Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Partitioned vs. Integrated Planning of Hinterland Networks for LCL Transportation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.10345 v1 pith:LUSATX2H submitted 2022-11-15 math.OC

classification math.OC
keywords hinterlandnetworksproblemtransportationportshipmentsconsolidationintegrated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Utilizing existing transportation networks better and designing (parts of) networks involves routing decisions to minimize transportation costs and maximize consolidation effects. We study the concrete example of hinterland networks for the truck-transportation of less-than-container-load (LCL) ocean freight shipments: A set of LCL shipments is given. They have to be routed through the hinterland network to be transported to an origin port and finally to the destination port via ship. On their way, they can be consolidated in hubs to full-container-load (FCL) shipments. The overall transportation cost depends on the selection of the origin port and the routing and consolidation in the hinterland network. A problem of this type appears for the global logistics provider DB Schenker. We translate the business problem into a hub location problem, describe it mathematically, and discuss solution strategies. As a result, an integrated modeling approach has several advantages over solving a simplified version of the problem, although it requires more computational effort.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools