REVIEW 2 cited by
MixCo: Mix-up Contrastive Learning for Visual Representation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Contrastive learning has shown remarkable results in recent self-supervised approaches for visual representation. By learning to contrast positive pairs' representation from the corresponding negatives pairs, one can train good visual representations without human annotations. This paper proposes Mix-up Contrast (MixCo), which extends the contrastive learning concept to semi-positives encoded from the mix-up of positive and negative images. MixCo aims to learn the relative similarity of representations, reflecting how much the mixed images have the original positives. We validate the efficacy of MixCo when applied to the recent self-supervised learning algorithms under the standard linear evaluation protocol on TinyImageNet, CIFAR10, and CIFAR100. In the experiments, MixCo consistently improves test accuracy. Remarkably, the improvement is more significant when the learning capacity (e.g., model size) is limited, suggesting that MixCo might be more useful in real-world scenarios. The code is available at: https://github.com/Lee-Gihun/MixCo-Mixup-Contrast.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
inversedMixup: Data Augmentation via Inverting Mixed Embeddings
Mixing BERT embeddings and inverting them into text with LLaMA produces interpretable augmented sentences, improves few-shot classification on some datasets, and exposes 'manifold intrusion' in text Mixup.
-
Perception Activator: An intuitive and portable framework for brain cognitive exploration
Injecting fMRI vectors into Mask R-CNN via cross-attention produces a small detection AP gain and a slight segmentation AP drop on NSD, contradicting the abstract's claim of improved segmentation accuracy.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.