Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

On-device Sora: Enabling Training-Free Diffusion-based Text-to-Video Generation for Mobile Devices

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that three training-free techniques — Linear Proportional Leap, Temporal Dimension Token Merging, and Concurrent Inference with Dynamic Loading — let a pre-trained text-to-video diffusion model run on an iPhone 15 Pro and…

desk verdict A real first demonstration of training-free on-device diffusion text-to-video, but the headline quality/latency claim is not backed by a single joint measurement. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04363 v2 pith:LRW3GFUA submitted 2025-02-05 cs.CV

Bosung Kim , Kyuhwan Lee , Isu Jeong , Jungmin Cheon , Yeojin Lee , Seulki Lee This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords text-to-videogenerationon-deviceinferencediffusionmodelsrectifiedflowtokenmergingtraining-freeaccelerationmobiledevicesmodelpartitioning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a pre-trained diffusion text-to-video model can run directly on a smartphone, with no re-training, distillation, or compression, and still generate videos nearly as good as those from a high-end GPU. The authors attribute this to three techniques applied to the existing Open-Sora model: Linear Proportional Leap, which skips most denoising steps by moving in one scaled jump along the model's nearly straight rectified-flow trajectory; Temporal Dimension Token Merging, which averages adjacent video-frame tokens so attention processes half as many tokens; and Concurrent Inference with Dynamic Loading, which splits the large text and video transformers into blocks and overlaps CPU loading with GPU inference. On an iPhone 15 Pro, the combined methods reduce the denoising process from about 1,768 seconds to 293–454 seconds (depending on resolution) and end-to-end latency to roughly 638 seconds, while VBench quality scores stay within about 0.01 of Open-Sora running on an NVIDIA A6000. The paper frames this as the first training-free route to on-device text-to-video generation, removing the GPU-intensive model re-training that earlier on-device video generators require.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the rectified-flow drift $v(P_k, t_k)$ and the leap identity $z_k = z_n + v(P_{n+1}, t_{n+1}) t_{n+1}$, which says that once the trajectory is straight, the accumulated update of all remaining denoising steps equals one scaled Euler step taken with the next drift. LPL uses the cosine similarity between $v(P_n, t_n)$ and $v(P_{n-1}, t_{n-1})$ as a runtime straightness probe, stopping the denoising loop when similarity stops improving. TDTM's machinery is a merge/unmerge pair on the temporal axis: input tokens of shape $[B, ST, C]$ become $[B, ST/2, C]$ by averaging consecutive frames, and the attention output is replicated back; this exploits the fact that adjacent frames in a video are near-duplicates. CI-DL's machinery is a block pipeline: the transformer is cut into segments, the CPU loads segment $i+1$ while the GPU executes segment $i$, and a dynamic number of segments stay resident in memory across denoising iterations, so the same blocks are not reloaded each step.

What would settle it

Apply Linear Proportional Leap to a flow-matching video model whose consecutive-drift cosine similarity stays below 0.95 through the second half of its schedule (CogVideoX, which the paper itself names as non-straight, is a direct candidate), and compare VBench frame-wise quality against full-step generation: a drop in imaging quality or aesthetic quality larger than the roughly 0.03 the paper reports on Open-Sora would show that LPL depends on the straightness premise, not on the leap formula alone. A sharper probe is to print the cosine-similarity curve for a 50-step rectified-flow generation and check whether it is monotone non-decreasing past step 25; if it dips, the dynamic stopping rule's 10⁻⁴ improvement tolerance can halt too early or too late, and the reported 1.94× speedup is not generally reproducible.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On-device Sora's central claim is that the three bottlenecks of mobile video diffusion — too many denoising steps, quadratic attention cost, and model weights that exceed device memory — can each be bypassed without changing any weights. In the rectified-flow formulation used by Open-Sora, the denoising trajectory becomes nearly straight after the early steps; LPL detects this straightness from the cosine similarity of consecutive drifts and replaces all remaining steps with the single update $z_k = z_n + v(P_{n+1}, t_{n+1}) t_{n+1}$, cutting steps from 30 to as few as 16 with VBench scores essentially unchanged. TDTM merges pairs of adjacent tokens along the temporal dimension, computes attention on half the tokens, and replicates the output to restore the original shape, reducing self-attention by a factor of four and cross-attention by half. CI-DL partitions T5 and STDiT into blocks that are loaded by the CPU while the GPU executes the previous block, retaining a memory-fit subset across denoising iterations. The experimental section reports that with all three applied, Open-Sora on an iPhone 15 Pro produces 256×256 videos whose temporal-quality scores are 0.96–0.99 versus 0.97–0.99 for the same model on an A6000, with an average frame-wise drop of 0.03 and a 0.06 improvement in dynamic degree.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the later stages of the rectified-flow reverse process are approximately straight, so one scaled Euler step with the final drift can replace all remaining denoising steps without visible quality loss; if the trajectory curves, LPL's leap overshoots and quality degrades.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any pre-trained rectified-flow text-to-video model becomes deployable on a phone without re-training, eliminating the GPU-heavy distillation and compression pipelines that earlier on-device video generators require.
  • LPL's step reduction and TDTM's attention reduction are multiplicative, and both stack with CI-DL's memory pipelining, so the combined 6x denoising speedup is not the sum but the product of the individual gains.
  • Because the methods touch only the sampling schedule and token layout, they transfer to more compact DiT-based video generators as those models appear, making on-device generation progressively cheaper without new optimization work.
  • Deploying the full pre-trained model on-device means prompts and videos never need to leave the phone, which makes private, offline text-to-video possible on commodity hardware.
  • TDTM's motion cost matters: merging all 30 denoising steps drops dynamic degree from 0.23 to 0.06 on VBench, so applications wanting lively videos should merge only the first half of steps and sacrifice part of the speedup.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The leap identity in LPL is a zero-training shortcut that effectively distills the model's learned drift into a near-one-step update in the straight region; the same reasoning should apply to rectified-flow image diffusion, where even larger step reductions are plausible because the trajectory straightness assumption is not video-specific.
  • CI-DL's block pipeline is a general technique for any transformer whose weights exceed device memory, not just T5 and STDiT; the paper's latency formula predicts that gains grow with the number of blocks, so other over-capacity models should see comparable speedups.
  • A natural extension the authors do not explore is merging both spatial and temporal tokens: combining TDTM with spatial token merging would cut self-attention by up to 16×, but the dynamic-degree drop observed with full temporal merging suggests such aggressive merging would need selective scheduling to stay usable.
  • The paper runs only on the GPU and leaves the device's Neural Engine idle; if the device vendor's software eventually supports the required diffusion operators, offloading T5 or the VAE to a dedicated neural processor could cut the remaining ~500 seconds of end-to-end latency substantially.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents On-device Sora, a training-free framework for running diffusion-based text-to-video generation on mobile devices. The system combines three techniques: Linear Proportional Leap (LPL), which halts denoising early and replaces remaining steps with a scaled Euler leap; Temporal Dimension Token Merging (TDTM), which merges consecutive temporal tokens in attention layers; and Concurrent Inference with Dynamic Loading (CI-DL), which partitions models for memory-constrained execution. The authors implement the system on an iPhone 15 Pro using Open-Sora as the backbone and evaluate quality with VBench, reporting that On-device Sora achieves video quality comparable to Open-Sora on an NVIDIA A6000 while cutting end-to-end latency to about 638 seconds at 256x256 resolution. The paper also includes an ablation study of Pyramidal Flow with LPL. The central claim is that these techniques together enable efficient, high-quality on-device text-to-video generation without retraining.

Significance. If the central claim is substantiated, this is a useful and timely contribution: it avoids the large GPU training budgets required by prior on-device video generation methods such as SnapGen-V, and it is accompanied by an open-source implementation and real-device latency measurements. The system is concretely implemented on commodity smartphone hardware, and the three techniques are clearly separable and tested in isolation. However, the paper's headline result—high quality and low latency from the complete pipeline—is not directly evidenced: no VBench evaluation is reported for the exact configuration used in the latency table, and the quality metrics are saturated around 0.99 without error bars or significance tests. The LPL straightness assumption is also only validated indirectly. These gaps currently prevent a full endorsement of the claimed result.

major comments (3)
  1. [§7.4, Table 5 vs. §7.3, Table 4] The central claim of "comparable quality at 638 s" is not established because no quality measurement is reported for the exact 'All' configuration that produces the 638-second latency. Section 7.4 states that 'All' uses LPL activated at the 15th denoising step and TDTM applied throughout all steps. However, Table 4 shows that applying TDTM for 30/30 steps on VBench reduces Dynamic Degree to 0.06 (and 15/30 to 0.12), while Table 2 reports On-device Sora's Dynamic Degree as 0.27; these cannot describe the same configuration. The quality table and the latency table therefore appear to have been generated under different LPL/TDTM settings. Please provide VBench scores for the exact 'All' configuration used in Table 5, ideally with per-prompt error bars, and clarify which settings were used for each row of Table 2.
  2. [§7.1, Table 2] The quality comparison relies on heavily saturated metrics: Temporal Flickering, Motion Smoothness, Subject Consistency, and Background Consistency are all around 0.97–0.99 for both methods, and the reported differences (e.g., a 0.03 average drop in frame-wise quality) are within the noise of a single VBench run. No error bars, per-category standard deviations, or significance tests are provided, so the claim that quality is "nearly equivalent" is statistically unsupported. Please report confidence intervals (e.g., bootstrap over the 800 prompts) or per-prompt distributions, and consider supplementing with a less saturated metric such as FVD or human evaluation.
  3. [§4.2, Fig. 4, App. C] The LPL method rests on the assumption that the reverse-process trajectory is approximately straight after a certain number of steps, but this is validated only by cosine similarities between adjacent drifts on the same models; the paper itself concedes in App. C that LPL is inapplicable to non-rectified-flow models such as CogVideoX. The runtime stopping rule also involves hand-tuned parameters (a 1e-4 tolerance and a 50% minimum step fraction). Please provide a sensitivity analysis of these thresholds and, more importantly, a direct downstream evaluation (e.g., VBench or FVD) comparing LPL's output at early stop against the full-trajectory output, to confirm that the straightness assumption preserves quality rather than merely correlating with drift similarity.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§1, §9] The paper contains two naming typos: "Conference Inference and Dynamic Loading" in Section 1 should be "Concurrent Inference and Dynamic Loading," and "Linear Professional Leap" in Section 9 should be "Linear Proportional Leap."
  2. [App. A.1] The text repeatedly uses "retrained state" (e.g., "loaded in a retrained state" and "with a retrained state"); this should be "retained state."
  3. [Table 5] The baseline latency of 1768.32 seconds for STDiT comes from Table 1, which reports the 50-step configuration, whereas all other rows in Table 5 presumably use a 30-step schedule; please state the number of denoising steps for each row to make the comparison fair and reproducible.
  4. [§7.2, §7.3] Tables 3 and 4 report speedups relative to a 30/30 baseline, but Table 2's "On-device Sora" row does not state which LPL/TDTM configuration was used; please specify this so the reader can map the headline quality numbers to the actual pipeline.
  5. [§1, §8] The introduction claims broad applicability to "pre-trained video generative models, e.g., Open-Sora, Pyramidal Flow," but only LPL is experimented on Pyramidal Flow; TDTM and CI-DL are only evaluated with Open-Sora. Please clarify the scope of the generality claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: LPL, TDTM, and CI-DL are empirical approximations validated against the external VBench benchmark, with no self-citation chain and no fitted quantity renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. LPL (Sec. 4.2) is an algebraic consequence of an explicitly stated straight-trajectory assumption: Eq. (5) shows that if the remaining drift is held constant, the remaining steps collapse to a single scaled step. The paper does not claim to derive straightness from this equation; instead it probes straightness independently via cosine similarity between adjacent drifts (Fig. 4) and validates quality with the external VBench benchmark (Tab. 3). The dynamic-stop thresholds (10^-4 tolerance and 50% minimum steps) are design hyperparameters, not parameters fitted to VBench and then reported as a prediction of VBench. TDTM (Sec. 5.2) is a simple averaging-and-unmerging operation whose quality cost and speedup are measured externally (Tab. 4), and CI-DL (App. A.1) is an engineering scheme whose latency formulas (Eqs. 10-11) are definitions of the overlap mechanism rather than fitted outputs. There are no self-citations that carry the argument, no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work, and no renamed known result presented as a derivation. The skeptical observation that Tab. 5's 'All' configuration is not matched by a VBench table with the same settings is an experimental reporting gap, not a circular reduction of the central claim; the reader's noted limitation that LPL requires rectified-flow straightness is explicitly acknowledged in App. C. The central claims remain independently testable against Open-Sora on VBench and against measured on-device latency, so the paper receives a 0 circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical or representational entities. Its contributions are algorithms and a system integration. The free parameters are the hand-tuned thresholds for LPL and the TDTM application schedule.

free parameters (3)
  • LPL cosine-similarity tolerance = 1e-4
    Stop condition for dynamic LPL: halt denoising when consecutive drift cosine similarities fail to improve beyond 1e-4 after a minimum number of steps. Hand-tuned, no sensitivity analysis.
  • LPL minimum step fraction = 50%
    Dynamic LPL does not stop before 50% of total steps, chosen as a safety floor; hand-picked.
  • TDTM merging schedule = first 15 of 30 steps in Tab. 4 recommendation; 30/30 in Tab. 5 'All'
    Token merging is applied only to initial denoising steps to avoid quality loss; the specific fraction is an empirical choice from Tab. 4, and Tab. 5 uses 30/30 instead, creating ambiguity.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Euler method for ODE integration
    Used to discretize the rectified flow ODE in Eq. (3); standard numerical method.
  • domain assumption Rectified-flow drift direction is approximately constant in later denoising steps
    Core premise of Linear Proportional Leap (Sec. 4.2), validated only by cosine-similarity measurements on the tested models.
  • domain assumption Consecutive video frames are similar enough that averaging their tokens preserves semantics
    Basis of Temporal Dimension Token Merging (Sec. 5.2); not proven, only supported by quality metrics.
  • domain assumption Open-Sora (STDiT, T5, VAE) is a valid pre-trained video generation model
    Used as backbone without modification; the paper does not question its correctness.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On-device Sora: Enabling Training-Free Diffusion-based Text-to-Video Generation for Mobile Devices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LRW3GFUA

@misc{pith2026250204363,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On-device Sora: Enabling Training-Free Diffusion-based Text-to-Video Generation for Mobile Devices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LRW3GFUA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04363}
}
read the original abstract

We present On-device Sora, the first model training-free solution for diffusion-based on-device text-to-video generation that operates efficiently on smartphone-grade devices. To address the challenges of diffusion-based text-to-video generation on computation- and memory-limited mobile devices, the proposed On-device Sora applies three novel techniques to pre-trained video generative models. First, Linear Proportional Leap (LPL) reduces the excessive denoising steps required in video diffusion through an efficient leap-based approach. Second, Temporal Dimension Token Merging (TDTM) minimizes intensive token-processing computation in attention layers by merging consecutive tokens along the temporal dimension. Third, Concurrent Inference with Dynamic Loading (CI-DL) dynamically partitions large models into smaller blocks and loads them into memory for concurrent model inference, effectively addressing the challenges of limited device memory. We implement On-device Sora on the iPhone 15 Pro, and the experimental evaluations show that it is capable of generating high-quality videos on the device, comparable to those produced by high-end GPUs. These results show that On-device Sora enables efficient and high-quality video generation on resource-constrained mobile devices. We envision the proposed On-device Sora as a significant first step toward democratizing state-of-the-art generative technologies, enabling video generation on commodity mobile and embedded devices without resource-intensive re-training for model optimization (compression). The code implementation is available at a GitHub repository(https://github.com/eai-lab/On-device-Sora).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04363 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. On-device Sora enables training-free text-to-video generation directly on the device by employing three key methods: 1) Linear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The size of Open-Sora models: T5 [48] (18.00 GB), STDiT [83] (4.50 GB), and VAE [15] (0.82 GB), which exceeds the available memory capacity of the iPhone 15 Pro [1] (3.3 GB). 3. Overview: On-device Sora [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. An abstracted illustration of trajectories and latent vi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: In attention layers of STDiT [83], two consecutive to￾kens are merged along the temporal dimension and subsequently unmerged after processing, reducing the token size by half and the computational complexity up to a quarter. In STDiT [83], the attention bias influenced…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Example videos generated by On-device Sora and Open-Sora [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The snapshots of videos (68 frames, 256×256 resolution) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The block loading and inference cycles for (a) sequential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The block loading and inference cycle for Dynamic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: A visual comparison of videos generated by On-device Sora and Open-Sora [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The block loading and inference cycles of T5 [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Cosine similarities between adjacent drifts estimated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Videos generated using naive Pyramidal Flow [29] (top) and Pyramidal Flow with the proposed Linear Proportional Leap (bottom) under identical prompts. Linear Proportional Leap (LPL) reduces the total number of denoising steps by nearly half (i.e., from 270 to 159), wh…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MobileWan: Closing the Quality Gap for Mobile Video Diffusion

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 5B-parameter video diffusion transformer is made deployable on mobile hardware via recurrence distillation, learnable head pruning, step distillation, and decoder optimization, achieving 83.79 VBench at 20s latency.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    iphone 15 pro—technical specifications, 2023

    Apple. iphone 15 pro—technical specifications, 2023. [On- line]. Available: https://support.apple.com/en- us/111829. 2, 3, 6, 14, 16

    2023

  2. [2]

    Swift, 2024

    Apple. Swift, 2024. https://developer.apple. com/swift/. 6

    2024

  3. [3]

    A discussion on euler method: A review

    BN Biswas, Somnath Chatterjee, SP Mukherjee, and Subhradeep Pal. A discussion on euler method: A review. Electronic Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applica- tions, 1(2):2090–2792, 2013. 2

    2013

  4. [4]

    Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets

    Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Sumith Kulal, Daniel Mendelevitch, Maciej Kilian, Dominik Lorenz, Yam Levi, Zion English, Vikram V oleti, Adam Letts, et al. Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023. 1, 8

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Align your latents: High-resolution video synthesis with la- tent diffusion models

    Andreas Blattmann, Robin Rombach, Huan Ling, Tim Dock- horn, Seung Wook Kim, Sanja Fidler, and Karsten Kreis. Align your latents: High-resolution video synthesis with la- tent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 22563–22575, 2023. 1

    2023

  6. [6]

    To- ken merging: Your vit but faster

    Daniel Bolya, Cheng-Yang Fu, Xiaoliang Dai, Peizhao Zhang, Christoph Feichtenhofer, and Judy Hoffman. To- ken merging: Your vit but faster. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.09461, 2022. 2, 3, 5, 9

    arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Token merging: Your ViT but faster

    Daniel Bolya, Cheng-Yang Fu, Xiaoliang Dai, Peizhao Zhang, Christoph Feichtenhofer, and Judy Hoffman. Token merging: Your ViT but faster. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. 2, 3, 5, 9

    2023

  8. [8]

    Edgefusion: On-device text-to-image generation

    Thibault Castells, Hyoung-Kyu Song, Tairen Piao, Shinkook Choi, Bo-Kyeong Kim, Hanyoung Yim, Changgwun Lee, Jae Gon Kim, and Tae-Ho Kim. Edgefusion: On-device text-to-image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.11925,

    arXiv

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    Tempme: Towards the explain- ability of temporal graph neural networks via motif discov- ery

    Jialin Chen and Rex Ying. Tempme: Towards the explain- ability of temporal graph neural networks via motif discov- ery. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36,

  2. [10]

    Neural ordinary differential equa- tions

    Ricky TQ Chen, Yulia Rubanova, Jesse Bettencourt, and David K Duvenaud. Neural ordinary differential equa- tions. Advances in neural information processing systems , 31, 2018. 4

    2018

  3. [11]

    Panda-70m: Captioning 70m videos with multiple cross-modality teachers

    Tsai-Shien Chen, Aliaksandr Siarohin, Willi Menapace, Ekaterina Deyneka, Hsiang-wei Chao, Byung Eun Jeon, Yuwei Fang, Hsin-Ying Lee, Jian Ren, Ming-Hsuan Yang, and Sergey Tulyakov. Panda-70m: Captioning 70m videos with multiple cross-modality teachers. arXiv preprint arXiv:240...

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Speed is all you need: On-device acceleration of large diffu- sion models via gpu-aware optimizations

    Yu-Hui Chen, Raman Sarokin, Juhyun Lee, Jiuqiang Tang, Chuo-Ling Chang, Andrei Kulik, and Matthias Grundmann. Speed is all you need: On-device acceleration of large diffu- sion models via gpu-aware optimizations. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and...

    2023

  5. [13]

    Squeezing large-scale diffusion models for mobile

    Jiwoong Choi, Minkyu Kim, Daehyun Ahn, Taesu Kim, Yul- hwa Kim, Dongwon Jo, Hyesung Jeon, Jae-Joon Kim, and Hyungjun Kim. Squeezing large-scale diffusion models for mobile. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01193, 2023. 1

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis

    Prafulla Dhariwal and Alexander Nichol. Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis. Advances in neural informa- tion processing systems, 34:8780–8794, 2021. 1

    2021

  7. [15]

    Tutorial on variational autoencoders

    Carl Doersch. Tutorial on variational autoencoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05908, 2016. 2, 3, 6, 8, 16

    2016 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Scaling recti- fied flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis

    Patrick Esser, Sumith Kulal, Andreas Blattmann, Rahim Entezari, Jonas M ¨uller, Harry Saini, Yam Levi, Dominik Lorenz, Axel Sauer, Frederic Boesel, et al. Scaling recti- fied flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. In Forty-first International Conference on Mach...

    2024

  9. [17]

    Efficient vision trans- former via token merger

    Zhanzhou Feng and Shiliang Zhang. Efficient vision trans- former via token merger. IEEE Transactions on Image Pro- cessing, 2023. 5, 9

    2023

  10. [18]

    Efficient time series processing for transform- ers and state-space models through token merging

    Leon G ¨otz, Marcel Kollovieh, Stephan G¨unnemann, and Leo Schwinn. Efficient time series processing for transform- ers and state-space models through token merging. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17951, 2024. 9

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Knowledge distillation: A survey

    Jianping Gou, Baosheng Yu, Stephen J Maybank, and Dacheng Tao. Knowledge distillation: A survey. Interna- tional Journal of Computer Vision, 129(6):1789–1819, 2021. 16

    2021

  12. [20]

    Gray and David L

    Robert M. Gray and David L. Neuhoff. Quantization. IEEE transactions on information theory, 44(6):2325–2383, 1998. 5

    1998

  13. [21]

    Flexible diffusion modeling of long videos

    William Harvey, Saeid Naderiparizi, Vaden Masrani, Chris- tian Weilbach, and Frank Wood. Flexible diffusion modeling of long videos. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:27953–27965, 2022. 1

    2022

  14. [22]

    Distilling the knowledge in a neural net- work

    Geoffrey Hinton. Distilling the knowledge in a neural net- work. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531, 2015. 5

    2015 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020. 1

    2020

  16. [24]

    Imagen video: High definition video generation with diffusion mod- els

    Jonathan Ho, William Chan, Chitwan Saharia, Jay Whang, Ruiqi Gao, Alexey Gritsenko, Diederik P Kingma, Ben Poole, Mohammad Norouzi, David J Fleet, et al. Imagen video: High definition video generation with diffusion mod- els. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02303, 2022. 1

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Cascaded diffu- sion models for high fidelity image generation

    Jonathan Ho, Chitwan Saharia, William Chan, David J Fleet, Mohammad Norouzi, and Tim Salimans. Cascaded diffu- sion models for high fidelity image generation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 23(47):1–33, 2022. 1

    2022

  18. [26]

    Video dif- fusion models

    Jonathan Ho, Tim Salimans, Alexey Gritsenko, William Chan, Mohammad Norouzi, and David J Fleet. Video dif- fusion models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:8633–8646, 2022. 1

    2022

  19. [27]

    Toward controlled generation of text

    Zhiting Hu, Zichao Yang, Xiaodan Liang, Ruslan Salakhut- dinov, and Eric P Xing. Toward controlled generation of text. In International conference on machine learning, pages 1587–1596. PMLR, 2017. 1

    2017

  20. [28]

    Vbench: Comprehensive bench- mark suite for video generative models

    Ziqi Huang, Yinan He, Jiashuo Yu, Fan Zhang, Chenyang Si, Yuming Jiang, Yuanhan Zhang, Tianxing Wu, Qingyang Jin, Nattapol Chanpaisit, et al. Vbench: Comprehensive bench- mark suite for video generative models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and P...

    2024

  21. [29]

    Pyramidal flow matching for efficient video generative modeling

    Yang Jin, Zhicheng Sun, Ningyuan Li, Kun Xu, Hao Jiang, Nan Zhuang, Quzhe Huang, Yang Song, Yadong Mu, and Zhouchen Lin. Pyramidal flow matching for efficient video generative modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.05954 ,

  22. [30]

    Imagic: Text-based real image editing with diffusion models

    Bahjat Kawar, Shiran Zada, Oran Lang, Omer Tov, Huiwen Chang, Tali Dekel, Inbar Mosseri, and Michal Irani. Imagic: Text-based real image editing with diffusion models. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 6007–6017, 2023. 1

    2023

  23. [31]

    Text2video-zero: Text- to-image diffusion models are zero-shot video generators

    Levon Khachatryan, Andranik Movsisyan, Vahram Tade- vosyan, Roberto Henschel, Zhangyang Wang, Shant Navasardyan, and Humphrey Shi. Text2video-zero: Text- to-image diffusion models are zero-shot video generators. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Comput...

    2023

  24. [32]

    Black Forest Labs. Flux. https://github.com/ black-forest-labs/flux, 2024. 15

    2024

  25. [33]

    xformers: A modular and hackable trans- former modelling library

    Benjamin Lefaudeux, Francisco Massa, Diana Liskovich, Wenhan Xiong, Vittorio Caggiano, Sean Naren, Min Xu, Jieru Hu, Marta Tintore, Susan Zhang, Patrick Labatut, Daniel Haziza, Luca Wehrstedt, Jeremy Reizenstein, and Grigory Sizov. xformers: A modular and hackable trans- forme...

    2022

  26. [34]

    Vidtome: Video token merging for zero-shot video editing

    Xirui Li, Chao Ma, Xiaokang Yang, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Vidtome: Video token merging for zero-shot video editing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7486–7495, 2024. 5, 9

    2024

  27. [35]

    Snap- fusion: Text-to-image diffusion model on mobile devices within two seconds

    Yanyu Li, Huan Wang, Qing Jin, Ju Hu, Pavlo Chemerys, Yun Fu, Yanzhi Wang, Sergey Tulyakov, and Jian Ren. Snap- fusion: Text-to-image diffusion model on mobile devices within two seconds. Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, 36, 2024. 1

    2024

  28. [36]

    Animatediff-lightning: Cross-model diffusion distillation

    Shanchuan Lin and Xiao Yang. Animatediff-lightning: Cross-model diffusion distillation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12706, 2024. 1

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Generative adversarial networks for image and video synthesis: Algorithms and applications

    Ming-Yu Liu, Xun Huang, Jiahui Yu, Ting-Chun Wang, and Arun Mallya. Generative adversarial networks for image and video synthesis: Algorithms and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 109(5):839–862, 2021. 1

    2021

  30. [38]

    Flow straight and fast: Learning to generate and transfer data with rectified flow

    Xingchao Liu, Chengyue Gong, and Qiang Liu. Flow straight and fast: Learning to generate and transfer data with rectified flow. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.03003, 2022. 4, 8, 15, 17

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Sora: A review on background, technology, limitations, and opportunities of large vision models

    Yixin Liu, Kai Zhang, Yuan Li, Zhiling Yan, Chujie Gao, Ruoxi Chen, Zhengqing Yuan, Yue Huang, Hanchi Sun, Jian- feng Gao, et al. Sora: A review on background, technology, limitations, and opportunities of large vision models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17177, 2024. 13

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Dpm-solver++: Fast solver for guided sampling of diffusion probabilistic models

    Cheng Lu, Yuhao Zhou, Fan Bao, Jianfei Chen, Chongx- uan Li, and Jun Zhu. Dpm-solver++: Fast solver for guided sampling of diffusion probabilistic models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.01095, 2022. 4

    2022 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Snap video: Scaled spatiotemporal transformers for text-to-video synthesis

    Willi Menapace, Aliaksandr Siarohin, Ivan Skorokhodov, Ekaterina Deyneka, Tsai-Shien Chen, Anil Kag, Yuwei Fang, Aleksei Stoliar, Elisa Ricci, Jian Ren, et al. Snap video: Scaled spatiotemporal transformers for text-to-video synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference...

    2024

  34. [42]

    Dreamix: Video diffusion models are general video editors

    Eyal Molad, Eliahu Horwitz, Dani Valevski, Alex Rav Acha, Yossi Matias, Yael Pritch, Yaniv Leviathan, and Yedid Hoshen. Dreamix: Video diffusion models are general video editors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.01329, 2023. 1

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    A review on the attention mechanism of deep learning

    Zhaoyang Niu, Guoqiang Zhong, and Hui Yu. A review on the attention mechanism of deep learning. Neurocomputing, 452:48–62, 2021. 3

    2021

  36. [44]

    Generative models for video analysis and 3D range data applications

    Xavier Orriols. Generative models for video analysis and 3D range data applications . Universitat Aut `onoma de Barcelona,, 2004. 1

    2004

  37. [45]

    Pytorch: An im- perative style, high-performance deep learning library

    Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, James Bradbury, Gregory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zeming Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, et al. Pytorch: An im- perative style, high-performance deep learning library. Ad- vances in neural information processing systems ...

    2019

  38. [46]

    Scalable diffusion models with transformers

    William Peebles and Saining Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Inter- national Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4195–4205,

  39. [47]

    Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion mod- els for high-resolution image synthesis

    Dustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Jonas M ¨uller, Joe Penna, and Robin Rombach. Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion mod- els for high-resolution image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952, 2023. 1, 3

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer

    Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J Liu. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. Journal of machine learning research, 21(140):1–67, 2020. 2, 3, 6, 8,...

    2020

  41. [49]

    Pruning algorithms-a survey

    Russell Reed. Pruning algorithms-a survey. IEEE transac- tions on Neural Networks, 4(5):740–747, 1993. 5, 16

    1993

  42. [50]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 1, 8

    2022

  43. [51]

    U- net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmen- tation

    Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. U- net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmen- tation. In Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th international conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, proceedings, pa...

    2015

  44. [52]

    ¨Uber die numerische aufl¨osung von differential- gleichungen

    Carl Runge. ¨Uber die numerische aufl¨osung von differential- gleichungen. Mathematische Annalen, 46(2):167–178, 1895. 4

  45. [53]

    Palette: Image-to-image diffusion models

    Chitwan Saharia, William Chan, Huiwen Chang, Chris Lee, Jonathan Ho, Tim Salimans, David Fleet, and Mohammad Norouzi. Palette: Image-to-image diffusion models. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 conference proceedings, pages 1–10,

    2022

  46. [54]

    Introduction to apple ml tools

    ¨Ozg¨ur Sahin and ¨Ozg¨ur Sahin. Introduction to apple ml tools. Develop Intelligent iOS Apps with Swift: Understand Texts, Classify Sentiments, and Autodetect Answers in Text Using NLP, pages 17–39, 2021. 6

    2021

  47. [55]

    Sin- gan: Learning a generative model from a single natural im- age

    Tamar Rott Shaham, Tali Dekel, and Tomer Michaeli. Sin- gan: Learning a generative model from a single natural im- age. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international confer- ence on computer vision, pages 4570–4580, 2019. 1

    2019

  48. [56]

    Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data

    Uriel Singer, Adam Polyak, Thomas Hayes, Xi Yin, Jie An, Songyang Zhang, Qiyuan Hu, Harry Yang, Oron Ashual, Oran Gafni, et al. Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14792 ,

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    Video edit- ing via factorized diffusion distillation

    Uriel Singer, Amit Zohar, Yuval Kirstain, Shelly Sheynin, Adam Polyak, Devi Parikh, and Yaniv Taigman. Video edit- ing via factorized diffusion distillation. In European Con- ference on Computer Vision, pages 450–466. Springer, 2024. 1

    2024

  50. [58]

    Denoising diffusion implicit models

    Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. Denoising diffusion implicit models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502, 2020. 1, 3

    2010 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding

    Jianlin Su, Murtadha Ahmed, Yu Lu, Shengfeng Pan, Wen Bo, and Yunfeng Liu. Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding. Neurocomputing, 568:127063,

  52. [60]

    A survey of multi- modal deep generative models

    Masahiro Suzuki and Yutaka Matsuo. A survey of multi- modal deep generative models. Advanced Robotics, 36(5-6): 261–278, 2022. 1

    2022

  53. [61]

    Vidgen-1m: A large-scale dataset for text-to-video genera- tion

    Zhiyu Tan, Xiaomeng Yang, Luozheng Qin, and Hao Li. Vidgen-1m: A large-scale dataset for text-to-video genera- tion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.02629, 2024. 6

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Qvd: Post-training quantization for video diffusion models

    Shilong Tian, Hong Chen, Chengtao Lv, Yu Liu, Jinyang Guo, Xianglong Liu, Shengxi Li, Hao Yang, and Tao Xie. Qvd: Post-training quantization for video diffusion models. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 10572–10581, 2024. 1

    2024

  55. [63]

    To- wards accurate generative models of video: A new metric & challenges

    Thomas Unterthiner, Sjoerd Van Steenkiste, Karol Kurach, Raphael Marinier, Marcin Michalski, and Sylvain Gelly. To- wards accurate generative models of video: A new metric & challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.01717, 2018. 1

    2018 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Mobileone: An im- proved one millisecond mobile backbone

    Pavan Kumar Anasosalu Vasu, James Gabriel, Jeff Zhu, Oncel Tuzel, and Anurag Ranjan. Mobileone: An im- proved one millisecond mobile backbone. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 7907–7917, 2023. 1

    2023

  57. [65]

    Mcvd-masked conditional video diffusion for prediction, generation, and interpolation

    Vikram V oleti, Alexia Jolicoeur-Martineau, and Chris Pal. Mcvd-masked conditional video diffusion for prediction, generation, and interpolation. Advances in neural informa- tion processing systems, 35:23371–23385, 2022. 1

    2022

  58. [66]

    Animatelcm: Computation-efficient personalized style video generation without personalized video data

    Fu-Yun Wang, Zhaoyang Huang, Weikang Bian, Xiaoyu Shi, Keqiang Sun, Guanglu Song, Yu Liu, and Hongsheng Li. Animatelcm: Computation-efficient personalized style video generation without personalized video data. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Technical Communications, New York, NY , USA,

    2024

  59. [67]

    Transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing

    Thomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chau- mond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pierric Cistac, Tim Rault, R ´emi Louf, Morgan Funtowicz, et al. Transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. In Proceed- ings of the 2020 conference on empirical methods...

    2020

  60. [68]

    Tune-a-video: One-shot tuning of image diffusion models for text-to-video generation

    Jay Zhangjie Wu, Yixiao Ge, Xintao Wang, Stan Weixian Lei, Yuchao Gu, Yufei Shi, Wynne Hsu, Ying Shan, Xiaohu Qie, and Mike Zheng Shou. Tune-a-video: One-shot tuning of image diffusion models for text-to-video generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference...

    2023

  61. [69]

    In- dividual content and motion dynamics preserved pruning for video diffusion models

    Yiming Wu, Huan Wang, Zhenghao Chen, and Dong Xu. In- dividual content and motion dynamics preserved pruning for video diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.18375 ,

    arXiv

  62. [70]

    Snapgen-v: Generating a five-second video within five seconds on a mobile device

    Yushu Wu, Zhixing Zhang, Yanyu Li, Yanwu Xu, Anil Kag, Yang Sui, Huseyin Coskun, Ke Ma, Aleksei Lebe- dev, Ju Hu, et al. Snapgen-v: Generating a five-second video within five seconds on a mobile device. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10494, 2024. 1, 8

    2024 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Mobile video diffusion

    Haitam Ben Yahia, Denis Korzhenkov, Ioannis Lelekas, Amir Ghodrati, and Amirhossein Habibian. Mobile video diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.07583, 2024. 1, 8

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Stat: Spatial-temporal attention mechanism for video cap- tioning

    Chenggang Yan, Yunbin Tu, Xingzheng Wang, Yongbing Zhang, Xinhong Hao, Yongdong Zhang, and Qionghai Dai. Stat: Spatial-temporal attention mechanism for video cap- tioning. IEEE transactions on multimedia , 22(1):229–241,

  65. [73]

    Diffusion models: A comprehensive survey of methods and applications

    Ling Yang, Zhilong Zhang, Yang Song, Shenda Hong, Run- sheng Xu, Yue Zhao, Wentao Zhang, Bin Cui, and Ming- Hsuan Yang. Diffusion models: A comprehensive survey of methods and applications. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(4): 1–39, 2023. 4

    2023

  66. [74]

    Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer

    Zhuoyi Yang, Jiayan Teng, Wendi Zheng, Ming Ding, Shiyu Huang, Jiazheng Xu, Yuanming Yang, Wenyi Hong, Xiao- han Zhang, Guanyu Feng, et al. Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072, 2024. 17

    2024 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Schedule on the fly: Diffusion time prediction for faster and better image generation

    Zilyu Ye, Zhiyang Chen, Tiancheng Li, Zemin Huang, Wei- jian Luo, and Guo-Jun Qi. Schedule on the fly: Diffusion time prediction for faster and better image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.01243, 2024. 17

    2024 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Language model beats diffusion–tokenizer is key to visual generation

    Lijun Yu, Jos ´e Lezama, Nitesh B Gundavarapu, Luca Ver- sari, Kihyuk Sohn, David Minnen, Yong Cheng, Vighnesh Birodkar, Agrim Gupta, Xiuye Gu, et al. Language model beats diffusion–tokenizer is key to visual generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05737, 2023. 3

    arXiv

  69. [77]

    Text-to-image diffusion models in gener- ative ai: A survey

    Chenshuang Zhang, Chaoning Zhang, Mengchun Zhang, and In So Kweon. Text-to-image diffusion models in gener- ative ai: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07909, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models

    Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3836–3847, 2023. 1

    2023

  71. [79]

    A survey on personalized content synthesis with diffusion models

    Xulu Zhang, Xiao-Yong Wei, Wengyu Zhang, Jinlin Wu, Zhaoxiang Zhang, Zhen Lei, and Qing Li. A survey on personalized content synthesis with diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.05538, 2024. 1

    2024

  72. [80]

    Vidit-q: Efficient and accurate quantization of diffusion transformers for im- age and video generation

    Tianchen Zhao, Tongcheng Fang, Enshu Liu, Rui Wan, Widyadewi Soedarmadji, Shiyao Li, Zinan Lin, Guohao Dai, Shengen Yan, Huazhong Yang, et al. Vidit-q: Efficient and accurate quantization of diffusion transformers for im- age and video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02540,

    arXiv

  73. [81]

    Mobilediffusion: Subsecond text-to-image generation on mobile devices

    Yang Zhao, Yanwu Xu, Zhisheng Xiao, and Tingbo Hou. Mobilediffusion: Subsecond text-to-image generation on mobile devices. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.16567, 2023. 1

    2023 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Dpm- solver-v3: Improved diffusion ode solver with empirical model statistics

    Kaiwen Zheng, Cheng Lu, Jianfei Chen, and Jun Zhu. Dpm- solver-v3: Improved diffusion ode solver with empirical model statistics. Advances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems, 36:55502–55542, 2023. 4, 17

    2023

  75. [83]

    Open-sora: Democratizing efficient video production for all, 2024

    Zangwei Zheng, Xiangyu Peng, Tianji Yang, Chenhui Shen, Shenggui Li, Hongxin Liu, Yukun Zhou, Tianyi Li, and Yang You. Open-sora: Democratizing efficient video production for all, 2024. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16

    2024

  76. [84]

    Slimflow: Training smaller one-step diffusion models with rectified flow

    Yuanzhi Zhu, Xingchao Liu, and Qiang Liu. Slimflow: Training smaller one-step diffusion models with rectified flow. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 342–359. Springer, 2025. 8 A. Appendix - Implementation A.1. Concurrent Inference with Dynamic Loading On-devic...

    2025

  77. [86]

    and Temporal Dimension Token Merging (Sec. 5). Straightness Constraints. For video generation mod- els that do not exhibit straightness during their denois- ing procedures, such as CogVideoX [74], which employs DPM-Solver [82], Linear Proportional Leap (LPL) is cur- rently ina...

  78. [2024]

    Association for Computing Machinery. 1

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.