REVIEW 2 cited by
A Comprehensive Survey on Rare Event Prediction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Rare event prediction involves identifying and forecasting events with a low probability using machine learning (ML) and data analysis. Due to the imbalanced data distributions, where the frequency of common events vastly outweighs that of rare events, it requires using specialized methods within each step of the ML pipeline, i.e., from data processing to algorithms to evaluation protocols. Predicting the occurrences of rare events is important for real-world applications, such as Industry 4.0, and is an active research area in statistical and ML. This paper comprehensively reviews the current approaches for rare event prediction along four dimensions: rare event data, data processing, algorithmic approaches, and evaluation approaches. Specifically, we consider 73 datasets from different modalities (i.e., numerical, image, text, and audio), four major categories of data processing, five major algorithmic groupings, and two broader evaluation approaches. This paper aims to identify gaps in the current literature and highlight the challenges of predicting rare events. It also suggests potential research directions, which can help guide practitioners and researchers.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Rare Event Detection in Imbalanced Multi-Class Datasets Using an Optimal MIP-Based Ensemble Weighting Approach
A MIP-based ensemble weighting scheme jointly selects K classifiers and assigns per-class weights; it reports average balanced accuracy gains of 4.53% over six baselines on four imbalanced CPS datasets.
-
Applied Statistics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: A Review and Vision
A review and vision paper: applied statistics and AI are complementary, and statisticians should focus on uniquely human skills as AI automates routine analysis.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.