REVIEW 2 cited by
CLMASP: Coupling Large Language Models with Answer Set Programming for Robotic Task Planning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) possess extensive foundational knowledge and moderate reasoning abilities, making them suitable for general task planning in open-world scenarios. However, it is challenging to ground a LLM-generated plan to be executable for the specified robot with certain restrictions. This paper introduces CLMASP, an approach that couples LLMs with Answer Set Programming (ASP) to overcome the limitations, where ASP is a non-monotonic logic programming formalism renowned for its capacity to represent and reason about a robot's action knowledge. CLMASP initiates with a LLM generating a basic skeleton plan, which is subsequently tailored to the specific scenario using a vector database. This plan is then refined by an ASP program with a robot's action knowledge, which integrates implementation details into the skeleton, grounding the LLM's abstract outputs in practical robot contexts. Our experiments conducted on the VirtualHome platform demonstrate CLMASP's efficacy. Compared to the baseline executable rate of under 2% with LLM approaches, CLMASP significantly improves this to over 90%.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Adaptive Domain Modeling with Language Models: A Multi-Agent Approach to Task Planning
TAPAS uses several specialized language-model agents to generate, correct, and adapt symbolic planning problems, reporting high benchmark accuracy and a virtual-home execution demo.
-
Fast optics-based modeling enabling large-scale optimization of the H4 and M2 beamlines in the CERN SPS North Area
Xsuite-based multi-objective genetic optimization of H4/M2 optics, validated by BDSIM and 2025 beam tests, delivered +30% electrons (5× less halo) on H4 and +67% muons / ~2× electrons on M2.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.