Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Behaviour Policy Estimation in Off-Policy Policy Evaluation: Calibration Matters

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1807.01066 v2 pith:LWORRY3P submitted 2018-07-03 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords policybehaviourmodelscalibrationestimatedestimatesevaluationoff-policy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we consider the problem of estimating a behaviour policy for use in Off-Policy Policy Evaluation (OPE) when the true behaviour policy is unknown. Via a series of empirical studies, we demonstrate how accurate OPE is strongly dependent on the calibration of estimated behaviour policy models: how precisely the behaviour policy is estimated from data. We show how powerful parametric models such as neural networks can result in highly uncalibrated behaviour policy models on a real-world medical dataset, and illustrate how a simple, non-parametric, k-nearest neighbours model produces better calibrated behaviour policy estimates and can be used to obtain superior importance sampling-based OPE estimates.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools