Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks

As of 15 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 58 of 58 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2505.23820.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2505.23820 v1

Coverage vector

measured 58 of 58 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:56.226957Z

measured 58 of 58 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

58 of 58 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact0
  • verified fuzzy33
  • unresolved23
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier1
  • metadata mismatch1

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation e49bc5aa-211c-4f7f-b441-31228fdc7075 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Unresolved cited work

Reference 1

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:05.540791Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:52.198871Z digest=sha256:89078bba0614dfb353c2804666db569d99b943232817fccd2400ba43d9ee93a8

Observation 3f77f499-1fbb-4bd2-9442-efb880faa316 · outbound

This paper cites arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.13341.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.13341

Reference 2

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:51.247273Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:51.247273Z digest=sha256:d1d6b68bf6d9d481253a52c473ca8a3e9c976d2019e40633fb4d2a5ef004c252

Observation f2b73356-9bf0-4845-bf90-087e6e8af349 · outbound

This paper cites JuStRank: Benchmarking LLM Judges for System Ranking.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks JuStRank: Benchmarking LLM Judges for System Ranking

Reference 3

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:51.306832Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:51.306832Z digest=sha256:6612dbd353000eb1fe40ab1b917aaf860d5c87c3b5a3669b5206eefff1f03f8b

Observation fc38fd31-2c52-43f1-8486-9e496d0c59b7 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Unresolved cited work

Reference 4

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:01.517640Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:54.253934Z digest=sha256:d155954169e56dd8bb1730247811e2ffbd73937b2adedfee68225fb50502fa6c

Observation 21675b91-42b0-4346-8d5c-3efa541a0428 · outbound

This paper cites Annotation alignment: Comparing LLM and human annotations of conversational safety.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Annotation alignment: Comparing LLM and human annotations of conversational safety

Reference 5

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:51.453586Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:51.453586Z digest=sha256:2db258dcbe01363a974d27ab57b2a0e95331179be862fbeb4535a566b1ca2419

Observation 2cffc3f0-5379-4b31-9312-d2577b244163 · outbound

This paper cites What Can We Learn from Collective Human Opinions on Natural Language Inference Data?.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks What Can We Learn from Collective Human Opinions on Natural Language Inference Data?

Reference 6

Resolution
metadata mismatch
local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:56.621840Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:51.516077Z digest=sha256:8bbb85a6c4933a2a2857be56ae9f803f0d839f8dd8d611119c6cb464b06a3099

Observation 7d507328-e78d-4e2e-a586-1182f6b83ec3 · outbound

This paper cites In The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks In The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems

Reference 8

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:05.737127Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:51.658237Z digest=sha256:0480a2dd15bfa8c214b0a1931f618070defec39335838cd20c7f1906e78a20f8

Observation cf414de8-f5cb-4774-a741-0368a7daa066 · outbound

This paper cites LLM Agents Grounded in Self-Reports Enable General-Purpose Simulation of Individuals.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks LLM Agents Grounded in Self-Reports Enable General-Purpose Simulation of Individuals

Reference 9

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:51.716422Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:51.716422Z digest=sha256:8cadfbe22acb37f6ef12ec8ea370b182386a24d0358387fc163fe9d9d8d8b0a8

Observation 4c27bcdb-3240-4fa8-9836-28e435a06b05 · outbound

This paper cites Large language models that replace human participants can harmfully misportray and flatten identity groups.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Large language models that replace human participants can harmfully misportray and flatten identity groups

Reference 11

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:51.785827Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:51.785827Z digest=sha256:75a2764b8609a2aff35462044aecc822ea91a43eefd2ed72015ebde1e55517d8

Observation 63d4d49b-d07f-41a1-9d27-ce35964f4831 · outbound

This paper cites Characterizing LLM Abstention Behavior in Science QA with Context Perturbations.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Characterizing LLM Abstention Behavior in Science QA with Context Perturbations

Reference 12

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:51.792519Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:51.792519Z digest=sha256:8c72f799f61e703127b062acaf8bdc4764fad561302f2703dcda85b2d2da74bd

Observation 6e402fa4-2599-4dcc-aea5-eeadf9694d1a · outbound

This paper cites Justice or Prejudice? Quantifying Biases in LLM-as-a-Judge.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Justice or Prejudice? Quantifying Biases in LLM-as-a-Judge

Reference 14

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:51.933537Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:51.933537Z digest=sha256:53ef8604cd15babf392d54a1420e8c3a0d872a22cf76e8562bf76eee4599c672

Observation 02c8fd81-3950-4342-8506-651c0e1ea80d · outbound

This paper cites JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judges.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judges

Reference 15

Resolution
malformed identifier
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:52.045926Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:52.045926Z digest=sha256:2b8d922916387f2d74d0f586016c315fbd8b3888f0d659708ae6206ec0fa8012

Observation 87fc5299-aab7-4786-aa38-016554b34663 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Unresolved cited work

Reference 17

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:05.391789Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:52.335115Z digest=sha256:2c5bb332b055b4af94fac0b81b1c5fd35a2b95707ef0b0cfeb39bf00ed3dd9dc

Observation edc56f97-4417-4bf0-a00b-c96599f4eb04 · outbound

This paper cites My final verdict is tie : [[ A = B ]].

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks My final verdict is tie : [[ A = B ]]

Reference 18

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:05.196566Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:52.473228Z digest=sha256:b360d2f1b9dfb97dec1ea6ffc38f5b7a0053d440e3027f667455e0c7f92a3b6d

Observation 4a06cd92-38dd-4fac-a41d-7386c45e40b7 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Unresolved cited work

Reference 19

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:04.995415Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:52.558078Z digest=sha256:ec564af48e9ed081c2fe1b0bfa57f47ec3299db730340133cfb273ffa8f16852

Observation 1305ecb8-7554-400d-b560-1547823314d2 · outbound

This paper cites ’ s e c o n d _ r o u n d _ t h i n k i n g : ’1.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks ’ s e c o n d _ r o u n d _ t h i n k i n g : ’1

Reference 20

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:04.806792Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:52.646210Z digest=sha256:2f9ccf624056facf129b1841321ef97ba712c3c75cad2f2668f9234bf9c7e2ea

Observation a0b37465-7286-4734-afb6-f3681da22be2 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Unresolved cited work

Reference 21

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:04.621820Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:52.788332Z digest=sha256:dc27d63d56a257721aea42c1c7346522c3c79b50a8dff436d9baf31679577045

Observation 9ca24958-c0ad-457e-aa0a-f350c2706708 · outbound

This paper cites ’ n th _ r ou n d _t h i nk i n g : ’1.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks ’ n th _ r ou n d _t h i nk i n g : ’1

Reference 22

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:04.183640Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:52.901625Z digest=sha256:4d9db81811ab1272dabd059e141bfaa908e78f92621a57d213aa484c467c3c1b

Observation 42e71d4d-b094-44eb-a439-1a437add77f7 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Unresolved cited work

Reference 23

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:03.920368Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:52.991743Z digest=sha256:26b2e4a28e6a27d3a8c53dd5d9d42e2c52e1ac8e1dcb43f365abfb3bd2acbfd6

Observation e566b718-2988-49ad-b480-50cd2fee701c · outbound

This paper cites < QUESTION >.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks < QUESTION >

Reference 24

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:03.792658Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:53.107554Z digest=sha256:b6ed374331378572b6690ff1b94bc78b9454cc309949208fb95272cf41f01973

Observation ccec10ec-ea24-471c-bca3-4bdcc3982f97 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Unresolved cited work

Reference 25

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:03.652403Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:53.213588Z digest=sha256:b5538b2222a5b6a8a54447ed7244b60dd23b6e45ac7499e2967277ed5db215d7

Observation a842de72-971a-4ad0-8b95-fa6880ff80a0 · outbound

This paper cites Answer : <A | B | Tie >.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Answer : <A | B | Tie >

Reference 26

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:03.433289Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:53.294864Z digest=sha256:ca916eb2283fc8467530c688b883c3974e800e8cdf1435df4a9d0316569234a3

Observation 39271214-bae8-4c91-a5eb-9498da4544c3 · outbound

This paper cites A well - balanced vegetarian diet can provide all necessary nutrients while reducing the intake of saturated fats and cholesterol commonly found in meat.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks A well - balanced vegetarian diet can provide all necessary nutrients while reducing the intake of saturated fats and cholesterol commonly found in meat

Reference 27

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:03.192908Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:53.378683Z digest=sha256:605fc3131c2a7b761f24c341e71b2aefc15f08832ee70f75c6b8dac90101489e

Observation 8399c1de-1721-4402-8606-293148468377 · outbound

This paper cites Reducing meat consumption can help mitigate climate change and promote environmental sustainability.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Reducing meat consumption can help mitigate climate change and promote environmental sustainability

Reference 28

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:03.002015Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:53.455120Z digest=sha256:bbfea10ec253f66c2e247c39a248a3084c4b7bd8e24c6eccd046772577295663

Observation 2c489002-c111-475a-8c67-01f63069d7b1 · outbound

This paper cites ** Arguments against becoming vegetarian :**.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks ** Arguments against becoming vegetarian :**

Reference 29

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:02.816187Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:53.547909Z digest=sha256:0069bcdc03c08b78a89757298aff0c664370803571d1c04ff64f93a11ff5a946

Observation 44fac053-eb38-498a-83f5-6b7f75137682 · outbound

This paper cites Some people may find it challenging to meet their nutritional needs without animal products.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Some people may find it challenging to meet their nutritional needs without animal products

Reference 30

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:02.614414Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:53.655416Z digest=sha256:a03a96041bdc86c62dc1691723781c726fe6af0c0cd25483aa5c089f8d9682f8

Observation 36550dcc-5644-45ba-bb60-eb9f6695c8d0 · outbound

This paper cites For many , meat consumption is an integral part of their culinary heritage and lifestyle , making the transition to vegetarianism difficult.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks For many , meat consumption is an integral part of their culinary heritage and lifestyle , making the transition to vegetarianism difficult

Reference 31

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:02.455890Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:53.745399Z digest=sha256:c1e115af77a998e9216077abd7c8ccaceb0c9261222354d7ed54b4b5306a967c

Observation 3536b335-f87a-4f5e-b46b-ee1e6a1b475b · outbound

This paper cites vegetarian diets are healthful, nutritionally adequate, and may provide health benefits in the prevention and treatment of certain diseases.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks vegetarian diets are healthful, nutritionally adequate, and may provide health benefits in the prevention and treatment of certain diseases

Reference 32

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:02.300526Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:53.838113Z digest=sha256:6dbc19d69be5b1eab80a24625bfe8b2bb1d59a3ffab8ccceae1d123c09df0b92

Observation b11f410c-843e-4368-87ea-a4682e031cf7 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Unresolved cited work

Reference 33

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:02.105834Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:53.958113Z digest=sha256:b3a7ce01c3081c1de5fe80c1313641b70f8e3947c290fc1c76984bad2c55166e

Observation 7dd14c1b-ade5-4cc1-bdf3-2d9674ee9179 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Unresolved cited work

Reference 34

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:01.897132Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:54.041642Z digest=sha256:9a150e912c19be73e88351bd5b77e69f5dcabd41d4b77ca86fac5589e8414b3e

Observation 8bb22c86-493f-4b6e-adb5-8cf49842c860 · outbound

This paper cites Each point is supported with specific data or statements from authoritative sources.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Each point is supported with specific data or statements from authoritative sources

Reference 35

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:01.673493Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:54.169863Z digest=sha256:ec8f519b091fb6f64e3a89ea2fd86d2484f9bceed39581214f2fe5881021d827

Observation 48d6d194-dfa2-4ced-83de-382302f83637 · outbound

This paper cites Sustainable.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Sustainable

Reference 37

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:01.371413Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:54.292221Z digest=sha256:90d0bfd9576e7f70d983a04664133b0b0e6ce33adf0905e0c946a09e2441ea19

Observation 9dfead65-7162-449a-ab20-cb0fcb312a9c · outbound

This paper cites - Provides specific health benefits ( lower risks of heart disease , diabetes , and certain cancers ) and environmental impacts (14.5% of human - induced emissions from livestock ).

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks - Provides specific health benefits ( lower risks of heart disease , diabetes , and certain cancers ) and environmental impacts (14.5% of human - induced emissions from livestock )

Reference 38

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:01.136436Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:54.361994Z digest=sha256:2df1e70597e63751d18527f0130d129c9d427985a82088103e0ef628e6b676f2

Observation c20f00fc-6b09-4b32-8589-d1dc92199e52 · outbound

This paper cites - Points out the cultural and traditional significance of meat , which is a valid consideration in dietary choices.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks - Points out the cultural and traditional significance of meat , which is a valid consideration in dietary choices

Reference 39

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:00.940709Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:54.451361Z digest=sha256:01a91f9e234ca5434b022461855b4913c3c6a83d73189eb0a3d49b8878865b77

Observation 9f60ae74-2164-4b5e-88c2-6d11d1eefe9e · outbound

This paper cites - Debater B acknowledges the benefits but emphasizes potential nutrient deficiencies , which can be mitigated with fortified foods and supplements as Debater A argues.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks - Debater B acknowledges the benefits but emphasizes potential nutrient deficiencies , which can be mitigated with fortified foods and supplements as Debater A argues

Reference 40

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:00.760151Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:54.552425Z digest=sha256:16a410c21795672255c9f35e1daa67846b48ee90a0267bdb81b2d80833895caf

Observation b2f87fa3-98dd-4bee-ad9c-7c36db336010 · outbound

This paper cites Vegetarianism can address these issues.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Vegetarianism can address these issues

Reference 41

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:00.545549Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:54.641608Z digest=sha256:b7be981407cf7816243f208b27629ab1c78f15516aa3aa394b9840c68dc2a2ea

Observation b378906f-d509-4220-9b8e-c8a7e299c426 · outbound

This paper cites Health benefits : Reduced risk of chronic diseases.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Health benefits : Reduced risk of chronic diseases

Reference 42

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:00.387523Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:54.732572Z digest=sha256:d78f7bf2947c75d185e735c825130fdd3ef94007177b501ae638de00523eff06

Observation 6ffaeb5d-981a-4e18-afc1-308754cf88a8 · outbound

This paper cites Studies showing lower rates of heart disease , diabetes , and cancer in vegetarians.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Studies showing lower rates of heart disease , diabetes , and cancer in vegetarians

Reference 43

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:24:00.159499Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:54.809964Z digest=sha256:99270b61081b32129aaebd9e150e7768560be6350115c42f7dd7fbddb8f84d93

Observation 91ea1871-2500-4858-9b4e-48e291a58c30 · outbound

This paper cites A balanced diet , including both plant and animal products , is essential for many individuals.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks A balanced diet , including both plant and animal products , is essential for many individuals

Reference 44

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:59.969331Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:54.882287Z digest=sha256:43b183dd9ea229fa24b78f4e0d8b1c9f40ebf0c050b145767c9b6b5e97775674

Observation 4423ddec-262f-48a9-bc98-7722a7aadc0a · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Unresolved cited work

Reference 45

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:59.691057Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:55.005224Z digest=sha256:8fc958e1e62ea7ee223b1318342b89eb9eba2d7fcaedb25a7fdd08474eae3f20

Observation 2ddf008e-8663-4a8b-95a9-e2601d2bb7cd · outbound

This paper cites - Improved livestock farming techniques reducing environmental damage.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks - Improved livestock farming techniques reducing environmental damage

Reference 46

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:59.474524Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:55.101106Z digest=sha256:dc184aa76d5eea27d5eb381984d78c1d6b6147ec61d52064ab00682a9c130e37

Observation f42632c3-3a49-4c05-a400-9fe77f46cbcc · outbound

This paper cites - Overestimating the effectiveness of sustainable livestock farming.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks - Overestimating the effectiveness of sustainable livestock farming

Reference 47

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:59.286217Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:55.169944Z digest=sha256:591577b53d2855024ba3fc65f7860f0d43e86386821714b91dd5cd2048149461

Observation 6f4b7293-350d-435d-9155-fd6117ef4874 · outbound

This paper cites - Point out that sustainable livestock farming is not widespread and still poses significant environmental issues.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks - Point out that sustainable livestock farming is not widespread and still poses significant environmental issues

Reference 48

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:59.085126Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:55.251766Z digest=sha256:7470522c37957e5b17e151ae438440d90c75f9ba4afe64ad4e755765255d6fc2

Observation d2ff8f3c-3cb9-4d31-8f87-7d29d66f14b3 · outbound

This paper cites - Data showing the limited impact of sustainable livestock farming.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks - Data showing the limited impact of sustainable livestock farming

Reference 49

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:58.896969Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:55.391553Z digest=sha256:bf01bf82332cdc99896053841d4f31bb3097515e1dea07e72f9975ec0c320845

Observation 2be4732f-8c8d-47e8-bfa0-d334e9b4fac2 · outbound

This paper cites - Environmental impact of livestock farming can be mitigated by sustainable practices.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks - Environmental impact of livestock farming can be mitigated by sustainable practices

Reference 50

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:58.639251Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:55.484000Z digest=sha256:7461a468f28d084e791a5a9529b9e0e4a6cb841c70322af8d803d7cbaeb0eae6

Observation d82e4db8-9c56-4cf8-8a04-6e11c52ff28f · outbound

This paper cites - Emphasize the improvements in sustainable farming practices and lower - impact meat alternatives.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks - Emphasize the improvements in sustainable farming practices and lower - impact meat alternatives

Reference 51

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:58.481379Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:55.602716Z digest=sha256:0a48da7ce96e07facd9cbd7d3c2eeef3d1dc4e4cb5b567daa1586907aaca6ca1

Observation c8eca3db-7460-40d3-a814-2ca968ebec09 · outbound

This paper cites - Evidence of sustainable livestock practices.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks - Evidence of sustainable livestock practices

Reference 52

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:58.223451Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:55.701122Z digest=sha256:a3c9a54d22faef53676c39db50fd897db930170b4441d5786846b08a6dd6303d

Observation b8d450aa-7c33-4977-af96-c17692594ec7 · outbound

This paper cites - Sustainable livestock practices reduce environmental impact.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks - Sustainable livestock practices reduce environmental impact

Reference 53

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:58.035083Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:55.771483Z digest=sha256:4579a4442247cec614dfe34bd1964f7160a202ec80a0a967da22d3b7312cf7f1

Observation a137c67a-4015-4e0a-afb5-51a710f8ce98 · outbound

This paper cites - Sustainable livestock practices are not as effective and widespread as needed.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks - Sustainable livestock practices are not as effective and widespread as needed

Reference 54

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:57.816775Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:55.883892Z digest=sha256:025e68271032aeeb279cada4f9d2715105fe02570e510ba7f2703588331de67d

Observation e1b2a6a8-833a-4012-82ea-6f80c7c62f57 · outbound

This paper cites - Studies on the actual environmental impact of ‘‘ sustainable ’ ’ livestock practices.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks - Studies on the actual environmental impact of ‘‘ sustainable ’ ’ livestock practices

Reference 55

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:57.606934Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:55.960083Z digest=sha256:882a31800fc8824bc902544845cdca2e0a1cf6269992f769c0f2295bf6fb65aa

Observation 404a1f7d-39f5-4a31-bebf-715c691c9046 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Unresolved cited work

Reference 56

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:57.413271Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:56.048395Z digest=sha256:de7d5558a5c7dedc5eef9f454d318c09677e8398bde70159a3de4e24dc21ad3f

Observation 107a26db-ab5f-43f9-9715-1138da8db922 · outbound

This paper cites - Sustainable livestock practices are growing , and innovations are reducing environmental footprints effectively.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks - Sustainable livestock practices are growing , and innovations are reducing environmental footprints effectively

Reference 57

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:57.225097Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:56.157801Z digest=sha256:c6f342c8489341d1d04bdb26c472f47d60426dbc349e2c85944cbd8023c418c1

Observation ada4928e-8213-427e-a0c8-3fa78f8c54af · outbound

This paper cites You should always know why you do things.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks You should always know why you do things

Reference 58

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:57.002755Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:56.226957Z digest=sha256:d22f3ad5fa9ef4c33fcce2ff4a05e93ebca3836f526679de747ca8fc0f1b2d67

Observation fad9e950-0625-4afc-9a8e-724ea7bc4716 · outbound

This paper cites LLM-as-a-Judge & Reward Model: What They Can and Cannot Do.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks LLM-as-a-Judge & Reward Model: What They Can and Cannot Do

Reference 2001

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:51.778830Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:51.778830Z digest=sha256:cde132b30770f0350577d8314a6bcb6d40f82f03165ff0d1e46f89b523f4d78e

Observation a01fedc5-c6b4-4bc9-9208-1279ac3466e3 · outbound

This paper cites Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judge.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judge

Reference 2018

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:51.799718Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:51.799718Z digest=sha256:c9e644df1249dc8a178e37e2f4596ead54a872f4b113fc9595e1561c80892bdf

Observation 487ff4ce-77a9-460c-ae37-99a31a85c4a9 · outbound

This paper cites Human-Centered Design Recommendations for LLM-as-a-Judge.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Human-Centered Design Recommendations for LLM-as-a-Judge

Reference 2022

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:51.588167Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:51.588167Z digest=sha256:e86298057b3f949b596d69f43e6f7a79e3a5c9c0cc3a0b6abf83275ba944a6bb

Observation 2b02863d-5263-42b6-8999-d83640697296 · outbound

This paper cites Human and LLM Biases in Hate Speech Annotations: A Socio-Demographic Analysis of Annotators and Targets.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Human and LLM Biases in Hate Speech Annotations: A Socio-Demographic Analysis of Annotators and Targets

Reference 2023

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:51.382539Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:51.382539Z digest=sha256:3bdf5c8c023ee4adf6d15c3a124f8b8c028757b875d69c90b042fb5687c2e343

Observation 37ef0adc-7ad1-47a0-a10f-9c515876f026 · outbound

This paper cites Can LLM be a Personalized Judge?.

Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Can LLM be a Personalized Judge?

Reference 2024

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:51.198521Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T13:23:51.198521Z digest=sha256:611460f6bc76f500d7f3da8efe7c8adaa1860362b25a043fad87df99bbfc9874

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.