Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 40 references

Visible-Light High-Contrast Polarimetry with MagAO-X: Characterization and Initial Results

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read MagAO-X's visible-light polarimeter is characterized with a polarized-light generator and a fitted Mueller-matrix model, and a dual rotating quarter-wave plate compensator raises average polarimetric efficiency from 70.0% to 87.4%, cuts…

desk verdict A solid instrument paper with a real on-sky result; the headline numbers are instrument-only and the M3 model is an assumption, but the limitations are mostly stated in the text. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06579 v1 pith:LUCF46EL submitted 2026-08-06 astro-ph.IM

Miles Lucas , Laird Close , Jared R. Males , Tiago Gualberto Bezerra de Souza , Rodrigo Pereira , Jialin Li , Joseph D. Long , Jaren N. Ashcraft
show 17 more authors
Kyle Van Gorkom Olivier Guyon Sebastiaan Y. Haffert Alexander D. Hedglen Rob G. van Holstein Parker T. Johnson Maggie Kautz Jay Kueny Briley L. Lewis Joshua Liberman Jennifer Lumbres Eden McEwen Avalon L. McLeod Maxwell A. Millar-Blanchaer Lauren Schatz Katie Twitchell Manxuan Zhang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords polarimetricdifferentialimaginginstrumentalpolarizationMuellermatrixdualrotatingquarter-waveplatehigh-contrastdebrisdiskextremeadaptiveopticsMagAO-X
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

MagAO-X, the visible-light extreme-adaptive-optics instrument on the 6.5 m Magellan Clay Telescope, has been upgraded into a polarimetric differential imaging (PDI) camera in the r', i', and z' bands. This paper is trying to establish that the instrument's polarimetric response can be captured by a Mueller-matrix model calibrated with a purpose-built polarization generator, and that the dominant defect—a dynamic loss of efficiency tied to the k-mirror image rotator—can be actively corrected with a dual rotating quarter-wave plate (DQWP) compensator. It reports that the compensator raises average polarimetric efficiency from 70.0% to 87.4% and lowers average instrumental polarization from 13.7% to 8.3%, and demonstrates the end-to-end pipeline on sky with i'-band imaging of the HR 4796 debris disk. A sympathetic reader would care because PDI is one of the cleanest ways to suppress unpolarized starlight and see faint dust-scattered light around other stars, and the same calibration-plus-compensation architecture is the path for polarimeters on next-generation extremely large telescopes.

What carries the argument

The object that carries the argument is the dual rotating quarter-wave plate (DQWP) compensator: two zero-order quarter-wave plates (design wavelength 780 nm) on stepper-controlled rotation mounts, placed in the collimated beam after the tweeter deformable mirror, with a tracking law that reorients the input polarization so it reaches the polarizing beamsplitter in the instrument's eigenpolarization, cancelling the elliptical retardance and diattenuation of the k-mirror and periscope. The measurement side of the argument is a Mueller-matrix model of the whole optical chain, fit by Nelder-Mead minimization of mean-squared error against normalized single-difference fluxes taken with and without the injection polarizer; the fitted model yields polarimetric efficiency and instrumental polarization as functions of image-rotator angle and filter, and later supplies the least-squares Mueller-matrix inversion used for the HR 4796 Stokes images. The one component that cannot be measured with the generator, the telescope tertiary mirror M3, is inserted in the on-sky model as an idealized silver mirror.

What would settle it

Observe a grid of polarized and unpolarized standard stars at several parallactic angles and telescope altitudes, and fit the M3 Mueller matrix from the on-sky data alone; if the best-fit M3 diattenuation and retardance depart from the idealized silver-mirror values by more than the model residuals, the internal-calibration numbers (87.4% efficiency, 8.3% instrumental polarization) and the HR 4796 Stokes images are systematically biased.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that MagAO-X can be made a calibrated, high-contrast visible-light polarimeter, and that its main weakness—polarimetric efficiency and instrumental polarization that swing strongly with the k-mirror image rotator angle—is a hardware problem with a hardware solution. Using a polarization generator that injects effectively 100% linearly polarized light, the authors measure normalized single-difference fluxes for every HWP and image-rotator angle in each filter, then fit a Mueller-matrix model that chains the telescope tertiary mirror (M3), the half-wave plate, the M4 fold mirror, the image rotator, a generic periscope-dominated instrument term, and the polarizing beamsplitter, with separate diattenuations for the two cameras. The fit quantifies efficiency as the average recovered linear polarization for Stokes Q and U and instrumental polarization as the polarized fraction generated from unpolarized input. The newly installed DQWP dynamically reorients incoming polarization to the instrument's eigenpolarization, raising average efficiency from 70.0% to 87.4% (i' from 82.0% to 97.9%, z' from 59.9% to 96.3%) and cutting average instrumental polarization from 13.7% to 8.3%; r' stays limited by beamsplitter leakage. On sky, least-squares Mueller-matrix inversion of double-differenced i' images of HR 4796 yields a Stokes $Q_\phi$ image of the bright forward-scattering near side of the disk at one of the closest inner working angles yet.

Load-bearing premise

The on-sky calibration rests on the assumption that the telescope's tertiary mirror M3 behaves exactly like an idealized silver mirror, because the polarization generator injects light only after M3 and cannot measure it; if the real M3 Mueller matrix differs from the silver model, the reported efficiency, instrumental polarization, and HR 4796 Stokes images inherit a systematic error.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In i' and z', where the DQWP tracking law pushes efficiency to 97.9% and 96.3%, MagAO-X can now run PDI close to its photon-noise limit rather than being crippled by image-rotator crosstalk.
  • The r' band remains the weak link: polarizing-beamsplitter leakage below roughly 650 nm caps its efficiency, and the 65/35 wavefront-sensor beamsplitter adds about 22% instrumental polarization, so the planned November 2026 PBS replacement should be the decisive fix.
  • The HR 4796 result shows the full calibration chain—double-differencing, Mueller-matrix inversion, ad-hoc IP removal, and $Q_\phi$ optimization—works on a real debris disk and resolves the forward-scattering near side at small inner working angle.
  • Because rotating the DQWP shifts the pupil image on the wavefront sensor by about 0.5 pixels over 180 degrees of plate rotation, a per-QWP lookup table for the pupil-alignment loop is required before the compensator can be used for deep, long-exposure high-contrast observations.
  • The DQWP-plus-Mueller-model architecture is explicitly the template for GMT and ELT polarimeters, whose Nasmyth optics will introduce even larger and more dynamic polarization effects.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the DQWP is effectively an analog pre-compensator that diagonalizes the instrument's Mueller matrix in real time; the same tracking-law idea could be retrofit to any Nasmyth high-contrast polarimeter whose k-mirror angle changes during an observation.
  • Editorial inference: because M3 is excluded from the internal calibration, the 87.4% efficiency and 8.3% instrumental polarization are upper limits on true on-sky performance; standard-star measurements will likely revise them by a few percent in one direction or the other.
  • Editorial inference: the residual speckle noise and dispersion smearing seen around HR 4796 suggest the polarimetric contrast floor is currently set by the atmosphere-dispersion control law, not by the polarimeter; closing the ADC loop could improve inner working angle without any new polarimetric optics.
  • Editorial inference: the observed asymmetry in the r' response is a clean signature of PBS leakage rather than mirror retardance, and the same Mueller-model fit could be used to predict the polarimeter's performance after the PBS swap before re-running the full calibration.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper describes the visible-light polarimetric mode of MagAO-X, a high-contrast instrument at the Magellan Clay Telescope. The authors built a polarization generator to inject known polarization states after the telescope's tertiary mirror, fit a Mueller-matrix model to the resulting calibration data across r', i', and z' filters, and used the fitted model to compute polarimetric efficiency and instrumental polarization as functions of the k-mirror image rotator angle. They find that the image rotator introduces significant, angle-dependent inefficiency and polarization; to mitigate this, they designed and deployed a dual rotating quarter-wave plate (DQWP) compensator. After installation, they report an average polarimetric efficiency of 87.4% (up from 70.0%) and an average instrumental polarization of 8.3% (down from 13.7%). Finally, they present on-sky i'-band polarimetric images of the HR 4796 debris disk, showing the forward-scattering side of the disk, and conclude that lessons learned will inform future ELT polarimeters.

Significance. If the reported performance holds, this is a useful addition to the comparatively small set of visible-light high-contrast polarimeters on large telescopes. The paper's strengths are concrete: it includes a purpose-built polarization generator, a physically motivated Mueller-matrix model with low fit residuals (MSE of 0.1-0.3% in the calibration data), a novel DQWP compensation scheme that demonstrably flattens the image-rotator-induced efficiency curves, and a first on-sky demonstration that detects the polarized HR 4796 disk at small inner working angle. These elements are reproducible in principle and the work is relevant both to the MagAO-X upgrade path and to polarimetric design for GMT and ELT instruments. The main weakness is that the headline performance numbers are model-derived and exclude the telescope's M3 mirror, while the on-sky reduction uses an unvalidated idealized silver model for M3; the abstract presents the lab-only numbers without this caveat.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. 3.4; Table 2] The headline values 'average increase in polarimetric efficiency of +17.5% (to 87.4%) and a reduction in instrumental polarization of -5.4% (to 8.3%)' are derived from the Mueller-matrix model fitted to calibration data taken with the polarization generator injecting light after the telescope's M3 mirror. As the captions of Figures 4 and 9 state, these values are 'based on the Mueller-matrix model excluding M3.' The abstract omits this caveat, presenting the numbers as measured instrument performance without qualification. Because M3's diattenuation and retardance are not measured (the paper lists standard-star calibration as future work), the end-to-end on-sky efficiency and IP could differ substantially. The abstract and conclusions should explicitly state that these are instrument-only values, not end-to-end telescope-plus-instrument values.
  2. [Sec. 4.2; Table 2] The average improvement across filters masks a lack of improvement in r': post-DQWP r' efficiency is 67.9% (a change of only +0.3%), and r' instrumental polarization remains 22.4%. The statement in the abstract that the DQWP 'increased polarimetric efficiency... and reduced instrumental polarization... across all filters' is technically true only because i' and z' improve dramatically, while r' is essentially unchanged. Since the r' band is one of the three science filters and is the filter most affected by PBS leakage, the paper should prominently report filter-by-filter values in the abstract or at least in the conclusions, rather than relying on the average.
  3. [Sec. 5.1; Eq. (10)] The on-sky calibration assumes an idealized silver-mirror Mueller matrix for M3 because the polarization generator cannot inject light through the telescope. This assumed M3 model is never validated against polarized or unpolarized standard stars; the authors explicitly state that such measurements are future work. Since the least-squares Mueller inversion of the HR 4796 data (Eqs. 17-18) uses this unvalidated M3 term, the calibrated Stokes Q and U images inherit unknown systematic errors from any discrepancy between the real M3 and the idealized silver model, including in the reported on-sky efficiency and IP values. This is a load-bearing uncertainty for the paper's central demonstration, and it should be discussed quantitatively (e.g., a sensitivity analysis of plausible M3 diattenuation/retardance values on the final Q_phi image).
  4. [Sec. 3.4; Table 2] The efficiency and IP values in Table 2 are quoted to one decimal place without any uncertainties. The Mueller-model fit has small MSE (0.1-0.3%), but the derived efficiency/IP values are nonlinear functions of the fitted parameters, and their uncertainties are not estimated (e.g., via covariance propagation or bootstrap). Without error bars, it is impossible to assess whether the reported improvements are statistically significant, particularly for i' and z' where the post-DQWP values are close to 98% and 96%. Adding uncertainties to Table 2 and to the abstract's headline numbers would materially strengthen the claims.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.1] The phrase 'two radial-basis-function (RBF) Gaussian processes' is imprecise; Gaussian process regression with an RBF kernel is the standard terminology, and the text should be clarified to distinguish the kernel from the process.
  2. [Sec. 5.2] The 'optimized offset angle was 1.9' should specify the units (degrees) and define the sign convention for the offset relative to the azimuthal angle theta in Eq. (17).
  3. [Sec. 2.1; Eq. (7)] The symbol X is used both as the vertical-minus-horizontal flux difference and later as Stokes Q or U in the derivation; this overloaded notation is confusing. Suggest using a different symbol for the raw difference, such as D, and reserving X for the Stokes parameter in Eq. (16).
  4. [Sec. 3.3, after Eq. (11)] The matrix product in Eq. (11) lists components from PBS back to telescope, but the text says 'matrix multiplication from right to left' and then gives M = M_PBS * M_Inst * ... * M_Tel; the ordering is correct, but a sentence explicitly noting that this corresponds to light propagating from telescope to detector would help the reader avoid confusion.
  5. [Sec. 5.1] The sentence 'we converted the data to units of e-/s using the camera conversion gain, EM gain, and integration time' would benefit from stating the numerical values of the conversion gain and EM gain for each camera, as these affect the absolute calibration of the Stokes images.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; efficiency/IP are explicitly model-based and externally anchored by the HR 4796 on-sky result.

full rationale

The paper's central chain is not circular. The polarization generator injects known linear states (Sections 3.1-3.2); the single-difference fluxes are raw measured data; the Mueller-matrix model is fitted to those data by minimizing MSE (Eq. 15), with residuals shown in Figures 3 and 8. The reported efficiency and IP are explicitly derived from this fitted model ('From our Mueller-matrix model we can learn a few things about MagAO-X as a polarimeter, namely the polarimetric efficiency and the total instrumental polarization'), and the relevant figures are captioned as 'based on the Mueller-matrix model excluding M3.' This is standard model-based characterization rather than a prediction of independent data, and the DQWP improvement is a before/after comparison over the same calibration protocol, not a forced identity: the grid search optimized a single normalized Q observable, while the reported efficiency combines Q and U terms, so the improvement is not true by construction. The on-sky HR 4796 Stokes Q/Qphi images provide an external benchmark that the calibrated polarimeter detects the expected centrosymmetric disk geometry, and the M3 silver-mirror assumption is explicitly flagged with future standard-star calibration planned; this is an admitted limitation, not a circular input. Self-citations (e.g., refs 21, 23, 27) document prior hardware and the VAMPIRES technique; none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification for the central claim. No step reduces to its own inputs by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 18 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calibration and performance numbers rest on a Mueller-matrix model with 16 fitted parameters, an assumed perfect polarization generator, and idealized component models for M3 and the PBS. No genuinely new physical entities are introduced; the DQWP is a hardware implementation of a known technique.

free parameters (18)
  • δHWP
    Offset to HWP angle telemetry, fitted in Mueller model (Table 1).
  • ηHWP
    Retardance of the HWP, fitted.
  • χM4
    Linear diattenuation of fold mirror M4, fitted.
  • ηM4
    Linear retardance of M4, fitted.
  • δIMR
    Offset to image rotator angle, fitted.
  • χIMR
    Linear diattenuation of IMR, fitted.
  • ηQ_IMR
    Elliptical retardance Q component of IMR, fitted.
  • ηU_IMR
    Elliptical retardance U component of IMR, fitted.
  • ηV_IMR
    Elliptical retardance V component of IMR, fitted.
  • θInst
    Angle of instrument term (periscope), fitted.
  • χInst
    Linear diattenuation of instrument term, fitted.
  • ηQ_Inst
    Elliptical retardance Q component of instrument, fitted.
  • ηU_Inst
    Elliptical retardance U component of instrument, fitted.
  • ηV_Inst
    Elliptical retardance V component of instrument, fitted.
  • χ1
    Diattenuation of PBS for cam sci1, fitted.
  • χ2
    Diattenuation of PBS for cam sci2, fitted.
  • c_Q, c_U
    Scaling factors for ad-hoc instrumental polarization removal in HR 4796 images (Eq. 16).
  • QWP tracking law (RBF interpolants)
    Gaussian process / RBF fits to optimal QWP angles from grid search, used as control law.
assumptions (8)
  • standard math Mueller calculus and Stokes formalism are valid for this polarimetric system.
    Underpins the model in Section 3.3.
  • domain assumption The polarization generator produces 100% linearly polarized light with negligible diattenuation.
    Polarizer extinction ratio >1e3-1e6 is treated as perfect (Section 3.1).
  • domain assumption The HWP is a linear retarder with no diattenuation.
    Model component M_HWP in Section 3.3 and Appendix A.5.
  • domain assumption The PBS is modeled as a diattenuator (Wollaston-like) with separate extinction per camera and no retardance.
    Model component M_PBS in Section 3.3.
  • domain assumption The IMR is an elliptical retarder with linear diattenuation.
    Model component M_IMR in Section 3.3.
  • domain assumption The M3 mirror can be modeled as an idealized silver reflection.
    Used for on-sky calibration in Section 5.1.
  • domain assumption The telescope term M_Tel is known from geometry and not fitted.
    Stated in Section 3.3.
  • domain assumption DQWP compensates IMR crosstalk by reorienting input linear polarization to instrument eigenpolarization.
    Underpins the DQWP concept in Section 4.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Visible-Light High-Contrast Polarimetry with MagAO-X: Characterization and Initial Results." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LUCF46EL

@misc{pith2026260806579,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Visible-Light High-Contrast Polarimetry with MagAO-X: Characterization and Initial Results},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LUCF46EL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06579}
}
read the original abstract

MagAO-X is a visible-light extreme adaptive optics instrument on the 6.5 meter Magellan Clay Telescope, recently upgraded to enable high-contrast polarimetric differential imaging (PDI) in r', i', and z' filters. Polarimetry is a powerful technique for suppressing unpolarized starlight and isolating the faint, polarized signal scattered by circumstellar dust, but it demands precise calibration of instrumental polarization effects introduced by the telescope and instrument optics. We present an overview of the MagAO-X polarimeter and characterize its polarimetric response using a purpose-built polarization generator that injects light of a known polarization state. From these measurements, we fit a Mueller-matrix model of the instrument and quantify its polarimetric efficiency and instrumental polarization as a function of the k-mirror image rotator angle and observing filter. The initial characterization revealed significant, dynamic inefficiencies driven by the image rotator, motivating the deployment of a dual rotating quarter-wave plate (DQWP) compensator that dynamically reorients the input polarization to the instrument's eigenpolarization. Following installation of the DQWP, we measured an average increase in polarimetric efficiency of +17.5% (to 87.4%) and a reduction in instrumental polarization of -5.4% (to 8.3%) across all filters. Finally, we demonstrate the on-sky performance of the polarimeter with i' imaging of the debris disk around HR 4796, producing one of the closest inner-working-angle views of the bright, forward-scattering side of the disk. These results help pave the way for polarimeters on future extremely large telescopes such as GMT and ELT.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06579 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (Left) The HWP stage mounted on the exterior of the MagAO-X enclosure. (Right) The beamsplitter turret [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (Left) A computer model of the polarization generator. (Right) the polarization generator installed on its [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The normalized single-difference fluxes alongside the optimized Mueller-matrix model. The left column shows [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (Left) polarimetric efficiency for each filter as a function of IMR angle based on the Mueller-matrix model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparing the r’ instrumental polarization based on models fit to calibration data injected with unpolarized light. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Surfaces of normalized polarimetric flux (from -1 to 1) as a function of QWP angles. The surfaces are shown with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The optimal QWP angles as a function of IMR angle extracted from the normalized flux surfaces ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Stokes Q (left) and Stokes U (right) images of HR 4796 shown with linear, diverging colormaps. Both images [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Stokes Qϕ (left) and Stokes Uϕ (right) images of HR 4796 shown with linear colormaps. The Qϕ image is effectively the polarized intensity, while the Uϕ image (shown with a diverging colormap) is the effective polarized intensity error. The Uϕ image is scaled to the sa…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Imaging Spectroscopy for Extrasolar Planet Detection,

    Sparks, W. B. and Ford, H. C., “Imaging Spectroscopy for Extrasolar Planet Detection,”Astrophys. J.578, 543 (Oct. 2002)

    work page 2002

  2. [2]

    Direct imaging of exoplanets,

    Traub, W. A. and Oppenheimer, B. R., “Direct imaging of exoplanets,”Exoplanets, 111–156 (Dec. 2010)

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Imaging extrasolar giant planets,

    Bowler, B. P., “Imaging extrasolar giant planets,”Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.128, 102001 (Oct. 2016). arXiv: 1605.02731

    arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Optical and near-infrared view of planet-forming disks and protoplanets,

    Benisty, M., Dominik, C., Follette, K., Garufi, A., Ginski, C., Hashimoto, J., Keppler, M., Kley, W., and Monnier, J., “Optical and near-infrared view of planet-forming disks and protoplanets,” in [Protostars and Planets VII],534, 605, Protostars and Planets VII (July 2023). Conference Name: Protostars and Planets VII Place: eprint: arXiv:2203.09991 ADS B...

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Observations of Protoplanetary Disk Structures,

    Andrews, S. M., “Observations of Protoplanetary Disk Structures,”Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.58, 483–528 (Aug. 2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Planet-Disk Interaction and Orbital Evolution,

    Kley, W. and Nelson, R. P., “Planet-Disk Interaction and Orbital Evolution,”Annu. Rev. Astron. Astro- phys.50, 211–249 (Sept. 2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    How Bright are Planet-induced Spiral Arms in Scattered Light?,

    Dong, R. and Fung, J., “How Bright are Planet-induced Spiral Arms in Scattered Light?,”Astrophys. J.835, 38 (Jan. 2017). ADS Bibcode: 2017ApJ...835...38D

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    What is the Mass of a Gap-opening Planet?,

    Dong, R. and Fung, J., “What is the Mass of a Gap-opening Planet?,”Astrophys. J.835, 146 (Feb. 2017). ADS Bibcode: 2017ApJ...835..146D

    work page 2017

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Extreme adaptive optics,

    Guyon, O., “Extreme adaptive optics,”Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.56, 315–355 (Sept. 2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Effect of dust size and structure on scattered-light images of protoplanetary discs,

    Tazaki, R., Tanaka, H., Muto, T., Kataoka, A., and Okuzumi, S., “Effect of dust size and structure on scattered-light images of protoplanetary discs,”MNRAS485, 4951–4966 (June 2019). ADS Bibcode: 2019MNRAS.485.4951T

    2019

  3. [11]

    Imaging polarimetric observations of a new circumstellar disk system,

    Kuhn, J. R., Potter, D., and Parise, B., “Imaging polarimetric observations of a new circumstellar disk system,”Astrophys. J.553, L189 (May 2001)

    2001

  4. [12]

    A new algorithm for point-spread func- tion subtraction in high-contrast imaging: a demonstration with angular differential imaging,

    Lafreni` ere, D., Marois, C., Doyon, R., Nadeau, D., and Artigau,´E., “A new algorithm for point-spread func- tion subtraction in high-contrast imaging: a demonstration with angular differential imaging,”Astrophys. J.660, 770–780 (May 2007)

    2007

  5. [13]

    Detection and characterization of exoplanets and disks using projections on karhunen-lo` eve eigenimages,

    Soummer, R., Pueyo, L., and Larkin, J., “Detection and characterization of exoplanets and disks using projections on karhunen-lo` eve eigenimages,”Astrophys. J. Lett.755, L28 (Aug. 2012)

    2012

  6. [14]

    Multiple spiral arms in the disk around intermediate-mass binary HD 34700A,

    Monnier, J. D., Harries, T. J., Bae, J., Setterholm, B. R., Laws, A., Aarnio, A., Adams, F. C., Andrews, S., Calvet, N., Espaillat, C., Hartmann, L., Kraus, S., McClure, M., Miller, C., Oppenheimer, R., Wilner, D., and Zhu, Z., “Multiple spiral arms in the disk around intermed...

    2019

  7. [15]

    Quantitative polarimetry of the disk around HD 169142,

    Tschudi, C. and Schmid, H. M., “Quantitative polarimetry of the disk around HD 169142,”A & A655, A37 (Nov. 2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Quantitative polarimetry for the transition disk in RX J1604.3- 213010,

    Ma, J., Schmid, H. M., and Tschudi, C., “Quantitative polarimetry for the transition disk in RX J1604.3- 213010,”A & A676, A6 (Aug. 2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Accurate optical polarimetry on the nasmyth platform,

    Tinbergen, J., “Accurate optical polarimetry on the nasmyth platform,”Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.119(862), 1371–1384 (2007)

    2007

  10. [18]

    Polarimetry with the gemini planet imager: methods, performance at first light, and the circumstellar ring around hr 4796a,

    Perrin, M. D., Duchene, G., Millar-Blanchaer, M., Fitzgerald, M. P., Graham, J. R., Wiktorowicz, S. J., Kalas, P. G., Macintosh, B., Bauman, B., Cardwell, A., Chilcote, J., Rosa, R. J. D., Dillon, D., Doyon, R., Dunn, J., Erikson, D., Gavel, D., Goodsell, S., Hartung, M., Hibo...

    2015

  11. [19]

    Polarimetric imaging mode of VLT/SPHERE/IRDIS - II. Characterization and correction of instrumental polarization effects,,

    Holstein, R. G. v., Girard, J. H., Boer, J. d., Snik, F., Milli, J., Stam, D. M., Ginski, C., Mouillet, D., Wahhaj, Z., Schmid, H. M., Keller, C. U., Langlois, M., Dohlen, K., Vigan, A., Pohl, A., Carbillet, M., Fantinel, D., Maurel, D., Orign´ e, A., Petit, C., Ramos, J., Rig...

    2020

  12. [20]

    Calibration of the instrumental polarization effects of SCExAO- CHARIS’ spectropolarimetric mode,

    Holstein, R. G. v., Bos, S. P., Ruigrok, J., Lozi, J., Guyon, O., Norris, B., Snik, F., Chilcote, J., Currie, T., Groff, T. D., Hart, J. t., Jovanovic, N., Kasdin, J., Kudo, T., Martinache, F., Mazin, B., Sahoo, A., Tamura, M., Vievard, S., Walter, A., and Zhang, J., “Calibrat...

    2020

  13. [21]

    Characterizing the instrument polarization of SCExAO V AMPIRES,

    Zhang, M., Millar-Blanchaer, M., Safonov, B., Lucas, M., Lilley, L., Ashcraft, J., Norris, B., Lozi, J., Guyon, O., and Bottom, M., “Characterizing the instrument polarization of SCExAO V AMPIRES,” in [Techniques and Instrumentation for Detection of Exoplanets XI],12680, 261–2...

    2023

  14. [22]

    MagAO-X first light,

    Males, J. R., Close, L. M., Guyon, O., Hedglen, A. D., Gorkom, K. V., Long, J. D., Kautz, M., Lumbres, J., Schatz, L., Rodack, A., Miller, K., Doelman, D., Snik, F., Bos, S., Knight, J. M., Morzinski, K., Gasho, V., Keller, C., Haffert, S., and Pearce, L., “MagAO-X first light...

    2020

  15. [23]

    Concept, implementation, and on-sky commissioning of the AO polarimetric module on MagAO-X,

    Souza, T. G. B. d., Close, L. M., Li, J., Pereira, R., Haffert, S. Y., Males, J. R., Kueny, J., Kautz, M. Y., Long, J. D., Liberman, J., Twitchell, K., Johnson, P., Guyon, O., McEwen, E., Hedglen, A. D., Tonucci, E., and Mars, M., “Concept, implementation, and on-sky commissio...

    2025

  16. [24]

    Updating the scexao/charis polarimetric calibration following the nasmyth beam-switcher upgrade,

    McIntosh, T., Zhang, M., Lewis, B. L., Lucas, M., and Millar-Blanchaer, M. A., “Updating the scexao/charis polarimetric calibration following the nasmyth beam-switcher upgrade,” in [Space Telescopes and Instru- mentation 2026: Adaptive Optics Systems], SPIE (July 2026). arXiv:...

    2026 arXiv

  17. [25]

    The V AM- PIRES instrument: imaging the innermost regions of protoplanetary discs with polarimetric interferometry,

    Norris, B., Schworer, G., Tuthill, P., Jovanovic, N., Guyon, O., Stewart, P., and Martinache, F., “The V AM- PIRES instrument: imaging the innermost regions of protoplanetary discs with polarimetric interferometry,” MNRAS447, 2894–2906 (Mar. 2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    Full characterization of the instrumental polarization effects of the spectropolarimetric mode of SCExAO-CHARIS,

    Joost ‘t Hart, G. J., van Holstein, R. G., Bos, S. P., Ruigrok, J., Snik, F., Lozi, J., Guyon, O., Kudo, T., Zhang, J., Jovanovic, N., Norris, B., Martinod, M.-A., Groff, T. D., Chilcote, J., Currie, T., Tamura, M., Vievard, S., Sahoo, A., Deo, V., Ahn, K., Martinache, F., and...

    2021

  19. [27]

    Visible-light high-contrast imaging and polarimetry with SCExAO/V AMPIRES,

    Lucas, M., Norris, B., Guyon, O., Bottom, M., Deo, V., Vievard, S., Lozi, J., Ahn, K., Ashcraft, J., Cur- rie, T., Doelman, D., Kudo, T., Leboulleux, L., Lilley, L., Millar-Blanchaer, M., Safonov, B., Tuthill, P., Uyama, T., Walk, A., and Zhang, M., “Visible-light high-contras...

    2024

  20. [28]

    Speckle suppression through dual imaging polarimetry, and a ground-based image of the hr 4796a circumstellar disk,

    Hinkley, S., Oppenheimer, B. R., Soummer, R., Brenner, D., Graham, J. R., Perrin, M. D., Sivaramakrish- nan, A., Lloyd, J. P., Roberts, L. C., and Kuhn, J., “Speckle suppression through dual imaging polarimetry, and a ground-based image of the hr 4796a circumstellar disk,”Astr...

    2009

  21. [29]

    Near-infrared scattered light properties of the HR 4796 A dust ring - A measured scattering phase function from 13.6°to 166.6°,

    Milli, J., Vigan, A., Mouillet, D., Lagrange, A.-M., Augereau, J.-C., Pinte, C., Mawet, D., Schmid, H. M., Boccaletti, A., Matr` a, L., Kral, Q., Ertel, S., Chauvin, G., Bazzon, A., M´ enard, F., Beuzit, J.-L., Thalmann, C., Dominik, C., Feldt, M., Henning, T., Min, M., Girard...

    2017

  22. [30]

    Optical polarised phase function of the HR 4796A dust ring,

    Milli, J., Engler, N., Schmid, H. M., Olofsson, J., M´ enard, F., Kral, Q., Boccaletti, A., Th´ ebault, P., Choquet, E., Mouillet, D., Lagrange, A.-M., Augereau, J.-C., Pinte, C., Chauvin, G., Dominik, C., Perrot, C., Zurlo, A., Henning, T., Beuzit, J.-L., Avenhaus, H., Bazzon...

    2019

  23. [31]

    Precision photometric and astrometric calibration using alternating satellite speckles,

    Sahoo, A., Guyon, O., Lozi, J., Chilcote, J., Jovanovic, N., Brandt, T., Groff, T., and Martinache, F., “Precision photometric and astrometric calibration using alternating satellite speckles,”Astron. J.159, 250 (May 2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Closed-loop atmospheric dispersion correction for high contrast imaging with magao-x,

    Twitchell, K., Haffert, S., Males, J., Close, L., and Lucas, M., “Closed-loop atmospheric dispersion correction for high contrast imaging with magao-x,” in [Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2026: Adaptive Optics Systems], SPIE (in prep 2026)

    2026

  25. [33]

    Computer vision applications for coronagraphic optical alignment and image processing,

    Savransky, D., Thomas, S. J., Poyneer, L. A., and Macintosh, B. A., “Computer vision applications for coronagraphic optical alignment and image processing,”Appl. Opt.52, 3394 (May 2013). ADS Bibcode: 2013ApOpt..52.3394S

    2013

  26. [34]

    SEEDS ADAPTIVE OPTICS IMAGING OF THE ASYMMETRIC TRANSITION DISK OPH IRS 48 IN SCATTERED LIGHT*,

    Follette, K. B., Grady, C. A., Swearingen, J. R., Sitko, M. L., Champney, E. H., van der Marel, N., Takami, M., Kuchner, M. J., Close, L. M., Muto, T., Mayama, S., McElwain, M. W., Fukagawa, M., Maaskant, K., Min, M., Russell, R. W., Kudo, T., Kusakabe, N., Hashimoto, J., Abe,...

    2015

  27. [35]

    Disks around T tauri stars with SPHERE (DARTTS-S). I. SPHERE/IRDIS polarimetric imaging of eight prominent T tauri disks,

    Avenhaus, H., Quanz, S. P., Garufi, A., Perez, S., Casassus, S., Pinte, C., Bertrang, G. H. M., Caceres, C., Benisty, M., and Dominik, C., “Disks around T tauri stars with SPHERE (DARTTS-S). I. SPHERE/IRDIS polarimetric imaging of eight prominent T tauri disks,”Astrophys. J.86...

    2018

  28. [36]

    Polarimetric differential imaging with VLT/NACO - A comprehensive PDI pipeline for NACO data (PIPPIN),

    de Regt, S., Ginski, C., Kenworthy, M. A., Caceres, C., Garufi, A., Gledhill, T. M., Hales, A. S., Huelamo, N., K´ osp´ al,´A., Millar-Blanchaer, M. A., P´ erez, S., and Schreiber, M. R., “Polarimetric differential imaging with VLT/NACO - A comprehensive PDI pipeline for NACO ...

    2024

  29. [37]

    Limb polarization of Uranus and neptune - I. Imaging polarimetry and comparison with analytic models,

    Schmid, H. M., Joos, F., and Tschan, D., “Limb polarization of Uranus and neptune - I. Imaging polarimetry and comparison with analytic models,”A & A452, 657–668 (June 2006). Number: 2

    2006

  30. [38]

    Giant Magellan Telescope: overview,

    Johns, M., McCarthy, P., Raybould, K., Bouchez, A., Farahani, A., Filgueira, J., Jacoby, G., Shectman, S., and Sheehan, M., “Giant Magellan Telescope: overview,” in [Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes IV], 8444, 526–541, SPIE (Sept. 2012)

    2012

  31. [39]

    The European Extremely Large Telescope (E-ELT),

    Gilmozzi, R. and Spyromilio, J., “The European Extremely Large Telescope (E-ELT),”Messenger127, 11 (Mar. 2007). ADS Bibcode: 2007Msngr.127...11G

    2007

  32. [40]

    Polarization-dependent beam shifts upon metallic reflection in high-contrast imagers and telescopes,

    van Holstein, R. G., Keller, C. U., Snik, F., and Bos, S. P., “Polarization-dependent beam shifts upon metallic reflection in high-contrast imagers and telescopes,”Astronomy and Astrophysics677, A150 (Sept. 2023). ADS Bibcode: 2023A&A...677A.150V. APPENDIX A. MUELLER MA TRICES...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.