Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Finding the unicorn: Predicting early stage startup success through a hybrid intelligence method

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.03360 v1 pith:LXYPGWUK submitted 2021-05-07 cs.AI cs.HC

classification cs.AIcs.HC
keywords intelligencehumanshybridinformationmachinesmethodsituationsextreme
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial intelligence is an emerging topic and will soon be able to perform decisions better than humans. In more complex and creative contexts such as innovation, however, the question remains whether machines are superior to humans. Machines fail in two kinds of situations: processing and interpreting soft information (information that cannot be quantified) and making predictions in unknowable risk situations of extreme uncertainty. In such situations, the machine does not have representative information for a certain outcome. Thereby, humans are still the gold standard for assessing soft signals and make use of intuition. To predict the success of startups, we, thus, combine the complementary capabilities of humans and machines in a Hybrid Intelligence method. To reach our aim, we follow a design science research approach to develop a Hybrid Intelligence method that combines the strength of both machine and collective intelligence to demonstrate its utility for predictions under extreme uncertainty.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Random Rule Forest (RRF): Interpretable and Manageable Ensembles of LLM-Generated Questions for Predicting Success from Unstructured Data

    cs.AI 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    An LLM-generated set of yes/no founder questions, combined by simple threshold voting, is reported to predict startup success with 13.1% precision versus a 1.9% base rate, though the supporting evidence has significant gaps.

Pith tools