Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

signwriting-evaluation: Effective Sign Language Evaluation via SignWriting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.13668 v1 pith:LQ6S7RPB submitted 2024-10-17 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords signwritingevaluationmetricmetricstexttteffectiveevaluatinglanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The lack of automatic evaluation metrics tailored for SignWriting presents a significant obstacle in developing effective transcription and translation models for signed languages. This paper introduces a comprehensive suite of evaluation metrics specifically designed for SignWriting, including adaptations of standard metrics such as \texttt{BLEU} and \texttt{chrF}, the application of \texttt{CLIPScore} to SignWriting images, and a novel symbol distance metric unique to our approach. We address the distinct challenges of evaluating single signs versus continuous signing and provide qualitative demonstrations of metric efficacy through score distribution analyses and nearest-neighbor searches within the SignBank corpus. Our findings reveal the strengths and limitations of each metric, offering valuable insights for future advancements using SignWriting. This work contributes essential tools for evaluating SignWriting models, facilitating progress in the field of sign language processing. Our code is available at \url{https://github.com/sign-language-processing/signwriting-evaluation}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SiLVERScore: Semantically-Aware Embeddings for Sign Language Generation Evaluation

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SiLVERScore, built on the CiCo video-text contrastive model, discriminates correct vs. random sign-video/text pairs with 0.99 ROC AUC and is robust to word reordering and prosody intensity.

Pith tools