Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Symmetric Product Orbifold Universality and the Mirage of an Emergent Spacetime

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Symmetric product orbifolds reproduce BTZ thermal correlators exactly

desk verdict High-impact challenge to emergent-spacetime criteria, with a real but acknowledged gap in the saddle-dominance argument. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.01734 v3 pith:LTE6JQQ6 submitted 2025-02-03 hep-th

Alexandre Belin , Suzanne Bintanja , Alejandra Castro , Waltraut Knop This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 81T4083C57
keywords symmetricproductorbifoldsthermaltwo-pointfunctionsBTZblackholeHawking-PagetransitionuniversalityatlargeNemergentspacetimevonNeumannalgebrastwistedsectors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that in symmetric product orbifolds, the large-N thermal two-point function of any untwisted single-trace scalar operator is universal: above the Hawking-Page transition it equals the BTZ boundary two-point function, for any choice of seed CFT. The same universality extends to two-point functions of light probes in typical twisted ground states, which reproduce the two-point function on a conical defect geometry that becomes massless BTZ as N grows. The authors' point is that this exact match with black-hole correlators occurs in theories that are not dual to semiclassical gravity, because they have higher spin currents, Hagedorn spectra, and no chaos. From this they conclude that requiring the infinite-N thermal two-point function to look like BTZ, or the associated von Neumann algebra to be type III₁, cannot be a sufficient criterion for emergent spacetime or a sharp horizon. A reader should care because it pins down what thermal data can and cannot certify about holography.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the sum over pairs of commuting permutations (g,h) that gives torus correlators of permutation orbifolds, with each orbit contributing a seed partition function or seed correlator on a covering torus with modular parameter τ_ξ=(μ_ξ τ+κ_ξ)/λ_ξ. The paper isolates the contribution from a long cycle g=(1)^{N-L}(L) with L∼N; long cycles generate two effects: an enhanced effective temperature τ/L for the seed correlators, forcing them into the universal β→0 form, and a sum over periodic images that yields the sum over j∈Z in Eq. (3.17). The claim is that these two effects are universal and dominate all other commuting pairs at large N, making the seed theory drop out.

What would settle it

Compute the full sum over all commuting (g,h) in Eq. (3.7) for a specific solvable seed, such as a free boson, at large but finite N, keeping all multi-cycle and off-diagonal contributions to the two-point function; if any family of commuting pairs contributes at order $N^{0}$ and modifies the sum over images, the exact BTZ form fails. A more direct test is to find one seed CFT for which Eq. (3.17) is violated above the Hawking-Page transition at leading order in N, which would falsify universality.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is Eq. (3.17)/(5.1): at large N and β<2π, the thermal two-point function of an untwisted single-trace scalar in Sym^N(C) takes the exact BTZ form, independent of the seed CFT. The mechanism is that the dominant cover surface comes from a long twist cycle of length L∼N; the seed two-point function is evaluated at an effective temperature enhanced by L, so it is in its universal high-temperature regime, and the periodic images on the cover produce the sum over images that is exactly the BTZ answer. The paper also shows that two-point functions of light operators in twisted ground states with long cycles are universal, giving the same functional form as the M=0 BTZ geometry in the limit. Because symmetric product orbifolds are explicitly not dual to Einstein gravity, the paper interprets the match as evidence that thermal two-point data alone cannot single out holographic theories.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, in the large-N sum over commuting permutations, the leading contribution comes from long twist cycles, and that inserting light operators does not change which saddles dominate; this is argued heuristically rather than proven by evaluating the full sum over all commuting pairs.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Protected single-trace operators in the D1-D5 system have thermal two-point functions that are unchanged by the coupling at leading order in the large-N limit, even though thermal correlators are not generally protected.
  • Each single-trace operator generates a subalgebra that formally looks type III₁ with infinite causal depth, matching the algebraic criterion for a horizon, while the full symmetric product orbifold is not a standard gravitational dual.
  • The sparse-spectrum and factorization conditions used in earlier large-c analyses are satisfied, so those conditions cannot distinguish holographic CFTs from non-holographic ones.
  • Two-point functions in twisted ground states match conical-defect or massless-BTZ answers for typical partitions, not just in the thermal ensemble.
  • The results imply that a condition on the infinite-N thermal two-point functions cannot be stringent enough to define an emergent spacetime or a sharp horizon.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the paper is right, the BTZ form is likely a generic property of sparse large-N CFTs, so a convincing holography test must use data beyond two-point functions, such as OTOCs, higher-point functions, or 1/N corrections.
  • One can test the proposal by computing thermal two-point functions of twisted-sector operators on the torus; if universality persists there, even more algebraic criteria lose discriminating power, and if it fails, different probes would see different effective geometries.
  • A natural extension is to resum the full tower of exponentially many light single-trace operators and ask whether the full von Neumann algebra remains type III₁ or collapses to type I, which would sharpen the 'mirage' interpretation.
  • The paper's corrected statement about partitions (no typical partition, but a typical N-scaling) could be used to derive statistical predictions for microstate correlators in other orbifold-like ensembles.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies large-N correlation functions in symmetric product orbifolds. For untwisted single-trace scalar probes on the torus, it derives a Bantay-type formula for the thermal two-point function and evaluates the contribution of a single long twist cycle, obtaining Eq. (3.17), which equals the BTZ boundary two-point function for β < 2π independently of the seed theory. For four-point functions with two heavy twisted ground states and two light probes, the paper computes universal results for untwisted and twist-2 probes, e.g., Eqs. (4.16), (4.29), and (4.59), again with no dependence on seed OPE coefficients. The authors interpret these results as showing that infinite-N thermal two-point functions cannot distinguish symmetric product orbifolds from a theory with a sharp emergent horizon, thereby challenging the sufficiency of type III₁ algebra criteria for emergent spacetime. The paper also corrects a claim in the literature about typical twisted sectors and reviews the sparseness-based approach of Ref. [17] in an appendix.

Significance. If the central result holds, this is a significant contribution to the debate on what constitutes a holographic CFT: it provides an explicit large class of non-holographic CFTs whose thermal two-point functions exactly mimic BTZ correlators, directly undermining proposals that continuous spectral density or type III₁ operator algebras are sufficient for an emergent horizon. The paper's strengths are its explicit Bantay-based formalism, the clean computation of the representative long-cycle contribution, the coincidence-limit check of Eq. (3.10), and the detailed cover-map computations in Sec. 4. The authors are also honest about several limitations, including the lack of invertible cover maps for unequal-length cycles and the heuristic nature of the saddle-dominance step. However, the central universal claim is not fully established because the paper does not analyze the complete sum over commuting pairs in Eq. (3.7); the conclusion therefore rests on an unproven dominance assumption.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eqs. (3.7), (3.13)–(3.17)] The derivation of the universal BTZ result evaluates only the representative pair (g,h) = ((1)^{N-L}(L), 1). The full Bantay sum in Eq. (3.7) also contains commuting pairs with h nontrivial on the long cycle; for h = g^k, Eq. (3.5) gives κξ = k, so the seed two-point function is evaluated at a complex modular parameter with nonzero real part. The high-temperature seed formula in Eq. (3.14) is written for imaginary τ, and the analytic continuation to complex τ is not discussed. Since Eq. (5.1) is an exact equality with coefficient unity, any unsuppressed or seed-dependent correction from these configurations would invalidate the universality claim. The authors should either prove that such contributions are exponentially suppressed or clearly state the result as a conjecture with a precise validity regime.
  2. [Sec. 3.2, 'Regimes of validity' (p. 22)] The passage from the single-covering computation to Eq. (3.16) is argued heuristically: the text says 'it is not hard to see' and 'we can argue' that any long-cycle configuration gives the same leading result and that light insertions do not shift the dominant saddle. This is plausible for the partition function, but for correlators the probe sums over images can be sensitive to subleading saddles. In particular, configurations with several long cycles have combinatorial multiplicities that could compete with the single-long-cycle term, and the paper does not bound such contributions. This step is load-bearing because Eq. (3.17) is the basis for the paper's main interpretation. A complete derivation or an explicit estimate of the neglected terms is needed.
  3. [Sec. 4.2.1 and Sec. 5.1, Eq. (5.3)] The summary result Eq. (5.3) is phrased for a general permutation g with cycles of length n, but the explicit derivation in Sec. 4.2 covers only the case of equal-length cycles that are joined by the twist-2 probe. The authors themselves state, for cycles of unequal length, that 'there is no cover map that is invertible' and hence they 'cannot make statements about universality.' This limitation should be reflected in the abstract or in Eq. (5.3) so that the scope of the claimed universal result for twisted probes is not overstated.
  4. [Appendix B, condition (B.5)] The claim that symmetric product orbifolds satisfy all four conditions of Ref. [17] is used to argue universality of thermal correlators for all light operators, including twisted operators in Sec. 5.2. The discussion of the medium-state growth condition (B.5) is a sketch: the text refers to a 'similar argument' and to Ref. [50] rather than providing the required large-N estimate. Since this appendix is part of the evidence for the broader universality claim, the authors should either provide the explicit check or mark this as a conjecture.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (3.12)] The notation 'iJOseed CχχOseed' is unexplained and appears to contain a typo or undefined symbol; please clarify or correct it.
  2. [Sec. 3.2] The notation g = (1)^{N-L}(L) is clear to experts but should be defined explicitly for readers unfamiliar with cycle notation in permutation orbifolds.
  3. [Eqs. (4.43)–(4.53)] The normalization factor N in Eq. (4.45) is easily confused with the total number of copies N; consider renaming it (e.g., \mathcal{N}) to avoid ambiguity.
  4. [Sec. 4.1.1] The correction to Refs. [36,81,82] would be more useful if it identified the precise statement being corrected rather than referring to the papers collectively.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the BTZ two-point function is obtained from seed CFT data after the computation, with no fitted parameters or self-referential definition.

full rationale

The central chain is self-contained. Starting from Bantay's exact torus formula (3.7), the large-N evaluation in Sec. 3.2 evaluates a representative long-cycle pair and uses the universal high-temperature seed two-point function (3.14); the sum over images generated by the cycle is then rewritten as the BTZ boundary two-point function (3.17)/(5.1) only after the computation. No parameter is fitted to the BTZ form, and the orbifold observable is not defined in terms of BTZ data. Citations to the authors' prior work supply the partition-function input that long twist cycles dominate ([18,39], App. A), but that input is independent of the target correlator result and does not assume it; the self-citation [39] is real external evidence (also present in the independent [18]). The only flagged weakness, located in Sec. 3.2 'Regimes of validity', is the heuristic passage from one commuting pair g=(1)^{N-L}(L), h=1 to all long-cycle configurations via the assertion that light probes do not change saddle dominance. That is a rigor gap in bounding subleading commuting pairs, not a circular reduction: the claimed universal form is not equivalent by construction to the input assumptions. The unpublished self-citation [96] is peripheral (App. B) and not load-bearing for the main derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation introduces no fitted parameters. The only numerical inputs are the seed central charge, the operator dimension, and the cycle lengths, all fixed by the setup. The assumptions are mostly standard orbifold technology plus two load-bearing heuristic claims: long-cycle dominance at high temperature, and suppression of genus-one cover contributions for typical twisted states. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are postulated.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The seed CFT C is compact and its torus correlators obey the standard high-temperature thermal two-point behavior (3.14).
    Used in Sec. 3.2 to evaluate seed correlators on the long-cycle cover at enhanced temperature; assumed valid for any compact CFT.
  • domain assumption Large-N factorization and the HKS sparseness condition hold for all symmetric product orbifolds.
    Quoted from [18,49] and reviewed in Sec. 2.2; needed to extend the explicit long-cycle computation to a universal statement and to apply the [17] criteria in App. B.
  • domain assumption The cover-map and Lunin-Mathur method, including the Liouville action (4.44), correctly computes twisted correlators.
    Used throughout Sec. 4; method from [43,44,83].
  • ad hoc to paper Thermal saddles are dominated by long twist cycles and light operator insertions do not shift the dominant saddle.
    Sec. 3.2 states the leading contribution comes from g=(1)^{N-L}(L) and that any long-cycle g gives the same qualitative result, but this is argued, not proven.
  • domain assumption Typical twisted ground states are described by Bose-Einstein occupation numbers (4.23), and O(1) variances do not affect large-N scaling.
    Sec. 4.1.1 uses typical partition scaling to conclude universality; the paper corrects the 'no typical partition' issue in [36].
  • ad hoc to paper For twist-2 probes, genus-one cover contributions are subleading when cycles have large occupation numbers, and the genus-zero map (4.35) is the dominant piece.
    Sec. 4.2 states this scaling but does not compute the genus-one term; normalization N0 is only fixed for special g.
  • domain assumption The four conditions of [17] are satisfied by symmetric product orbifolds, including growth of light correlators in medium states.
    App. B argues each condition, but one step for extracting images relies on unpublished work [96].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Symmetric Product Orbifold Universality and the Mirage of an Emergent Spacetime." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LTE6JQQ6

@misc{pith2026250201734,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Symmetric Product Orbifold Universality and the Mirage of an Emergent Spacetime},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LTE6JQQ6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.01734}
}
abstract

We study thermal two-point functions and four-point functions involving two heavy twisted operators and two light probes in symmetric product orbifolds. We identify cases where they are universal at large $N$, that is, they are only sensitive to the orbifold structure. Surprisingly, such observables mimic correlators obtained from the BTZ background, even though symmetric product orbifolds are not dual to semi-classical gravity. We discuss the interpretation of these results in light of the criteria for emergence of spacetime via Von Neumann algebras. Our analysis implies that a condition on the infinite $N$ thermal two-point functions cannot be stringent enough to define an emergent spacetime and the concept of a sharp horizon.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The analytic bootstrap at finite temperature

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Universal dispersion-based formulae for thermal two-point functions of scalars that satisfy bootstrap axioms except clustering at infinite distance.

  2. A Holographic Map from AdS$_3$ to CFT$_2$

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Semiclassical pure AdS3 gravity states, labelled by fixed-area geodesic networks, are mapped to CFT2 primary states whose wavefunctions are networks of OPE coefficients.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [96]

    Unpublished

    A. Belin, T. Hartman, and E. Shaghoulian, “Unpublished.”. 52

  2. [17]

    Black holes fro m CFT: Universality of correlators at large c,

    P. Kraus, A. Sivaramakrishnan, and R. Snively, “Black holes fro m CFT: Universality of correlators at large c,” JHEP 08 (2017) 084 , arXiv:1706.00771 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2017

  3. [50]

    Genus two partition func tions and R´ enyi entropies of large c conformal field theories,

    A. Belin, C. A. Keller, and I. G. Zadeh, “Genus two partition func tions and R´ enyi entropies of large c conformal field theories,” J. Phys. A 50 no. 43, (2017) 435401 , arXiv:1704.08250 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2017

  4. [1]

    Hologr aphy from Conformal Field Theory,

    I. Heemskerk, J. Penedones, J. Polchinski, and J. Sully, “Hologr aphy from Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP 10 (2009) 079 , arXiv:0907.0151 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2009

  5. [2]

    Einste in gravity 3-point functions from conformal field theory,

    N. Afkhami-Jeddi, T. Hartman, S. Kundu, and A. Tajdini, “Einste in gravity 3-point functions from conformal field theory,” JHEP 12 (2017) 049 , arXiv:1610.09378 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2017

  6. [3]

    Beyond a = c: gravitational couplings to matter and the stress tensor OPE,

    D. Meltzer and E. Perlmutter, “Beyond a = c: gravitational couplings to matter and the stress tensor OPE,” JHEP 07 (2018) 157 , arXiv:1712.04861 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2018

  7. [4]

    Einstein gravity from ANE C correlators,

    A. Belin, D. M. Hofman, and G. Mathys, “Einstein gravity from ANE C correlators,” JHEP 08 (2019) 032 , arXiv:1904.05892 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [5]

    S hocks, Superconvergence, and a Stringy Equivalence Principle,

    M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Zhiboedov, “S hocks, Superconvergence, and a Stringy Equivalence Principle,” JHEP 11 (2020) 096 , arXiv:1904.05905 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

Show all 96 references
  1. [6]

    Ad S bulk locality from sharp CFT bounds,

    S. Caron-Huot, D. Mazac, L. Rastelli, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Ad S bulk locality from sharp CFT bounds,” JHEP 11 (2021) 164 , arXiv:2106.10274 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  2. [7]

    Emergent Spacetime and Holog raphic CFTs,

    S. El-Showk and K. Papadodimas, “Emergent Spacetime and Holog raphic CFTs,” JHEP 10 (2012) 106 , arXiv:1101.4163 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  3. [8]

    The Conformal Bootstrap at Finite Temperature,

    L. Iliesiu, M. Kolo˘ glu, R. Mahajan, E. Perlmutter, and D. Simmons -Duffin, “The Conformal Bootstrap at Finite Temperature,” JHEP 10 (2018) 070 , arXiv:1802.10266 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  4. [9]

    Universal Lowest-Twist in CF Ts from Holography,

    A. L. Fitzpatrick and K.-W. Huang, “Universal Lowest-Twist in CF Ts from Holography,” JHEP 08 (2019) 138 , arXiv:1903.05306 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [10]

    Model-dependence of minimal-twist OPEs in d > 2 holographic CFTs,

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, K.-W. Huang, D. Meltzer, E. Perlmutter, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Model-dependence of minimal-twist OPEs in d > 2 holographic CFTs,” JHEP 11 (2020) 060 , arXiv:2007.07382 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [11]

    Holographic correlat ors at finite temperature,

    L. F. Alday, M. Kologlu, and A. Zhiboedov, “Holographic correlat ors at finite temperature,” JHEP 06 (2021) 082 , arXiv:2009.10062 [hep-th] . 46

    2021 arXiv

  7. [12]

    Near Lightcone Thermal Conformal Correlat ors and Holography,

    A. Parnachev, “Near Lightcone Thermal Conformal Correlat ors and Holography,” J. Phys. A 54 no. 15, (2021) 155401 , arXiv:2005.06877 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [13]

    Therm al stress tensor correlators, OPE and holography,

    R. Karlsson, A. Parnachev, V. Prilepina, and S. Valach, “Therm al stress tensor correlators, OPE and holography,” JHEP 09 (2022) 234 , arXiv:2206.05544 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [14]

    Sum rules & Tauber ian theorems at finite temperature,

    E. Marchetto, A. Miscioscia, and E. Pomoni, “Sum rules & Tauber ian theorems at finite temperature,” JHEP 09 (2024) 044 , arXiv:2312.13030 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [15]

    Universal Spectrum o f 2d Conformal Field Theory in the Large c Limit,

    T. Hartman, C. A. Keller, and B. Stoica, “Universal Spectrum o f 2d Conformal Field Theory in the Large c Limit,” JHEP 09 (2014) 118 , arXiv:1405.5137 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  11. [16]

    A universal inequality on the unitary 2D CFT partition function,

    I. Dey, S. Pal, and J. Qiao, “A universal inequality on the unitary 2D CFT partition function,” arXiv:2410.18174 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  12. [18]

    Phase transitions in symmetric orbifold CFTs and un iversality,

    C. A. Keller, “Phase transitions in symmetric orbifold CFTs and un iversality,” JHEP 03 (2011) 114 , arXiv:1101.4937 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Causal connectability between qu antum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality,

    S. Leutheusser and H. Liu, “Causal connectability between qu antum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 8, (2023) 086019 , arXiv:2110.05497 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Emergent Times in Holographic Duality,

    S. A. W. Leutheusser and H. Liu, “Emergent Times in Holographic Duality,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 8, (2023) 086020 , arXiv:2112.12156 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Gravity and the crossed product,

    E. Witten, “Gravity and the crossed product,” JHEP 10 (2022) 008 , arXiv:2112.12828 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Ge neralized black hole entropy is von Neumann entropy,

    J. Kudler-Flam, S. Leutheusser, and G. Satishchandran, “Ge neralized black hole entropy is von Neumann entropy,” Phys. Rev. D 111 no. 2, (2025) 025013 , arXiv:2309.15897 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  17. [23]

    State-dressed local operators in the AdS/CFT correspondence,

    E. Bahiru, A. Belin, K. Papadodimas, G. Sarosi, and N. Vardian, “ State-dressed local operators in the AdS/CFT correspondence,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 8, (2023) 086035 , arXiv:2209.06845 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Holography and localization of information in quantum gravity,

    E. Bahiru, A. Belin, K. Papadodimas, G. Sarosi, and N. Vardian, “ Holography and localization of information in quantum gravity,” JHEP 05 (2024) 261 , arXiv:2301.08753 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Generalized entro py for general subregions in quantum gravity,

    K. Jensen, J. Sorce, and A. J. Speranza, “Generalized entro py for general subregions in quantum gravity,” JHEP 12 (2023) 020 , arXiv:2306.01837 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Informat ion loss, mixing and emergent type III 1 factors,

    K. Furuya, N. Lashkari, M. Moosa, and S. Ouseph, “Informat ion loss, mixing and emergent type III 1 factors,” JHEP 08 (2023) 111 , arXiv:2305.16028 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [27]

    An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington, and E. Witten, “ An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,” JHEP 02 (2023) 082 , arXiv:2206.10780 [hep-th] . 47

    2023 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Algebras, regions, and observers.,

    E. Witten, “Algebras, regions, and observers.,” Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 107 (2024) 247–276 , arXiv:2303.02837 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [29]

    A clock is just a way to tell the time : gravitational algebras in cosmological spacetimes,

    C.-H. Chen and G. Penington, “A clock is just a way to tell the time : gravitational algebras in cosmological spacetimes,” arXiv:2406.02116 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  24. [30]

    Alg ebraic Observational Cosmology,

    J. Kudler-Flam, S. Leutheusser, and G. Satishchandran, “Alg ebraic Observational Cosmology,” arXiv:2406.01669 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  25. [31]

    Toward stringy horizons,

    E. Gesteau and H. Liu, “Toward stringy horizons,” arXiv:2408.12642 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  26. [32]

    The Worlds heet Dual of the Symmetric Product CFT,

    L. Eberhardt, M. R. Gaberdiel, and R. Gopakumar, “The Worlds heet Dual of the Symmetric Product CFT,” JHEP 04 (2019) 103 , arXiv:1812.01007 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Deriving th e AdS 3/CFT2 correspondence,

    L. Eberhardt, M. R. Gaberdiel, and R. Gopakumar, “Deriving th e AdS 3/CFT2 correspondence,” JHEP 02 (2020) 136 , arXiv:1911.00378 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Finite entanglement entropy in str ing theory,

    A. Dabholkar and U. Moitra, “Finite entanglement entropy in str ing theory,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 12, (2024) L121901 , arXiv:2306.00990 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [35]

    Quantum entanglement on black ho le horizons in string theory and holography,

    A. Dabholkar and U. Moitra, “Quantum entanglement on black ho le horizons in string theory and holography,” JHEP 06 (2024) 053 , arXiv:2312.14253 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Massless blac k holes and black rings as effective geometries of the D1-D5 system,

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Kraus, and M. Shigemori, “Massless blac k holes and black rings as effective geometries of the D1-D5 system,” Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005) 4803–4838 , arXiv:hep-th/0508110

    2005 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Orbifolds by Cyclic Permutations of T ensor Product Conformal Field Theories,

    A. Klemm and M. G. Schmidt, “Orbifolds by Cyclic Permutations of T ensor Product Conformal Field Theories,” Phys. Lett. B 245 (1990) 53–58

    1990

  32. [38]

    Permutation orbifolds and holog raphy,

    F. M. Haehl and M. Rangamani, “Permutation orbifolds and holog raphy,” JHEP 03 (2015) 163 , arXiv:1412.2759 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  33. [39]

    String Universality for Per mutation Orbifolds,

    A. Belin, C. A. Keller, and A. Maloney, “String Universality for Per mutation Orbifolds,” Phys. Rev. D 91 no. 10, (2015) 106005 , arXiv:1412.7159 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  34. [40]

    Permutation Orbifolds in th e large N Limit,

    A. Belin, C. A. Keller, and A. Maloney, “Permutation Orbifolds in th e large N Limit,” arXiv:1509.01256 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  35. [41]

    Permutation Orbifolds and Chaos,

    A. Belin, “Permutation Orbifolds and Chaos,” JHEP 11 (2017) 131 , arXiv:1705.08451 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  36. [42]

    The Spectrum of Permutation Orbifolds,

    C. A. Keller and B. J. M¨ uhlmann, “The Spectrum of Permutation Orbifolds,” Lett. Math. Phys. 109 no. 7, (2019) 1559–1572 , arXiv:1708.01258 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  37. [43]

    Correlation functions for M**N / S( N) orbifolds,

    O. Lunin and S. D. Mathur, “Correlation functions for M**N / S( N) orbifolds,” Commun. Math. Phys. 219 (2001) 399–442 , arXiv:hep-th/0006196

    2001 arXiv

  38. [44]

    Three point functions for M(N) / S( N) orbifolds with N=4 supersymmetry,

    O. Lunin and S. D. Mathur, “Three point functions for M(N) / S( N) orbifolds with N=4 supersymmetry,” Commun. Math. Phys. 227 (2002) 385–419 , arXiv:hep-th/0103169. 48

    2002 arXiv

  39. [45]

    E lliptic genera of symmetric products and second quantized strings,

    R. Dijkgraaf, G. W. Moore, E. P. Verlinde, and H. L. Verlinde, “E lliptic genera of symmetric products and second quantized strings,” Commun. Math. Phys. 185 (1997) 197–209 , arXiv:hep-th/9608096

    1997 arXiv

  40. [46]

    Symmetric products, permutation orbifolds and d iscrete torsion,

    P. Bantay, “Symmetric products, permutation orbifolds and d iscrete torsion,” Lett. Math. Phys. 63 (2003) 209–218 , arXiv:hep-th/0004025

    2003 arXiv

  41. [47]

    Characters and modular properties of permutat ion orbifolds,

    P. Bantay, “Characters and modular properties of permutat ion orbifolds,” Phys. Lett. B 419 (1998) 175–178 , arXiv:hep-th/9708120

    1998 arXiv

  42. [48]

    Permutation orbifolds,

    P. Bantay, “Permutation orbifolds,” Nucl. Phys. B 633 (2002) 365–378 , arXiv:hep-th/9910079

    2002 arXiv

  43. [49]

    Diagrams for Symme tric Product Orbifolds,

    A. Pakman, L. Rastelli, and S. S. Razamat, “Diagrams for Symme tric Product Orbifolds,” JHEP 10 (2009) 034 , arXiv:0905.3448 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Higher spins in the symm etric orbifold of K3,

    M. Baggio, M. R. Gaberdiel, and C. Peng, “Higher spins in the symm etric orbifold of K3,” Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 026007 , arXiv:1504.00926 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Higgsing the stringy higher spin symmetry,

    M. R. Gaberdiel, C. Peng, and I. G. Zadeh, “Higgsing the stringy higher spin symmetry,” JHEP 10 (2015) 101 , arXiv:1506.02045 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Stringy Symmetries and th e Higher Spin Square,

    M. R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, “Stringy Symmetries and th e Higher Spin Square,” J. Phys. A 48 no. 18, (2015) 185402 , arXiv:1501.07236 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Def orming symmetric product orbifolds: a tale of moduli and higher spin currents,

    L. Apolo, A. Belin, S. Bintanja, A. Castro, and C. A. Keller, “Def orming symmetric product orbifolds: a tale of moduli and higher spin currents,” JHEP 08 (2022) 159 , arXiv:2204.07590 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  48. [55]

    The st ranger things of symmetric product orbifold CFTs,

    N. Benjamin, S. Bintanja, A. Castro, and J. Hollander, “The st ranger things of symmetric product orbifold CFTs,” JHEP 11 (2022) 054 , arXiv:2208.11141 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Non-in vertible symmetries in S N orbifold CFTs and holography,

    M. Gutperle, Y.-Y. Li, D. Rathore, and K. Roumpedakis, “Non-in vertible symmetries in S N orbifold CFTs and holography,” JHEP 09 (2024) 110 , arXiv:2405.15693 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Topological defects and tensionless holography,

    B. Knighton, V. Sriprachyakul, and J. Voˇ smera, “Topological defects and tensionless holography,” arXiv:2406.03467 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  51. [58]

    Quantum W -symmetry in AdS3,

    M. R. Gaberdiel, R. Gopakumar, and A. Saha, “Quantum W -symmetry in AdS3,” JHEP 02 (2011) 004 , arXiv:1009.6087 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Higher Spin The ories in AdS 3 and a Gravitational Exclusion Principle,

    A. Castro, A. Lepage-Jutier, and A. Maloney, “Higher Spin The ories in AdS 3 and a Gravitational Exclusion Principle,” JHEP 01 (2011) 142 , arXiv:1012.0598 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Deforming t he D1D5 CFT away from the orbifold point,

    S. G. Avery, B. D. Chowdhury, and S. D. Mathur, “Deforming t he D1D5 CFT away from the orbifold point,” JHEP 06 (2010) 031 , arXiv:1002.3132 [hep-th] . 49

    2010 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Conformal Perturbation Theory for Twisted Fields,

    C. A. Keller and I. G. Zadeh, “Conformal Perturbation Theory for Twisted Fields,” J. Phys. A 53 no. 9, (2020) 095401 , arXiv:1907.08207 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Lifting 1 4 -BPS States on K3 and Mathieu Moonshine,

    C. A. Keller and I. G. Zadeh, “Lifting 1 4 -BPS States on K3 and Mathieu Moonshine,” Commun. Math. Phys. 377 no. 1, (2020) 225–257 , arXiv:1905.00035 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Lifting at higher levels in the D1D5 CFT,

    B. Guo and S. D. Mathur, “Lifting at higher levels in the D1D5 CFT,” JHEP 11 (2020) 145 , arXiv:2008.01274 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Lifting 1/4-BPS sta tes in AdS 3 × S3 × T 4,

    N. Benjamin, C. A. Keller, and I. G. Zadeh, “Lifting 1/4-BPS sta tes in AdS 3 × S3 × T 4,” JHEP 10 (2021) 089 , arXiv:2107.00655 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Bounding the Space of Holographic CFTs with Ch aos,

    E. Perlmutter, “Bounding the Space of Holographic CFTs with Ch aos,” JHEP 10 (2016) 069 , arXiv:1602.08272 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Fast Scramblers,

    Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, “Fast Scramblers,” JHEP 10 (2008) 065 , arXiv:0808.2096 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Towards the Fast Scrambling Conjecture,

    N. Lashkari, D. Stanford, M. Hastings, T. Osborne, and P. Ha yden, “Towards the Fast Scrambling Conjecture,” JHEP 04 (2013) 022 , arXiv:1111.6580 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  61. [68]

    A bound on ch aos,

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, “A bound on ch aos,” JHEP 08 (2016) 106 , arXiv:1503.01409 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  62. [69]

    The spectrum of boundary sta tes in symmetric orbifolds,

    A. Belin, S. Biswas, and J. Sully, “The spectrum of boundary sta tes in symmetric orbifolds,” JHEP 01 (2022) 123 , arXiv:2110.05491 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  63. [70]

    D-branes in Ad S3 × S3 × T4 at k = 1 and their holographic duals,

    M. R. Gaberdiel, B. Knighton, and J. Voˇ smera, “D-branes in Ad S3 × S3 × T4 at k = 1 and their holographic duals,” JHEP 12 (2021) 149 , arXiv:2110.05509 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  64. [71]

    Engineering perturbative string d uals for symmetric product orbifold CFTs,

    Y. Hikida and V. Schomerus, “Engineering perturbative string d uals for symmetric product orbifold CFTs,” JHEP 06 (2024) 071 , arXiv:2312.05317 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  65. [72]

    Deriving the long-string CFT in AdS 3,

    B. Knighton, “Deriving the long-string CFT in AdS 3,” arXiv:2410.16904 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  66. [73]

    N = 2 Minimal Models: A Holographic Needle in a Symmetric Orbifold Haystack,

    A. Belin, N. Benjamin, A. Castro, S. M. Harrison, and C. A. Keller , “ N = 2 Minimal Models: A Holographic Needle in a Symmetric Orbifold Haystack,” SciPost Phys. 8 no. 6, (2020) 084 , arXiv:2002.07819 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  67. [74]

    Con formal field theories dual to quantum gravity with strongly coupled matter,

    L. Apolo, A. Belin, S. Bintanja, A. Castro, and C. A. Keller, “Con formal field theories dual to quantum gravity with strongly coupled matter,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 6, (2023) L061901 , arXiv:2212.07436 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  68. [75]

    Searching for strongly cou pled AdS matter with multi-trace deformations,

    L. Apolo, A. Belin, and S. Bintanja, “Searching for strongly cou pled AdS matter with multi-trace deformations,” arXiv:2401.15141 [hep-th]

  69. [76]

    Type II string theory on AdS3 × S3× T4 and symmetric orbifolds,

    O. Aharony and E. Y. Urbach, “Type II string theory on AdS3 × S3× T4 and symmetric orbifolds,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 4, (2024) 046028 , arXiv:2406.14605 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  70. [77]

    Unpublished

    K. Papadodimas and S. Raju, “Unpublished.”. 50

  71. [78]

    A cardy formula for three-point coe fficients or how the black hole got its spots,

    P. Kraus and A. Maloney, “A cardy formula for three-point coe fficients or how the black hole got its spots,” JHEP 05 (2017) 160 , arXiv:1608.03284 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  72. [79]

    Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,

    J. M. Maldacena, “Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,” JHEP 04 (2003) 021 , arXiv:hep-th/0106112

    2003 arXiv

  73. [80]

    The OPE of ba re twist operators in bosonic SN orbifold CFTs at large N ,

    B. A. Burrington, I. T. Jardine, and A. W. Peet, “The OPE of ba re twist operators in bosonic SN orbifold CFTs at large N ,” JHEP 08 (2018) 202 , arXiv:1804.01562 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  74. [81]

    Black Holes as Effective Geometries,

    V. Balasubramanian, J. de Boer, S. El-Showk, and I. Messamah , “Black Holes as Effective Geometries,” Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 214004 , arXiv:0811.0263 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  75. [82]

    Ech oes of chaos from string theory black holes,

    V. Balasubramanian, B. Craps, B. Czech, and G. S´ arosi, “Ech oes of chaos from string theory black holes,” JHEP 03 (2017) 154 , arXiv:1612.04334 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  76. [83]

    Correlation func tions of composite Ramond fields in deformed D1-D5 orbifold SCFT 2,

    A. A. Lima, G. M. Sotkov, and M. Stanishkov, “Correlation func tions of composite Ramond fields in deformed D1-D5 orbifold SCFT 2,” Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 10, (2020) 106004 , arXiv:2006.16303 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  77. [84]

    On the dynamics o f protected ramond ground states in the D1-D5 CFT,

    A. A. Lima, G. M. Sotkov, and M. Stanishkov, “On the dynamics o f protected ramond ground states in the D1-D5 CFT,” JHEP 07 (2021) 120 , arXiv:2103.04459 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  78. [85]

    Bulk and boundary dynamics in BTZ black holes ,

    E. Keski-Vakkuri, “Bulk and boundary dynamics in BTZ black holes ,” Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 104001 , arXiv:hep-th/9808037

    1999 arXiv

  79. [86]

    Proper time to the black hole sing ularity from thermal one-point functions,

    M. Grinberg and J. Maldacena, “Proper time to the black hole sing ularity from thermal one-point functions,” JHEP 03 (2021) 131 , arXiv:2011.01004 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  80. [87]

    Explicit large N von Neumann algebras from matrix models,

    E. Gesteau and L. Santilli, “Explicit large N von Neumann algebras from matrix models,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 28 no. 7, (2024) 2245–2429 , arXiv:2402.10262 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  81. [88]

    Modular I ntersections, Time Interval Algebras and Stringy AdS 2,

    N. Lashkari, K. L. Leung, M. Moosa, and S. Ouseph, “Modular I ntersections, Time Interval Algebras and Stringy AdS 2,” arXiv:2412.19882 [hep-th]

  82. [89]

    Thermal Decay without Information Loss in Horizonless Microstate Geometries,

    I. Bena, P. Heidmann, R. Monten, and N. P. Warner, “Thermal Decay without Information Loss in Horizonless Microstate Geometries,” SciPost Phys. 7 no. 5, (2019) 063 , arXiv:1905.05194 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  83. [90]

    An Operator Algebraic Appr oach To Black Hole Information,

    J. van der Heijden and E. Verlinde, “An Operator Algebraic Appr oach To Black Hole Information,” arXiv:2408.00071 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  84. [91]

    Universal dy namics of heavy operators in CFT2,

    S. Collier, A. Maloney, H. Maxfield, and I. Tsiares, “Universal dy namics of heavy operators in CFT2,” JHEP 07 (2020) 074 , arXiv:1912.00222 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  85. [92]

    Non-Gaussianities in the stat istical distribution of heavy OPE coefficients and wormholes,

    A. Belin, J. de Boer, and D. Liska, “Non-Gaussianities in the stat istical distribution of heavy OPE coefficients and wormholes,” JHEP 06 (2022) 116 , arXiv:2110.14649 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  86. [93]

    OPE statistics fro m higher-point crossing,

    T. Anous, A. Belin, J. de Boer, and D. Liska, “OPE statistics fro m higher-point crossing,” JHEP 06 (2022) 102 , arXiv:2112.09143 [hep-th] . 51

    2022 arXiv

  87. [94]

    Multiboundary wormholes an d OPE statistics,

    J. de Boer, D. Liska, and B. Post, “Multiboundary wormholes an d OPE statistics,” JHEP 10 (2024) 207 , arXiv:2405.13111 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  88. [95]

    The light we can see: extracting black holes from weak Jacobi forms,

    L. Apolo, S. Bintanja, A. Castro, and D. Liska, “The light we can see: extracting black holes from weak Jacobi forms,” JHEP 10 (2024) 068 , arXiv:2407.06260 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.