7.18: Involute and Cycloid curves traced by the malleable link in bot [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7_18.png]
Figure 7.19
Figure 7.19. Figure 7.19: A summary of the reconfiguration algorithm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_7_19.png]
Figure 7.20
Figure 7.20. Figure 7.20: (a) Design of flexible spine.(b)Tendon path and cross-sec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_7_20.png]
Figure 7.21
Figure 7.21. Figure 7.21: (a) Feedforward neural network.(b) Recurrent neura [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_7_21.png]
Figure 7.22
Figure 7.22. Figure 7.22: (a) Control Policy A.(b) Control Policy B.(c) Control Policy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_7_22.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [68]

    A data-efficient model-based l earning framework for the closed-loop control of continuum robots

    Xinran W ang and Nicolas Rojas. A data-efficient model-based l earning framework for the closed-loop control of continuum robots. In 2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Soft Robotics (Ro boSoft), pages 247–254. IEEE, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [1]

    A reconfigurable robot with lockable cylindrical joints

    Farhad Aghili and Kourosh Parsa. A reconfigurable robot with lockable cylindrical joints. IEEE Transactions on Robotics , 25(4):785–797, 2009

    work page 2009

  3. [2]

    Progress and prospects of the human–robot collaboration

    Arash Ajoudani, Andrea Maria Zanchettin, Serena Ivaldi, Al in Albu-Sch¨ affer, Kazuhiro Kosuge, and Oussama Khatib. Progress and prospects of the human–robot collaboration. Autonomous Robots, 42:957–975, 2018

    work page 2018

  4. [3]

    Registration techniques for clinical applications of three-dimensiona l augmented reality devices

    Christopher M Andrews, Alexander B Henry, Ignacio M Soriano , Michael K Southworth, and Jonathan R Silva. Registration techniques for clinical applications of three-dimensiona l augmented reality devices. IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine , 9:1–14, 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [4]

    Flexibl e medical devices: Review of controllable stiffness solutio ns

    Lo ¨ ıc Blanc, Alain Delchambre, and Pierre Lambert. Flexibl e medical devices: Review of controllable stiffness solutio ns. In Actuators, volume 6, page 23. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing I nstitute, 2017

    work page 2017

  6. [5]

    Novel continuum robots wi th variable-length sections

    Marshal Blessing and Ian D W alker. Novel continuum robots wi th variable-length sections. IF AC Proceedings Volumes, 37(14):55–60, 2004

    work page 2004

  7. [6]

    Theory and applications of distance geometr y, 1953

    LM Blumenthal. Theory and applications of distance geometr y, 1953

    work page 1953

  8. [7]

    Active constraints/virtual fixtures: A survey

    Stuart A Bowyer, Brian L Davies, and Ferdinando Rodriguez y B aena. Active constraints/virtual fixtures: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Robotics , 30(1):138–157, 2013

    work page 2013

Show all 72 references
  1. [8]

    Task-dependent structural modification s on reconfigurable general serial manipulators

    Mathias Brandst¨ otter, Paolo Gallina, Stefano Seriani, an d Michael Hofbaur. Task-dependent structural modification s on reconfigurable general serial manipulators. In International Conference on Robotics in Alpe-Adria Danube Region, pages 316–324. Springer, 2018. 204

    2018

  2. [9]

    Co ntinuum robots for medical applications: A survey

    Jessica Burgner-Kahrs, D Caleb Rucker, and Howie Choset. Co ntinuum robots for medical applications: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Robotics , 31(6):1261–1280, 2015

    2015

  3. [10]

    Stiffness-tuneable limb seg ment with flexible spine for malleable robots

    Angus B Clark and Nicolas Rojas. Stiffness-tuneable limb seg ment with flexible spine for malleable robots. In 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , pages 3969–3975. IEEE, 2019

    2019

  4. [11]

    Design and workspace charac terisation of malleable robots

    Angus B Clark and Nicolas Rojas. Design and workspace charac terisation of malleable robots. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , pages 9021–9027. IEEE, 2020

    2020

  5. [12]

    Clark and Nicolas Rojas

    Angus B. Clark and Nicolas Rojas. Malleable robots: Reconfig urable robotic arms with continuum links of variable stiffne ss. IEEE Transaction on Robotics , Submitted 11/06/21, 2021

    2021

  6. [13]

    A 6-dof reconfigur able hybrid parallel manipulator

    Gianmarc Coppola, Dan Zhang, and Kefu Liu. A 6-dof reconfigur able hybrid parallel manipulator. Robotics and Computer- Integrated Manufacturing, 30(2):99–106, 2014

    2014

  7. [14]

    Socially intelligent robots: dimensi ons of human–robot interaction

    Kerstin Dautenhahn. Socially intelligent robots: dimensi ons of human–robot interaction. Philosophical transactions of the royal society B: Biological sciences , 362(1480):679–704, 2007

    2007

  8. [15]

    Pilco: A model-based a nd data-efficient approach to policy search

    Marc Deisenroth and Carl E Rasmussen. Pilco: A model-based a nd data-efficient approach to policy search. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on machine learning (ICM L-11), pages 465–472. Citeseer, 2011

    2011

  9. [16]

    Image fusion during standard and complex endovascu- lar aortic repair, to fuse or not to fuse? a meta-analysis and additional data from a single-center retrospective cohort

    Sabrina AN Doelare, Stefan PM Smorenburg, Theodorus G van Sc haik, Jan D Blankensteijn, Willem Wisselink, Johanna H Nederhoed, Rutger J Lely, Arjan WJ Hoksbergen, and Kak Khee Y eung. Image fusion during standard and complex endovascu- lar aortic repair, to fuse or not to fuse...

    2021

  10. [17]

    Vision-based online learning kinematic control for soft ro bots using local gaussian process regression

    Ge Fang, Xiaomei W ang, Kui W ang, Kit-Hang Lee, Justin DL Ho, H ing-Choi Fu, Denny Kin Chung Fu, and Ka-W ai Kwok. Vision-based online learning kinematic control for soft ro bots using local gaussian process regression. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , 4(2):1194–1201, 2019

    2019

  11. [18]

    Mobile m ixed-reality interfaces that enhance human–robot interac tion in shared spaces

    Jared A Frank, Matthew Moorhead, and Vikram Kapila. Mobile m ixed-reality interfaces that enhance human–robot interac tion in shared spaces. Frontiers in Robotics and AI , 4:20, 2017

    2017

  12. [19]

    Design and experi mental testing of the octarm soft robot manipulator

    Michael D Grissom, Vilas Chitrakaran, Dustin Dienno, Matth ew Csencits, Michael Pritts, Bryan Jones, William McMahan, Darren Dawson, Chris Rahn, and Ian W alker. Design and experi mental testing of the octarm soft robot manipulator. In Unmanned Systems Technology VIII , volume...

    2006

  13. [20]

    Design considerations for manipulator w orkspace

    KC Gupta and B Roth. Design considerations for manipulator w orkspace. Journal of Mechanical Design , 104(4):704–711, 1982

    1982

  14. [21]

    The use of distances as coordinates in computer-aid es proofs of theorems in euclidean geometry

    T Havel. The use of distances as coordinates in computer-aid es proofs of theorems in euclidean geometry. J. Symbolic Comput. , 11:579–593, 1991

    1991

  15. [22]

    Markerless navigation system for orthopaedic knee surgery: A proof of concept study

    Xue Hu, He Liu, and Ferdinando Rodriguez Y Baena. Markerless navigation system for orthopaedic knee surgery: A proof of concept study. IEEE Access, 9:64708–64718, 2021

    2021

  16. [23]

    Augmented reality in robotic assisted orthopaedic surger y: A pilot study

    Hisham Iqbal, Fabio Tatti, and Ferdinando Rodriguez y Baena . Augmented reality in robotic assisted orthopaedic surger y: A pilot study. Journal of Biomedical Informatics , 120:103841, 2021

    2021

  17. [24]

    Design of a variabl e stiffness flexible manipulator with composite granular jamm ing and membrane coupling

    Allen Jiang, Georgios Xynogalas, Prokar Dasgupta, Kaspar A lthoefer, and Thrishantha Nanayakkara. Design of a variabl e stiffness flexible manipulator with composite granular jamm ing and membrane coupling. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Syst...

    2012

  18. [25]

    Design, modeling and control of a pneumatically actuated manipulator inspired b y biological continuum structures

    Rongjie Kang, David T Branson, Tianjiang Zheng, Emanuele Gu glielmino, and Darwin G Caldwell. Design, modeling and control of a pneumatically actuated manipulator inspired b y biological continuum structures. Bioinspiration & biomimetics , 8(3):036008, 2013

    2013

  19. [26]

    Task-based optimization of reconfigurable robot manipulators

    Jason A Kereluk and M Reza Emami. Task-based optimization of reconfigurable robot manipulators. Advanced Robotics, 31(16):836–850, 2017

    2017

  20. [27]

    Augmen ted reality in neurovascular surgery: feasibility and first use s in the operating room

    Marta Kersten-Oertel, Ian Gerard, Simon Drouin, Kelvin Mok , Denis Sirhan, David S Sinclair, and D Louis Collins. Augmen ted reality in neurovascular surgery: feasibility and first use s in the operating room. International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery , 1...

    2015

  21. [28]

    Design of a tubular snake-like manipulator with stiffening capability by layer jamming

    Yong-Jae Kim, Shanbao Cheng, Sangbae Kim, and Karl Iagnemma . Design of a tubular snake-like manipulator with stiffening capability by layer jamming. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Rob ots and Systems , pages 4251–4256. IEEE, 2012

    2012

  22. [29]

    A novel layer jamming mechanism with tunable stiffness capability for minimally invasive surgery

    Yong-Jae Kim, Shanbao Cheng, Sangbae Kim, and Karl Iagnemma . A novel layer jamming mechanism with tunable stiffness capability for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Transactions on Robotics , 29(4):1031–1042, 2013

    2013

  23. [30]

    A stiffness-adjustable hyperredundant manipulator using a variable neutral-line mechanism for minimally invasive s urgery

    Yong-Jae Kim, Shanbao Cheng, Sangbae Kim, and Karl Iagnemma . A stiffness-adjustable hyperredundant manipulator using a variable neutral-line mechanism for minimally invasive s urgery. IEEE transactions on robotics , 30(2):382–395, 2013

    2013

  24. [31]

    Development of a fpga-ba sed motion control ic for robot arm

    Ying-Shieh Kung and Gua-Shieh Shu. Development of a fpga-ba sed motion control ic for robot arm. In 2005 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology , pages 1397–1402. IEEE, 2005

    2005

  25. [32]

    S tiffening sheaths for continuum robots

    Marlene Langer, Ernar Amanov, and Jessica Burgner-Kahrs. S tiffening sheaths for continuum robots. Soft robotics, 5(3):291– 303, 2018

    2018

  26. [33]

    Produ ct lifecycle management in aviation maintenance, repair and overhaul

    Stephen G Lee, Y-S Ma, Georg L Thimm, and J Verstraeten. Produ ct lifecycle management in aviation maintenance, repair and overhaul. Computers in industry , 59(2-3):296–303, 2008

    2008

  27. [34]

    Mode l-free control for continuum robots based on an adaptive kalman filter

    Minhan Li, Rongjie Kang, David T Branson, and Jian S Dai. Mode l-free control for continuum robots based on an adaptive kalman filter. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics , 23(1):286–297, 2017

    2017

  28. [35]

    Design an d analysis of a biomimetic wire-driven robot arm

    Zheng Li, Ruxu Du, Man Cheong Lei, and Song Mei Yuan. Design an d analysis of a biomimetic wire-driven robot arm. In ASME 2011 International Mechanical Engineering Congress a nd Exposition , pages 191–198. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, 2011

    2011

  29. [36]

    Baxter’s homun culus: Virtual reality spaces for teleoperation in manufac turing

    Jeffrey I Lipton, Aidan J Fay, and Daniela Rus. Baxter’s homun culus: Virtual reality spaces for teleoperation in manufac turing. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , 3(1):179–186, 2017

    2017

  30. [37]

    Augmented reality surgical navigation with ultrasound-assisted registration for pedicle screw place ment: a pilot study

    Longfei Ma, Zhe Zhao, Fang Chen, Boyu Zhang, Ligong Fu, and Ho ngen Liao. Augmented reality surgical navigation with ultrasound-assisted registration for pedicle screw place ment: a pilot study. International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery , 12(12):2205–2215, 2017

    2017

  31. [38]

    A bayesian approach for task recognition and future human activity prediction

    Vito Magnanimo, Matteo Saveriano, Silvia Rossi, and Donghe ui Lee. A bayesian approach for task recognition and future human activity prediction. In The 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human int eractive communication, pages 726–731. IEEE, 2014. 205

    2014

  32. [39]

    Soft robotics: a perspective—current trend s and prospects for the future

    Carmel Majidi. Soft robotics: a perspective—current trend s and prospects for the future. Soft robotics, 1(1):5–11, 2014

    2014

  33. [40]

    Augmented real ity for robotics: a review

    Zhanat Makhataeva and Huseyin Atakan Varol. Augmented real ity for robotics: a review. Robotics, 9(2):21, 2020

    2020

  34. [41]

    Effects of handle size and shape on measured grip strength

    Thomas W McDowell, Bryan M Wimer, Daniel E W elcome, Christop her W arren, and Ren G Dong. Effects of handle size and shape on measured grip strength. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics , 42(2):199–205, 2012

    2012

  35. [42]

    Design and i mplementation of a multi-section continuum robot: Air-oct or

    William McMahan, Bryan A Jones, and Ian D W alker. Design and i mplementation of a multi-section continuum robot: Air-oct or. In 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Rob ots and Systems , pages 2578–2585. IEEE, 2005

    2005

  36. [43]

    A minimally invasive tendril robot for in-space inspecti on

    Joshua S Mehling, Myron A Diftler, Mars Chu, and Michael Valv o. A minimally invasive tendril robot for in-space inspecti on. In The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biome dical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006. BioRob 2006. , pages 690–695. IEEE, 2006

    2006

  37. [44]

    New foundation of euclidean geometry

    Karl Menger. New foundation of euclidean geometry. American Journal of Mathematics , 53(4):721–745, 1931

    1931

  38. [45]

    Moving objects in space: exploiting proprioception in virtual- environment interaction

    Mark R Mine, Frederick P Brooks Jr, and Carlo H Sequin. Moving objects in space: exploiting proprioception in virtual- environment interaction. In Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Computer graph ics and interactive techniques , pages 19–26, 1997

    1997

  39. [46]

    Combining visual natural markers and imu for improved ar based indoor navigation

    Matthias Neges, Christian Koch, Markus K¨ onig, and Michael Abramovici. Combining visual natural markers and imu for improved ar based indoor navigation. Advanced Engineering Informatics , 31:18–31, 2017

    2017

  40. [47]

    Interactive robots co ntrol using mixed reality

    M Ostanin, R Yagfarov, and A Klimchik. Interactive robots co ntrol using mixed reality. IF AC-PapersOnLine, 52(13):695–700, 2019

    2019

  41. [48]

    Calculating determinants of block matrice s

    Philip D Powell. Calculating determinants of block matrice s. arXiv preprint arXiv:1112.4379 , 2011

    2011 arXiv

  42. [49]

    How to model tendon-driven continuum robots and benchmark modelling performance

    Priyanka Rao, Quentin Peyron, Sven Lilge, and Jessica Burgn er-Kahrs. How to model tendon-driven continuum robots and benchmark modelling performance. Frontiers in Robotics and AI , 7:630245, 2021

    2021

  43. [50]

    Soft pneumatic actuator fascicles for high forc e and reliability

    Matthew A Robertson, Hamed Sadeghi, Juan Manuel Florez, and Jamie Paik. Soft pneumatic actuator fascicles for high forc e and reliability. Soft robotics, 4(1):23–32, 2017

    2017

  44. [51]

    Distance-based formulations for the posit ion analysis of kinematic chains

    Nicol` as Rojas. Distance-based formulations for the posit ion analysis of kinematic chains. PhD dissertation , 2012

    2012

  45. [52]

    The coupler surface of the r srs mechanism

    Nicolas Rojas and Aaron M Dollar. The coupler surface of the r srs mechanism. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics , 8(1), 2016

    2016

  46. [53]

    Distance-based kinematic s of the five-oblique-axis thumb model with intersecting axe s at the metacarpophalangeal joint

    Nicolas Rojas and Aaron M Dollar. Distance-based kinematic s of the five-oblique-axis thumb model with intersecting axe s at the metacarpophalangeal joint. In 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), pages 1331–1336. IEEE, 2017

    2017

  47. [54]

    A unified position analysis of the dixon and the generalized peaucell ier linkages

    Nicolas Rojas, Aaron M Dollar, and Federico Thomas. A unified position analysis of the dixon and the generalized peaucell ier linkages. Mechanism and Machine Theory , 94:28–40, 2015

    2015

  48. [55]

    Forward kinematics of th e general triple-arm robot using a distance-based formulat ion

    Nicolas Rojas and Federico Thomas. Forward kinematics of th e general triple-arm robot using a distance-based formulat ion. In Computational Kinematics , pages 257–264. Springer, 2018

    2018

  49. [56]

    Comm u- nicating and controlling robot arm motion intent through mi xed-reality head-mounted displays

    Eric Rosen, David Whitney, Elizabeth Phillips, Gary Chien, James Tompkin, George Konidaris, and Stefanie Tellex. Comm u- nicating and controlling robot arm motion intent through mi xed-reality head-mounted displays. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 38(12-13):151...

    2019

  50. [57]

    Gaussian process dyna mics models for soft robots with shape memory actuators

    Andrew P Sabelhaus and Carmel Majidi. Gaussian process dyna mics models for soft robots with shape memory actuators. In 2021 IEEE 4th International Conference on Soft Robotics (Ro boSoft), pages 191–198. IEEE, 2021

    2021

  51. [58]

    Soft robots and kangaroo tails: modulating compliance in continuum structures through mechanical lay er jamming

    Jessie Lee C Santiago, Isuru S Godage, Phanideep Gonthina, a nd Ian D W alker. Soft robots and kangaroo tails: modulating compliance in continuum structures through mechanical lay er jamming. Soft Robotics, 3(2):54–63, 2016

    2016

  52. [59]

    Conti nuum robots for space applications based on layer-jamming scales with stiffening capability

    Jessie Lee C Santiago, Ian D W alker, and Isuru S Godage. Conti nuum robots for space applications based on layer-jamming scales with stiffening capability. In 2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference , pages 1–13. IEEE, 2015

    2015

  53. [60]

    Modular reconfigurabl e robotics

    Jungwon Seo, Jamie Paik, and Mark Yim. Modular reconfigurabl e robotics. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Au- tonomous Systems , 2:63–88, 2019

    2019

  54. [61]

    Human–robot interaction: status and cha llenges

    Thomas B Sheridan. Human–robot interaction: status and cha llenges. Human factors , 58(4):525–532, 2016

    2016

  55. [62]

    Perceptive augmented reality-based interface for robot ta sk planning and visualization

    Ahmed Eslam Solyman, Khaled Mohamed Ibrahem, Mostafa Rosto m Atia, Hassan Ibrahim Saleh, and Magdy Raouf Roman. Perceptive augmented reality-based interface for robot ta sk planning and visualization. Int J Innov Comput Inf Control , 16(5):1769–1785, 2020

    2020

  56. [63]

    Revisiting trilateration f or robot localization

    Federico Thomas and Llu ´ ıs Ros. Revisiting trilateration f or robot localization. IEEE Transactions on robotics , 21(1):93–101, 2005

    2005

  57. [64]

    Real-time dynami cs of soft and continuum robots based on cosserat rod models

    John Till, Vincent Aloi, and Caleb Rucker. Real-time dynami cs of soft and continuum robots based on cosserat rod models. The International Journal of Robotics Research , 38(6):723–746, 2019

    2019

  58. [65]

    An algorithm for the workspace of a genera l nr robot

    YC Tsai and AH Soni. An algorithm for the workspace of a genera l nr robot. Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design , 105(1):52–57, 1983

    1983

  59. [66]

    Reconfigurable industrial robots: A stochast ic programming approach for designing and assembling robot ic arms

    Anna Valente. Reconfigurable industrial robots: A stochast ic programming approach for designing and assembling robot ic arms. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing , 41:115–126, 2016

    2016

  60. [67]

    Soft-material robotics

    Liyu W ang, Surya G Nurzaman, and Fumiya Iida. Soft-material robotics. Foundations and Trends in Robotics , 5(3):191–259, 2017

    2017

  61. [69]

    Design and development of a high-s peed and high-rotation robot with four identical arms and a single platform

    Fugui Xie and Xin-Jun Liu. Design and development of a high-s peed and high-rotation robot with four identical arms and a single platform. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics , 7(4):041015, 2015

    2015

  62. [70]

    Task-based optimization of mod ular robot configurations: minimized degree-of-freedom ap proach

    Guilin Yang and I-Ming Chen. Task-based optimization of mod ular robot configurations: minimized degree-of-freedom ap proach. Mechanism and machine theory , 35(4):517–540, 2000

    2000

  63. [71]

    Modular self-reconfigurable robot systems: Chall enges and opportunities for the future

    Mark Yim. Modular self-reconfigurable robot systems: Chall enges and opportunities for the future. IEEE Robotics Automat. Mag., 10:2–11, 2007

    2007

  64. [72]

    A 4-dof flexible continuum rob ot using a spring backbone

    Hyun-Soo Yoon and Byung-Ju Yi. A 4-dof flexible continuum rob ot using a spring backbone. In 2009 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation , pages 1249–1254. IEEE, 2009

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.