Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Multinomial Logit Contextual Bandits: Provable Optimality and Practicality

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.13929 v1 pith:LQC352SC submitted 2021-03-25 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords algorithmboundregretachievesassortmentbanditcontextualsqrt
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We consider a sequential assortment selection problem where the user choice is given by a multinomial logit (MNL) choice model whose parameters are unknown. In each period, the learning agent observes a $d$-dimensional contextual information about the user and the $N$ available items, and offers an assortment of size $K$ to the user, and observes the bandit feedback of the item chosen from the assortment. We propose upper confidence bound based algorithms for this MNL contextual bandit. The first algorithm is a simple and practical method which achieves an $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(d\sqrt{T})$ regret over $T$ rounds. Next, we propose a second algorithm which achieves a $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{dT})$ regret. This matches the lower bound for the MNL bandit problem, up to logarithmic terms, and improves on the best known result by a $\sqrt{d}$ factor. To establish this sharper regret bound, we present a non-asymptotic confidence bound for the maximum likelihood estimator of the MNL model that may be of independent interest as its own theoretical contribution. We then revisit the simpler, significantly more practical, first algorithm and show that a simple variant of the algorithm achieves the optimal regret for a broad class of important applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Experimental Assortments for Choice Estimation and Nest Identification

    stat.ME 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A binary-code experiment design with O(log n) assortments, plus a boost-factor algorithm, provably recovers substitution nests in Nested Logit models and improves choice prediction.

Pith tools