Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

RecExplainer: Aligning Large Language Models for Explaining Recommendation Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.10947 v2 pith:LSFC6I2Z submitted 2023-11-18 cs.IR cs.AI

classification cs.IRcs.AI
keywords modelsalignmentbehaviorlanguagellmsmodelreasoningrecommender
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recommender systems are widely used in online services, with embedding-based models being particularly popular due to their expressiveness in representing complex signals. However, these models often function as a black box, making them less transparent and reliable for both users and developers. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable intelligence in understanding, reasoning, and instruction following. This paper presents the initial exploration of using LLMs as surrogate models to explaining black-box recommender models. The primary concept involves training LLMs to comprehend and emulate the behavior of target recommender models. By leveraging LLMs' own extensive world knowledge and multi-step reasoning abilities, these aligned LLMs can serve as advanced surrogates, capable of reasoning about observations. Moreover, employing natural language as an interface allows for the creation of customizable explanations that can be adapted to individual user preferences. To facilitate an effective alignment, we introduce three methods: behavior alignment, intention alignment, and hybrid alignment. Behavior alignment operates in the language space, representing user preferences and item information as text to mimic the target model's behavior; intention alignment works in the latent space of the recommendation model, using user and item representations to understand the model's behavior; hybrid alignment combines both language and latent spaces. Comprehensive experiments conducted on three public datasets show that our approach yields promising results in understanding and mimicking target models, producing high-quality, high-fidelity, and distinct explanations. Our code is available at https://github.com/microsoft/RecAI.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLM4MEA: Data-free Model Extraction Attacks on Sequential Recommenders via Large Language Models

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM-driven agent generates synthetic interaction sequences that, when queried against a target sequential recommender, produce surrogate models with higher agreement to the target than random or autoregressive data...

  2. Explainable CTR Prediction via LLM Reasoning

    cs.IR 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ExpCTR jointly trains an LLM explanation generator and a CTR model via two reinforcement rewards, reporting higher AUC than ID-based baselines on BookCrossing, ML-20M, and Amazon Books.

  3. CARTS: Collaborative Agents for Recommendation Textual Summarization

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    CARTS is a multi-agent LLM pipeline for generating e-commerce carousel titles, and it reports gains over single-shot LLM baselines in offline relevance and online engagement metrics.

Pith tools