Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Examining the local Universe isotropy with galaxy cluster velocity dispersion scaling relations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.00726 v1 pith:LRFRYIGY submitted 2024-08-01 astro-ph.CO

Examining the local Universe isotropy with galaxy cluster velocity dispersion scaling relations

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords mathrmsigmaclustergalaxyrelationscircscalingapparent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In standard cosmology, the late Universe is assumed to be statistically homogeneous and isotropic. However, a recent study based on galaxy clusters by Migkas et al. (2021, arXiv:2103.13904) found an apparent spatial variation of approximately $9\%$ in the Hubble constant, $H_0$, across the sky. The authors utilised galaxy cluster scaling relations between various cosmology-dependent cluster properties and a cosmology-independent property, i.e., the temperature of the intracluster gas $(T)$. A position-dependent systematic bias of $T$ measurements can, in principle, result in an overestimation of apparent $H_0$ variations. In this study, we search for directional $T$ measurement biases by examining the scaling relation between the member galaxy velocity dispersion and the gas temperature $(\sigma_\mathrm{v}-T)$. Additionally, we search for apparent $H_0$ angular variations independently of $T$ by analysing the relations between the X-ray luminosity and Sunyaev-Zeldovich signal with the velocity dispersion, $L_\mathrm{X}-\sigma_\mathrm{v}$ and $Y_\mathrm{SZ}-\sigma_\mathrm{v}$. We utilise Monte Carlo simulations of isotropic cluster samples to quantify the statistical significance of any observed anisotropies. We find no significant directional $T$ measurement biases, and the probability that a directional $T$ bias causes the previously observed $H_0$ anisotropy is only $0.002\%$. On the other hand, from the joint analysis of the $L_\mathrm{X}-\sigma_\mathrm{v}$ and $Y_\mathrm{SZ}-\sigma_\mathrm{v}$ relations, the maximum variation of $H_0$ is found in the direction of $(295^\circ\pm71^\circ, -30^\circ\pm71^\circ)$ with a statistical significance of $3.64\sigma$, fully consistent with arXiv:2103.13904. Our findings strongly corroborate the previously detected spatial anisotropy of galaxy cluster scaling relations using a new independent cluster property, $\sigma_\mathrm{v}$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. New constraints on cosmic anisotropy from galaxy clusters using an improved dipole fitting method

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Galaxy cluster observations yield two preferred directions with cosmic anisotropy amplitude of about 5.3 times 10 to the minus 4 at roughly 1 sigma overall significance, though higher in the XMM-Newton subsample.

  2. Testing cosmic anisotropy with the Combo correlation of gamma-ray bursts

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Larger sample of 244 GRBs with Combo correlation shifts best-fit anisotropy longitude by 54° from Pantheon-only result and deviates >1σ in hemisphere method, unlike smaller A118 sample, indicating potential to reduce ...

  3. Updates on dipolar anisotropy in local measurements of the Hubble constant from Cosmicflows-4

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Local Hubble constant anisotropy in Cosmicflows-4 data is primarily attributed to peculiar velocities and survey structure rather than cosmic-scale isotropy violation, with limited implications for the Hubble tension.