Operator approach in nonlinear stochastic open quantum physics

Sina Khorasani

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Operator approach in nonlinear stochastic open quantum physics

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims a non-standard quadratic optomechanical interaction that couples mechanical momentum to the optical field and makes red and blue sidebands unequal.

desk verdict A self-review of the author's higher-order operator method with one interesting prediction (side-band inequivalence), but the central new Hamiltonian term survives only through an unjustified asymmetric truncation of the mode sums. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05189 v1 pith:LU5BSF64 submitted 2019-08-14 quant-ph

Sina Khorasani This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-ph

keywords operatoralgebranonlinearityquantumnoisestochasticprocessesoptomechanicsside-bandinequivalencehigher-orderoperatorsquadratic

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review is built around one central assertion: nonlinear quantum optomechanics can be solved analytically beyond linearization by extending the operator basis to higher-order products, and this method uncovers physics that linearization hides. The headline physical claims are that the red and blue sidebands of an optomechanical cavity are not equally spaced from the pump, with an asymmetry approximately $2g_0^2\bar n/\Omega$ in weakly coupled sideband-resolved cavities, and that a non-standard quadratic Hamiltonian $H_2=-\hbar g_2(a-a^\dagger)^2(b-b^\dagger)^2$ arises from first principles and couples mechanical momentum to the field. If correct, standard optomechanical analyses need correction terms that grow when the mechanical frequency approaches the optical frequency, and the predicted sideband asymmetry should be directly measurable. The paper also provides the operator algebra that converts certain nonlinear Langevin problems into integrable linear matrix systems.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the higher-order operator basis: a finite set of composite ladder operators such as $\hat n_a=\hat a^\dagger\hat a$, $\hat n_b=\hat b^\dagger\hat b$, $\hat r=\tfrac12\hat a^2$, $\hat s=\tfrac12\hat b^2$, plus cross terms $\hat a\hat b$ and $\hat a\hat b^\dagger$, chosen so that their commutators close into a Lie algebra, exactly for some systems and after mean-field replacement for others. This turns nonlinear Heisenberg or Langevin equations into a linear matrix system that can be integrated, Fourier transformed, and used to compute spectra, populations, and squeezing. In the first-principles Hamiltonian derivation, the crucial mechanical object is the double mode-sum over cavity modes; the decision to keep the inner sum infinite while the outer sum selects one mode is what produces the non-standard momentum-field term $H_2$. The side-band inequivalence then follows from the eigenvalues of the resulting coefficient matrix.

What would settle it

Measure the center frequencies of the first red and blue sidebands in a weakly coupled, sideband-resolved optomechanical cavity with independently calibrated intracavity photon number $\bar n$. The paper predicts a frequency asymmetry $\delta\approx 2g_0^2\bar n/\Omega$; observing equal spacing ($\delta=0$) at the stated precision would falsify the claim. In parallel, a derivation that truncates both the inner and outer mode sums to the same single mode removes the non-standard term, so checking which truncation the physical boundary conditions impose would settle the controversy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that standard optomechanical theory, which linearizes the radiation-pressure interaction into products of ladder operators, discards observable nonlinear physics, and that the missing physics is captured by a hierarchy of higher-order operators. From the moving-boundary Lagrangian the paper derives a first-principles optomechanical Hamiltonian containing, alongside the usual $H_0=-\hbar g_0 a^\dagger a(b+b^\dagger)$ and the standard quadratic term $H_1=\hbar g_1 a^\dagger a(b+b^\dagger)^2$, a non-standard quadratic term $H_2=-\hbar g_2(a-a^\dagger)^2(b-b^\dagger)^2$ that couples mechanical momentum to the field and does not vanish under any choice of canonical momenta. Solving the resulting Langevin equations reveals side-band inequivalence: the red and blue first-order sidebands are not equally spaced from the pump, with $\delta=\frac12(\Delta_++\Delta_-)-\Delta\approx 2g_0^2\bar n/\Omega$ in the weakly coupled, sideband-resolved regime. The method also yields the coherent phonon population, corrections to the optical spring and noise spectrum, and a route to squeezing in quadratic optomechanics even in a one-to-one single-mode cavity.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that when the modal derivation is reduced to a single optical mode, the inner summation over optical modes must remain infinite even though the outer sum is cut off to one mode; only with that asymmetric truncation does the new momentum-field interaction survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Standard optomechanical sideband thermometry and backaction cooling recipes must be corrected by the detuning asymmetry $\delta\approx 2g_0^2\bar n/\Omega$ in resolved-sideband cavities.
Cavities designed with $g_0=0$ to isolate quadratic optomechanics should exhibit momentum-field coupling, photon-phonon cross-population growing with pump, and single-photon-level squeezing, even off resonance.
The higher-order operator algebra turns previously numerical nonlinear Langevin problems into linear matrix problems, yielding explicit spectra and populations in regimes where linearized optomechanics fails.
At large coherent phonon population, red and blue sideband center frequencies separate, so pump-probe spectra should show asymmetric higher-order sidebands even without thermal phonon imbalance.
The non-standard quadratic term dominates when the mechanical frequency is comparable to or larger than the optical frequency, making superconducting circuit optomechanics and molecular optomechanics natural places to look for it.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same modal-truncation issue implies that the predicted $g_2$ coupling is not a free parameter: it depends on how many virtual optical modes the physical boundary conditions actually retain, which could be probed by multi-mode numerical simulations or engineered cavities with modified high-frequency dispersion.
If the momentum-field term is real, it adds a measurement backaction channel through mechanical momentum, which would alter quantum nondemolition phonon counting and force-sensing limits; the review does not work out these metrological consequences.
The operator-basis hierarchy suggests the method could be exported to other bosonic nonlinearities such as Josephson circuits, cross-Kerr media, and atomic ensembles, with the same caveat: approximate closure of the Lie algebra should be justified by the physical cutoff rather than assumed.
An independent numerical integration of the full nonlinear Heisenberg or Langevin equations, without linearization, could directly test the eigenvalue expansion that produces the side-band inequivalence formula and identify the pump-power range where the approximation breaks down.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The thing to know: this is a 109-page self-review, and its headline physical claims are not actually derived in the text. The most important one – a non-standard quadratic optomechanical interaction that couples mechanical momentum to the field – collapses if you choose a consistent truncation of the modal sums. The paper's own Section 3.2 says 'there is no reason to cut off both of the inner and outer summations,' but that split is exactly the load-bearing step. If you truncate both sums to a single mode, the F_1 term disappears and you're back to Law's Hamiltonian. If you keep both infinite, the author says the two Lagrangians are equivalent. Only the asymmetric case gives the new H_2 term, and no physical argument is given for why that case should apply. The stress-test note is correct on this point.

What the paper does well: the algebraic framework is coherent, the review is clearly organized, and it reproduces the standard linearized limits in several places. The higher-order operator method is a legitimate extension of mean-field truncation to larger operator bases, even if it is not as revolutionary as the presentation suggests. The side-band inequivalence prediction is concrete and small, and the paper gives a clean formula (Eq. 43) that could be checked experimentally in principle.

Soft spots, in proportion. The derivation of Eq. 43 is not shown – the text says it follows from a 3x3 eigenvalue expansion, but the expansion is absent. The ideal-laser threshold of sqrt(6)-2 is asserted with no derivation. Numerical stability claims are referred to the author's earlier papers. This is a self-review, so in principle that is fine, but the paper promises a 'first-principles derivation' of the non-standard interactions, and that promise is not kept in the text. There is also an apparent inconsistency in the value of F (q_11 = F_1 ~ 3.8 in one place, other values elsewhere) that a careful referee would need to resolve.

I am not convinced the central new terms exist. They might, but the evidence in this manuscript is not sufficient. The method itself is not obviously wrong; it may turn out to be a useful tool for other problems. But the load-bearing justification for H_2 is missing, and the side-band inequivalence is built on a separate analysis that is also under-derived.

Who this is for: researchers working on optomechanics or nonlinear quantum optics who want to see a broad survey of the author's higher-order operator formalism, and who are willing to chase the original papers for the actual derivations. The paper deserves a serious referee – not a desk reject – because the claims are nontrivial and a good referee could quickly test the truncation logic and request the missing steps. My recommendation: send it to peer review, but flag Section 3.2-3.4 as the critical area, and require the derivations for Eqs. 43 and the threshold value before acceptance.

I would not cite it in my own work without first checking the original papers.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a self-contained review of the author's 'higher-order operator' method for nonlinear, open, stochastic quantum systems, with optomechanics as the main application. It develops approximately closed operator algebras, constructs higher-dimensional Langevin equation systems for quadratic and cross-Kerr interactions, and reports several new physical claims: a first-principles derivation of a non-standard quadratic momentum–field Hamiltonian H2 = -ħ g2 (a - a†)^2 (b - b†)^2, the consequent possibility of squeezing in a single-mode 1:1 optomechanical cavity, and a symmetry-breaking 'side-band inequivalence' quantified by δ ≈ 2g0^2 n̄/Ω. The paper also makes quantitative claims about the ideal laser threshold (√6 - 2 photons), Q-functions, quantum circuits, and classical nonlinear systems. A substantial portion of the derivation and validation is drawn from the author's own earlier papers [7-13].

Significance. If the central derivations were fully supported, the paper would be significant: it would provide an analytical alternative to full numerical master-equation treatment for nonlinear quantum Langevin systems, with explicit operator algebras, closed bases in special cases, and falsifiable predictions of sideband asymmetry and momentum–field squeezing. The manuscript is unusually explicit in places (e.g., the step-by-step derivation of Eq. (52) in §3.10 and the relativistic corrections in §3.13), and the collection of commutator and matrix systems in §§2-4 and §10 is potentially useful to practioners. However, the central new physical prediction H2 rests on a modal-sum truncation rule that is not independently justified, and the side-band inequivalence formula is asserted without its promised eigenvalue expansion. These issues materially reduce the confidence that the headline claims are first-principles results rather than artifacts of a chosen cutoff.

major comments (3)

[§3.2–§3.4, Eq. (73)] The derivation of the non-standard quadratic Hamiltonian H2 depends on an asymmetric modal-sum truncation: the outer optical-mode sum is restricted to a single mode while the inner sum over optical modes is kept infinite. The text states this explicitly ('there is no reason to cut off both of the inner and outer summations') but provides no physical justification for this particular rule. If the inner sum is also truncated to the same single mode, then a_11 = 0 and the F_1 = q_11 term in Eq. (73) disappears, leaving Law's Hamiltonian (74). If both sums are instead extended to infinity, the manuscript itself notes that the two Lagrangians (57) and (59) are equivalent and the extra term vanishes. The new momentum–field interaction therefore survives only in the intermediate asymmetric case. This is load-bearing: Eqs. (5)-(7), §3.8, and §10 build on H2. The manuscript does not establish that H2 is a first-principles consequence rather than an artifact of a chosen cutoff, so the claim that it 'cannot be eliminated under any choice of canonical momenta' is unsupported.
[§2.7, Eq. (43)] The side-band inequivalence formula δ ≈ 2g0^2 n̄/Ω is a central quantitative prediction, but the text only states that a 3×3 eigenvalue problem leads to third-order algebraic equations whose power series 'leads to' this expression. The eigenvalue expansion and the coefficient 2 are not shown. Without the intermediate calculation, the leading coefficient cannot be verified, and the later statement that §9 will provide a more accurate expression is not connected to a derivation in the visible text. Please provide the actual eigenvalue expansion and power series, or an exact pointer to the derivation in the author's earlier work, so that the formula (43) is checkable.
[§4.2–§4.5, Eqs. (147), (154)] The method is advertised as solving nonlinear Langevin equations beyond linearization, but the hierarchy is closed by replacing number operators with their steady-state mean values (e.g., Eqs. (147), (151), (154)). This is an uncontrolled mean-field approximation: after the replacement, the system is linear and integrable, but its accuracy relative to the original nonlinear system is not established. The paper states that numerical tests show stability and accuracy, yet no numerical data or benchmarks are provided; the Introduction says that graphs and numerical calculations are not displayed. The same applies to the ideal-laser threshold √6 - 2, which is quoted repeatedly without derivation or numerical evidence. As a review intended to make the method usable, the manuscript should either provide reproducible validation or clearly mark such quantitative claims as carried over from the author's earlier papers.

minor comments (4)

[Throughout] The manuscript contains many typesetting artifacts, including raw Unicode control sequences such as '/u1D...' and 'ℏ' in equations, and textual errors such as 'are are' in §3. These should be corrected in production, as they obscure the mathematics.
[§3.2] The text refers to Eq. '(S3-18)' when discussing the numerical verification of the diagonal identity (60)-(62), but no such equation label appears in the manuscript; it should be renumbered to a local equation.
[Introduction / §4] Since the paper explicitly omits graphs and numerical data, the many quantitative statements (the √6 - 2 threshold, stability boundaries, and the 10^-6 to 10^-4 side-band inequivalence range) have no in-manuscript evidentiary basis. At minimum, the author should state where the numerical results can be reproduced or obtained.
[§8, §9, §10] The table of contents lists extensive subsections (§8.1-§8.13, §9.1-§9.4, §10.1-§10.6) whose detailed derivations are only partly visible in the text, with many formulas stated as 'known' or deferred to earlier papers. Distinguishing new results from reviewed results of [7-13] would make the review more useful and would clarify the novelty claim.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The claimed first-principles momentum-field Hamiltonian H2 is built from an asymmetric modal-sum cutoff: the paper's own text shows the term disappears under either consistent truncation or full summation.

self definitional [Section 3.2, between Eqs. (59) and (64); used in Eqs. (73), (5), and (8)]
"In the single-mode 1:1 regime, where only one mechanical and one optical modes are allowed to interact, the double summations of the Lagrangian (59) involve one single term on the outermost summation. If the innermost summation is to be taken also with only one single term, then the results of [5] based on Lagrangian (59) retain their validity. However, physically speaking, there is no reason to cutoff both of the inner and outer summations."

The new Hamiltonian term H2 = -ħ g2 (a - a†)^2 (b - b†)^2 is the central 'first-principles' result of Section 3, but it is produced only by the asymmetric summation rule stated in the quotation: one optical mode in the outer sum, an infinite inner sum. The coefficient F_1 ≈ 3.8 enters through the infinite-sum identity (60), Σ_k a_{qk} a_{kq} = F_q, while the diagonal element a_{11} = 0 by Eq. (48) would make the inner sum vanish if both sums are truncated to the same single mode. The paper itself concedes that Law's Hamiltonian (74) is recovered when both sums are cut off, and that when both sums are extended to infinity the two Lagrangians (57) and (59) are equivalent, so the extra term disappears.

full rationale

The only step that reduces to its own construction is the Section 3 Hamiltonian: H2 survives only under the asymmetric 'outer single mode, inner infinite modes' cutoff, and the paper's own equations show it vanishes under either consistent single-mode truncation or full multi-mode summation. The side-band inequivalence formula (43), and the higher-order operator hierarchy generally, are self-consistent mathematical developments from the stated linearizations and mean-field closures; they are not themselves tautological, but they are validated only by the author's prior citations [7-13] and the paper explicitly omits numerical or experimental benchmarking ('graphs and numerical calculations are not displayed'). The score is 6 rather than higher because the circular reduction is localized to the central H2 construction, while much of the remaining analysis is a genuine, if self-referential, calculation from its assumptions.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central results rest on two layers of assumptions: the physical model (mode decomposition, field boundary conditions, Gaussian white baths, conducting-interface mirror) and the method's own closure rules (mean-field replacement of number operators, infinite inner mode sum, truncation order). The non-standard interaction term, which generates the paper's headline predictions, requires the modal-sum assumption that is specific to this paper and is not independently verified.

free parameters (2)

F (diagonal mode coefficient) = about 3.8 in text; Eq (53) gives F1 = pi^2/3 + 1/4, about 3.54
Appears in the single-mode nonlinear Hamiltonian (73) and defines K=F/4 about 0.95 in Eq (85). The text value is inconsistent with the derived value, and the choice matters for the strength of the momentum-field term.
eta = 1/2
Chosen in Section 3.8 (Eqs 104-107) so that omega equals the square root of eta K Omega and the linearized quartic Hamiltonian becomes a beam-splitter-like interaction. It is selected by hand to produce the desired squeezing form.

assumptions (7)

domain assumption Cavity mode decomposition remains valid independent of mirror motion.
Stated as a basic assumption at the start of Section 3; required for the instantaneous Fourier expansion in Eq (45).
domain assumption Electric fields vanish at the mirror surface in the Lagrangian frame.
Second basic assumption in Section 3; fixes the sine-mode expansion of the vector potential.
ad hoc to paper The inner summation over optical modes remains infinite when the outer sum is truncated to a single mode.
Load-bearing for the non-standard H2 term. Introduced in Section 3.2: 'there is no reason to cut off both of the inner and outer summations.'
domain assumption Number operators can be replaced by their steady-state mean values to close the operator hierarchy.
Used in Sections 2.6 and 4.5 (e.g., Eqs 28, 147-152). This is a mean-field closure, not an exact step.
ad hoc to paper Conducting-interface approximation for the moving mirror: chi(x,t) approximately chi0 l delta(x-q(t)).
Used in Section 3.13 (Eq 128) to derive the relativistic correction (110).
domain assumption Bath fluctuations are Gaussian white noise.
Stated in Section 1: 'all random fluctuations are approximated as Gaussian white.'
standard math Symmetrization rule (78) gives the correct operator ordering for quantization.
Used in Section 3.5; referenced to Refs [88-90].

invented entities (2)

Non-standard quadratic optomechanical interaction H2 = -hbar g2 (a - a-dagger)^2 (b - b-dagger)^2
purpose: Couples mechanical momentum to field quadrature; claimed to originate from momentum exchange and relativistic corrections.
No direct measurement is provided; Section 3.6 says experiments to observe it are for the future.
Side-band inequivalence (frequency asymmetry between red and blue sidebands)
purpose: Observable symmetry-breaking effect predicted by the higher-order operator method.
Estimated ranges from 10^-6 to 10^-4 are based on the author's model, not on measured data or independent calculation.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Operator approach in nonlinear stochastic open quantum physics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LU5BSF64

@misc{pith2026190805189,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Operator approach in nonlinear stochastic open quantum physics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LU5BSF64}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05189}
}

read the original abstract

The success of quantum physics in description of various physical interaction phenomena relies primarily on the accuracy of analytical methods used. In quantum mechanics, many of such interactions such as those found in quantum optomechanics and quantum computing have a highly nonlinear nature, which makes their analysis extraordinarily difficult using classical schemes. Typically, modern quantum systems of interest nowadays come with four basic properties: (i) quantumness, (ii) openness, (iii) randomness, and (iv) nonlinearity. The newly introduced method of higher-order operators targets analytical solutions to such systems, and while providing at least mathematically approximate expressions with improved accuracy over the fully linearized schemes, some cases admit exact solutions. Many different applications of this method in quantum and classically nonlinear systems are demonstrated throughout. This review is purposed to provide the reader with ease of access to this recent and well-established operator algebra, while going over a moderate amount of literature review. The reader with basic knowledge of quantum mechanics and quantum noise theory should be able to start using this scheme to his or her own problem of interest.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Nonlinear Limits to Optomechanical Thermometry
quant-ph 2019-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

Side-band inequivalence, a nonlinear optomechanical asymmetry, creates a critical pump power above which quantum thermometry is predicted to break down.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

298 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

T. J. Kippenberg, K. J. Vahala, Cavity optomechanics, Sc ience 321 (2008) 1172. S. Khorasani: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 101 of 109 Method of Higher-order Operators

2008
[2]

Aspelmeyer, T

M. Aspelmeyer, T. Kippenberg, F. Marquardt, Cavity Opto mechanics: Nano- and Micromechanical Resonators Interact ing with Light, Springer, Berlin, 2014

2014
[3]

Aspelmeyer, T

M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, F. Marquardt, Cavity op tomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86 (2014) 1391

2014
[4]

Meystre, A short walk through quantum optomechanics, Ann

P. Meystre, A short walk through quantum optomechanics, Ann. Phys. 525 (2013) 215

2013
[5]

C. K. Law, Interaction between a moving mirror and radiat ion pressure: A Hamiltonian formulation, Phys. Rev. A 51 (19 95) 2537
[6]

W. P. Bowen, G. J. Milburn, Quantum Optomechanics, CRC Pr ess, Boca Raton, 2016

2016
[7]

Khorasani, Higher-order interactions in quantum opt omechanics: Revisiting the theoretical foundations, Appl

S. Khorasani, Higher-order interactions in quantum opt omechanics: Revisiting the theoretical foundations, Appl . Sci. 7 (2017) 656

2017
[8]

Khorasani, Higher-order interactions in quantum opt omechanics: Analytical solution of nonlinearity, Photoni cs 4 (2017) 48

S. Khorasani, Higher-order interactions in quantum opt omechanics: Analytical solution of nonlinearity, Photoni cs 4 (2017) 48

2017

Show all 298 references

[9]

Khorasani, Method of higher-order operators for quan tum optomechanics, Sci

S. Khorasani, Method of higher-order operators for quan tum optomechanics, Sci. Rep. 8 (2018) 11566

2018
[10]

Khorasani, Higher-order interactions in quantum op tomechanics: Analysis of quadratic terms, Sci

S. Khorasani, Higher-order interactions in quantum op tomechanics: Analysis of quadratic terms, Sci. Rep. 8 (2018 ) 16676

2018
[11]

Khorasani, Solution of cross-Kerr interaction comb ined with parametric ampliﬁcation, Sci

S. Khorasani, Solution of cross-Kerr interaction comb ined with parametric ampliﬁcation, Sci. Rep. 9 (2019) 1830

2019
[12]

Khorasani, Momentum-ﬁeld interactions beyond stan dard quadratic optomechanics, in A

S. Khorasani, Momentum-ﬁeld interactions beyond stan dard quadratic optomechanics, in A. I. Arbab (ed.) Quantum M echanics: Theory, Analysis, and Applications, Nova Science Publishers, 2018 , pp. 1âĂŞ17

2018
[13]

Khorasani, Analysis of side-band inequivalence, Sc i

S. Khorasani, Analysis of side-band inequivalence, Sc i. Rep. 9 (2019) 9075

2019
[14]

Zhang, F

L. Zhang, F. Ji, X. Zhang, W. Zhang, Photon-phonon param etric oscillation induced by quadratic coupling in an optom echanical resonator, J. Phys. B 50 (2017) 145501

2017
[15]

Doolin, B

C. Doolin, B. D. Hauer, P. H. Kim, A. J. R. MacDonald, H. Ra mp, J. P. Davis, Nonlinear optomechanics in the stationary r egime, Phys. Rev. A 89 (2014) 053838

2014
[16]

Asjad, G

M. Asjad, G. S. Agarwal, M. S. Kim, P. Tombesi, G. Di Guise ppe, D. Vitali, Robust stationary mechanical squeezing in a kicked quadratic optomechanical system, Phys. Rev. A 89 (2014) 023849

2014
[17]

D. E. Bruschi, A. Xuereb, Mechano-optics: An optomecha nical quantum simulator, New J. Phys. 20 (2018) 065004

2018
[18]

Liu, W.-X

S. Liu, W.-X. Yang, T. Shui, Z. Zhu, Z.-X. Chen, Tunable t wo-phonon higher-order sideband ampliﬁcation in a quadratically coupled optome- chanical system, Sci. Rep. 7 (2017) 17637

2017
[19]

C. W. Gardiner, M. J. Collett, Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic diﬀerential equations and the master equation, Phys. Rev. A 31 (1985) 3761

1985
[20]

C. W. Gardiner, P. Zoller, Quantum Noise, Springer, Ber lin, 2004

2004
[21]

Gardiner, P

C. Gardiner, P. Zoller, The Quantum World of Ultra-Cold Atoms and Light. Book I: Foundations of Quantum Optics, Impe rial College Press, London, 2014

2014
[22]

Combesa, J

J. Combesa, J. Kerckhoﬀ, M. Sarovar, The SLH framework f or modeling quantum input-output networks, Adv. Phys.: X 2 ( 2017) 784

2017
[23]

K. J. Rubin, G. Pruessner, G. A. Pavliotis, Mapping mult iplicative to additive noise, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47 (20 14) 195001
[24]

Marquardt, S

F. Marquardt, S. M. Girvin, Optomechanics Retarded rad iation forces, Physics 2 (2009) 40

2009
[25]

Z. R. Gong, H. Ian, X. Y. Liu, C. P. Sun, F. Nori, Eﬀective H amiltonian approach to the Kerr nonlinearity in an optomech anical system, Phys. Rev. A 80 (2009) 065801

2009
[26]

X. Y. Lü, W. M. Zhang, S. Ashhab, Y. Wu, F. Nori, Quantum-c riticality-induced strong Kerr nonlinearities in optomec hanical systems, Sci. Rep. 3 (2013) 2943

2013
[27]

Mahboob, M

I. Mahboob, M. Mounaix, K. Nishiguchi, A. Fujiwara, H. Y amaguchi, A multimode electromechanical parametric reson ator array, Sci. Rep. 4 (2014) 4448

2014
[28]

Heinrich, M

G. Heinrich, M. Ludwig, J. Qian, B. Kubala, F. Marquardt , Collective dynamics in optomechanical arrays, Phys. Rev.Lett. 107 (2011) 043603

2011
[29]

J. H. Gan, H. Xiong, L. G. Si, X. Y. Lu, Y. Wu, Solitons in op tomechanical arrays, Opt. Lett. 41 (2016) 2676

2016
[30]

W. Chen, A. A. Clerk, Photon propagation in a one-dimens ional optomechanical lattice, Phys. Rev. A 89 (2014) 033854

2014
[31]

Xuereb, C

A. Xuereb, C. Genes, G. Pupillo, M. Paternostro, A. Dant an, Reconﬁgurable long-range phonon dynamics in optomecha nical arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 133604

2014
[32]

Houhou, H

O. Houhou, H. Aissaoui, A. Ferraro, Generation of clust er states in optomechanical quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 92 (2015) 063843

2015
[33]

Peano, C

V . Peano, C. Brendel, M. Schmidt, F. Marquardt, Topolog ical phases of sound and light, Phys. Rev. X 5 (2015) 031011

2015
[34]

Ludwig, F

M. Ludwig, F. Marquardt, Quantum many-body dynamics in optomechanical arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 073603

2013
[35]

Liao, Q.-Q

J.-Q. Liao, Q.-Q. Wu, F. Nori, Entangling two macroscop ic mechanical mirrors in a two-cavity optomechanical system, Phys. Rev. A 89 (2014) 014302

2014
[36]

J. R. Johansson, G. Johansson, F. Nori, Optomechanical -like coupling between superconducting resonators, Phys. Rev. A 90 (2014) 053833

2014
[37]

Kronwald, F

A. Kronwald, F. Marquardt, A. A. Clerk, Arbitrarily lar ge steady-state bosonic squeezing via dissipation, Phys. R ev. A 88 (2013) 063833

2013
[38]

X. Y. Lü, J. Q. Liao, L. Tian, F. Nori, Steady-state mecha nical squeezing in an optomechanical system via Duﬃng nonli nearity, Phys. Rev. A 91 (2015) 013834

2015
[39]

X. Y. Lü, Y. Wu, J. R. Johansson, H. Jing, J. Zhang, F. Nori , Squeezed optomechanics with phase-matched ampliﬁcation and dissipation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 093602

2015
[40]

chilling, H

R. chilling, H. Schütz, A. H. Ghadimi, V . Sudhir, D. J. Wi lson, T. J. Kippenberg, Field integration of a SiN nanobeam a nd a SiO2 microcavity for Heisenberg-limited displacement sensing, Phys. Rev. A pplied 5 (2016) 054019

2016
[41]

Ruesink, M

F. Ruesink, M. A. Miri, A. Alu, E. Verhagen, Nonreciproc ity and magnetic-free isolation based on optomechanical in teractions, Nature Commun. 7 (2016) 13662

2016
[42]

X.-W. Xu, Y. Li, A.-X. Chen, Y.-X. Liu, Nonreciprocal conversion between microwave and optical photons in electro-optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. A 93 (2016) 023827

2016
[43]

K. Fang, J. Luo, A. Metelmann, M. H. Matheny, F. Marquard t, A. A. Clerk, O. Painter, Generalized nonreciprocity in an optomechanical circuit via synthetic magnetism and reservoir engineering , Nature Phys. 13 (2017) 465

2017
[44]

N. R. Bernier, L. D. Tóth, A. Koottandavida, M. Ioannou, D. Malz, A. Nunnenkamp, A. K. Feofanov, T. J. Kippenberg, Non reciprocal reconﬁgurable microwave optomechanical circuit, Nature Commun. 8 (2017) 604. S. Khorasani: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 102 of 109 Method of...

2017
[45]

G. A. Peterson, F. Lecocq, K. Cicak, R. W. Simmonds, J. Au mentado, J. D. Teufel, Demonstration of eﬃcient nonrecipro city in a microwave optomechanical circuit, Phys. Rev. X 7 (2017) 031001

2017
[46]

D. Malz, L. D. Tóth, N. R. Bernier, A. K. Feofanov, T. J. Ki ppenberg, A. Nunnenkamp, Quantum-limited directional amp liﬁers with optome- chanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 023601

2018
[47]

Zippilli, J

S. Zippilli, J. Li, D. Vitali, Steady-state nested enta nglement structures in harmonic chains with single-site squeezing manipulation. Phys. Rev. A 92 (2015) 032319

2015
[48]

Barzanjeh, S

S. Barzanjeh, S. Guha, C. Weedbrook, D. Vitali, J. H. Sha piro, S. Pirandola, Microwave quantum illumination. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 080503

2015
[49]

Zhang, F

K. Zhang, F. Bariani, Y. Dong, W. Zhang, P. Meystre, Prop osal for an optomechanical microwave sensor at the subphoto n level, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 113601

2015
[50]

L. D. Toth, N. R. Bernier, A. Nunnenkamp, E. Glushkov, A. K. Feofanov, T. J. Kippenberg, A dissipative quantum reserv oir for microwave light using a mechanical oscillator, Nature Physics 13 (201 7) 787
[51]

Galland, N

C. Galland, N. Sangouard, N. Piro, N. Gisin, T. J. Kippen berg, Heralded single-phonon preparation, storage, and re adout in cavity optome- chanics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 143602

2014
[52]

Khorasani, Coupled mode theory of optomechanical cr ystals

S. Khorasani, Coupled mode theory of optomechanical cr ystals. IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 52 (2016) 6100406

2016
[53]

M. H. Aram, S. Khorasani, Eﬃcient analysis of conﬁned gu ided modes in phoxonic crystal slabs, IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Technol. 35 (2017) 3734-3742

2017
[54]

M. H. Aram, S. Khorasani, Optical wave evolution due to i nteraction with elastic wave in a phoxonic crystal slab wave guide, Appl. Phys. B 123 (2017) 218

2017
[55]

Bochmann, A

J. Bochmann, A. Vainsencher, D. D. Awschalom, A. N. Clel and, Nanomechanical coupling between microwave and optica l photons, Nat. Phys. 9 (2013) 712

2013
[56]

R. W. Andrews, R. W. Peterson, T. P. Purdy, K. Cicak, R. W. Simmonds, C. A. Regal, K. W. Lehnert, Bidirectional and eﬃci ent conversion between microwave and optical light, Nat. Phys. 10 (2014) 32 1,

2014
[57]

Javerzac-Galy, K

C. Javerzac-Galy, K. Plekhanov, N. R. Bernier, L. D. Tot h, A. K. Feofanov, T. J. Kippenberg, On-chip microwave-to-optical quantum coherent converter based on a superconducting resonator coupled to a n electro-optic microresonator, Phys. Rev. A 94 (2016) 0538 15

2016
[58]

Tian, Optoelectromechanical transducer: reversib le conversion between microwave and optical photons, Ann

L. Tian, Optoelectromechanical transducer: reversib le conversion between microwave and optical photons, Ann. P hys. (Berlin) 527 (2015) 1

2015
[59]

Caprara Vivoli, T

V . Caprara Vivoli, T. Barnea, C. Galland, N.Sangouard, Proposal for an optomechanical Bell test, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1 16 (2016) 070405

2016
[60]

Tsang, Cavity quantum electro-optics

M. Tsang, Cavity quantum electro-optics. Phys. Rev. A 8 1 (2010) 063837

2010
[61]

Tsang, Cavity quantum electro-optics

M. Tsang, Cavity quantum electro-optics. II. Input-ou tput relations between traveling optical and microwave ﬁel ds, Phys. Rev. A 84 (2011) 043845

2011
[62]

Chang, T

Y. Chang, T. Shi, Y. X. Liu, C. P. Sun, F. Nori, Multistabi lity of electromagnetically induced transparency in atom- assisted optomechanical cavities, Phys. Rev. A 83 (2011) 063826

2011
[63]

H. Jing, Ş. K. Özdemir, Z. Geng, J. Zhang, X. Y. Lü, B. Peng , L. Yang, F. Nori, Optomechanically-induced transparency in parity-time- symmetric microresonators. Sci. Rep. 5 (2015) 9663

2015
[64]

H. Wang, X. Gu, Y. X. Liu, A. Miranowicz, F. Nori, Optomec hanical analog of two-color electromagnetically-induced transparency: Photon transmission through an optomechanical device with a two-l evel system, Phys. Rev. A 90 (2014) 023817

2014
[65]

Y. L. Liu, R. Wu, J. Zhang, Ş. K. Özdemir, L. Yang, F. Nori, Y. X. Liu, Controllable optical response by modifying the ga in and loss of a mechanical resonator and cavity mode in an optomechanical s ystem, Phys. Rev. A 95 (2017) 013843

2017
[66]

Huang, Quantum state transfer in cavity electro-opt ic modulators, Phys

S. Huang, Quantum state transfer in cavity electro-opt ic modulators, Phys. Rev. A 92 (2015) 043845

2015
[67]

Larson, M

J. Larson, M. Horsdal, Photonic Josephson eﬀect, phase transitions, and chaos in optomechanical systems, Phys. Re v. A 84 (2011) 021804

2011
[68]

Alidoosty, S

M. Alidoosty, S. Khorasani, M. H. Aram, Simulation of mu ltipartite cavity quantum electrodynamics, IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 49 (2013) 1066

2013
[69]

Alidoosty, S

M. Alidoosty, S. Khorasani, M. H. Aram, Theory and simul ation of cavity quantum electro-dynamics in multi-partite quantum complex systems, Appl. Phys. A 115 (2014) 595

2014
[70]

Moniﬁ, J

F. Moniﬁ, J. Zhang, Ş. K. Özdemir, B. Peng, Y.-X. Liu, F. B o, F. Nori, L. Yang, Optomechanically induced stochastic re sonance and chaos transfer between optical ﬁelds, Nat. Photon. 10 (2016) 399

2016
[71]

Neill, P

C. Neill, P. Roushan, M. Fang, Y. Chen, M. Kolodrubetz, Z . Chen, A. Megrant, R. Barends, B. Campbell, B. Chiaro, A. Dun sworth, E. Jeﬀrey, J. Kelly, J. Mutus, P. J. J. O’Malley, C. Quintana, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. C. White, A. Polkovnikov, J. M. Ma rtinis, Erg...

2016
[72]

J. D. Thompson, B. M. Zwickl, A. M. Jayich, F. Marquardt, S. M. Girvin, J. G. E. Harris, Strong dispersive coupling of a high-ﬁnesse cavity to a micromechanical membrane, Nature 452 (2008) 72

2008
[73]

J. C. Sankey, C. Yang, B. M. Zwickl, A. M. Jayich, J. G. E. H arris, Strong and tunable nonlinear optomechanical coupling in a low-loss system, Nat. Phys. 6 (2010) 707

2010
[74]

Nunnenkamp, K

A. Nunnenkamp, K. Børkje, J. G. E. Harris, S. M. Girvin, C ooling and squeezing via quadratic optomechanical couplin g, Phys. Rev. A 82 (2010) 021806

2010
[75]

C. U. Lei, A. J. Weinstein, J. Suh, E. E. Wollman, A. Kronwald, F. Marquardt, A. A. Clerk, K. C. Schwab, Quantum nondemolition measurement of a quantum squeezed state beyond the 3 dB limit. Phys. Rev. L ett. 117 (2016) 100801

2016
[76]

J. Q. Liao, F. Nori, Photon blockade in quadratically co upled optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. A 88 (2013) 023853

2013
[77]

J. Q. Liao, F. Nori, Single-photon quadratic optomecha nics, Sci. Rep. 4 (2014) 6302

2014
[78]

E. J. Kim, J. R. Johansson, F. Nori, Circuit analog of qua dratic optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A 91 (2015) 033835

2015
[79]

T. P. Purdy, D. W. Brooks, T. Botter, N. Brahms, z. Y. Ma, D . M. Stamper-Kurn, Tunable cavity optomechanics with ultra cold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 133602

2010
[80]

Shen, Y.-L

Z. Shen, Y.-L. Zhang, Y. Chen, C.-L. Zou, Y.-F. Xiao, X.- B. Zou, F.-W. Sun, G.-C. Guo, C.-H. Dong, Experimental reali zation of optome- S. Khorasani: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 103 of 109 Method of Higher-order Operators chanically induced non-reciprocity, Nat. Photo...

2016
[81]

G. A. Brawley, M. R. Vanner, P. E. Larsen, S. Schmid, A. Boisen, W. P. Bowen, Nonlinear optomechanical measurement ofmechanical motion, Nature Commun. 7 (2016) 10988

2016
[82]

Leijssen, G

R. Leijssen, G. La Gala, L. Freisem, J. T. Muhonen, E. Ver hagen, Nonlinear cavity optomechanics with nanomechanical thermal ﬂuctuations, Nature Commun. 8 (2017) 16024

2017
[83]

V . B. Branginskii, A. B. Manukn, Ponderomotive eﬀects o f electromagnetic radiation. Sov. Phys. JETP 25 (1967) 653

1967
[84]

H. K. Cheung, C. K. Law, Nonadiabatic optomechanical Ha miltonian of a moving dielectric membrane in a cavity, Phys. Rev. A 84 (2011) 023812

2011
[85]

L. O. Castaños, R. Weder, Equations of a moving mirror an d the electromagnetic ﬁeld, Phys. Scr. 90 (2015) 068011

2015
[86]

C. M. Wilson, G. Johansson, A. Pourkabirian, M. Simoen, J. R. Johansson, T. Duty, F. Nori, P. Delsing, Observation of the dynamical Casimir eﬀect in a superconducting circuit, Nature 479 (2011) 376

2011
[87]

J. Q. You, F. Nori, Atomic physics and quantum optics usi ng superconducting circuits, Nature 474 (2011) 589

2011
[88]

Schleich, Quantum Optics in Phase Space, Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 2001

W. Schleich, Quantum Optics in Phase Space, Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 2001

2001
[89]

Khorasani, A proof for Poisson bracket in non-commut ative algebra of quantum mechanics

S. Khorasani, A proof for Poisson bracket in non-commut ative algebra of quantum mechanics. Elec. J. Th. Phys. 13 (20 16) 57
[90]

Khorasani, Applied Quantum Mechanics, Delarang, Te hran, 2010

S. Khorasani, Applied Quantum Mechanics, Delarang, Te hran, 2010

2010
[91]

J. H. Hetherington, F. D. C. Willard, Two-, three-, and f our-atom exchange eﬀects in bcc 3He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35 (1975) 1442

1975
[92]

Roger, J

M. Roger, J. H. Hetherington, J. M. Delrieu, Magnetism i n solid 3He, Rev. Mod. Phys. 55 (1983) 1

1983
[93]

G. S. Agarwal, S. S. Jha, Theory of optomechanical inter actions in superﬂuid He, Phys. Rev. A 90 (2014) 023812

2014
[94]

A. B. Shkarin, A. B., A. D. Kashkanova, C. D. Brown, S. Gar cia, K. Ott, J. Reichel, J. G. E. Harris, Quantum optomechani cs in a liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 153601

2019
[95]

X. He, G. I. Harris, C. G. Baker, A. Sawadsky, Y. L. Sfendl a, Y. P. Sachkou, S. Forstner, W. P. Bowen, Strong optical cou pling through superﬂuid Brillouin lasing, arXiv (2019) 1907.06811

2019 arXiv
[96]

J. Suh, A. J. Weinstein, K. C. Schwab, Optomechanical eﬀ ects of two-level systems in a back-action evading measurement of micro-mechanical motion, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 (2013) 052604

2013
[97]

Roelli, C

P. Roelli, C. Galland, N. Piro, T. J. Kippenberg, Molecu lar cavity optomechanics as a theory of plasmon-enhanced Ra man scattering. Nat. Nano. 11 (2016) 164

2016
[98]

Bagci, A

T. Bagci, A. Simonsen, S. Schmid, L. G. Villanueva, E. Ze uthen, J. Appel, J. M. Taylor, A. Sørensen, K. Usami, A. Schli esser, E. S. Polzik, Optical detection of radio waves through a nanomechanical t ransducer, Nature 507 (2014) 81

2014
[99]

Lannebere, M

S. Lannebere, M. G. Silveirinha, Wave instabilities an d unidirectional light ﬂow in a cavity with rotating walls, Phys. Rev. A 94 (2016) 033810

2016
[100]

LIGO Scientiﬁc Collaboration and Virgo Collaboratio n, Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 061102

2016
[101]

T. K. Paraïso, M. Kalaee, L. Zang, H. Pfeifer, F. Marquardt, O. Painter, Position-squared coupling in a tunable photonic crystal optomechanical cavity, Phys. Rev. X 5 (2015) 041024

2015
[102]

Kalaee, T

M. Kalaee, T. K. Paraiso, H. Pfeifer, O. Painter, Desig n of a quasi-2D photonic crystal optomechanical cavity with tunable, large x2-coupling, Opt. Express 24 (2016) 21308

2016
[103]

Metelmann, A

A. Metelmann, A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal photon trans mission and ampliﬁcation via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. X 5 (2015) 021025

2015
[104]

Gütig, C

R. Gütig, C. Eberlein, Dynamical Casimir eﬀect with Di richlet and Neumann boundary conditions, J. Phys. A 31 (1998 ) 6819

1998
[105]

Khorasani, B

S. Khorasani, B. Rashidian, Guided light propagation in dielectric slab waveguide with conducting interfaces, J . Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 3 (2001) 380

2001
[106]

Khorasani, B

S. Khorasani, B. Rashidian, Modiﬁed transfer matrix m ethod for conducting interfaces, J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 4 (2002) 251

2002
[107]

Karimi, S

F. Karimi, S. Khorasani, Optical modulation by conduc ting interfaces, IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 49 (2013) 607

2013
[108]

Ludwig, F

M. Ludwig, F. Marquardt, Quantum many-body dynamics i n optomechanical arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 073603

2013
[109]

J. Q. Liao, C. K. Law, L. M. Kuang, F. Nori, Enhancement o f mechanical eﬀects of single photons in modulated two-mode optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A 92 (2015) 013822

2015
[110]

J.-H. Kim, S. Kim, G. Bahl, Complete linear optical iso lation at the microscale with ultralow loss, Sci. Rep. 7 (201 7) 1647
[111]

B. Peng, Ş. K. Özdemir, F. Lei, F. Moniﬁ, M. Gianfreda, G . L. Long, S. Fan, F. Nori, C. M. Bender, L. Yang, Parity-time- symmetric whispering-gallery microcavities, Nat. Phys. 10 (2014) 39 4

2014
[112]

Khorasani, Coupled mode theory of optomechanical c rystals, IEEE J

S. Khorasani, Coupled mode theory of optomechanical c rystals, IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 52 (2016) 6100406

2016
[114]

Bhattacharya, H

M. Bhattacharya, H. Uys, P. Meystre, Optomechanical t rapping and cooling of partially reﬂective mirrors, Phys. R ev. A 77 (2008) 033819

2008
[115]

Zhan, L.-G

X.-G. Zhan, L.-G. Si, A.-S. Zheng, X. X. Yang, Tunable s low light in a quadratically coupled optomechanical system , J. Phys. B 46 (2013) 025501

2013
[116]

L. F. Buchmann, L. Zhang, A. Chirivelli, P. Meystre, Ma croscopic tunneling of a membrane in an optomechanical doub le-well potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 210403

2012
[117]

H. Seok, L. F. Buchmann, E. M. Wright, P. Meystre, Multi mode strong-coupling quantum optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A 8 8 (2013) 063850

2013
[118]

H. Seok, E. M. Wright, P. Meystre, Dynamic stabilizati on of an optomechanical oscillator, Phys. Rev. A 90 (2014) 04 3840

2014
[119]

M. R. Vanner, Selective linear or quadratic optomecha nical coupling via measurement, Phys. Rev. X 1 (2011) 021011

2011
[120]

H. Seok, E. M. Wright, Antibunching in an optomechanic al oscillator, Phys. Rev. A 95 (2017) 053844

2017
[121]

A. M. Jayich, J. C. Sankey, B. M. Zwickl, C. Yang, J. D. Th ompson, S. M. Girvin, A. A. Clerk, F. Marquardt, J. G. E. Harri s, Dispersive optomechanics: a membrane inside a cavity, New J. Phys. 10 (2 008) 095008
[122]

Kolář, A

M. Kolář, A. Ryabov, R. Filip, Optomechanical oscilla tor controlled by variation in its heat bath temperature, Phys. Rev. A 95 (2017) 042105

2017
[123]

B. Fan, M. Xie, Stochastic resonance in a tristable opt omechanical system, Phys. Rev. A 95 (2017) 023808

2017
[124]

D. Lee, M. Underwood, D. Mason, A. B. Shkarin, S. W. Hoch , J. G. E. Harris, Multimode optomechanical dynamics in a cav ity with avoided S. Khorasani: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 104 of 109 Method of Higher-order Operators crossings. Nature Commun. 6 (2015) 6232

2015
[125]

J. H. Lee, H. Seok, Quantum reservoir engineering thro ugh quadratic optomechanical interaction in the reversed d issipation regime, Phys. Rev. A 97 (2018) 013805

2018
[126]

Buluta, F

I. Buluta, F. Nori, Quantum simulators, Science 326 (2 009) 108
[127]

Georgescu, S

I. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, F. Nori, Quantum simulation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86 (2014) 153

2014
[129]

B. P. Venkatesh, D. H. J. OâĂŹDell, J. Goldwin, An optom echanical elevator: Transport of a Bloch oscillating Boseâ ĂŞEinstein condensate up and down an optical lattice by cavity sideband ampliﬁcati on and cooling, Atoms 4 (2016) 2

2016
[130]

Kiesel, F

N. Kiesel, F. Blaser, U. Delić, R. Klatenbaek, M. Aspel meyer, Cavity cooling of an optically levitated submicron p article, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110 (2013) 14180

2013
[131]

M. J. Woolley, M. F. Emzir, G. J. Milburn, M. Jerger, M. G oryachev, M. E. Tobar, A. Fedorov, Quartz-superconductor q uantum electrome- chanical system, Phys. Rev. B 93 (2016) 224518

2016
[132]

Domokos, H

P. Domokos, H. Ritsch, Mechanical eﬀects of light in op tical resonators, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20 (2003) 1098

2003
[133]

M. J. Woolley, A. C. Doherty, G. J. Milburn, Continuous quantum nondemolition measurement of Fock states of a nanor esonator using feedback-controlled circuit QED, Phys. Rev. B 82 (2010) 094 511

2010
[134]

Romero-Isart, A

O. Romero-Isart, A. C. Pﬂanzer, F. Blaser, R. Kaltenba ek, N. Kiesel, M. Aspelmeyer, J. I. Cirac, Large quantum supe rpositions and interfer- ence of massive nanometer-sized objects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1 07 (2011) 020405

2011
[135]

Haug, Quantum-mechanical rate equations for semic onductor lasers, Phys

H. Haug, Quantum-mechanical rate equations for semic onductor lasers, Phys. Rev. A 184 (1969) 338

1969
[136]

H. Haug, S. W. Koch, Quantum Theory of the Optical and El ectronic Properties of Semiconductors, World Scientiﬁc, S ingapore, 2009

2009
[137]

M. Lax, H. Yuen, Quantum noise. XIII. Six-classical-v ariable description of quantum laser ﬂuctuations, Phys. Re v. 172 (1968) 362

1968
[138]

Risken, The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of Sol ution and Applications, Springer, Berlin, 1996

H. Risken, The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of Sol ution and Applications, Springer, Berlin, 1996

1996
[139]

Ludwig, B

M. Ludwig, B. Kubala, F. Marquardt, The optomechanica l instability in the quantum regime, New J. Phys. 10 (2008) 09 5013

2008
[140]

Hamerly, H

R. Hamerly, H. Mabuchi, Quantum noise of free-carrier dispersion in semiconductor optical cavities, Phys. Rev. A 92 (2015) 023819

2015
[141]

Nunnenkamp, K

A. Nunnenkamp, K. Børkje, S. M. Girvin, Single-photon optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 063602

2011
[142]

S. Rips, M. Kiﬀner, I. Wilson-Rae, M. J. Hartmannnew, S teady-state negative Wigner functions of nonlinear nanome chanical oscillators, New J. Phys. 14 (2012) 023042

2012
[143]

Casteels, S

W. Casteels, S. Finazzi, A. Le Boité, F. Storme, C. Ciut i, Truncated correlation hierarchy schemes for driven-dissipative multimode quantum systems, New J. Phys. 18 (2016) 093007

2016
[144]

Jiang, Y

C. Jiang, Y. Cui, G. Chen, Dynamics of an optomechanica l system with quadratic coupling: Eﬀect of ﬁrst order correc tion to adiabatic elimination, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016) 35583

2016
[145]

D. R. Haaheim, F. M. Stein, Methods of solution of the Ri ccati diﬀerential equation, Mathematics Magazine 42 (1969 ) 233

1969
[146]

Schneider, M

T. Schneider, M. Zannetti, R. Badii, H. R. Jauslin, Sto chastic simulation of quantum systems and critical dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984) 2191

1984
[147]

E. B. Iversen, R. Juhl, J. K. Møller, J. Kleissl, H. Mads en, J. M. Morales, Spatio-temporal forecasting by coupled s tochastic diﬀerential equations: Applications to solar power, arXiv (2017) 1706. 04394

2017
[148]

Adomian, K

G. Adomian, K. Malakian, Operator-theoretic solutio n of stochastic systems, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 76 (1980) 183

1980
[149]

Adomian, Nonlinear stochastic operator equations , Academic Press, Orlando, 1986

G. Adomian, Nonlinear stochastic operator equations , Academic Press, Orlando, 1986

1986
[150]

Bouchaud, R.Cont, A Langevin approach to stock m arket ﬂuctuations and crashes, Eur

J.-P. Bouchaud, R.Cont, A Langevin approach to stock m arket ﬂuctuations and crashes, Eur. Phys. J. B 6 (1998) 543

1998
[151]

J. J. H. Brouwers, Langevin and diﬀusion equation of tu rbulent ﬂuid ﬂow, Phys. Fluids 22 (2010) 085102

2010
[152]

B. O. Heppe, Generalized Langevin equation for relati ve turbulent dispersion, J. Fluid Mech. 357 (1998) 167

1998
[153]

B. A. Bodo, M. E. Thompson, T. E. Unny, A review on stocha stic diﬀerential equations for applications in hydrology, Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics 1 (1987) 81

1987
[154]

P. Wang, D. A. Barajas-Solano, E. Constantinescu, S. A bhyankar, D. Ghosh, B. F. Smith, Z. Huang, A. M. Tartakovsky, Probabilistic density function method for stochastic ODEs of power systems with un certain power input, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertainty Quantiﬁcatio n 3 (2015) 873

2015
[155]

A. V . Shapovalov, R. O. Rezaev, A. Y. Trifonov, Symmetr y operators for the FokkerâĂŞPlankâĂŞKolmogorov equation with nonlocal quadratic nonlinearity, Sigma 3 (2007) 005

2007
[156]

G. A. Pavliotis, Stochastic Processes and Applicatio ns: Diﬀusion Processes, the Fokker-Planck and Langevin Equations, Springer, New York, 2014

2014
[157]

H. J. Carmichael, Statistical Methods in Quantum Opti cs 1: Master Equations and Fokker-Planck Equations, Spring er, Berlin, 2002

2002
[158]

H. J. Carmichael, Statistical Methods in Quantum Opti cs 2: Nonclassical Fields, Springer, Berlin, 2008

2008
[159]

K. I. Kim, Higher order bias correcting moment equatio n for M-estimation and its higher order eﬃciency, Econometr ics 4 (2016) 48

2016
[160]

Xiong, L.-G

H. Xiong, L.-G. Si, X.-Y. Lu, Y. Wu, Optomechanically i nduced sum sideband generation, Opt. Express 24 (2016) 5773

2016
[161]

F. Wang, W. Nie, C. H. Oh, Higher-order squeezing and en tanglement of harmonic oscillators in superconducting cir cuits, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 34 (2017) 130

2017
[162]

Ginzburg, Accelerating spontaneous emission in op en resonators, Ann

P. Ginzburg, Accelerating spontaneous emission in op en resonators, Ann. Phys. 528 (2016) 571

2016
[163]

P. D. Nation, J. R. Johansson, M. P. Blencowe, F. Nori, S timulating uncertainty: Amplifying the quantum vacuum wit h superconducting circuits, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 1

2012
[164]

Rabl, Photon blockade eﬀect in optomechanical syst ems, Phys

P. Rabl, Photon blockade eﬀect in optomechanical syst ems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 063601

2011
[165]

Dagenais, L

M. Dagenais, L. Mandel, Investigation of two-time cor relations in photon emissions from a single atom, Phys. Rev. A 18 (1978) 2217

1978
[166]

S. Hong, R. Riedinger, I. Marinković, A. Wallucks, S. G . Hofer, R. A. Norte, M. Aspelmeyer, S. Gröblacher, Hanbury B rown and Twiss interferometry of single phonons from an optomechanical re sonator, Science 358 (2017) 203-206

2017
[167]

H. Wang, X. Gu, Y. X. Liu, A. Miranowicz, F. Nori, Tunabl e photon blockade in a hybrid system consisting of an optomec hanical device coupled to a two-level system, Phys. Rev. A 92 (2015) 033806. S. Khorasani: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 105 of 109 Method of Higher-or...

2015
[168]

A. Roy, M. Devoret, Introduction to parametric ampliﬁ cation of quantum signals with Josephson circuits, Comptes Rendus Physique 17 (2016) 740

2016
[169]

C. A. Holmes, G. J. Milburn, Parametric self pulsing in a quantum opto-mechanical system, Fortschr. Phys. 57 (2009 ) 1052

2009
[170]

Yamamoto, K

Y. Yamamoto, K. Semba, Principles and Methods of Quant um Information Technologies, Springer, Tokyo, 2016

2016
[171]

Imoto, H

N. Imoto, H. A. Haus, Y. Yamamoto, Quantum nondemoliti on measurement of the photon number via the optical Kerr eﬀec t, Phys. Rev. A 32 (1985) 2287

1985
[172]

R. H. Hadﬁeld, G. Johansson, Superconducting Devices in Quantum Optics, Springer, Cham, 2016

2016
[173]

A. A. Gangat, T. M. Stace, G. J. Milburn, Phonon number q uantum jumps in an optomechanical system, New J. Phys. 13 (20 11) 043024
[174]

Cirio, K

M. Cirio, K. Debnath, N. Lambert, F. Nori, Ampliﬁed opt o-mechanical transduction of virtual radiation pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 053601

2017
[175]

R. Khan, F. Massel, T. T. Heikkilä, Cross-Kerr nonline arity in optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. A 91 (2015) 0438 22

2015
[176]

N. R. Bernier, L. D. Tóth, A. Koottandavida, M. Ioannou , D. Malz, A. Nunnenkamp, A. K. Feofanov, T. J. Kippenberg, No nreciprocal reconﬁgurable microwave optomechanical circuit, Nat. Comm. 8 (2017) 604

2017
[177]

A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, R . J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measuremen t, and ampliﬁcation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 1155

2010
[178]

G. C. Wick, The evaluation of the collision matrix, Phy s. Rev. 80 (1950) 268

1950
[179]

P. W. Milonni, J. H. Eberly, Lasers, Wiley, New York, 19 88
[180]

Björk, A

G. Björk, A. Karlsson, Y. Yamamoto, Deﬁnition of a lase r threshold, Phys Rev A. 50 (1994) 1675

1994
[181]

C. Z. Ning, What is Laser Threshold?, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Q uant. Elect. 19 (2013) 1503604

2013
[182]

W. W. Chow, F. Jahnke, C. Gie, Emission properties of na nolasers during the transition to lasing, Light: Sci. Appl. 3 (2014) e201

2014
[183]

Strauf, F

S. Strauf, F. Jahnke, Single quantum dot nanolaser, La ser Photonics Rev. 5 (2011) 607

2011
[184]

C. Gies, J. Wiersig, M. Lorke, F. Jahnke, Semiconducto r model for quantum-dot-based microcavity lasers, Phys. Re v. A 75 (2007) 013803

2007
[185]

Flayac, V

H. Flayac, V . Savona, Non classical statistics in weak ly nonlinear media. Presented at School on Recent Trends in L ight-Matter Interaction, Lausanne, Switzerland, September 2017

2017
[186]

Flayac, V

H. Flayac, V . Savona, Nonclassical statistics from a p olaritonic Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. A 95 (2017) 04383 8

2017
[187]

Flayac, V

H. Flayac, V . Savona, Single photons from dissipation in coupled cavities, Phys. Rev. A 94 (2016) 013815

2016
[188]

Arakawa, S

Y. Arakawa, S. Iwamoto, M. Nomura, A. Tandaechanurat, Y. Ota, Cavity quantum electrodynamics and lasing oscillat ion in single quantum dot-photonic crystal nanocavity coupled systems, IEEE J. S el. Top. Quant. Electron. 18 (2012) 1818

2012
[189]

Nomura, N

M. Nomura, N. Kumagai, S. Iwamoto, Y. Ota, Y. Arakawa, L aser oscillation in a strongly coupled single-quantum-dotâĂŞnanocavity system, Nat. Phys. 6 (2010) 279

2010
[190]

Mikkelsen, T

M. Mikkelsen, T. Fogarty, J. Twamley, T. Busch, Optome chanics with a Kerr-type nonlinear coupling, Phys. Rev. A 96 (2017) 043832

2017
[191]

Shahidani, M

S. Shahidani, M. H. Naderi, M. Soltanolkotabi, S. Barz anjeh, Steady-state entanglement, cooling, and tristability in a nonlinear optomechan- ical cavity, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 31 (2014) 1087

2014
[192]

Dykman, Fluctuating Nonlinear Oscillators, Oxfor d University Press, Oxford, 2012

M. Dykman, Fluctuating Nonlinear Oscillators, Oxfor d University Press, Oxford, 2012

2012
[193]

Wendin, V

G. Wendin, V . S. Shumeiko, Quantum bits with Josephson junctions, Low Temp. Phys. 33 (2007) 724

2007
[194]

Khorasani, A

S. Khorasani, A. Koottandavida, Nonlinear graphene q uantum capacitors for electro-optics, npj 2D Mater. Appl. 1 (2017) 7

2017
[195]

Clarke, F

J. Clarke, F. K. Wilhelm, Superconducting quantum bit s, Nature 453 (2008) 1031

2008
[196]

Makhlin, G

Y. Makhlin, G. Schön, A. Shnirman, Quantum-state engi neering with Josephson-junction devices, Rev. Mod. Phys. 7 3 (2001) 357

2001
[197]

Y. A. Pashkin, O. Astaﬁev, T. Yamamoto, Y. Nakamura, J. S. Tsai, Josephson charge qubits: A brief review. Quantum In f. Process. 8 (2009) 55

2009
[198]

J. M. Martinis, Superconducting phase qubits, Quantu m Inf. Process. 8 (2009) 81

2009
[199]

S. M. Girvin, M. H. Devoret, R. J. Schoelkopf, Circuit Q ED and engineering charge based superconducting qubits, Ph ys. Scr. T 137 (2009) 014012

2009
[200]

Z. L. Xiang, S. Ashhab, J. Q. You, F. Nori, Hybrid quantu m circuits: Superconducting circuits interacting with oth er quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 (2013) 623

2013
[201]

D. Malz, A. Nunnenkamp, Floquet approach to bichromat ically driven cavity-optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. A 94 (2016) 023803

2016
[202]

B. He, L. Yang, Q. Lin, M. Xiao, Radiation pressure cool ing as a quantum dynamical process, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (201 7) 233604
[203]

Khorasani, A

S. Khorasani, A. Adibi, Analytical solution of linear ordinary diﬀerential equations by diﬀerential transfer ma trix method, Elect. J. Diﬀ. Eq. 2003 (2003) 1

2003
[204]

Khorasani, Diﬀerential transfer matrix solution o f generalized eigenvalue problems, Proc

S. Khorasani, Diﬀerential transfer matrix solution o f generalized eigenvalue problems, Proc. Dynamic Sys. Appl . 6 (2012) 213

2012
[205]

P. J. Colmenares, Fokker-Planck equation of the reduc ed Wigner function associated to an Ohmic quantum Langevin d ynamics, Phys. Rev. E 97 (2018) 052126

2018
[206]

Boyanovsky, D

D. Boyanovsky, D. Jasnow, Heisenberg-Langevin vs. qu antum master equation, Phys. Rev. A 96 (2017) 062108

2017
[207]

Macrì, A

V . Macrì, A. Ridolfo, O. Di Stefano, A. F. Kockum, F. Nor i, S. Savasta, Non-perturbative dynamical Casimir eﬀect in optomechanical systems: Vacuum Casimir-Rabi splittings, Phys. Rev. X 8 (20 18) 011031
[208]

Chang, T

Y. Chang, T. Shi, Y.-X. Liu, C. P. Sun, F. Nori, Multista bility of electromagnetically induced transparency in ato m-assisted optomechanical cavities, Phys. Rev. A 83 (2011) 063826

2011
[209]

Jing, H., Ş. K. Özdemir, Z. Geng, J. Zhang, X.-Y. Lü, B. P eng, L. Yang, F. Nori, Optomechanically-induced transpare ncy in parity-time- symmetric microresonators, Sci. Rep. 5 (2015) 9663

2015
[210]

H. Ian, Z. R. Gong, X.-Y. Liu, C. P. Sun, F. Nori, Cavity o ptomechanical coupling assisted by an atomic gas, Phys. Rev. A 78 (2008) 013824

2008
[211]

H. Jing, Ş. K. Özdemir, H. Lü, F. Nori, High-order excep tional points in optomechanics, Sci. Rep. 7 (2017) 3386

2017
[212]

J.-Q. Liao, F. Nori, Spectrometric reconstruction of mechanical-motional states in optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A 90 (2014) 023851

2014
[213]

J.-Q. Liao, C. K. Law, L.-M. Kuang, F. Nori, Enhancemen t of mechanical eﬀects of single photons in modulated two-mo de optomechanics, S. Khorasani: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 106 of 109 Method of Higher-order Operators Phys. Rev. A 92 (2015) 013822

2015
[214]

H. Wang, X. Gu, Y.-X. Liu, A. Miranowicz, F. Nori, Optom echanical analog of two-color electromagnetically-induced transparency: Photon transmission through an optomechanical device with a two-l evel system, Phys. Rev. A 90 (2014) 023817

2014
[215]

Børkje, A

K. Børkje, A. Nunnenkamp, J. D. Teufel, S. M. Girvin, Si gnatures of nonlinear cavity optomechanics in the weak coup ling regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2012) 053603

2012
[216]

Lemonde, N

M.-A. Lemonde, N. Didier, A. A. Clerk, Nonlinear inter action eﬀects in a strongly driven optomechanical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 053602

2013
[217]

S. Weis, R. Rivière, S. Deléglise, E. Gavartin, O. Arci zet, A. Schliesser, T. J. Kippenberg, Optomechanically ind uced transparency, Science 330 (2010) 1520

2010
[218]

J. D. Teufel, D. Li, M. S. Allman, K. Cicak, A. J. Sirois, J. D. Whittaker, R. W. Simmonds, Circuit cavity electromech anics in the strong- coupling regime, Nature 471 (2011) 204

2011
[219]

Verhagen, S

E. Verhagen, S. Deléglise, S. Weis, A. Schliesser, T. J . Kippenberg, Quantum-coherent coupling of a mechanical os cillator to an optical cavity mode, Nature 482 (2012) 63

2012
[220]

Lemonde, N

M.-A. Lemonde, N. Didier, A. A. Clerk, Enhanced nonlin ear interactions in quantum optomechanics via mechanical a mpliﬁcation, Nat. Commun. 7 (2016) 11338

2016
[221]

Lemonde, A

M.-A. Lemonde, A. A. Clerk, Real photons from vacuum ﬂu ctuations in optomechanics: The role of polariton interact ions, Phys. Rev. A. 91 (2015) 033836

2015
[222]

T. J. Kippenberg, H. Rokhsari, T. Carmon, A. Scherer, K . J. Vahala, Analysis of radiation-pressure induced mechan ical oscillation of an optical microcavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 033901

2005
[223]

Marquardt, J

F. Marquardt, J. G. E. Harris, S. M. Girvin, Dynamical m ultistability induced by radiation pressure in high-ﬁness e micromechanical optical cavities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 103901

2006
[224]

Vahala, M

K. Vahala, M. Herrmann, S. Knünz, V . Batteiger, G. Saat hoﬀ, T. W. Hänsch, T. Udem, A phonon laser, Nat. Phys. 5 (2009) 682

2009
[225]

Bagheri, M

M. Bagheri, M. Poot, M. Li, W. P. H. Pernice, H. X. Tang, D ynamic manipulation of nanomechanical resonators in the high-amplitude regime and non-volatile mechanical memory operation, Nat. Nanote chnol. 6 (2011) 726

2011
[226]

A. G. Krause, J. T. Hill, M. Ludwig, A. H. Safavi-Naeini , J. Chan, F. Marquardt, O. Painter, Nonlinear radiation pre ssure dynamics in an optomechanical crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 233601

2015
[227]

Carmon, M

T. Carmon, M. Cross, K. Vahala, Chaotic quivering of mi cron-scaled on-chip resonators excited by centrifugal opt ical pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 167203

2007
[228]

Navarro-Urrios, N

D. Navarro-Urrios, N. E. Capuj, M. F. Colombano, P. Dav id Garcıa, M. Sledzinska, F. Alzina, A. Griol, A. Martınez, C. M. Sotomayor-Torres, Nonlinear dynamics and chaos in an optomechanical beam, Nat . Commun. 8 (2017) 14965

2017
[229]

Neuhaus, M

R. Neuhaus, M. J. Sellars, S. J. Bingham, D. Suter, Brea king the StokesâĂŞanti-Stokes symmetry in Raman heterodyne detection of magnetic- resonance transitions, Phys. Rev. A 58 (1998) 4961

1998
[230]

Goldstein, S.-Y

T. Goldstein, S.-Y. Chen, D. Xiao, A. Ramasubramaniam , J. Yan, Raman scattering and anomalous StokesâĂŞanti-Sto kes ratio in MoTe 2 atomic layers, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016) 28024

2016
[231]

E. A. Kittlaus, N. T. Otterstrom, P. T. Rakich, On-chip inter-modal Brillouin scattering, Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 15 819

2017
[232]

C. F. Ockeloen-Korppi, E. Damskagg, J.-M. Pirkkalain en, A. A. Clerk, F. Massel, M. J. Woolley, M. A. Sillanpaa, Ent angled massive mechanical oscillators, Nature 556 (2018) 478

2018
[233]

K. Gajo, S. Schüz, E. M. Weig, Strong 4-mode coupling of nanomechanical string resonators, Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 (2 017) 133109
[234]

M. J. Seitner, M. Abdi, A. Ridolfo, M. J. Hartmann, E. M. Weig, Parametric oscillation, frequency mixing, and injec tion locking of strongly coupled nanomechanical resonator modes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1 18 (2017) 254301

2017
[235]

Schliesser, R

A. Schliesser, R. Rivière, G. Anetsberger, O. Arcizet , T. J. Kippenberg, Resolved-sideband cooling of a micromec hanical oscillator, Nature Phys. 4 (2008) 415

2008
[236]

J. B. Clark, F. Lecocq, R. W. Simmonds, J. Aumentado, J. D. Teufel, Sideband cooling beyond the quantum backaction l imit with squeezed light, Nature 541 (2017) 191

2017
[237]

Sudhir, R

V . Sudhir, R. Schilling, S. A. Fedorov, H. Schuetz, D. J . Wilson, T. J. Kippenberg, Quantum correlations of light fr om a room-temperature mechanical oscillator, Phys. Rev. X 7 (2017) 031055

2017
[238]

P. E. Barclay, K. Srinivasan, O. Painter, Nonlinear re sponse of silicon photonic crystal microresonators excite d via an integrated waveguide and ﬁber taper, Opt. Express 13 (2005) 801

2005
[239]

J. D. Teufel, J. W. Harlow, C. A. Regal, K. W. Lehnert, Dy namical backaction of microwave ﬁelds on a nanomechanical oscillator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 197203

2008
[240]

Eichenﬁeld, R

M. Eichenﬁeld, R. Camacho, J. Chan, K. J. Vahala, O. Pai nter, A picogram- and nanometre-scale photonic-crystal op tomechanical cavity, Nature 459 (2009) 550

2009
[241]

A. H. Safavi-Naeini, S. Groeblacher, J. T. Hill, J. Cha n, M. Aspelmeyer, O. Painter, Squeezed light from a silicon micromechanical resonator, Nature 500 (2013) 185

2013
[242]

P. B. Deotare, I. Bulu, I. W. Frank, Q. Quan, Y. Zhang, R. Ilic, M. Loncar, All optical reconﬁuration of optomechanical ﬁters, Nat. Commun. 3 (2011) 846

2011
[243]

C. J. Sarabalis, Y. D. Dahmani, R. N. Patel, J. T. Hill, A . H. Safavi-Naeini, Release-free silicon-on-insulator cavity optomechanics, Optica 4 (2017) 1147

2017
[244]

Leijssen, E

R. Leijssen, E. Verhagen, Strong optomechanical inte ractions in a sliced photonic crystal nanobeam, Sci. Rep. 5 ( 2015) 15974

2015
[245]

Riedinger, A

R. Riedinger, A. Wallucks, I. Marinkovic, C. Löschnau er, M. Aspelmeyer, S. Hong, S. Gröblacher, Remote quantum en tanglement between two micromechanical oscillators, Nature 556 (2018) 473

2018
[246]

Schliesser, T

A. Schliesser, T. J. Kippenberg, Cavity optomechanic s with whispering-gallery-mode optical micro-resonators , Adv. At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 58 (2010) 207. S. Khorasani: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 107 of 109 Method of Higher-order Operators

2010
[247]

S. G. Loo, Spectral density of random signals corrupte d by multiplicative noise, Electron. Lett. 3 (1967) 238

1967
[248]

Hübener, A

R. Hübener, A. Mari, J. Eisert, WickâĂŹs theorem for ma trix product states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 040401

2013
[249]

Isserlis, On a formula for the product-moment coeﬃc ient of any order of a normal frequency distribution in any nu mber of variables, Biometrika 12 (1918) 134

L. Isserlis, On a formula for the product-moment coeﬃc ient of any order of a normal frequency distribution in any nu mber of variables, Biometrika 12 (1918) 134

1918
[250]

W. J. Gu, Z. Yi, L.-H. Sun, Y. Yan, Enhanced quadratic no nlinearity with parametric ampliﬁcations, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 35 (2018) 652

2018
[251]

J. S. Zhang, A.-X. Chen, Enhancing quadratic optomech anical coupling via nonlinear medium and lasers, Phys. Rev. A 99 (2019) 013843

2019
[252]

Hossein-Zadeh, K

M. Hossein-Zadeh, K. J. Vahala, Observation of optica l spring eﬀect in a microtoroidal optomechanical resonator, Opt. Lett. 32 (2007) 1611

2007
[253]

Huang, M

K. Huang, M. Hossein-Zadeh, Direct stabilization of o ptomechanical oscillators, Opt. Lett. 42 (2017) 1946

2017
[254]

T. P. Purdy, P.-L. Yu, N. S. Kampel, R. W. Peterson, K. Ci cak, R. W. Simmonds, C. A. Regal, Optomechanical Raman-rati o thermometry. Phys. Rev. A 92 (2015) 031802(R)

2015
[255]

T. P. Purdy, K. E. Grutter, K. Srinivasan, J. M. Taylor, Quantum correlations from a room-temperature optomechani cal cavity, Science 356 (2017) 1265

2017
[256]

Marquardt, J

F. Marquardt, J. P. Chen, A. A. Clerk, S. M. Girvin, Quan tum theory of cavity-assisted sideband cooling of mechanic al motion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 093902

2007
[257]

Wilson-Rae, N

I. Wilson-Rae, N. Nooshi, W. Zwerger, T. J. Kippenberg , Theory of ground state cooling of a mechanical oscillator u sing dynamical backac- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 093901 (2007)

2007
[258]

Khorasani, B

S. Khorasani, B. Cabon, Theory of Optimal Mixing in Dir ectly Modulated Laser Diodes, Scientia Iranica 16 (2009) 15 7

2009
[259]

Sudhir, D

V . Sudhir, D. J. Wilson, R. Schilling, H. Schütz, S. A. F edorov, A. H. Ghadimi, A. Nunnenkamp, T. J. Kippenberg, Appe arance and disap- pearance of quantum correlations in measurement-based fee dback control of a mechanical oscillator, Phys. Rev. X 7 (201 7) 011001
[260]

Rakich, F

P. Rakich, F. Marquardt, Quantum theory of continuum o ptomechanics, New J. Phys. 20 (2018) 045005

2018
[261]

M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, P. Eklund, Raman sc attering in fullerenes, J. Raman Spect. 27 (1996) 351

1996
[262]

A. G. Souza Filho, S. G. Chou, Ge. G. Samsonidze, G. Dres selhaus, M. S. Dresselhaus, Lei An, J. Liu, Anna K. Swan, M. S. Ünlü, B. B. Goldberg, A. Jorio, A. Grüneis, R. Saito, Stokes and anti-St okes Raman spectra of small-diameter isolated carbon nanot ubes, Phys. Rev. B 69 (...

2004
[263]

M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, R. Saito, A. Jorio, Raman spectroscopy of carbon nanotubes, Phys. Rep. 409 (200 5) 47
[264]

Jorio, A

A. Jorio, A. G. Souza Filho, G. Dresselhaus, M. S. Dress elhaus, R. Saito, J. H. Hafner, C. M. Lieber, F. M. Matinaga, M . S. S. Dantas, M. A. Pimenta, Joint density of electronic states for one isola ted single-wall carbon nanotube studied by resonant Raman s cattering, Phys....

2001
[265]

Y. Chen, Z. Shen, Z. Xu, Y. Hu, H. Xu, S. Wang, X. Guo, Y. Zh ang, L. Peng, F. Ding, Z. Liu, J. Zhang, Helicity-dependent s ingle-walled carbon nanotube alignment on graphite for helical angle and handedness recognition, Nat. Commun. 4 (2013) 2205

2013
[266]

P.-H. Tan, ed. Raman Spectroscopy of Two-dimensional Materials, Springer, Singapore, 2019

2019
[267]

F. Shao, R. Zenobi, Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: principles, practice, and applications to nanospectroscopic imaging of 2D materials, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 411 (2019) 37

2019
[268]

Jorio, R

A. Jorio, R. Saito, G. Dresselhaus, M. S. Dresselhaus, Raman Spectroscopy in Graphene Related Systems, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2011

2011
[269]

Khorasani, Third-order optical nonlinearity in tw o-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Commun

S. Khorasani, Third-order optical nonlinearity in tw o-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Commun. Theor. Phys. 70 (2018) 334

2018
[270]

Zhang, X.-F

X. Zhang, X.-F. Qiao, W. Shi, J.-B. Wu, D.-S. Jiang, P.- H. Tan, Phonon and Raman scattering of two-dimensional tran sition metal dichalco- genides from monolayer, multilayer to bulk material, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (2015) 2757

2015
[271]

Tuschel, Raman spectroscopy and imaging of low ener gy phonons, Spectroscopy 30 (2015) 18

D. Tuschel, Raman spectroscopy and imaging of low ener gy phonons, Spectroscopy 30 (2015) 18

2015
[272]

Saito, M

R. Saito, M. Hofmann, G. Dresselhaus, A. Jorio, M. S. Dr esselhaus, Raman spectroscopy of graphene and carbon nanot ubes, Adv. Phys. 60 (2011) 413

2011
[273]

Wu, M.-L

J.-B. Wu, M.-L. Lin, X. Cong, H.-N. Liua, P.-H. Tan, Ram an spectroscopy of graphene-based materials and its applications in related devices, Chem. Soc. Rev. 47 (2018) 1822

2018
[274]

J.-B. Wu, X. Zhang, M. Ijäs, W.-P. Han, X.-F. Qiao, X.-L . Li, D.-S. Jiang, A. C. Ferrari, P.-H. Tan, Resonant Raman sp ectroscopy of twisted multilayer graphene, Nat. Commun. 5 (2014) 5309

2014
[275]

P. H. Tan, W. P. Han, W. J. Zhao, Z. H. Wu, K. Chang, H. Wang , Y. F. Wang, N. Bonini, N. Marzari, N. Pugno, G. Savini, A. Lom bardo, A. C. Ferrari, The shear mode of multilayer graphene, Nat. Mate r. 11 (2012) 294

2012
[276]

https://www.nanophoton.net/raman/raman-spectro scopy.html
[277]

Zaitsu, H

S.-I. Zaitsu, H. Izaki, T. Tsuchiya, T. Imasaka, Conti nuous-wave phase-matched molecular optical modulator, Sc i. Rep. 6 (2016) 20908

2016
[278]

Ferrante, C. et al. Raman spectroscopy of graphene und er ultrafast laser excitation. Nat. Commun. 9, 308 (2018)

2018
[279]

picocavities

F. Benz, M. K. Schmidt, A. Dreismann, R. Chikkaraddy, Y . Zhang, A. Demetriadou, C. Carnegie, H. Ohadi, B. de Nijs, R. Esteban, J. Aizpurua, J. J. Baumberg, Single-molecule optomechanics i n “picocavities”, Science 354 (2016) 726

2016
[280]

picocavities

F. Benz, M. K. Schmidt, A. Dreismann, R. Chikkaraddy, Y . Zhang, A. Demetriadou, C. Carnegie, H. Ohadi, B. de Nijs, R. Esteban, J. Aizpurua, J. J. Baumberg, Single-molecule optomechanics i n “picocavities”, [Data set] Apollo (2016) doi:10.17863/C AM.1675

2016 doi
[281]

T. H. Runcorn, R. T. Murray, J. R. Taylor, Highly eﬃcien t nanosecond 560 nm source by SHG of a combined Yb-Raman ﬁber a mpliﬁer, Opt. Express 26 (2018) 4440

2018
[282]

T. H. Runcorn, R. T. Murray, J. R. Taylor, Highly eﬃcien t nanosecond 560 nm source by SHG of a combined Yb-Raman ﬁber a mpliﬁer, [Data set] Zenodo (2018) doi:10.5281/zenodo.1166082

2018 doi
[283]

Di Stefano, A

O. Di Stefano, A. Settineri, V . Macrı, A. Ridolfo, R. St assi, A. F. Kockum, S. Savasta, F. Nori, Interaction of mechanical oscillators mediated by the exchange of virtual photon pairs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 030402

2019
[284]

Jansen, J

E. Jansen, J. D. P. Machado, Y. M. Blanter, Realization of a degenerate parametric oscillator in electromechanica l systems, Phys. Rev. B 99 (2019) 045401

2019
[285]

Nabholz, F

U. Nabholz, F. Schatz, J. E. Mehner, P. Degenfeld-Schonburg, Spontaneous parametric down-conversion induced bynon-degenerate phononic three-wave mixing in a scanning MEMS micro mirror, Sci. Rep. 9 (2019) 3997. S. Khorasani: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 108 of 109 Method...

2019
[286]

Capmany, C

J. Capmany, C. R. Fernández-Pousa, Quantum model for e lectro-optical phase modulation, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27 (2010 ) A119

2010
[287]

M. K. Schmidt, R. Esteban, A. González-Tudela, G. Gied ke, J. Aizpurua, Quantum mechanical description of Raman sc attering from molecules in plasmonic cavities, ACS Nano 10 (2016) 6291

2016
[288]

Lombardi, M

A. Lombardi, M. K. Schmidt, L. Weller, W. M. Deacon, F. B enz, B. de Nijs, J. Aizpurua, J. J. Baumberg, Pulsed molecula r optomechanics in plasmonic nanocavities: From nonlinear vibrational ins tabilities to bond-breaking, Phys. Rev. X 8 (2018) 011016

2018
[289]

N. N. Akhmediev, V . M. Eleonskii, N. E. Kulagin, Exact ﬁ rst-order solutions of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation , Theor. Math. Phys. 72 (1987) 809

1987
[290]

Xiong, Y

H. Xiong, Y. Wu, Optomechanical Akhmediev breathers, Laser Photon. Rev. 12 (2018) 1700305

2018
[291]

Xiong, L.-G

H. Xiong, L.-G. Si, A.-N. Zheng, X. Yang, Y. Wu, Higher- order sidebands in optomechanically induced transparency, Phys. Rev. A 86 (2012) 013815

2012
[292]

Y. F. Jiao, T. X. Lu, H. Jing, Optomechanical second-or der sidebands and group delays in a Kerr resonator, Phys. Rev . A 97 (2018) 013843

2018
[293]

Kronwald, F

A. Kronwald, F. Marquardt, Optomechanically induced transparency in the nonlinear quantum regime, Phys. Rev. Le tt. 111 (2013) 133601

2013
[294]

Karuza, C

M. Karuza, C. Biancoﬁore, M. Bawaj, C. Molinelli, M. Ga lassi, R. Natali, P. Tombesi, G. Di Giuseppe, D. Vitali, Opto mechanically induced transparency in a membrane-in-the-middle setup at room tem perature. Phys. Rev. A 88 (2013) 013804

2013
[295]

Shen, C.-H

Z. Shen, C.-H. Dong, Y. Chen, Y.-F. Xiao, F.-W. Sun, G.- C. Guo, Compensation of the Kerr eﬀect for transient optomec hanically induced transparency in a silica microsphere. Opt. Lett. 41 (2016) 1 249

2016
[296]

H. Jing, Ş. K. Özdemir, X.-Y. Lü, J. Zhang, L. Yang, F. No ri, PT-symmetric phonon laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 0 53604

2014
[297]

Zhang, B

J. Zhang, B. Peng, Ş. K. Özdemir, K. Pichler, D. O. Krime r, G. Zhao, F. Nori, Y.-X. Liu, S. Rotter, L. Yang, A phonon las er operating at an exceptional point, Nat. Photon. 12 (2018) 479

2018
[298]

Zhang, B

J. Zhang, B. Peng, Ş. K. Özdemir, Y.-X. Liu, H. Jing, X.- Y. Lü, Y.-L. Liu, L. Yang, F. Nori, Giant nonlinearity via bre aking parity-time symmetry: A route to low-threshold phonon diodes, Phys. Rev . B 92 (2015) 115407

2015
[299]

L. Fan, K. Y. Fong, M. Poot, H. X. Tang, Cascaded optical transparency in multimode-cavity optomechanical systems , Nat. Commun. 6 (2015) 5850

2015
[300]

Z.-P. Liu, J. Zhang, Ş. K. Özdemir, B. Peng, H. Jing, X.- Y. Lü, C.-W. Li, L. Yang, F. Nori, Y.-X. Liu, Metrology with PT-symmetric cavities: Enhanced sensitivity near the PT-phase transition, Phys. R ev. Lett. 117 (2016) 110802

2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

T. J. Kippenberg, K. J. Vahala, Cavity optomechanics, Sc ience 321 (2008) 1172. S. Khorasani: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 101 of 109 Method of Higher-order Operators

2008

[2] [2]

Aspelmeyer, T

M. Aspelmeyer, T. Kippenberg, F. Marquardt, Cavity Opto mechanics: Nano- and Micromechanical Resonators Interact ing with Light, Springer, Berlin, 2014

2014

[3] [3]

Aspelmeyer, T

M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, F. Marquardt, Cavity op tomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86 (2014) 1391

2014

[4] [4]

Meystre, A short walk through quantum optomechanics, Ann

P. Meystre, A short walk through quantum optomechanics, Ann. Phys. 525 (2013) 215

2013

[5] [5]

C. K. Law, Interaction between a moving mirror and radiat ion pressure: A Hamiltonian formulation, Phys. Rev. A 51 (19 95) 2537

[6] [6]

W. P. Bowen, G. J. Milburn, Quantum Optomechanics, CRC Pr ess, Boca Raton, 2016

2016

[7] [7]

Khorasani, Higher-order interactions in quantum opt omechanics: Revisiting the theoretical foundations, Appl

S. Khorasani, Higher-order interactions in quantum opt omechanics: Revisiting the theoretical foundations, Appl . Sci. 7 (2017) 656

2017

[8] [8]

Khorasani, Higher-order interactions in quantum opt omechanics: Analytical solution of nonlinearity, Photoni cs 4 (2017) 48

S. Khorasani, Higher-order interactions in quantum opt omechanics: Analytical solution of nonlinearity, Photoni cs 4 (2017) 48

2017