Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Gigahertz-Frequency, Acousto-Optic Phase Modulation of Visible Light in a CMOS-Fabricated Photonic Circuit

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A CMOS-fabricated 2 mm silicon-nitride device phase-modulates 730 nm light at 2.31 GHz to a 2.1 rad depth using 15 mW of microwave power, which the authors report as the highest-performing visible-light resonant phase modulator in the…

desk verdict Solid measured 2.1 rad at 2.31 GHz in a CMOS visible-light AO modulator, but the headline high-power-handling class is inferred, not demonstrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08012 v1 pith:LWYNCV5M submitted 2025-02-11 physics.optics

classification physics.optics
keywords acousto-opticphasemodulationvisiblelightsiliconnitridealuminumpiezo-optomechanicsCMOSphotonicsgigahertzquantumcontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a visible-light phase modulator made in a standard CMOS foundry that turns a small microwave drive into a large optical phase shift at gigahertz speed. The device confines a 730 nm optical mode and a mechanically resonating "breathing" mode in the same released silicon-nitride microstructure; an aluminum-nitride piezoelectric layer driven by 15 mW of microwave power strains the waveguide at 2.31 GHz, and that strain changes the optical path length through the photoelastic and moving-boundary effects. The measured modulation depth of 2.1 rad in a 2 mm device corresponds to a voltage-length product of $V_\pi\cdot L = 0.26$ V cm, which the authors compare favorably with watt-class bulk lithium-niobate modulators for visible-light operation. Because the structure is fabricated on a 200 mm wafer with CMOS-compatible materials, and the same platform already hosts high-speed switches and tunable filters, the paper positions this modulator as a building block for channelized, chip-scale control of the visible laser beams used in atomic and ionic qubit systems.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is a single released microstructure that confines a fundamental transverse-electric optical mode and a high-$Q$ breathing-mode mechanical resonance in the same cross-section, with an aluminum-nitride piezoelectric film sandwiched between electrode layers. Strain from the driven mechanical resonance changes the waveguide's effective refractive index through the photoelastic effect and the moving-boundary effect, and the accumulated optical phase grows with device length $L$ while the mechanical quality factor $Q$ resonantly amplifies the strain produced by a fixed microwave drive. A Jacobi-Anger expansion, which expresses a sinusoidally phase-modulated wave as sidebands weighted by Bessel functions $J_n(\alpha)$, connects the measured sideband power ratios back to the modulation depth $\alpha$.

What would settle it

Launch increasing optical power at 730 nm through the released device, up to hundreds of milliwatts, while monitoring transmitted power, modulation depth, and the mechanical resonance frequency; if the output rolls over, the resonance detunes, or the device damages before reaching that power class, the high-power-handling claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a resonantly enhanced breathing-mode mechanical resonance, electrically excited through an embedded piezoelectric aluminum-nitride transducer, can imprint gigahertz-frequency phase modulation on visible light in an integrated silicon-nitride waveguide with $V_\pi\cdot L = 0.26$ V cm. At the 2.31 GHz resonance, 15 mW of applied microwave power produces a 2.1 rad modulation depth in a 2 mm long device, enough to push the first-order sideband past its theoretical maximum conversion point ($\alpha = 1.84$ rad) and to bring the second-order sideband above the remaining carrier. The authors extract a mechanical quality factor of 228, a switching time of 31.4 ns, and close agreement with the Bessel-function sideband weights expected from sinusoidal phase modulation. They also simulate the same geometry to operate across 400-1000 nm optical wavelengths and, by width tuning, across mechanical resonances from 1 to 5 GHz, and on that basis they call it the highest-performing resonant phase modulator with high power handling at visible wavelengths.

Load-bearing premise

The device's status as a high-power-handling modulator is inferred from prior silicon-nitride waveguide results rather than measured here; if this released, piezoelectrically actuated structure cannot actually carry hundreds of milliwatts of 730 nm light without damage or thermal detuning, the comparison to watt-class bulk modulators loses its basis even though the 2.1 rad measurement at low optical power may still stand.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A 2.1 rad depth at 2.31 GHz puts first-order sideband conversion near its theoretical maximum of 33.9%, the point where $J_1(\alpha)$ peaks at $\alpha = 1.84$ rad.
  • The $V_\pi\cdot L = 0.26$ V cm result implies a half-wave voltage of about 1.32 V for a 2 mm device, with a 31.4 ns switching time set by $Q = 228$.
  • Because high-speed Mach-Zehnder switches and ring resonators with quality factors above 1.5 million already exist in the same piezo-optomechanical platform, this phase modulator can be combined with them to build a channelized photonic chip that amplitude-modulates, frequency-shifts, and filters visible light for individual qubit control.
  • Simulations reported in the paper indicate that the geometry supports optical wavelengths from 400 to 1000 nm and, by changing device width, mechanical resonances covering the 1-5 GHz range used by common atomic and ionic qubit species.
  • The measured on-resonance impedance of 149 $\Omega$ corresponds to about 50% microwave power coupling, so impedance-matching networks could roughly double the modulation efficiency at the same applied power.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's "high power handling" classification is borrowed from prior silicon-nitride waveguide demonstrations rather than measured on this released, piezoelectrically actuated, metal-contacted structure; direct high-power tests at 730 nm would be needed to confirm the watt-class application target.
  • If the saturation observed above roughly 0.85 V of drive is thermal in origin, better heat sinking or substrate anchoring could extend modulation depth beyond 2.1 rad, whereas a mechanical nonlinearity would require a different resonator design.
  • The weak phononic-crystal doublets seen in the resonance spectrum are set by the periodic nanopillar supports, so choosing the support period could select a single high-$Q$ resonance and simplify the drive conditions.
  • The CMOS-foundry compatibility motivates scaling to many modulators on one die fed by a single laser, an integration path the paper envisions but does not yet demonstrate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a CMOS-fabricated, resonantly enhanced acousto-optic phase modulator for visible light. A 2 mm device with a SiNx waveguide, AlN piezoelectric transducer, and released microstructure produces phase modulation depth 2.1 rad at 2.31 GHz under 15 mW of applied microwave power at 730 nm. The modulation depth is extracted interferometrically from sideband power ratios, cross-checked with five ratios, and the measured sideband conversion efficiencies follow the Bessel-function dependence expected for sinusoidal phase modulation. The authors infer Vπ = 1.32 V, Vπ·L = 0.26 Vcm, and extract mechanical Q = 228 from the resonance lineshape. They claim this is the highest performing visible-light resonant phase modulator in the class that handles hundreds of milliwatts of optical power, with 15x lower Vπ and 100x lower microwave power than bulk lithium niobate modulators, and they outline a path toward integrated Raman-beam control for atomic qubits.

Significance. If the central measurement is taken at face value, this is a significant experimental result: a wafer-scale, CMOS-compatible visible-light phase modulator operating at gigahertz frequencies with low microwave drive power. The measurement methodology is a strength: the modulation depth is determined from multiple independent sideband ratios (Supplement S-IIIb), and the observed sideband conversion efficiency tracks the theoretical Bessel-function curves (Fig. 3b). The demonstrated 2.1 rad modulation depth and the extracted Vπ·L = 0.26 Vcm are credible low-power, linear-regime figures of merit. The paper also provides useful design simulations for photoelastic, moving-boundary, and electromechanical coupling, and it identifies a plausible route to higher-frequency and broader-wavelength operation. However, the headline comparison to 'high-power-handling' modulators and the advertised application class rest on an extrapolation of power handling from other SiN waveguides, not on any measurement of this device's optical power handling, thermal limits, or insertion loss. That comparison needs to be either demonstrated or substantially reframed.

major comments (3)
  1. [§IV and Abstract] The claim that this device belongs to the class of 'gigahertz-frequency modulators that can handle hundreds of milliwatts of visible-light optical power,' and the associated 15x/100x comparisons, are not supported by measurements on this device. The text cites refs [30,40] for SiNx waveguides operating at hundreds of milliwatts, but those are passive, unreleased waveguides without the AlN/AlCu piezoelectric stack, the released membrane, and the periodically patterned nanopillar supports used here. Metal-induced absorption, interface quality, and the altered thermal path through the nanopillars can all change the optical power-handling threshold. No insertion loss, propagation loss, or power-dependent measurement is reported. The 2.1 rad measurement at low optical power may stand, but the advertised class membership and the comparison to watt-class bulk modulators are not demonstrated. Please either measure power handling (e.g., transmitted power versus incident power, thermal rollover, or damage threshold) on this device, or reframe the claims as 'SiN-based devices are expected to be compatible with high power' and remove the class-based comparison and the 15x/100x headline numbers.
  2. [§III, Fig. 3c] The headline figure of merit Vπ·L = 0.26 Vcm is extracted from the linear portion of the drive-voltage curve, but the headline 2.1 rad at 15 mW lies in the nonlinear/saturated regime above V ≈ 0.85 V. The text acknowledges saturation and 'increased response' near the top of Fig. 3c, and Fig. 3b shows deviation from Bessel-function behavior above 8 dBm. This means Vπ·L = 0.26 Vcm is a small-signal, linear-regime figure of merit, and it should be presented as such; it should not be used to imply that the device can be driven to 2.1 rad by extrapolating the small-signal Vπ. The paper should state explicitly that the 2.1 rad operating point is in a regime with thermal/mechanical nonlinearities, and that the 0.26 Vcm value describes the linear response only.
  3. [Experimental Results and Fig. 2a/Fig. 3a] The paper does not report the on-chip optical insertion loss or propagation loss of the modulator. For a device advertised as 'efficient' and as a building block for quantum control, the optical loss is a central performance parameter: it determines how much of the input power actually reaches the output and how much is dissipated in the device, which is directly relevant to the power-handling claim. Please report the grating-coupled insertion loss, the waveguide propagation loss, and, if possible, the on-chip loss of the released modulator structure. Without this, the reader cannot assess the practical efficiency of the device or the thermal load that would accompany high optical power.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2a vs. Fig. 3a] Fig. 2a is described in the text as measured at a constant microwave power of 15 mW, while Fig. 3a states 12 dBm (≈15.8 mW). Please make the drive powers consistent across figures and text, or explain the difference explicitly.
  2. [Supplement S-II, Eq. (S11)] Equation (S11) writes 1/Δϵ_i = Σ p_ij S_j, which mixes the permittivity perturbation and the photoelastic tensor in a nonstandard way. The standard form is Δ(1/ε)_i = Σ p_ij S_j, i.e., a perturbation to the inverse permittivity. Please clarify the notation so the sign and magnitude conventions are unambiguous.
  3. [Fig. 2b-c] The labels 'AOFS' and '/uni0394GND' in Fig. 2b-c are cryptic and appear to be leftovers from a drawing program. Please replace them with clear labels or remove them.
  4. [Supplement S-I] In the phase-matching discussion, the estimate Δn ≈ 2 is described as conservative, but the actual refractive-index difference between the optical mode and the microwave mode for this device is not quantified. Please give the simulated or estimated Δn and the resulting phase-matching length for the specific device, so the reader can judge the validity of the sinc-factor approximation for L = 2 mm.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No material circularity: the central modulation-depth and V_pi results are directly measured with an external interferometer, and the only calibrated simulation is explicitly anchored to that measurement rather than being passed off as an independent prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on direct experimental measurement rather than on a fitted or self-referential derivation. The modulation depth is obtained by recording optical sideband powers at n*Omega + Delta on an RF spectrum analyzer and extracting alpha from ratios of Bessel functions J_n^2(alpha)/J_m^2(alpha), with the extraction cross-checked over five different sideband ratios in Supplement S-IIIb. V_pi is then a fit to the measured alpha-versus-voltage curve, so V_pi*L = 0.26 Vcm is a figure-of-merit conversion of measured data, not a predicted quantity. The only calibrated simulation appears in Supplement S-IV, where Eq. (S24) sets alpha(lambda) = R(lambda)*alpha_0, explicitly scaling simulated coupling ratios by the experimentally measured 730 nm modulation depth. This is a disclosed calibration, not a hidden re-import of the central claim, and the wavelength dependence itself comes from FEM simulations. The cited platform components from the same group (MZMs, rings, splitters) are prior independent demonstrations and are used only to argue future integration, not to justify the measured performance. The high-power-handling class is inferred from refs [30,40] rather than measured on this device, but that is an unverified extrapolation and a correctness risk, not a circular derivation. Overall, the main result is self-contained and externally verified against Bessel-function theory and interferometric detection.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, materials, or conserved quantities are postulated. The device uses a standard SiNx, SiO2, AlN stack and conventional breathing mechanical modes.

free parameters (4)
  • Vπ (half-wave voltage) = 1.32 V
    Extracted from a linear fit of modulation depth versus applied voltage at 2.31 GHz (Fig. 3c); used to report Vπ·L = 0.26 Vcm. No uncertainty is given.
  • Mechanical quality factor Q = Q = 228 at 2.31 GHz; other resonances 117 to 329
    Obtained by fitting Lorentzian sums to modulation depth spectra (Supplement S-IIIc); used to derive the 31.4 ns switching time.
  • Lorentzian resonance parameters (Ω0,j, Aj, Qj) = Listed in Fig. S3a
    Fit per mechanical resonance; these calibrate the assignment of measured peaks to simulated modes.
  • Index difference estimate Δn = ≈2 (chosen estimate)
    Used in Supplement S-I to justify the phase-matching approximation L ≪ 2c/(ΩΔn) for the 2 mm device.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Photoelastic and moving-boundary perturbation integrals (Eqs. S9 and S10) give the optomechanical coupling.
    Standard perturbation theory for Maxwell equations with moving boundaries (Johnson et al., ref 45); used in Supplement S-II.
  • domain assumption Materials are characterized by published photoelastic tensors and piezoelectric coefficients for AlN, SiO2, and SiNx.
    Simulation of optomechanical coupling and k2 in Supplement S-II relies on literature material constants not remeasured here.
  • domain assumption The optical traversal time is much shorter than the mechanical period, so the modulation depth is α = |Δβ|L.
    Supplement S-I; needed to interpret the sideband spectrum as pure sinusoidal phase modulation. The paper argues a 2 mm length satisfies this.
  • domain assumption The fabricated 2.31 GHz resonance corresponds to the simulated breathing mode at 2.27 GHz.
    Supplement S-II states the experimental mode is believed to correspond; mode identification is not directly verified.
  • domain assumption Silicon nitride waveguides of similar dimensions handle hundreds of milliwatts at visible wavelengths.
    Inferred from refs [30,40] and not measured on this device; load-bearing for the high-power application claim.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gigahertz-Frequency, Acousto-Optic Phase Modulation of Visible Light in a CMOS-Fabricated Photonic Circuit." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LWYNCV5M

@misc{pith2026250208012,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gigahertz-Frequency, Acousto-Optic Phase Modulation of Visible Light in a CMOS-Fabricated Photonic Circuit},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LWYNCV5M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08012}
}
abstract

Here we present an efficient, visible-light, gigahertz-frequency acousto-optic modulator fabricated on a 200 mm wafer in a volume CMOS foundry. Our device combines a piezoelectric transducer and a photonic waveguide within a single microstructure that confines both a propagating optical mode and an electrically excitable breathing-mode mechanical resonance. By tuning the device's geometry to optimize the optomechanical interaction, we achieve modulation depths exceeding 2 rad with 15 mW applied microwave power at 2.31 GHz in a 2 mm long device. This corresponds to a modulation figure of merit of $V_{\pi}\cdot L$ = 0.26 Vcm in a visible-light, integrated acousto-optics platform that can be straightforwardly extended to a wide range of optical wavelengths and modulation frequencies. For the important class of gigahertz-frequency modulators that can handle hundreds of milliwatts of visible-light optical power, which are critical for scalable quantum control systems, this represents a 15x decrease in $V_{\pi}$ and a 100x decrease in required microwave power compared to the commercial state-of-the-art and existing work in the literature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08012 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Design of the CMOS-fabricated, resonantly enhanced acousto-optic modulator. a Cross-section of the modulator showing the material stack and layer thicknesses. Resonant mechanical breathing modes of the structure are piezoelectrically excited by applying a microwave voltage across the electrodes that sandwich the AlN film. These mechanical deformations modify the effective refractive index of the device’s optical mod… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Observation of on-chip, gigahertz-frequency sideband generation at visible wavelengths. a Plot of normalized optical power at the input laser frequency (n = 0), first order sideband (n = 1), and second order sideband (n = 2) as a function of the microwave drive frequency Ω/2π. Resonantly enhanced phase-modulation is most prominently observed at 1.13 GHz, 2.31 GHz, 2.68 GHz, and 2.80 GHz. Inset shows the 2.31 GHz res… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Integrated acousto-optic phase modulation at visible wavelengths. a Plot showing modulation depth and microwave reflection as a function of frequency at a constant microwave drive power of 12 dBm. A strongly transduced mechanical resonance at 2.31 GHz produces a modulation depth of 2.1 rad, exceeding the point at which conversion to the first sideband reaches the theoretical maximum. The quality factors of prominent… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Future platform integration for a qubit control chip. a Microwave frequencies and optical wavelengths associated with the transitions used for Raman control of typical qubit species [41]. ∗Dependent on externally applied magnetic field. b Schematic of the envisioned qu…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Electrically Injected and Solid State Surface Acoustic Wave Phonon Laser

    physics.app-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A solid-state SAW resonator with an internal DC-biased InGaAs amplifier self-oscillates into a coherent phonon laser at 1 GHz, with a resolution-limited linewidth below 77 Hz and -6.1 dBm acoustic output.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    author author N. Savage ,\ title title Acousto-optic devices ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2010.229 journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 4 ,\ pages 728 ( year 2010 ) ,\ note publisher: Nature Publishing Group NoStop

  2. [2]

    Dong , author G

    author author M. Dong , author G. Clark , author A. J. \ Leenheer , author M. Zimmermann , author D. Dominguez , author A. J. \ Menssen , author D. Heim , author G. Gilbert , author D. Englund ,\ and\ author M. Eichenfield ,\ title title High-speed programmable photonic circuits in a cryogenically compatible, visible–near-infrared 200 mm CMOS architecture...

  3. [3]

    Shao , author M

    author author L. Shao , author M. Yu , author S. Maity , author N. Sinclair , author L. Zheng , author C. Chia , author A. Shams-Ansari , author C. Wang , author M. Zhang , author K. Lai ,\ and\ author M. Lončar ,\ title title Microwave-to-optical conversion using lithium niobate thin-film acoustic resonators ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.6.001498 jou...

  4. [4]

    Blésin , author W

    author author T. Blésin , author W. Kao , author A. Siddharth , author R. N. \ Wang , author A. Attanasio , author H. Tian , author S. A. \ Bhave ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ title title Bidirectional microwave-optical transduction based on integration of high-overtone bulk acoustic resonators and photonic circuits ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s4146...

  5. [5]

    Jiang , author C

    author author W. Jiang , author C. J. \ Sarabalis , author Y. D. \ Dahmani , author R. N. \ Patel , author F. M. \ Mayor , author T. P. \ McKenna , author R. Van Laer ,\ and\ author A. H. \ Safavi-Naeini ,\ title title Efficient bidirectional piezo-optomechanical transduction between microwave and optical frequency ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14...

  6. [6]

    Tian , author J

    author author H. Tian , author J. Liu , author A. Siddharth , author R. N. \ Wang , author T. Blésin , author J. He , author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ and\ author S. A. \ Bhave ,\ title title Magnetic-free silicon nitride integrated optical isolator ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-021-00882-z journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 15 ,\ pages 828 ( year ...

  7. [7]

    author author D. B. \ Sohn , author O. E. \ Örsel ,\ and\ author G. Bahl ,\ title title Electrically driven optical isolation through phonon-mediated photonic Autler – Townes splitting ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-021-00884-x journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 15 ,\ pages 822 ( year 2021 ) ,\ note publisher: Nature Publishing Group NoStop

  8. [8]

    author author C. W. \ Peterson , author S. Kim , author J. T. \ Bernhard ,\ and\ author G. Bahl ,\ title title Synthetic phonons enable nonreciprocal coupling to arbitrary resonator networks ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat0232 journal journal Science Advances \ volume 4 ,\ pages eaat0232 ( year 2018 ) ,\ note publisher: American Association for the ...

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    Li , author Q

    author author B. Li , author Q. Lin ,\ and\ author M. Li ,\ title title Frequency–angular resolving lidar using chip-scale acousto-optic beam steering ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06201-6 journal journal Nature \ volume 620 ,\ pages 316 ( year 2023 ) ,\ note publisher...

  2. [10]

    Gertler , author N

    author author S. Gertler , author N. T. \ Otterstrom , author M. Gehl , author A. L. \ Starbuck , author C. M. \ Dallo , author A. T. \ Pomerene , author D. C. \ Trotter , author A. L. \ Lentine ,\ and\ author P. T. \ Rakich ,\ title title Narrowband microwave-photonic notch f...

  3. [11]

    Li , author Q

    author author H. Li , author Q. Liu ,\ and\ author M. Li ,\ title title Electromechanical Brillouin scattering in integrated planar photonics ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5108672 journal journal APL Photonics \ volume 4 ,\ pages 080802 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

  4. [12]

    Mueller ,\ title title Theory of Photoelasticity in Amorphous Solids ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1745316 journal journal Physics \ volume 6 ,\ pages 179 ( year 1935 ) NoStop

    author author H. Mueller ,\ title title Theory of Photoelasticity in Amorphous Solids ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1745316 journal journal Physics \ volume 6 ,\ pages 179 ( year 1935 ) NoStop

  5. [13]

    Xiang , author W

    author author C. Xiang , author W. Jin ,\ and\ author J. E. \ Bowers ,\ title title Silicon nitride passive and active photonic integrated circuits: trends and prospects ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.452936 journal journal Photonics Research \ volume 10 ,\ pages A82 ( year 20...

  6. [14]

    author author G. N. \ Parsons , author J. H. \ Souk ,\ and\ author J. Batey ,\ title title Low hydrogen content stoichiometric silicon nitride films deposited by plasma‐enhanced chemical vapor deposition ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.349544 journal journal Journal of Applied Ph...

  7. [15]

    author author D. J. \ Blumenthal , author R. Heideman , author D. Geuzebroek , author A. Leinse ,\ and\ author C. Roeloffzen ,\ title title Silicon Nitride in Silicon Photonics ,\ https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2018.2861576 journal journal Proceedings of the IEEE \ volume 106 ,...

  8. [16]

    author author D. J. \ Moss , author R. Morandotti , author A. L. \ Gaeta ,\ and\ author M. Lipson ,\ title title New CMOS -compatible platforms based on silicon nitride and Hydex for nonlinear optics ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.183 journal journal Nature Photonics ...

  9. [17]

    Hu , author M

    author author Y. Hu , author M. Yu , author D. Zhu , author N. Sinclair , author A. Shams-Ansari , author L. Shao , author J. Holzgrafe , author E. Puma , author M. Zhang ,\ and\ author M. Lončar ,\ title title On-chip electro-optic frequency shifters and beam splitters ,\ htt...

  10. [18]

    Renaud , author D

    author author D. Renaud , author D. R. \ Assumpcao , author G. Joe , author A. Shams-Ansari , author D. Zhu , author Y. Hu , author N. Sinclair ,\ and\ author M. Loncar ,\ title title Sub-1 Volt and high-bandwidth visible to near-infrared electro-optic modulators ,\ https://do...

  11. [19]

    Kodigala , author M

    author author A. Kodigala , author M. Gehl , author G. W. \ Hoth , author J. Lee , author C. T. \ DeRose , author A. Pomerene , author C. Dallo , author D. Trotter , author A. L. \ Starbuck , author G. Biedermann , author P. D. D. \ Schwindt ,\ and\ author A. L. \ Lentine ,\ t...

  12. [20]

    \ Yu , author J.-M

    author author B.-M. \ Yu , author J.-M. \ Lee , author C. Mai , author S. Lischke , author L. Zimmermann ,\ and\ author W.-Y. \ Choi ,\ title title Single-chip Si optical single-sideband modulator ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.6.000006 journal journal Photonics Research \ vol...

  13. [21]

    Erdil , author Izhar , author Y

    author author M. Erdil , author Izhar , author Y. Deng , author Z. Tang , author M. H. \ Idjadi , author F. Ashtiani , author F. Aflatouni ,\ and\ author R. O. \ III ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01127 title Wideband, Efficient AlScN - Si Acousto - Optic Modulator in a Commerci...

  14. [22]

    author author E. A. \ Kittlaus , author W. M. \ Jones , author P. T. \ Rakich , author N. T. \ Otterstrom , author R. E. \ Muller ,\ and\ author M. Rais-Zadeh ,\ title title Electrically driven acousto-optics and broadband non-reciprocity in silicon photonics ,\ https://doi.or...

  15. [23]

    author author S. A. \ Tadesse \ and\ author M. Li ,\ title title Sub-optical wavelength acoustic wave modulation of integrated photonic resonators at microwave frequencies ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6402 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 5 ,\ pages 5402 ( ye...

  16. [24]

    Zhang , author C

    author author L. Zhang , author C. Cui , author P.-K. \ Chen ,\ and\ author L. Fan ,\ title title Integrated-waveguide-based acousto-optic modulation with complete optical conversion ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.488271 journal journal Optica \ volume 11 ,\ pages 184 ( yea...

  17. [25]

    Shao , author N

    author author L. Shao , author N. Sinclair , author J. Leatham , author Y. Hu , author M. Yu , author T. Turpin , author D. Crowe ,\ and\ author M. Lončar ,\ title title Integrated microwave acousto-optic frequency shifter on thin-film lithium niobate ,\ https://doi.org/10.136...

  18. [26]

    Zhu , author L

    author author D. Zhu , author L. Shao , author M. Yu , author R. Cheng , author B. Desiatov , author C. J. \ Xin , author Y. Hu , author J. Holzgrafe , author S. Ghosh , author A. Shams-Ansari , author E. Puma , author N. Sinclair , author C. Reimer , author M. Zhang ,\ and\ a...

  19. [27]

    Notaros , author D

    author author M. Notaros , author D. M. \ DeSantis , author M. Raval ,\ and\ author J. Notaros ,\ title title Liquid-crystal-based visible-light integrated optical phased arrays and application to underwater communications ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.494387 journal journal O...

  20. [28]

    Jantzi , author W

    author author A. Jantzi , author W. Jemison , author A. Laux , author L. Mullen ,\ and\ author B. Cochenour ,\ title title Enhanced underwater ranging using an optical vortex ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.002668 journal journal Optics Express \ volume 26 ,\ pages 2668 ( yea...

  21. [29]

    Bluvstein , author H

    author author D. Bluvstein , author H. Levine , author G. Semeghini , author T. T. \ Wang , author S. Ebadi , author M. Kalinowski , author A. Keesling , author N. Maskara , author H. Pichler , author M. Greiner , author V. Vuletić ,\ and\ author M. D. \ Lukin ,\ title title A...

  22. [30]

    author author K. K. \ Mehta , author C. Zhang , author M. Malinowski , author T.-L. \ Nguyen , author M. Stadler ,\ and\ author J. P. \ Home ,\ title title Integrated optical multi-ion quantum logic ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2823-6 journal journal Nature \ volume 5...

  23. [31]

    Kwon , author W

    author author J. Kwon , author W. J. \ Setzer , author M. Gehl , author N. Karl , author J. Van Der Wall , author R. Law , author M. G. \ Blain , author D. Stick ,\ and\ author H. J. \ McGuinness ,\ title title Multi-site integrated optical addressing of trapped ions ,\ https:...

  24. [32]

    author author K. K. \ Mehta \ and\ author R. J. \ Ram ,\ title title Precise and diffraction-limited waveguide-to-free-space focusing gratings ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02169-2 journal journal Scientific Reports \ volume 7 ,\ pages 2019 ( year 2017 ) ,\ note publis...

  25. [33]

    Hattori , author T

    author author A. Hattori , author T. Sneh , author M. Notaros , author S. Corsetti , author P. T. \ Callahan , author D. Kharas , author T. Mahony , author R. McConnell , author J. Chiaverini ,\ and\ author J. Notaros ,\ title title Integrated visible-light polarization rotato...

  26. [34]

    author author C. D. \ Bruzewicz , author J. Chiaverini , author R. McConnell ,\ and\ author J. M. \ Sage ,\ title title Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and challenges ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5088164 journal journal Applied Physics Reviews \ volume 6 ,\ pages 02131...

  27. [35]

    Lim , author S

    author author S. Lim , author S. Baek , author J. Whitlow , author M. D. \ Onofrio , author T. Chen , author S. Phiri , author S. Crain , author K. R. \ Brown , author J. Kim ,\ and\ author J. Kim ,\ title title Design and characterization of individual addressing optics based...

  28. [36]

    author author QUBIG ,\ https://www.qubig.com/products/electro-optic-modulators_eom/phase-modulators_pm/pm-fiber-coupled_pm-fc/pm-fc_rb title Resonant Phase Modulators NoStop

  29. [37]

    @noop title Electro-Optic Amplitude Modulator User Guide ,\ organization Thorlabs ( year 2024 ) NoStop

  30. [38]

    author author A. A. \ Savchenkov , author A. B. \ Matsko , author D. Strekalov , author V. S. \ Ilchenko ,\ and\ author L. Maleki ,\ title title Enhancement of photorefraction in whispering gallery mode resonators ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.245119 journal journal P...

  31. [39]

    Desiatov , author A

    author author B. Desiatov , author A. Shams-Ansari , author M. Zhang , author C. Wang ,\ and\ author M. Lončar ,\ title title Ultra-low-loss integrated visible photonics using thin-film lithium niobate ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.6.000380 journal journal Optica \ volume ...

  32. [40]

    author author P. S. \ Donvalkar , author F. A. S. \ Barbosa , author X. Ji , author X. Ji , author Y. Okawachi , author R. Mcnally , author A. Farsi , author A. Klenner , author M. Lipson ,\ and\ author A. L. \ Gaeta ,\ title title Broadband frequency comb generation in the ne...

  33. [41]

    Park , author M

    author author S. Park , author M. Notaros , author A. Mohanty , author D. Kim , author J. Notaros ,\ and\ author S. Mouradian ,\ title title Technologies for modulation of visible light and their applications ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pquantelec.2024.100534 journal journal ...

  34. [42]

    Moses , author C

    author author S. Moses , author C. Baldwin , author M. Allman , author R. Ancona , author L. Ascarrunz , author C. Barnes , author J. Bartolotta , author B. Bjork , author P. Blanchard , author M. Bohn , author J. Bohnet , author N. Brown , author N. Burdick , author W. Burton...

  35. [43]

    author author P. R. \ Stanfield , author A. J. \ Leenheer , author C. P. \ Michael , author R. Sims ,\ and\ author M. Eichenfield ,\ title title CMOS -compatible, piezo-optomechanically tunable photonics for visible wavelengths and cryogenic temperatures ,\ https://doi.org/10....

  36. [44]

    author author C. M. \ Lueng , author H. L. W. \ Chan , author C. Surya ,\ and\ author C. L. \ Choy ,\ title title Piezoelectric coefficient of aluminum nitride and gallium nitride ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1317244 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 88 ,\ pa...

  37. [45]

    author author S. G. \ Johnson , author M. Ibanescu , author M. A. \ Skorobogatiy , author O. Weisberg , author J. D. \ Joannopoulos ,\ and\ author Y. Fink ,\ title title Perturbation theory for Maxwell ’s equations with shifting material boundaries ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/P...

  38. [46]

    Wolff , author M

    author author C. Wolff , author M. J. \ Steel , author B. J. \ Eggleton ,\ and\ author C. G. \ Poulton ,\ title title Stimulated Brillouin scattering in integrated photonic waveguides: Forces , scattering mechanisms, and coupled-mode analysis ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev...

  39. [47]

    Yan , author L

    author author Y. Yan , author L. D. \ Geng , author H. Liu , author H. Leng , author X. Li , author Y. U. \ Wang ,\ and\ author S. Priya ,\ title title Near-ideal electromechanical coupling in textured piezoelectric ceramics ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31165-y journa...

  40. [48]

    Larson , author P

    author author J. Larson , author P. Bradley , author S. Wartenberg ,\ and\ author R. Ruby ,\ title title Modified Butterworth - Van Dyke circuit for FBAR resonators and automated measurement system ,\ in\ https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2000.922679 booktitle 2000 IEEE Ultrasoni...

  41. [49]

    Levine , author D

    author author H. Levine , author D. Bluvstein , author A. Keesling , author T. T. \ Wang , author S. Ebadi , author G. Semeghini , author A. Omran , author M. Greiner , author V. Vuletić ,\ and\ author M. D. \ Lukin ,\ title title Dispersive optical systems for scalable Raman ...

  42. [50]

    author author P. J. \ Lee , author B. B. \ Blinov , author K. Brickman , author L. Deslauriers , author M. J. \ Madsen , author R. Miller , author D. L. \ Moehring , author D. Stick ,\ and\ author C. Monroe ,\ title title Atomic qubit manipulations with an electro-optic modula...

  43. [51]

    Del’Haye , author S

    author author P. Del’Haye , author S. B. \ Papp ,\ and\ author S. A. \ Diddams ,\ title title Hybrid Electro - Optically Modulated Microcombs ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.263901 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 109 ,\ pages 263901 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

  44. [52]

    Ivory , author W

    author author M. Ivory , author W. Setzer , author N. Karl , author H. McGuinness , author C. DeRose , author M. Blain , author D. Stick , author M. Gehl ,\ and\ author L. Parazzoli ,\ title title Integrated Optical Addressing of a Trapped Ytterbium Ion ,\ https://doi.org/10.1...

  45. [53]

    author author C. W. \ Hogle , author D. Dominguez , author M. Dong , author A. Leenheer , author H. J. \ McGuinness , author B. P. \ Ruzic , author M. Eichenfield ,\ and\ author D. Stick ,\ title title High-fidelity trapped-ion qubit operations with scalable photonic modulator...

  46. [54]

    author author A. J. \ Menssen , author A. Hermans , author I. Christen , author T. Propson , author C. Li , author A. J. \ Leenheer , author M. Zimmermann , author M. Dong , author H. Larocque , author H. Raniwala , author G. Gilbert , author M. Eichenfield ,\ and\ author D. R...

  47. [55]

    Khelif \ and\ author A

    author author A. Khelif \ and\ author A. Adibi ,\ https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9393-8 title Phononic Crystals : Fundamentals and Applications ,\ edition 1st \ ed.\ ( publisher Springer ,\ address New York, NY ,\ year 2015 ) NoStop

  48. [56]

    author author F. M. \ Mayor , author W. Jiang , author C. J. \ Sarabalis , author T. P. \ McKenna , author J. D. \ Witmer ,\ and\ author A. H. \ Safavi-Naeini ,\ title title Gigahertz Phononic Integrated Circuits on Thin - Film Lithium Niobate on Sapphire ,\ https://doi.org/10...

  49. [57]

    Karpiński , author M

    author author M. Karpiński , author M. Jachura , author L. J. \ Wright ,\ and\ author B. J. \ Smith ,\ title title Bandwidth manipulation of quantum light by an electro-optic time lens ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.228 journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 11 ,\ ...

  50. [58]

    Pozar ,\ @noop title Microwave Engineering ,\ edition 4th \ ed.\ ( publisher Wiley ,\ year 2012 ) NoStop

    author author D. Pozar ,\ @noop title Microwave Engineering ,\ edition 4th \ ed.\ ( publisher Wiley ,\ year 2012 ) NoStop

  51. [59]

    Harty , author D

    author author T. Harty , author D. Allcock , author C. Ballance , author L. Guidoni , author H. Janacek , author N. Linke , author D. Stacey ,\ and\ author D. Lucas ,\ title title High- Fidelity Preparation , Gates , Memory , and Readout of a Trapped - Ion Quantum Bit ,\ https...

  52. [60]

    author author K. J. \ Palm , author M. Dong , author D. A. \ Golter , author G. Clark , author M. Zimmermann , author K. C. \ Chen , author L. Li , author A. Menssen , author A. J. \ Leenheer , author D. Dominguez , author G. Gilbert , author M. Eichenfield ,\ and\ author D. E...

  53. [61]

    Shugayev , author D

    author author R. Shugayev , author D. Dominguez , author A. Leenheer , author B. Little , author M. Chow , author Y.-Y. \ Jau ,\ and\ author M. Eichenfield ,\ title title Alumina Based Piezo - Optomechanical Blue and Ultraviolet Photonic Integrated Circuits in a VLSI Architect...

  54. [62]

    Zhou , author F

    author author Y. Zhou , author F. Ruesink , author S. Gertler , author H. Cheng , author M. Pavlovich , author E. Kittlaus , author A. L. \ Starbuck , author A. J. \ Leenheer , author A. T. \ Pomerene , author D. C. \ Trotter , author C. Dallo , author K. M. \ Musick , author ...

  55. [63]

    Johnson, M

    Steven G. Johnson, M. Ibanescu, M. A. Skorobogatiy, O. Weisberg, J. D. Joannopoulos, and Y. Fink. Perturbation theory for Maxwell ’s equations with shifting material boundaries. Physical Review E , 65(6):066611, June 2002

  56. [64]

    Piezoelectric Transducers

    Jose Luis Sanchez-Rojas, editor. Piezoelectric Transducers . MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, August 2020

  57. [65]

    Design and Applications of Resonant Electro - Optic Time Lenses

    Ryan Patrick Scott. Design and Applications of Resonant Electro - Optic Time Lenses . PhD thesis, University of California Los Angeles, 1995

  58. [66]

    Kenning, Yu Tian, Tzu Han Chang, Andrea Bancora, Viacheslav Snigirev, Vladimir Shadymov, Tobias J

    Hao Tian, Junqiu Liu, Alaina Attanasio, Anat Siddharth, Terence Blésin, Rui Ning Wang, Andrey Voloshin, Grigory Lihachev, Johann Riemensberger, Scott E. Kenning, Yu Tian, Tzu Han Chang, Andrea Bancora, Viacheslav Snigirev, Vladimir Shadymov, Tobias J. Kippenberg, and Sunil A. ...

  59. [67]

    Wiederhecker, Paulo Dainese, and Thiago P

    Gustavo S. Wiederhecker, Paulo Dainese, and Thiago P. Mayer Alegre. Brillouin optomechanics in nanophotonic structures. APL Photonics , 4(7):071101, July 2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.