Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Pushing The Limit of LLM Capacity for Text Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.07470 v2 pith:LWBJD3ZC submitted 2024-02-12 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords classificationtextlearnersllmsbasergptlanguagequestion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The value of text classification's future research has encountered challenges and uncertainties, due to the extraordinary efficacy demonstrated by large language models (LLMs) across numerous downstream NLP tasks. In this era of open-ended language modeling, where task boundaries are gradually fading, an urgent question emerges: have we made significant advances in text classification under the full benefit of LLMs? To answer this question, we propose RGPT, an adaptive boosting framework tailored to produce a specialized text classification LLM by recurrently ensembling a pool of strong base learners. The base learners are constructed by adaptively adjusting the distribution of training samples and iteratively fine-tuning LLMs with them. Such base learners are then ensembled to be a specialized text classification LLM, by recurrently incorporating the historical predictions from the previous learners. Through a comprehensive empirical comparison, we show that RGPT significantly outperforms 8 SOTA PLMs and 7 SOTA LLMs on four benchmarks by 1.36% on average. Further evaluation experiments show a clear surpassing of RGPT over human classification.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Reliable Generative AI-Driven Scaffolding: Reducing Hallucinations and Enhancing Quality in Self-Regulated Learning Support

    cs.CY 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A multi-agent reliability check and an LLM-as-a-judge quality check both reduce hallucinations in AI-generated study scaffolds, with the multi-agent check matching human expert judgments almost perfectly.

  2. How and Where to Translate? The Impact of Translation Strategies in Cross-lingual LLM Prompting

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For multilingual RAG intent classification, the best translation strategy depends on the model and language; translating instructions into the user's language helps some models, while making the model answer in low-re...

  3. Do BERT-Like Bidirectional Models Still Perform Better on Text Classification in the Era of LLMs?

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fine-tuned BERT-like models outperform zero-shot and internal-state LLM methods on four of six challenging text classification datasets.

Pith tools