pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12533 · v1 · pith:LTFW3RQNnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Constraining the real scalar singlet extension of the SM

Moritz Bosse , Gudrun Hiller , Daniel Litim , Fabio Maltoni , Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf , Simone Tentori , Guotao Xia This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 08:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords real scalar singletstrong first-order electroweak phase transitionHiggs self-couplingvacuum stabilityHL-LHCFCCcollider constraints
0
0 comments X

The pith

The real scalar singlet extension permits a strong first-order electroweak phase transition for singlet masses up to nearly 1 TeV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the real scalar singlet extension of the Standard Model as a minimal way to achieve a strong first-order electroweak phase transition while also improving high-scale vacuum stability. It combines these cosmological requirements with constraints from precision Higgs measurements, the trilinear self-coupling, electroweak precision observables, and resonant searches for the new scalar. A sympathetic reader would care because the results tie potential early-universe dynamics to concrete predictions at current and future colliders, showing that measurements of the Higgs potential can be more powerful than coupling measurements alone. The analysis finds viable regions remain for heavy singlets and that the HL-LHC and FCC will cover much of the space.

Core claim

Focusing on a singlet heavier than the standard model Higgs, there is parameter space compatible with a strong first-order electroweak phase transition for singlet-like scalar masses up to nearly 1 TeV. Deviations in the Higgs self-coupling can be larger than those in the Higgs-Z coupling, making Higgs-potential measurements a key probe. The HL-LHC will test a large fraction of the parameter space, while the FCC will provide ultimate discovery and model-discrimination capabilities.

What carries the argument

Combined constraints from electroweak phase transition strength, high-scale vacuum stability, and collider observables applied to the real scalar singlet extension of the Standard Model.

If this is right

  • Viable parameter space for strong first-order transitions exists with singlet-like masses up to nearly 1 TeV.
  • Deviations in the Higgs self-coupling can exceed those in the Higgs-Z coupling.
  • The HL-LHC will test a large fraction of the viable parameter space.
  • The FCC will deliver discovery reach and the ability to discriminate among models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If realized, the phase transition could open a window for electroweak baryogenesis within this minimal extension.
  • Precision mapping of the Higgs potential at future colliders could become the leading way to test or exclude such singlet models.
  • The same combined approach of phase-transition plus collider constraints could be applied directly to other minimal scalar extensions.

Load-bearing premise

The theoretical calculations of the electroweak phase transition strength and the projected collider sensitivities are sufficiently accurate and free of large systematic uncertainties.

What would settle it

A null result from resonant searches for the singlet in ZZ and di-Higgs channels up to 1 TeV together with no observed deviation in the Higgs trilinear coupling at the projected FCC sensitivity would rule out the remaining parameter space for a strong first-order transition.

read the original abstract

The real scalar singlet extension of the standard model provides a minimal framework in which the Higgs sector can realise a strong first-order electroweak phase transition and improve the stability of the electroweak vacuum. We combine the electroweak phase transition and high-scale vacuum stability with current and projected collider probes, including precision Higgs measurements, the Higgs trilinear coupling, EWPO and resonant searches for a heavy singlet-like scalar in $ZZ$ and di-Higgs final states. Focusing on a singlet heavier than the standard model Higgs, we find that there is parameter space compatible with a strong first-order electroweak phase transition for singlet-like scalar masses up to nearly 1 TeV. Deviations in the Higgs self-coupling can be larger than those in the Higgs--$Z$ coupling, making Higgs-potential measurements a key probe. We find that the HL-LHC will test a large fraction of the parameter space, while the FCC will provide ultimate discovery and model-discrimination capabilities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the real scalar singlet extension of the SM, combining requirements for a strong first-order electroweak phase transition (FOEWPT), high-scale vacuum stability, and constraints from precision Higgs measurements, EWPO, and resonant searches for a heavy singlet-like scalar. Focusing on m_s > m_h, it reports viable parameter space for strong FOEWPT up to singlet masses of nearly 1 TeV, notes that deviations in the Higgs trilinear coupling can exceed those in the Higgs-Z coupling, and concludes that HL-LHC will test a large fraction of the space while FCC offers discovery and discrimination power.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work provides a concrete mapping of the viable parameter space in a minimal BSM model that simultaneously addresses the EWPT and vacuum stability, with explicit collider projections that highlight the importance of Higgs-potential measurements. The combined treatment of theoretical and experimental constraints is a positive feature.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3 (finite-T potential) and §4 (parameter-space results)] The claim of viable FOEWPT parameter space up to m_s ≈ 1 TeV (abstract and §4) rests on the one-loop finite-T effective potential with daisy resummation. Standard implementations of this method carry O(1) theoretical uncertainties from higher-order corrections, gauge dependence, and barrier treatment; the manuscript does not quantify how these shift the v_c/T_c ≳ 1 boundary or the upper mass reach, which directly affects the statement that HL-LHC/FCC test a large fraction of the space.
  2. [§5 (collider projections) and Fig. 7/8] The projected collider sensitivities (HL-LHC and FCC) for the Higgs trilinear coupling and resonant di-Higgs/ZZ searches are used to delineate the testable region, but the manuscript does not propagate the theoretical uncertainty from the EWPT calculation into the final exclusion plots; this makes the quantitative reach statements sensitive to the choice of potential approximation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the singlet VEV and mixing angle is introduced without a dedicated table of definitions; a summary table would improve readability.
  2. [§3.2] The vacuum stability analysis cites high-scale running but does not specify the matching scale or renormalization scheme used for the portal coupling.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3 (finite-T potential) and §4 (parameter-space results)] The claim of viable FOEWPT parameter space up to m_s ≈ 1 TeV (abstract and §4) rests on the one-loop finite-T effective potential with daisy resummation. Standard implementations of this method carry O(1) theoretical uncertainties from higher-order corrections, gauge dependence, and barrier treatment; the manuscript does not quantify how these shift the v_c/T_c ≳ 1 boundary or the upper mass reach, which directly affects the statement that HL-LHC/FCC test a large fraction of the space.

    Authors: We agree that the one-loop finite-temperature effective potential with daisy resummation is subject to O(1) theoretical uncertainties arising from higher-order corrections, gauge dependence, and the treatment of the barrier. The manuscript employs the standard implementation used throughout the literature on the real singlet extension. A full quantification would require two-loop or gauge-invariant calculations that lie beyond the scope of the present work. We will revise §3 to add an explicit discussion of these uncertainties, referencing existing studies on their typical magnitude in similar models, and will qualify the ~1 TeV upper mass reach as indicative at the order-of-magnitude level. Corresponding caveats will be added to the abstract and §4. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§5 (collider projections) and Fig. 7/8] The projected collider sensitivities (HL-LHC and FCC) for the Higgs trilinear coupling and resonant di-Higgs/ZZ searches are used to delineate the testable region, but the manuscript does not propagate the theoretical uncertainty from the EWPT calculation into the final exclusion plots; this makes the quantitative reach statements sensitive to the choice of potential approximation.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the collider projections in §5 and Figs. 7/8 are derived from the nominal EWPT parameter space without explicit propagation of theoretical uncertainties from the effective potential. A complete propagation would require varying the v_c/T_c boundary within estimated error bands and regenerating the exclusion regions, which constitutes a substantial extension. In the revision we will insert a paragraph in §5 noting the sensitivity of the quantitative boundaries to the potential approximation and stating that the principal conclusions—HL-LHC covering a large fraction of the space and FCC providing discovery reach—remain robust at the qualitative level. A qualitative uncertainty estimate will be added to the text accompanying the figures. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity identified

full rationale

The abstract and available text describe a standard phenomenological analysis combining one-loop finite-T effective potential calculations for the EWPT, vacuum stability requirements, and collider projections. No equations, self-citations, or parameter fits are presented that reduce a claimed prediction or result to an input by construction. The derivation chain relies on external benchmarks (HL-LHC/FCC sensitivities, EWPO) and standard model-extension techniques without self-referential definitions or renaming of known results as new derivations. This is the typical non-circular outcome for such constraint papers.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model introduces one new scalar field whose mass and mixing parameters are scanned subject to theoretical and experimental requirements; no independent evidence for the field is provided.

free parameters (2)
  • singlet scalar mass
    Scanned parameter controlling the mass of the heavy singlet-like state.
  • Higgs-singlet mixing angle
    Scanned parameter controlling the mixing between the new scalar and the SM Higgs.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The real scalar singlet extension can realize a strong first-order electroweak phase transition
    Core modeling assumption invoked to motivate the parameter scan.
invented entities (1)
  • real scalar singlet no independent evidence
    purpose: Extend the SM Higgs sector to enable strong first-order EWPT and improved vacuum stability
    New postulated scalar field with no independent evidence supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5715 in / 1349 out tokens · 22387 ms · 2026-06-27T08:51:06.049858+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Profumo, M.J

    S. Profumo, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy,Singlet Higgs phenomenology and the electroweak phase transition,JHEP08(2007) 010 [0705.2425]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  2. [2]

    Barger, P

    V. Barger, P. Langacker, M. McCaskey, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy,LHC Phenomenology of an Extended Standard Model with a Real Scalar Singlet,Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 035005 [0706.4311]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  3. [3]

    Gonderinger, Y

    M. Gonderinger, Y. Li, H. Patel and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf,Vacuum Stability, Perturbativity, and Scalar Singlet Dark Matter,JHEP01(2010) 053 [0910.3167]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  4. [4]

    Buttazzo, G

    D. Buttazzo, G. Degrassi, P.P. Giardino, G.F. Giudice, F. Sala, A. Salvio et al.,Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson,JHEP12(2013) 089 [1307.3536]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    Ramsey-Musolf,The electroweak phase transition: a collider target,JHEP09(2020) 179 [1912.07189]

    M.J. Ramsey-Musolf,The electroweak phase transition: a collider target,JHEP09(2020) 179 [1912.07189]

    arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    O’Connell, M.J

    D. O’Connell, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and M.B. Wise,Minimal Extension of the Standard Model Scalar Sector,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 037701 [hep-ph/0611014]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  7. [7]

    Profumo, M.J

    S. Profumo, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, C.L. Wainwright and P. Winslow,Singlet-catalyzed electroweak phase transitions and precision Higgs boson studies,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 035018 [1407.5342]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  8. [8]

    Curtin, P

    D. Curtin, P. Meade and C.-T. Yu,Testing Electroweak Baryogenesis with Future Colliders, JHEP11(2014) 127 [1409.0005]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  9. [9]

    Kotwal, M.J

    A.V. Kotwal, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, J.M. No and P. Winslow,Singlet-catalyzed electroweak phase transitions in the 100 TeV frontier,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 035022 [1605.06123]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  10. [10]

    Hashino, M

    K. Hashino, M. Kakizaki, S. Kanemura, P. Ko and T. Matsui,Gravitational waves and Higgs boson couplings for exploring first order phase transition in the model with a singlet scalar field,Phys. Lett. B766(2017) 49 [1609.00297]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  11. [11]

    Zhang, H.-L

    W. Zhang, H.-L. Li, K. Liu, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Y. Zeng and S. Arunasalam,Probing electroweak phase transition in the singlet Standard Model via bbγγand 4l channels,JHEP12 (2023) 018 [2303.03612]

    arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Ramsey-Musolf, T.V.I

    M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, T.V.I. Tenkanen and V.Q. Tran,Refining Gravitational Wave and Collider Physics Dialogue via Singlet Scalar Extension,2409.17554

    arXiv

  13. [13]

    Braathen, S

    J. Braathen, S. Heinemeyer, C.P. Boatella and A. Verduras Schaeidt,Complementarity of gravitational wave analyses and di-Higgs production in the exploration of the Electroweak Phase Transition dynamics in the RxSM,2510.12569

    arXiv

  14. [14]

    Aboudonia, C

    M. Aboudonia, C. Balazs, A. Papaefstathiou and G. White,Investigating the Electroweak phase transition with a real scalar singlet at a muon collider,JHEP04(2025) 093 [2410.22700]

    arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Gould, J

    O. Gould, J. Kozaczuk, L. Niemi, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, T.V.I. Tenkanen and D.J. Weir, – 56 – Nonperturbative analysis of the gravitational waves from a first-order electroweak phase transition,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 115024 [1903.11604]

    arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Niemi, M.J

    L. Niemi, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Xia,Nonperturbative study of the electroweak phase transition in the real scalar singlet extended standard model,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 115016 [2405.01191]. [17]CMScollaboration,Combined measurements of Higgs boson couplings in proton–proton collisions at √s= 13TeV,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 421 [1809.10733]. [18]ATLAScolla...

    arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    de Blas et al.,Physics Briefing Book: Input for the 2026 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics,2511.03883

    J. de Blas et al.,Physics Briefing Book: Input for the 2026 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics,2511.03883

    arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    Elias-Miro, J.R

    J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, G.F. Giudice, H.M. Lee and A. Strumia,Stabilization of the Electroweak Vacuum by a Scalar Threshold Effect,JHEP06(2012) 031 [1203.0237]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    Hiller, T

    G. Hiller, T. H¨ ohne, D.F. Litim and T. Steudtner,Portals into Higgs vacuum stability,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 115004 [2207.07737]

    arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Hiller, T

    G. Hiller, T. H¨ ohne, D.F. Litim and T. Steudtner,Vacuum stability in the Standard Model and beyond,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 115017 [2401.08811]

    arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Kurup and M

    G. Kurup and M. Perelstein,Dynamics of Electroweak Phase Transition In Singlet-Scalar Extension of the Standard Model,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 015036 [1704.03381]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [22]

    Hindmarsh, S.J

    M. Hindmarsh, S.J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D.J. Weir,Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 041301 [1304.2433]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  23. [23]

    Espinosa, D

    J.R. Espinosa, D. Racco and A. Riotto,A Cosmological Signature of the SM Higgs Instability: Gravitational Waves,JCAP09(2018) 012 [1804.07732]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Lewicki and J.M. No,On the Maximal Strength of a First-Order Electroweak Phase Transition and its Gravitational Wave Signal,JCAP04(2019) 003 [1809.08242]

    arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    Caprini et al.,Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update,JCAP03(2020) 024 [1910.13125]

    C. Caprini et al.,Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update,JCAP03(2020) 024 [1910.13125]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Hu and Y.-L

    W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu,The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity,Natl. Sci. Rev.4(2017) 685. [30]TianQincollaboration,TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector,Class. Quant. Grav.33(2016) 035010 [1512.02076]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  27. [27]

    Alwall, R

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer et al.,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations,JHEP07(2014) 079 [1405.0301]. – 57 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  28. [28]

    Degrande, C

    C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mattelaer and T. Reiter,UFO - The Universal FeynRules Output,Comput. Phys. Commun.183(2012) 1201 [1108.2040]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  29. [29]

    Darm´ e et al.,UFO 2.0: the ‘Universal Feynman Output’ format,Eur

    L. Darm´ e et al.,UFO 2.0: the ‘Universal Feynman Output’ format,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 631 [2304.09883]

    arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Degrande,Automatic evaluation of UV and R2 terms for beyond the Standard Model Lagrangians: a proof-of-principle,Comput

    C. Degrande,Automatic evaluation of UV and R2 terms for beyond the Standard Model Lagrangians: a proof-of-principle,Comput. Phys. Commun.197(2015) 239 [1406.3030]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  31. [31]

    Litim and T

    D.F. Litim and T. Steudtner,ARGES – Advanced Renormalisation Group Equation Simplifier,Comput. Phys. Commun.265(2021) 108021 [2012.12955]

    arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Huang, A.J

    P. Huang, A.J. Long and L.-T. Wang,Probing the Electroweak Phase Transition with Higgs Factories and Gravitational Waves,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 075008 [1608.06619]. [37]CMScollaboration,A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery.,Nature607(2022) 60 [2207.00043]. [38]ATLAScollaboration,Search for new phenomena in events...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Carena, Z

    M. Carena, Z. Liu and Y. Wang,Electroweak phase transition with spontaneous Z 2-breaking, JHEP08(2020) 107 [1911.10206]

    arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    Kozaczuk, M.J

    J. Kozaczuk, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and J. Shelton,Exotic Higgs boson decays and the electroweak phase transition,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 115035 [1911.10210]

    arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Carena, J

    M. Carena, J. Kozaczuk, Z. Liu, T. Ou, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, J. Shelton et al.,Probing the Electroweak Phase Transition with Exotic Higgs Decays,LHEP2023(2023) 432 [2203.08206]

    arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Z. Wang, X. Zhu, E.E. Khoda, S.-C. Hsu, N. Konstantinidis, K. Li et al.,Study of Electroweak Phase Transition in Exotic Higgs Decays at the CEPC, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [2203.10184]

    arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    Niemi and T.V.I

    L. Niemi and T.V.I. Tenkanen,Investigating two-loop effects for first-order electroweak phase transitions,2408.15912

    arXiv

  38. [38]

    Blasi and A

    S. Blasi and A. Mariotti,Domain Walls Seeding the Electroweak Phase Transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 261303 [2203.16450]

    arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Agrawal, S

    P. Agrawal, S. Blasi, A. Mariotti and M. Nee,Electroweak phase transition with a double well done doubly well,JHEP06(2024) 089 [2312.06749]. – 58 –

    arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Carena, M

    M. Carena, M. Quiros and C.E.M. Wagner,Opening the window for electroweak baryogenesis, Phys. Lett. B380(1996) 81 [hep-ph/9603420]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  41. [41]

    Delepine, J.M

    D. Delepine, J.M. Gerard, R. Gonzalez Felipe and J. Weyers,A Light stop and electroweak baryogenesis,Phys. Lett. B386(1996) 183 [hep-ph/9604440]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  42. [42]

    Carena, M

    M. Carena, M. Quiros and C.E.M. Wagner,Electroweak Baryogenesis and Higgs and Stop Searches at LEP and the Tevatron,Nucl. Phys. B524(1998) 3 [hep-ph/9710401]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  43. [43]

    Niemi, M.J

    L. Niemi, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, T.V.I. Tenkanen and D.J. Weir,Thermodynamics of a Two-Step Electroweak Phase Transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 171802 [2005.11332]

    arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Linde,Infrared Problem in Thermodynamics of the Yang-Mills Gas,Phys

    A.D. Linde,Infrared Problem in Thermodynamics of the Yang-Mills Gas,Phys. Lett. B96 (1980) 289

    1980

  45. [45]

    Gross, R.D

    D.J. Gross, R.D. Pisarski and L.G. Yaffe,QCD and Instantons at Finite Temperature,Rev. Mod. Phys.53(1981) 43

    1981

  46. [46]

    Laine and A

    M. Laine and A. Vuorinen,Basics of Thermal Field Theory, vol. 925, Springer (2016), 10.1007/978-3-319-31933-9, [1701.01554]

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31933-9 2016

  47. [47]

    Pisarski,Scattering Amplitudes in Hot Gauge Theories,Phys

    R.D. Pisarski,Scattering Amplitudes in Hot Gauge Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.63(1989) 1129

    1989

  48. [48]

    Braaten and R.D

    E. Braaten and R.D. Pisarski,Soft Amplitudes in Hot Gauge Theories: A General Analysis, Nucl. Phys. B337(1990) 569

    1990

  49. [49]

    Kajantie, M

    K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and M.E. Shaposhnikov,Generic rules for high temperature dimensional reduction and their application to the standard model,Nucl. Phys. B 458(1996) 90 [hep-ph/9508379]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  50. [50]

    Schicho, T.V.I

    P.M. Schicho, T.V.I. Tenkanen and J. ¨Osterman,Robust approach to thermal resummation: Standard Model meets a singlet,JHEP06(2021) 130 [2102.11145]

    arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    Niemi, P

    L. Niemi, P. Schicho and T.V.I. Tenkanen,Singlet-assisted electroweak phase transition at two loops,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 115035 [2103.07467]

    arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Laine,Exact relation of lattice and continuum parameters in three-dimensional SU(2) + Higgs theories,Nucl

    M. Laine,Exact relation of lattice and continuum parameters in three-dimensional SU(2) + Higgs theories,Nucl. Phys. B451(1995) 484 [hep-lat/9504001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  53. [53]

    X.-X. Li, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, T.V.I. Tenkanen and Y. Wu,An Effective Sphaleron Awakens, 2506.01585

    arXiv

  54. [54]

    Annala, K

    J. Annala, K. Rummukainen and T.V.I. Tenkanen,Nonperturbative determination of the sphaleron rate for first-order phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 016014 [2506.04939]. [64]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

    arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    Farakos, K

    K. Farakos, K. Kajantie, K. Rummukainen and M.E. Shaposhnikov,3-D physics and the electroweak phase transition: Perturbation theory,Nucl. Phys. B425(1994) 67 [hep-ph/9404201]. – 59 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  56. [56]

    Fukuda and T

    R. Fukuda and T. Kugo,Gauge Invariance in the Effective Action and Potential,Phys. Rev. D 13(1976) 3469

    1976

  57. [57]

    Patel and M.J

    H.H. Patel and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf,Baryon Washout, Electroweak Phase Transition, and Perturbation Theory,JHEP07(2011) 029 [1101.4665]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  58. [58]

    Laine,Gauge dependence of the high temperature two loop effective potential for the Higgs field,Phys

    M. Laine,Gauge dependence of the high temperature two loop effective potential for the Higgs field,Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 4525 [hep-ph/9411252]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  59. [59]

    Kajantie, M

    K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and M.E. Shaposhnikov,The Electroweak phase transition: A Nonperturbative analysis,Nucl. Phys. B466(1996) 189 [hep-lat/9510020]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  60. [60]

    Chiang, Y.-T

    C.-W. Chiang, Y.-T. Li and E. Senaha,Revisiting electroweak phase transition in the standard model with a real singlet scalar,Phys. Lett. B789(2019) 154 [1808.01098]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    Robens and T

    T. Robens and T. Stefaniak,LHC Benchmark Scenarios for the Real Higgs Singlet Extension of the Standard Model,Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 268 [1601.07880]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  62. [62]

    H.-L. Li, M. Ramsey-Musolf and S. Willocq,Probing a scalar singlet-catalyzed electroweak phase transition with resonant di-Higgs boson production in the4bchannel,Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 075035 [1906.05289]

    arXiv 2019

  63. [63]

    Huang, J.M

    T. Huang, J.M. No, L. Perni´ e, M. Ramsey-Musolf, A. Safonov, M. Spannowsky et al., Resonant di-Higgs boson production in theb ¯bW Wchannel: Probing the electroweak phase transition at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 035007 [1701.04442]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  64. [64]

    Kajantie, M

    K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and M.E. Shaposhnikov,Is there a hot electroweak phase transition atm H ≳m W ?,Phys. Rev. Lett.77(1996) 2887 [hep-ph/9605288]. [75]ATLAScollaboration,Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 1 [1207.7214]. [76]CMScollaborat...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  65. [65]

    Hiller, T

    G. Hiller, T. H¨ ohne, D.F. Litim and T. Steudtner,Vacuum Stability as a Guide for Model Bulding, in57th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories, 5, 2023 [2305.18520]

    arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Gopalakrishna and A

    S. Gopalakrishna and A. Velusamy,Higgs vacuum stability with vectorlike fermions,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 115020 [1812.11303]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  67. [67]

    Bosse, G

    M. Bosse, G. Hiller, D.F. Litim and T. Steudtner,in preparation,

  68. [68]

    Dawson, P.P

    S. Dawson, P.P. Giardino and S. Homiller,Uncovering the High Scale Higgs Singlet Model, Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 075016 [2102.02823]

    arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Alam and S.P

    Z. Alam and S.P. Martin,Standard model at 200 GeV,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 013010 [2211.08576]. [82]CMScollaboration,Measurement oft ¯tnormalised multi-differential cross sections in pp collisions at √s= 13TeV, and simultaneous determination of the strong coupling strength, top – 60 – quark pole mass, and parton distribution functions,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020)...

    arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    Hiller, C

    G. Hiller, C. Hormigos-Feliu, D.F. Litim and T. Steudtner,Model Building from Asymptotic Safety with Higgs and Flavor Portals,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 095023 [2008.08606]

    arXiv 2020

  71. [71]

    Kainulainen, V

    K. Kainulainen, V. Keus, L. Niemi, K. Rummukainen, T.V.I. Tenkanen and V. Vaskonen,On the validity of perturbative studies of the electroweak phase transition in the Two Higgs Doublet model,JHEP06(2019) 075 [1904.01329]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  72. [72]

    H. Bahl, J. Braathen, M. Gabelmann and G. Weiglein,anyH3: precise predictions for the trilinear Higgs coupling in the Standard Model and beyond,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 1156 [2305.03015]

    arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    Kanemura, M

    S. Kanemura, M. Kikuchi and K. Yagyu,One-loop corrections to the Higgs self-couplings in the singlet extension,Nucl. Phys. B917(2017) 154 [1608.01582]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  74. [74]

    Braathen, S

    J. Braathen, S. Heinemeyer, A.P. Arnay and A. Verduras Schaeidt,Impact of one-loop corrections to trilinear scalar couplings on di-Higgs production in the RxSM,Eur. Phys. J. C 85(2025) 1153 [2507.02569]. [88]LISAcollaboration,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,1702.00786

    arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Gong et al.,Descope of the ALIA mission,J

    X. Gong et al.,Descope of the ALIA mission,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.610(2015) 012011 [1410.7296]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  76. [76]

    Ruan, Z.-K

    W.-H. Ruan, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai and Y.-Z. Zhang,Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35(2020) 2050075 [1807.09495]

    arXiv 2020

  77. [77]

    Crowder and N.J

    J. Crowder and N.J. Cornish,Beyond LISA: Exploring future gravitational wave missions, Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 083005 [gr-qc/0506015]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  78. [78]

    Yagi and N

    K. Yagi and N. Seto,Detector configuration of DECIGO/BBO and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 044011 [1101.3940]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  79. [79]

    Kawamura et al.,The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO,Class

    S. Kawamura et al.,The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO,Class. Quant. Grav.28(2011) 094011. [94]DECIGO Working groupcollaboration,Space gravitational wave detector DECIGO/pre-DECIGO,Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.10562(2017) 105623T

    2011

  80. [80]

    Ekstedt, P

    A. Ekstedt, P. Schicho and T.V.I. Tenkanen,Cosmological phase transitions at three loops: The final verdict on perturbation theory,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 096006 [2405.18349]

    arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.