pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08160 · v1 · pith:LYVR3JA4new · submitted 2026-06-06 · ✦ hep-ph

Anisotropic surface tension and stability of quark matter modified by the vector interaction

Yu-Ying He , Xin-Jian Wen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 19:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords quark mattersurface tensionvector interactionmagnetic fieldquasiparticle modelstabilityanisotropic tensionmultiple reflection expansion
0
0 comments X

The pith

The vector interaction causes transverse surface tension in quark matter to increase with magnetic field strength in strong fields.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how adding a vector interaction changes the surface tension and stability of quark matter inside a strong magnetic field. Calculations in the quasiparticle model show that this repulsive force raises surface tension both parallel and perpendicular to the field lines. In the strongest fields the transverse tension grows further with increasing field strength, reversing the drop to zero seen in earlier work without the vector term. The result is that only a moderate magnetic field strength permits formation of a stable quark-matter bubble once vector effects are included. The same interaction produces a small reduction in the overall stability of the quark matter.

Core claim

In the quasiparticle model with multiple reflection expansion, the vector interaction enlarges the surface tension of quark matter in both the parallel and transverse directions with respect to the magnetic field. In a stronger magnetic field region, the presence of the vector repulsive interaction leads to an increase in transverse surface tension with the magnetic field strength, which is opposite to the vanishing value without repulsive interaction in the previous work. Consequently, a moderate-intensity magnetic field is required for the formation of a quark matter bubble with the vector interaction. The vector interaction slightly reduces the stability of quark matter. The self-consiste

What carries the argument

The vector repulsive interaction inside the quasiparticle model with multiple reflection expansion, combined with an effective bag function that depends on both chemical potential and magnetic field.

If this is right

  • Surface tension is enlarged in both parallel and transverse directions by the vector interaction.
  • Transverse surface tension rises with magnetic field strength in the strong-field regime once the vector interaction is present.
  • Only moderate magnetic field strengths allow formation of a quark matter bubble when vector repulsion is included.
  • The vector interaction produces a slight reduction in the stability of quark matter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reported anisotropy may favor elongated or oriented shapes for quark-matter droplets inside magnetized neutron-star matter.
  • The requirement for moderate rather than arbitrarily strong fields could be tested by embedding the surface-tension result into global models of magnetized compact stars.
  • Similar vector-interaction effects might appear in other observables such as the speed of sound or the equation of state under the same magnetic-field conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The effective bag function continues to give a self-consistent thermodynamic treatment of the chemical-potential-dependent quark mass when the bag function itself depends on both chemical potential and magnetic field.

What would settle it

A recalculation of transverse surface tension in the same model that shows the quantity decreasing or reaching zero with rising magnetic field strength even after the vector interaction is added would falsify the main result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08160 by Xin-Jian Wen, Yu-Ying He.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The effective bag function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Dependence of the infrared cutoff on chemical potenti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The effective bag function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (a) The variation of the thermodynamic potential Ω wi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The parallel and transverse surface tensions are plo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Parallel (solid lines) and transverse (dashed lines [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The behavior of the transverse surface tension is sho [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The free energy per baryon as a function of the chemica [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: At [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Free energy per baryon versus the vector coupling co [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: The free energy per baryon as a function of magnetic fi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this article, the surface tension and stability of quark matter modified by the vector interaction in a strong magnetic field are investigated in the quasiparticle model with the multiple reflection expansion. The self-consistent thermodynamic treatment of the chemical-potential-dependent quark mass is maintained by the effective bag function, which depends on both the chemical potential and the magnetic field. It is found that the vector interaction could enlarge the surface tension in both the parallel and transverse directions with respect to the magnetic field. In a stronger magnetic field region, the presence of the vector repulsive interaction leads to an increase in transverse surface tension with the magnetic field strength, which is opposite to the vanishing value without repulsive interaction in the previous work. Consequently, it is concluded that a moderate-intensity magnetic field is required for the formation of a quark matter bubble with the vector interaction. Finally, it is demonstrated that the vector interaction slightly reduces the stability of quark matter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the anisotropic surface tension and stability of quark matter in a strong magnetic field within the quasiparticle model employing the multiple reflection expansion. An effective bag function B(μ, B) is used to maintain self-consistent thermodynamics for the chemical-potential-dependent quark mass. The vector interaction is found to enlarge surface tension in both parallel and transverse directions. In stronger magnetic field regions, the transverse surface tension increases with field strength (opposite to the vanishing value reported in prior work without the vector term), leading to the conclusion that a moderate-intensity magnetic field is required for quark-matter bubble formation. The vector interaction is also shown to slightly reduce the stability of quark matter.

Significance. If the thermodynamic consistency of the effective bag function is preserved under the addition of the vector interaction, the result supplies a concrete illustration of how repulsive vector forces can reverse the magnetic-field dependence of transverse surface tension. This has potential relevance for the energetics of quark-matter droplets in magnetized environments such as neutron-star interiors. The explicit contrast with the earlier vanishing-tension result is a clear incremental advance, provided the underlying quasiparticle thermodynamics remains intact.

major comments (1)
  1. [model description and thermodynamic consistency section] The central claim that the vector interaction reverses the B-dependence of transverse surface tension rests on the assertion that the effective bag function B(μ, B) continues to enforce thermodynamic consistency after the vector term is introduced. The abstract states that self-consistency is maintained, yet no explicit check is supplied that the pressure obtained from the grand potential still equals ∫ n dμ or satisfies the Gibbs-Duhem relation once the vector shift in effective chemical potential (or the G_v n² term) is present. If the bag function is not readjusted for the modified density, the reported increase of transverse tension with B could be an artifact of inconsistent thermodynamics rather than a physical effect.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. The major concern regarding thermodynamic consistency is addressed below. We will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the vector interaction reverses the B-dependence of transverse surface tension rests on the assertion that the effective bag function B(μ, B) continues to enforce thermodynamic consistency after the vector term is introduced. The abstract states that self-consistency is maintained, yet no explicit check is supplied that the pressure obtained from the grand potential still equals ∫ n dμ or satisfies the Gibbs-Duhem relation once the vector shift in effective chemical potential (or the G_v n² term) is present. If the bag function is not readjusted for the modified density, the reported increase of transverse tension with B could be an artifact of inconsistent thermodynamics rather than a physical effect.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of thermodynamic consistency after adding the vector interaction would strengthen the manuscript. In our construction the effective bag function B(μ, B) is readjusted to account for the density shift induced by the vector term (via μ* = μ − 2 G_v n), thereby preserving P = ∫ n dμ and the Gibbs-Duhem relation by design. Nevertheless, the referee is correct that this was not demonstrated explicitly. In the revised version we will add a short appendix or subsection that verifies the thermodynamic identities numerically and analytically with the vector interaction included, confirming that the reported rise of transverse surface tension with B is a physical effect. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model self-contained via effective bag function

full rationale

The derivation relies on the quasiparticle model with multiple reflection expansion, where the effective bag function B(μ,B) is introduced explicitly to enforce thermodynamic consistency for the μ-dependent mass in the presence of both magnetic field and vector interaction. Surface tension results (including the reported reversal of B-dependence under vector repulsion) follow from the model's equations rather than any parameter being fitted to the target surface-tension observables and then relabeled as a prediction. No self-definitional steps, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the abstract or described chain. The approach is standard for this class of models and remains independent of the specific numerical outcomes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; the model rests on the quasiparticle approximation and multiple-reflection expansion whose validity for anisotropic surface tension in magnetic fields is assumed rather than re-derived.

free parameters (2)
  • vector coupling strength
    Repulsive vector interaction strength is introduced and must be chosen to produce the reported enlargement of surface tension.
  • effective bag function parameters
    Bag function depends on both chemical potential and magnetic field; its functional form and coefficients are not specified in the abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Quasiparticle model with chemical-potential-dependent mass remains thermodynamically consistent when an effective bag function is used.
    Invoked to maintain self-consistency in the presence of magnetic field and vector interaction.
  • domain assumption Multiple reflection expansion accurately captures the anisotropic surface tension of quark matter.
    Method chosen for computing parallel and transverse surface tensions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5683 in / 1460 out tokens · 23940 ms · 2026-06-27T19:32:53.611738+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 12 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Quark Matter in Strong Magnetic Field

    S. Chakrabarty, Phys. Rev. D 54, 1306-1316 (1996) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.54.1306 [arXiv: hep-ph/9603406 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.54.1306 1996

  2. [2]

    The Equation of State of Neutron-Star Matter in Strong Magnetic Fields

    A. Broderick, M. Prakash, and J. M. Lattimer, Astrophys. J. 537, 351 (2000) doi:10.1086/309010 [arXiv:astro-ph/0001537 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/309010 2000

  3. [3]

    A. P. Martinez, H. P. Rojas, H. J. M. Cuesta, M. Boligan, an d M. G. Orsaria, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 14, 1959 (2005) doi:10.1142/S0218271805007401 [arXiv:astro-ph/050625 6 [astro-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271805007401 1959

  4. [4]

    D. Deb, B. Mukhopadhyay, and F. Weber, Astrophys. J. 922, 149 (2021) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac222a [arXiv:2108.1 2436 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac222a 2021

  5. [5]

    E. J. Ferrer, V. de la Incera, J. P. Keith, I. Portillo and P . L. Springsteen, Phys. Rev. C 82, 065802 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.82.065802 [arXiv:1009.3521 [hep- ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.82.065802 2010

  6. [6]

    V. R. Khalilov, Phys. Rev. D 65, 056001 (2002) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.056001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.056001 2002

  7. [7]

    Surface tension of highly magnetized degenerate quark matter

    G. Lugones and A. G. Grunfeld, Phys. Rev. C 95, no.1, 015804 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.015804 [ar Xiv:1610.05875 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.95.015804 2017

  8. [8]

    Surface tension of hot and dense quark matter under strong magnetic fields

    G. Lugones and A. G. Grunfeld, Phys. Rev. C 99, no.3, 035804 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.035804 [ar Xiv:1811.09954 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.035804 2019

  9. [9]

    A. G. Grunfeld and G. Lugones, Astron. Nachr. 342, no.1-2, 205-210 (2021) doi:10.1002/asna.202113905 [arX iv:2011.06131 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.202113905 2021

  10. [10]

    C. J. Xia, G. X. Peng, E. G. Zhao, and S. G. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 93, 085025 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.085025

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.085025 2016

  11. [11]

    T. A. S. Do Carmo, G. Lugones, and A. G. Grunfeld, J. Phys. G 40, 035201 (2013) doi:10.1088/0954-3899/40/3/035201 [arXiv:1301.3483 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0954-3899/40/3/035201 2013

  12. [12]

    Lugones and A

    G. Lugones and A. G. Grunfeld, Phys. Rev. D 84, 085003 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.085003 [arXiv:1 105.3992 [astro- ph.SR]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.085003 2011

  13. [13]

    B. W. Mintz, R. Stiele, R. O. Ramos, and J. Schaffner-Biel ich, Phys. Rev. D 87, 036004 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.054004 [arXiv:1210.7155 [hep- ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.054004 2013

  14. [14]

    D. Sen, N. Alam, and G. Chaudhuri, Phys. Rev. D 106, 083008 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.083008 [arXiv: 2209.13890 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.083008 2022

  15. [15]

    S. Pal, S. Podder, D. Sen, and G. Chaudhuri, Phys. Rev. D 107, 063019 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.063019 [arXiv:2303.04653 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.063019 2023

  16. [16]

    Chodos, R

    A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, C. B. Thorn, and V. F. We isskopf, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3471 (1974) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.3471

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.9.3471 1974

  17. [17]

    D. Sen, N. Alam, and G. Chaudhuri, J. Phys. G 48, 105201 (2021) doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ac1713 [arXiv:210 7.08971 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ac1713 2021

  18. [18]

    Podder, S

    S. Podder, S. Pal, D. Sen, and G. Chaudhuri, Nucl. Phys. A 1042, 122796 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2023.122796 [arXiv:2311.08962 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2023.122796 2024

  19. [19]

    Zhang, P

    Z. Zhang, P. C. Chu, X. H. Li, H. Liu, and X. M. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 103, 103021 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.103021

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.103021 2021

  20. [20]

    P. C. Chu, X. H. Li, H. Liu, M. Ju, and Y. Zhou, Phys. Rev. C 108, 025808 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.108.025808

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.108.025808 2023

  21. [21]

    Z. J. Ma, Z. Y. Lu, J. F. Xu, G. X. Peng, X. Fu, and J. Wang, Ph ys. Rev. D 108, 054017 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054017 [arXiv:308.05308 [hep -ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.054017 2023

  22. [22]

    G. X. Peng, H. C. Chiang, J. J. Yang, L. Li, and B. Liu, Phys . Rev. C 61, 015201 (2000) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.61.015201 [arXiv:hep-ph/9911222 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.61.015201 2000

  23. [23]

    X. J. Wen, X. H. Zhong, G. X. Peng, P. N. Shen, and P. Z. Ning , Phys. Rev. C 72, 015204 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.72.015204 [arXiv:hep-ph/0506050 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.72.015204 2005

  24. [24]

    P. C. Chu and L. W. Chen, Astrophys. J. 780, 135 (2013) doi:10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/135 [arXiv:121 2.1388 [astro- ph.SR]]

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/780/2/135 2013

  25. [25]

    O. G. Benvenuto and G. Lugones, Phys. Rev. D 51, 1989 (1995) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.1989

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.51.1989 1989

  26. [26]

    Chodos, R

    A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, and C. B. Thorn, Phys. R ev. D 10, 2599 (1974) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2599

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.10.2599 1974

  27. [27]

    Farhi, R

    E. Farhi and R. L. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. D 30, 2379 (1984) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.30.2379

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.30.2379 1984

  28. [28]

    Peshier, B

    A. Peshier, B. K¨ ampfer, O. P. Pavlenko, and G. Soff, Phys . Lett. B 337, 235–239 (1994) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)90969-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)90969-5 1994

  29. [29]

    P. K. Srivastava, S. K. Tiwari and C. P. Singh, Phys. Rev. D 82, 014023 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.014023 [arXiv:1002.4780 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.014023 2010

  30. [30]

    Itoh, Prog

    N. Itoh, Prog. Theor. Phys. 44, 291 (1970) doi:10.1143/PTP.44.291

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp.44.291 1970

  31. [31]

    A. R. Bodmer, Phys. Rev. D 4, 1601 (1971) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.4.1601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.4.1601 1971

  32. [32]

    Witten, Cosmic Separation of Phases, Phys

    E. Witten, Phys. Rev. D 30, 272 (1984) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.30.272

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.30.272 1984

  33. [33]

    Pal and G

    S. Pal and G. Chaudhuri, Phys. Rev. D 110, 123021 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123021 [arXiv: 2411.10735 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.123021 2024

  34. [34]

    Medium effects in strange quark matter and strange stars

    K. Schertler, C. Greiner and M. H. Thoma, Nucl. Phys. A 616, 659-679 (1997) doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(97)00014-6 [arXiv:hep-ph/9611305 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(97)00014-6 1997

  35. [35]

    Schertler, C

    K. Schertler, C. Greiner, and M. H. Thoma, J. Phys. G 23, 2051 (1997) doi:10.1088/0954-3899/23/12/030

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/23/12/030 2051

  36. [36]

    Peshier, B

    A. Peshier, B. Kampfer and G. Soff, Phys. Rev. C 61, 045203 (2000) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.61.045203 [arXiv:h ep- 14 ph/9911474 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.61.045203 2000

  37. [37]

    V. M. Bannur, Phys. Rev. C 78, 045206 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.78.045206 [arXiv:0 712.2886 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.78.045206 2008

  38. [38]

    X. J. Wen, Z. Q. Feng, N. Li and G. X. Peng, J. Phys. G 36, 025011 (2009) doi:10.1088/0954-3899/36/2/025011

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/36/2/025011 2009

  39. [39]

    M. Ju, J. Hu, and H. Shen, Astrophys. J. 923, 250 (2021) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac30dd [arXiv:2111.0 8909 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac30dd 2021

  40. [40]

    Balian and C

    R. Balian and C. Bloch, Annals Phys. 60, 401-447 (1970) doi:10.1016/0003-4916(70)90497-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(70)90497-5 1970

  41. [41]

    Madsen, Phys

    J. Madsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 391-393 (1993) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.391

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.391 1993

  42. [42]

    M. S. Berger and R. L. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. C 35, 213-225 (1987) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.35.213

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.35.213 1987

  43. [43]

    Lugones and A

    G. Lugones and A. G. Grunfeld, Phys. Rev. D 104, L101301 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L101301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.l101301 2021

  44. [44]

    Y. Y. He and X. J. Wen, Phys. Rev. D 107, 074030 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.074030 [arXiv: 2304.03491 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.074030 2023

  45. [45]

    Mardor and B

    I. Mardor and B. Svetitsky, Phys. Rev. D 44, 878 (1991) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.878

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.44.878 1991

  46. [46]

    Madsen, Phys

    J. Madsen, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3328 (1994) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.50.3328 [arXiv:hep-p h/9407314 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.50.3328 1994

  47. [47]

    Kiriyama, Phys

    O. Kiriyama, Phys. Rev. D 72, 054009 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.054009 [arXiv:h ep-ph/0507188 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.72.054009 2005

  48. [48]

    D. A. Terrero, D. M. Paret, and A. P. Martinez Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27, 1850016 (2018) doi:10.1142/S0218271818500165

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271818500165 2018

  49. [49]

    B. Jia, E. Sharpe, and R. Wu, J. High Energ. Phys. 2014, 17 (2014). doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2014)017

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2014)017 2014

  50. [50]

    E. S. Fraga, M. Hippert, and A. Schmitt, Phys. Rev. D 99, 014046 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.014046 [arXiv:1810.13226 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.014046 2019

  51. [51]

    M. Ju, P. Chu, X. Wu, and H. Liu, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1, 40(2025) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13788-9. 15 Appendix A: Thermodynamic consistency with effective mass In the appendix sections, for the sake of convenience, we have dis regarded the quark flavor indices in the variables. In the grand canonical ensemble, the thermodynamic pressure of quarks with a...

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13788-9 2025