Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 65 references

Thermodynamic evidence for interaction-driven first-order topological quantum phase transitions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Sharp magnetization steps show that the topological transitions in pentalayer graphene are first order, driven by phase competition rather than continuous gap closure.

desk verdict A strong, multi-pronged thermodynamic case for first-order topological transitions in rhombohedral graphene, with a legitimate Oersted-field worry that referees should pin down but which does not sink the central claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08697 v1 pith:LZC25IME submitted 2026-08-09 cond-mat.mes-hall

Surajit Dutta , Nadav Auerbach , Chiho Yoon , Tonghang Han , Matan Uzan , Zhengguang Lu , Niladri-Sekhar Kander , Yaozhang Zhou
show 7 more authors
Yuri Myasoedov Martin E. Huber Kenji Watanabe Takashi Taniguchi Long Ju Fan Zhang Eli Zeldov
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords first-ordertopologicalquantumphasetransitionorbitalmagnetizationanomalousHalleffectrhombohedralgraphenenanoSQUID-on-tipmagnetometrycoexistenceChernnumberHartree-Fockcalculation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports direct thermodynamic evidence that the topological quantum phase transitions in spin-orbit-proximitized rhombohedral pentalayer graphene are first order, not continuous. Using nanoSQUID-on-tip magnetometry, it images the local orbital magnetization of a Chern-number $C=\pm5$ quantum anomalous Hall state, reconstructs a local thermodynamic gap of roughly 1.2 meV, and shows that the displacement-field-modulated differential magnetization contains two sharp opposite-polarity peaks at the boundaries to the layer-antiferromagnetic and layer-polarized insulating states. The paper argues that these peaks are discontinuities in a first derivative of the free energy, a signature that a continuous transition cannot produce. Near one boundary it images fluctuating magnetic domains, which it reads as phase coexistence between nearly degenerate ordered states. The work therefore distinguishes abrupt, interaction-driven topological transitions from the gap-closing-and-reopening picture of noninteracting systems.

What carries the argument

The central observable is the displacement-field-modulated differential magnetization $B_z^{\mathrm{ac}} \propto \partial \mathcal{M}/\partial D$, measured with a nanoSQUID on a tip; a sharp peak in this quantity is the thermodynamic signature of a first-order step in orbital magnetization. The interpretation is carried by the decomposition of orbital magnetization into a self-rotation term and a Chern term with universal slope $\partial \mathcal{M}_C/\partial \mu = C e/h$, which lets the authors convert the measured magnetization jump into a local gap map via $\delta \mathcal{M} = C(e/h)\Delta$. On the theory side, self-consistent Hartree-Fock total-energy crossings determine the first-order transitions, and the near-degeneracy of competing phases in the M2 region explains the observed fluctuating domains.

What would settle it

A reader could try to falsify the claim by performing the same $D_{\mathrm{ac}}$ modulation on a known continuous topological transition with the same apparatus and checking whether sharp $\partial \mathcal{M}/\partial D$ peaks appear; absence of sharp peaks there would confirm the method, while their presence would indict the interpretation. Alternatively, independently calibrating the absolute magnetization scale, for example by measuring a device with known magnetization or by extracting $\delta \mathcal{M}$ from the Biot-Savart inversion and comparing it with an independent gap measurement from compressibility, would directly test whether the discontinuities are thermodynamic steps rather than artifacts.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the LAF-to-QAH and QAH-to-LPI transitions are first-order topological quantum phase transitions accompanied by discontinuous changes in orbital magnetization. The paper shows that under pure displacement-field modulation, the local differential magnetization $\partial \mathcal{M}/\partial D$ displays two sharp peaks of opposite polarity at $D_{d1} = -0.154$ V/nm and $D_{d2} = -0.178$ V/nm, while under pure density modulation the same response shows only the smooth tri-striped pattern expected inside the QAH gap. Because orbital magnetization enters the free energy as $\mathcal{M} = -\partial F/\partial B$, a step in $\mathcal{M}(D)$ is a discontinuity in a first derivative of $F$, which the paper states is direct thermodynamic evidence for first-order transitions and inconsistent with continuous evolution. Self-consistent Hartree-Fock calculations reproduce the sequence: a crossing of total energies in which one spin-valley flavor reverses its layer polarization and gap sign at each transition, producing a jump in $\mathcal{M}$ whose asymmetry matches the measured peak heights. The fluctuating M2 region is interpreted as coexistence of QAH-derived and LPI-derived phases with near-degenerate energies, giving a microscopic picture of first-order topological transitions driven by phase competition.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the measured ac stray-field signal under displacement-field modulation is a faithful measure of the local differential orbital magnetization $\partial \mathcal{M}/\partial D$; if those sharp peaks instead come from gate-modulation artifacts, nonlinear capacitance, or domain-wall currents, the first-order conclusion does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the transitions are first order, transport-derived activation gaps that appear continuous are a spatial average over disorder-broadened locally abrupt phase boundaries.
  • A finite magnetic field should stabilize the QAH phase and linearly widen its displacement-field window, exactly because the magnetization jump shifts the free energy of the competing phases unequally.
  • The M2 regime is not a homogeneous metal but a region of phase coexistence and slow fluctuations of chiral magnetic domains, visible in real space.
  • The same measurement strategy should reveal first-order character in the field-induced Chern insulator at $D>0$, where the transition is also reported to be first order.
  • Discontinuous band inversion persists deep into the metallic regime, so signatures of the first-order transition appear even when the Fermi level lies outside the QAH gap.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the method is as faithful as claimed, the same $D$-modulated magnetometry could act as a generic order-detector for topological transitions in other layer-polarization-tuned graphene multilayers, where transport alone cannot distinguish first-order from continuous behavior.
  • The absence of a control measurement on a known continuous transition leaves open the possibility that some peak broadening or background is modulation-related; an independent calibration of the absolute magnetization scale would settle this.
  • The observed hysteresis appearing only near $T \approx 1.5$ K suggests that the energy barrier between coexisting phases is temperature-activated; measuring the hysteresis loop area versus sweep rate could give the nucleation barrier and domain-wall energy.
  • If the LAF-to-QAH transition is truly first order with a small magnetization jump, applying small in-plane magnetic fields or strain might tune the jump to zero at a critical endpoint, giving a testable prediction of a critical point.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports nanoSQUID-on-tip imaging of the local orbital magnetization of a WS2-proximitized rhombohedral pentalayer graphene device. The authors identify a quantum anomalous Hall state with |C|=5 at charge neutrality, reconstruct a spatially resolved thermodynamic gap of about 1.2 meV, and track the evolution of the magnetization as the displacement field is tuned through the LAF, QAH, and LPI phases. Under pure displacement-field modulation, the measured ac magnetic signal shows two sharp peaks at the phase boundaries, which the authors interpret as discontinuous steps in the orbital magnetization M(D). Combined with self-consistent Hartree-Fock calculations, these observations are presented as direct thermodynamic evidence for first-order topological quantum phase transitions, with the M2 region interpreted as a regime of phase coexistence and fluctuations.

Significance. If the central identification is correct, this is a significant advance: it provides a thermodynamic probe of a topological phase transition in a strongly interacting system, real-space imaging of a C=5 QAH state, and a microscopic picture of phase coexistence and fluctuation near the transition. The paper's strengths include the orthogonal n-modulation and D-modulation schemes, the observed scaling of peak widths with modulation amplitude, the direct imaging of fluctuating magnetic domains, and the comparison with scHF calculations. However, the central claim of 'direct thermodynamic evidence' rests on the assumption that the D-modulated SOT signal is a faithful measure of the local differential orbital magnetization. The manuscript does not yet provide an independent calibration of the absolute magnetization scale, a control measurement on a known continuous transition, or a quantitative exclusion of Oersted-field backgrounds from ac gate and transport currents. These omissions make the headline claim stronger than the current evidence supports.

major comments (3)
  1. [First-order topological transitions (Fig. 4b,c; Extended Data Fig. 4)] The interpretation of the sharp Bz^ac peaks as discontinuities in the orbital magnetization M(D) assumes that the SOT signal is generated solely by the local magnetic response to the displacement-field modulation. This is not established. The same ac gate voltages that modulate D also drive displacement currents in the gate stack, and the biased Hall bar carries ac currents whose Oersted fields are detected at the same lock-in frequency. The transitions at D_d1 and D_d2 coincide with sharp changes in R_xx and R_yx (Figs. 1b,c and 4c), exactly where the current distribution is reconfigured, so any current-path sensitivity would produce peaks at the same D values. The Biot-Savart validation in Fig. 3d is a forward-consistency check of the inversion, not a diagnostic of the physical origin of the signal. To make the 'direct thermodynamic evidence' claim secure, the authors should provide a calibration of the absolute magnetization scale, a control measurement on a known continuous transition, a measurement of the frequency dependence, and/or a measurement of the signal with the SQUID positioned away from the active sample region. Without one of these, the sharp Bz^ac peaks cannot be unambiguously assigned to a step in M(D).
  2. [Imaging QAH magnetism (Fig. 3b,c)] The reconstructed gap of about 1.2 meV and the spatial maps of the magnetization jump delta-M(x,y) are presented without error bars or a quantitative measure of reconstruction uncertainty. The stray-field inversion is an ill-posed inverse problem, and the reported values depend on scan height, regularization, and noise. In addition, the relation delta-M = C(e/h)Delta assumes that the measured step is purely the Chern magnetization contribution; the self-rotation contribution to the magnetization step is not separately quantified. The authors should provide uncertainty estimates for the reconstructed gap and show that the Biot-Savart agreement in Fig. 3d is quantitative (for example, with a residual map or normalized error). This is relevant because the comparison of Delta to the Curie temperature and to the scHF gap is used as a consistency check.
  3. [scHF calculations and B-field dependence (Fig. 4d,f; Methods)] The supporting self-consistent Hartree-Fock calculations are tuned to experiment through several parameters (epsilon_r = 35, d_gate = 37 nm, alpha_VI = 0.03, lambda_I = 1 meV), and the B-field stabilization argument in the Methods uses Delta-E_tot = -M dot B with the explicit assumption that the interacting ground state does not undergo qualitative restructuring. This is not circular, because the measured M(D) discontinuity is independent of the theory, but the quantitative agreement in Fig. 4f is not a parameter-free prediction. The manuscript should state which parameters are varied, how the predicted FO boundaries and the linear expansion of the QAH window depend on those parameters, and whether any parameter choice could produce a continuous-transition scenario. As written, the phrase 'strong confirmation' overstates the strength of the theory-experiment comparison.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Extended Data Fig. 6] The hysteresis is absent at base temperature and is observed only at elevated temperatures, with no hysteresis at the D_d1 transition at any temperature. The text should more carefully state that the hysteresis is a supporting observation rather than an independent confirmation of first-order behavior, given that the strongest signature is thermal and not present in the ground-state sweep.
  2. [Fig. 3d and caption] The statement that the Biot-Savart calculation 'quantitatively reproduces' the measured map would benefit from a quantitative figure of merit or a difference map; visual agreement alone is difficult to assess in a small panel.
  3. [Methods, SOT measurements] The modulation amplitude for the pure-D measurement (V_top^ac = -18 mV rms and V_bot^ac = 12 mV rms) is much larger than the pure-n modulation amplitudes; the text should clarify whether the resulting D_mod amplitude and its effect on the peak width are consistent with the simulation in Extended Data Fig. 4d.
  4. [References and typos] Reference 58 contains a typo in the journal name ('Appiled' should be 'Applied'), and this should be corrected in the reference list.
  5. [Introduction] The abstract and introduction describe the C=5 QAH state as a 'record Chern number'; this is a comparative claim that should be explicitly justified or softened, since the comparison set is not defined in the text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the first-order transition claim rests on independent local magnetometry and transport data, with scHF theory and self-citations serving as supporting context rather than as the source of the conclusion.

full rationale

The central claim—that the LAF–QAH and QAH–LPI transitions are first order—is supported by the measured D-modulated stray-field peaks, R_yx^ac peaks, modulation-amplitude-dependent peak widths, B-field expansion of the QAH window, hysteresis, and real-space fluctuating domains. The inference that sharp peaks in B_z^ac correspond to steps in M(D) is an experimental transfer-function assumption, not a definitional equivalence, and it is grounded in prior SOT work including external groups; any failure of this mapping would be a measurement-artifact concern, not circularity. The scHF calculations do contain parameters stated to be chosen to match experiment (epsilon_r = 35, d_gate = 37 nm, alpha_VI = 0.03), but the first-order-versus-continuous distinction is not obtained by fitting the order of the transition: the measured sharp peaks and the predicted discontinuous M(U) are compared as independent consistency checks. Self-citations supply the theoretical framework and the SOT methodology, but the load-bearing thermodynamic evidence is the experimental magnetometry and transport, which are not derived from those citations. No uniqueness theorem is imported, no ansatz is smuggled in as an external constraint, and no known empirical pattern is merely renamed. The paper therefore shows no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The experimental first-order evidence is self-contained, but the supporting theory relies on a mean-field Hamiltonian with parameters fitted to the experiment (ε_r=35, d_gate=37 nm, α_VI=0.03, λ_I=1 meV) and on a stated assumption about how the magnetic field couples to the ground state. No new fundamental entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Dielectric constant ε_r = 35
    Used in the screened Coulomb interaction; Methods state 'We use ε_r=35 and d_gate=37 nm to match the experimental result.'
  • Gate distance d_gate = 37 nm
    Used in the image-charge screening model; chosen to match the experimental result as stated in Methods.
  • Valley-interchange exchange scaling α_VI = 0.03
    Methods: 'α_VI=0.03 is chosen to match with the experimental data.' It selects among degenerate phases.
  • Ising SOC λ_I (scHF) = 1 meV
    Set to 1 meV based on previous estimates [38,60,61]; affects the QAH stability and phase boundaries.
  • Continuous-model parameters Δ_int and λ_I = 33 meV and 4.91 meV
    Used in the ad-hoc continuous tight-binding countermodel to match the experimental D_d1 and D_d2; not part of the central claim but used for the first-order versus continuous comparison.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Universal relation δM = C(e/h)Δ between magnetization jump and topological gap
    Follows from the Chern number and the Streda formula; used to convert the measured magnetization step into a gap (Fig. 3).
  • standard math Orbital magnetization formula from semiclassical wave-packet or Wannier theory
    Used to compute M in scHF; referenced to [40-42]; accepted theoretical framework.
  • domain assumption Effective two-band Hamiltonian is a valid low-energy description of rhombohedral pentalayer graphene
    The scHF calculations rely on this Hamiltonian with hopping parameters from first principles; validated against the ten-band model in Extended Data Figs. 5b,c.
  • domain assumption The interacting ground state does not change qualitatively under B field apart from the energy shift ΔE=-M·B
    Stated in Methods; underlies the prediction of linear QAH-width expansion with B_a and its use as confirmation of the first-order transition.
  • domain assumption The phases at charge neutrality are LAF, QAH, and LPI, as inferred from transport and prior theory
    Phase identification relies on quantized Hall, Rxx maps, and scHF energetics; the specific assignment of LAF at low |D| follows prior literature [5,19-21].
  • domain assumption Hartree-Fock mean-field theory captures the qualitative energetics of the competing phases
    The scHF calculations are mean-field and overestimate gaps (acknowledged in the text); used to support the microscopic flavor-reversal picture.
  • domain assumption Conversion D=1 V/nm corresponds to U/2=100 meV
    Taken from refs [18,46]; used to compare experimental D with theoretical U.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermodynamic evidence for interaction-driven first-order topological quantum phase transitions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LZC25IME

@misc{pith2026260808697,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermodynamic evidence for interaction-driven first-order topological quantum phase transitions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LZC25IME}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08697}
}
read the original abstract

Topological quantum phase transitions in non interacting systems occur through continuous gap closing and reopening. In strongly interacting systems, however, competing ordered states have long been predicted to drive first order transitions, although this possibility has remained experimentally unresolved. Recent transport studies of correlated phases in charge neutral rhombohedral graphene were interpreted as evidence for continuous topological transitions. Here, using nanoSQUID on tip magnetometry, we directly image the local orbital magnetization of a spin orbit proximitized rhombohedral graphene quantum anomalous Hall (QAH) state. We provide the first real space visualization of a QAH phase with a record Chern number, reconstruct its local thermodynamic gap, and track the evolution of its magnetization across competing correlated states. Combined with self consistent Hartree Fock calculations, these measurements show that the sequential transitions between the layer antiferromagnetic, QAH, and layer polarized insulating states are first order, accompanied by discontinuous changes in orbital magnetization. Near the phase boundaries, we observe fluctuating magnetic domains, providing direct microscopic evidence of phase coexistence between nearly degenerate competing ordered states. Together, these observations provide the first direct thermodynamic evidence for first order topological quantum phase transitions and establish a microscopic framework for understanding interaction driven topological quantum phase transitions through phase competition and coexistence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08697 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Transport measurements of WS2-proximitized rhombohedral pentalayer graphene. a, Longitudinal resistance 𝑅𝑅𝑥𝑥𝑥𝑥(𝑛𝑛,𝐷𝐷) measured in zero magnetic field 𝐵𝐵𝑎𝑎 at 𝑇𝑇 = 20 mK. b,c, High-resolution maps of 𝑅𝑅𝑥𝑥𝑥𝑥 (b) and Hall resistance 𝑅𝑅𝑦𝑦 (c) in the dashed cyan box in (a). d, Schematics of the R5G proximitized to WS2 device and of the electrical circuit. e, 𝑅𝑅𝑥𝑥𝑥𝑥(𝑛𝑛, 𝐵𝐵𝑎𝑎) at 𝐷𝐷 = −0.164 V/nm at 𝑇𝑇 = 100 mK. The yellow… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Orbital magnetism in the QAH state. a, Schematics of the scanning SOT imaging setup (bottom), optical image of the device (top-right), and schematics of the different modulation schemes 𝑉𝑉𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡 𝑎𝑎 , 𝑉𝑉𝑏𝑏 𝑎𝑎 , 𝑛𝑛𝑎𝑎 , and 𝐷𝐷𝑎𝑎 used for differential magnetic imaging (top-left). b, 𝐵𝐵𝑧𝑧 𝑎𝑎 (𝑛𝑛,𝐷𝐷) measured by the SOT at a single location in the sample at 𝐵𝐵𝑎𝑎 = 12 mT and 𝑇𝑇 = 20 mK using 𝑉𝑉𝑏𝑏 𝑎𝑎 = 100 mV rms. c, Zoomed-i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Local magnetization reconstruction and thermodynamic gap of QAH state. a, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Parity Anomaly

    F. D. M. Haldane, ''Model for a Quantum Hall Effect without Landau Levels: Condensed-Matter Realization of the “Parity Anomaly”'', Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988)

    work page 1988

  2. [2]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, ''Colloquium: Topological insulators'', Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    X. L. Qi and S. C. Zhang, ''Topological insulators and superconductors'', Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Amaricci, J

    A. Amaricci, J. C. Budich, M. Capone, B. Trauzettel, and G. Sangiovanni, ''First-Order Character and Observable Signatures of Topological Quantum Phase Transitions'', Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 185701 (2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Zhang, J

    F. Zhang, J. Jung, G. A. Fiete, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, ''Spontaneous Quantum Hall States in Chirally Stacked Few-Layer Graphene Systems'', Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 156801 (2011)

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    J. Jung, F. Zhang, and A. H. MacDonald, ''Lattice theory of pseudospin ferromagnetism in bilayer graphene: Competing interaction-induced quantum Hall states'', Phys. Rev. B 83, 115408 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Zhang and A

    F. Zhang and A. H. MacDonald, ''Distinguishing Spontaneous Quantum Hall States in Bilayer Graphene'', Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 186804 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    J. Jia, P. K. Pyatkovskiy, E. V Gorbar, and V. P. Gusynin, ''Broken symmetry states in bilayer graphene in electric and in-plane magnetic fields'', Phys. Rev. B 95, 045410 (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    X. Li, F. Zhang, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, ''Spontaneous Layer-Pseudospin Domain Walls in Bilayer Graphene'', Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 116803 (2014)

    2014

  2. [10]

    Dhochak, E

    K. Dhochak, E. Shimshoni, and E. Berg, ''Spontaneous layer polarization and conducting domain walls in the quantum Hall regime of bilayer graphene'', Phys. Rev. B 91, 165107 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    T. Han, Z. Lu, Y. Yao, J. Yang, J. Seo, C. Yoon, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, F. Zhang, and L. Ju, ''Large quantum anomalous Hall effect in spin-orbit proximitized rhombohedral graphene'', Science 384, 647–651 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Y. Sha, J. Zheng, K. Liu, H. Du, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Jia, Z. Shi, R. Zhong, and G. Chen, ''Observation of a Chern insulator in crystalline ABCA-tetralayer graphene with spin-orbit coupling'', Science 384, 414–419 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Zhang, B

    F. Zhang, B. Sahu, H. Min, and A. H. MacDonald, ''Band structure of ABC-stacked graphene trilayers'', Phys. Rev. B 82, 035409 (2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    Guinea, A

    F. Guinea, A. H. Castro Neto, and N. M. R. Peres, ''Electronic states and Landau levels in graphene stacks'', Phys. Rev. B 73, 245426 (2006)

    2006

  7. [15]

    N. B. Kopnin, T. T. Heikkilä, and G. E. Volovik, ''High-temperature surface superconductivity in topological flat-band systems'', Phys. Rev. B 83, 220503 (2011)

    2011

  8. [16]

    Ghazaryan, T

    A. Ghazaryan, T. Holder, E. Berg, and M. Serbyn, ''Multilayer graphenes as a platform for interaction-driven physics and topological superconductivity'', Phys. Rev. B 107, 104502 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    H. Zhou, T. Xie, A. Ghazaryan, T. Holder, J. R. Ehrets, E. M. Spanton, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, E. Berg, M. Serbyn, and A. F. Young, ''Half- and quarter-metals in rhombohedral trilayer graphene'', Nature 598, 429–433 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Auerbach, S

    N. Auerbach, S. Dutta, M. Uzan, Y. Vituri, Y. Zhou, A. Y. Meltzer, S. Grover, T. Holder, P. Emanuel, M. E. Huber, Y. Myasoedov, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Y. Oreg, E. Berg, and E. Zeldov, ''Isospin magnetic texture and intervalley exchange interaction in rhombohedral tetralaye...

    2025

  11. [19]

    T. Han, Z. Lu, G. Scuri, J. Sung, J. Wang, T. Han, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, H. Park, and L. Ju, ''Correlated insulator and Chern insulators in pentalayer rhombohedral-stacked graphene'', Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 181–187 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    K. Liu, J. Zheng, Y. Sha, B. Lyu, F. Li, Y. Park, Y. Ren, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Jia, W. Luo, Z. Shi, J. Jung, and G. Chen, ''Spontaneous broken-symmetry insulator and metals in tetralayer rhombohedral graphene'', Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 188–195 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    J. Deng, J. Xie, H. Li, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Shan, K. F. Mak, and X. Liu, ''Superconductivity and Ferroelectric Orbital Magnetism in Semimetallic Rhombohedral Hexalayer Graphene'', arXiv:2508.15909 (2026)

    2026

  14. [22]

    Velasco, L

    J. Velasco, L. Jing, W. Bao, Y. Lee, P. Kratz, V. Aji, M. Bockrath, C. N. Lau, C. Varma, R. Stillwell, D. 15 Smirnov, F. Zhang, J. Jung, and A. H. MacDonald, ''Transport spectroscopy of symmetry-broken insulating states in bilayer graphene'', Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 156–160 (2012)

    2012

  15. [23]

    Y. Shi, S. Xu, Y. Yang, S. Slizovskiy, S. V. Morozov, S.-K. Son, S. Ozdemir, C. Mullan, J. Barrier, J. Yin, A. I. Berdyugin, B. A. Piot, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, V. I. Fal’ko, K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, and A. Mishchenko, ''Electronic phase separation in multilayer rhomboh...

    2020

  16. [24]

    R. T. Weitz, M. T. Allen, B. E. Feldman, J. Martin, and A. Yacoby, ''Broken-symmetry states in doubly gated suspended bilayer graphene'', Science 330, 812–816 (2010)

    2010

  17. [25]

    Y. Choi, Y. Choi, M. Valentini, C. L. Patterson, L. F. W. Holleis, O. I. Sheekey, H. Stoyanov, X. Cheng, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and A. F. Young, ''Superconductivity and quantized anomalous Hall effect in rhombohedral graphene'', Nature 639, 342–347 (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    F. R. Geisenhof, F. Winterer, A. M. Seiler, J. Lenz, T. Xu, F. Zhang, and R. T. Weitz, ''Quantum anomalous Hall octet driven by orbital magnetism in bilayer graphene'', Nature 598, 53–58 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Winterer, F

    F. Winterer, F. R. Geisenhof, N. Fernandez, A. M. Seiler, F. Zhang, and R. T. Weitz, ''Ferroelectric and spontaneous quantum Hall states in intrinsic rhombohedral trilayer graphene'', Nat. Phys. 20, 422–427 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju, ''Fractional quantum anomalous Hall effect in multilayer graphene'', Nature 626, 759–764 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    J. Xie, Z. Huo, X. Lu, Z. Feng, Z. Zhang, W. Wang, Q. Yang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. Liu, Z. Song, X. C. Xie, J. Liu, and X. Lu, ''Tunable fractional Chern insulators in rhombohedral graphene superlattices'', Nat. Mater. 24, 1042–1048 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    T. Han, Z. Lu, G. Scuri, J. Sung, J. Wang, T. Han, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, H. Park, and L. Ju, ''Orbital multiferroicity in pentalayer rhombohedral graphene'', Nature 623, 41–47 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Morissette, P

    E. Morissette, P. Qin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and J. I. A. Li, ''Coulomb-driven Momentum Space Condensation in Rhombohedral Hexalayer Graphene'', arXiv:2503.09954 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    Krötzsch, A

    K. Krötzsch, A. Herasymchuk, Y. Zhumagulov, A. Magrez, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. G. Sharapov, O. V. Yazyev, and M. Banerjee, ''Magnetoelectric Switching of Magnetic Order in Rhombohedral Graphene'', arXiv:2509.24672 (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    J. Xie, Z. Huo, Z. Chen, Z. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, X. Lin, and X. Lu, ''Magnetic-Field- Driven Insulator-Superconductor Transition in Rhombohedral Graphene'', Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 176505 (2026)

    2026

  26. [34]

    H. Zhou, T. Xie, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and A. F. Young, ''Superconductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene'', Nature 598, 434–438 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    T. Han, Z. Lu, Z. Hadjri, L. Shi, Z. Wu, W. Xu, Y. Yao, A. A. Cotten, O. Sharifi Sedeh, H. Weldeyesus, J. Yang, J. Seo, S. Ye, M. Zhou, H. Liu, G. Shi, Z. Hua, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Xiong, D. M. Zumbühl, L. Fu, and L. Ju, ''Signatures of chiral superconductivity in rhom...

    2025

  28. [36]

    Dutta, N

    S. Dutta, N. Auerbach, T. Han, Y. Zhou, G. Shavit, N.-S. Kander, Y. Myasoedov, M. E. Huber, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Ju, and E. Zeldov, ''Reconfigurable chiral superconductivity'', arXiv:2605.13303 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  29. [37]

    C. L. Patterson, O. I. Sheekey, T. B. Arp, L. F. W. Holleis, J. M. Koh, Y. Choi, T. Xie, S. Xu, Y. Guo, H. Stoyanov, E. Redekop, C. Zhang, G. Babikyan, D. Gong, H. Zhou, X. Cheng, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. E. Huber, C. Jin, É. Lantagne-Hurtubise, J. Alicea, and A. F. Young...

    2025

  30. [38]

    J. Yang, X. Shi, S. Ye, C. Yoon, Z. Lu, V. Kakani, T. Han, J. Seo, L. Shi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, F. Zhang, and L. Ju, ''Impact of spin–orbit coupling on superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene'', Nat. Mater. 24, 1058–1065 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    T. Han, J. P. Butler, S. Ye, Z. Hua, S. Dutta, Z. Hadjri, Z. Wu, J. Yang, J. Seo, P. Pattanakanvijit, E. Aitken, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Xiong, E. Zeldov, Z. Lu, R. Ashoori, and L. Ju, ''Evidence of Metallic Wigner Crystal in Rhombohedral Graphene'', arXiv:2604.00113 (2026). 16

    2026

  32. [40]

    D. Xiao, M. C. Chang, and Q. Niu, ''Berry phase effects on electronic properties'', Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959–2007 (2010)

    2010

  33. [41]

    Ceresoli, T

    D. Ceresoli, T. Thonhauser, D. Vanderbilt, and R. Resta, ''Orbital magnetization in crystalline solids: Multi-band insulators, Chern insulators, and metals'', Phys. Rev. B 74, 024408 (2006)

    2006

  34. [42]

    D. Xiao, J. Shi, and Q. Niu, ''Berry Phase Correction to Electron Density of States in Solids'', Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 137204 (2005)

    2005

  35. [43]

    A. Uri, S. Grover, Y. Cao, J. A. Crosse, K. Bagani, D. Rodan-Legrain, Y. Myasoedov, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Moon, M. Koshino, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and E. Zeldov, ''Mapping the twist-angle disorder and Landau levels in magic-angle graphene'', Nature 581, 47–52 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    Vasyukov, Y

    D. Vasyukov, Y. Anahory, L. Embon, D. Halbertal, J. Cuppens, L. Neeman, A. Finkler, Y. Segev, Y. Myasoedov, M. L. Rappaport, M. E. Huber, and E. Zeldov, ''A scanning superconducting quantum interference device with single electron spin sensitivity'', Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 639–6...

    2013

  37. [45]

    Grover, M

    S. Grover, M. Bocarsly, A. Uri, P. Stepanov, G. Di Battista, I. Roy, J. Xiao, A. Y. Meltzer, Y. Myasoedov, K. Pareek, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Yan, A. Stern, E. Berg, D. K. Efetov, and E. Zeldov, ''Chern mosaic and Berry-curvature magnetism in magic-angle graphene'', Nat....

    2022

  38. [46]

    H. Zhou, N. Auerbach, M. Uzan, Y. Zhou, N. Banu, W. Zhi, M. E. Huber, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Y. Myasoedov, B. Yan, and E. Zeldov, ''Imaging quantum oscillations and millitesla pseudomagnetic fields in graphene'', Nature 624, 275–281 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Redekop, C

    E. Redekop, C. Zhang, H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, O. Sheekey, T. Arp, G. Babikyan, S. Salters, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. E. Huber, X. Xu, and A. F. Young, ''Direct magnetic imaging of fractional Chern insulators in twisted MoTe2'', Nature 635, 584–589 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    F. R. Geisenhof, F. Winterer, A. M. Seiler, J. Lenz, F. Zhang, and R. T. Weitz, ''Impact of Electric Field Disorder on Broken-Symmetry States in Ultraclean Bilayer Graphene'', Nano Lett. 22, 7378– 7385 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Serlin, C

    M. Serlin, C. L. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. F. Young, ''Intrinsic quantized anomalous Hall effect in a moiré heterostructure'', Science 367, 900–903 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    R. Yu, W. Zhang, H.-J. Zhang, S.-C. Zhang, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, ''Quantized Anomalous Hall Effect in Magnetic Topological Insulators'', Science 329, 61–64 (2010)

    2010

  43. [51]

    A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, A. W. Barnard, J. Finney, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. A. Kastner, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, ''Emergent ferromagnetism near three-quarters filling in twisted bilayer graphene'', Science 365, 605–608 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    Y.-F. Zhao, R. Zhang, R. Mei, L.-J. Zhou, H. Yi, Y.-Q. Zhang, J. Yu, R. Xiao, K. Wang, N. Samarth, M. H. W. Chan, C.-X. Liu, and C.-Z. Chang, ''Tuning the Chern number in quantum anomalous Hall insulators'', Nature 588, 419–423 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    L. Ju, Z. Shi, N. Nair, Y. Lv, C. Jin, J. Velasco, C. Ojeda-Aristizabal, H. A. Bechtel, M. C. Martin, A. Zettl, J. Analytis, and F. Wang, ''Topological valley transport at bilayer graphene domain walls'', Nature 520, 650–655 (2015)

    2015

  46. [54]

    H. Li, Z. Ying, B. Lyu, A. Deng, L. Wang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and Z. Shi, ''Electrode-Free Anodic Oxidation Nanolithography of Low-Dimensional Materials'', Nano Lett. 18, 8011–8015 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    Anahory, H

    Y. Anahory, H. R. Naren, E. O. Lachman, S. Buhbut Sinai, A. Uri, L. Embon, E. Yaakobi, Y. Myasoedov, M. E. Huber, R. Klajn, and E. Zeldov, ''SQUID-on-tip with single-electron spin sensitivity for high-field and ultra-low temperature nanomagnetic imaging'', Nanoscale 12, 3174– 3...

    2020

  48. [56]

    Finkler, Y

    A. Finkler, Y. Segev, Y. Myasoedov, M. L. Rappaport, L. Ne’Eman, D. Vasyukov, E. Zeldov, M. E. Huber, J. Martin, and A. Yacoby, ''Self-aligned nanoscale SQUID on a tip'', Nano Lett. 10, 1046– 1049 (2010)

    2010

  49. [57]

    Halbertal, J

    D. Halbertal, J. Cuppens, M. Ben Shalom, L. Embon, N. Shadmi, Y. Anahory, H. R. Naren, J. Sarkar, A. Uri, Y. Ronen, Y. Myasoedov, L. S. Levitov, E. Joselevich, A. K. Geim, and E. Zeldov, ''Nanoscale thermal imaging of dissipation in quantum systems'', Nature 539, 407–410 (2016). 17

    2016

  50. [58]

    M. E. Huber, P. A. Neil, R. G. Benson, D. A. Burns, A. M. Corey, C. S. Flynn, Y. Kitaygorodskaya, O. Massihzadeh, J. M. Martinis, and G. C. Hilton, ''DC SQUID series array amplifiers with 120 MHz bandwidth'', IEEE Trans. Appiled Supercond. 11, 1251–1256 (2001)

    2001

  51. [59]

    Z. Wang, D. Ki, H. Chen, H. Berger, A. H. MacDonald, and A. F. Morpurgo, ''Strong interface- induced spin–orbit interaction in graphene on WS2'', Nat. Commun. 6, 8339 (2015)

    2015

  52. [60]

    Zollner, M

    K. Zollner, M. Gmitra, and J. Fabian, ''Proximity spin-orbit and exchange coupling in ABA and ABC trilayer graphene van der Waals heterostructures'', Phys. Rev. B 105, 115126 (2022)

    2022

  53. [61]

    Li and M

    Y. Li and M. Koshino, ''Twist-angle dependence of the proximity spin-orbit coupling in graphene on transition-metal dichalcogenides'', Phys. Rev. B 99, 075438 (2019)

    2019

  54. [62]

    Huang, T

    C. Huang, T. M. R. Wolf, W. Qin, N. Wei, I. V Blinov, and A. H. MacDonald, ''Spin and orbital metallic magnetism in rhombohedral trilayer graphene'', Phys. Rev. B 107, L121405 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    A. E. E. Dubois, D. A. Broadway, A. Stark, M. A. Tschudin, A. J. Healey, S. D. Huber, J.-P. Tetienne, E. Greplova, and P. Maletinsky, ''Untrained Physically Informed Neural Network for Image Reconstruction of Magnetic Field Sources'', Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 64076 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    D. A. Broadway, M. Flaks, A. E. E. Dubois, and P. Maletinsky, ''Reconstruction of nontrivial magnetization textures from magnetic field images using neural networks'', Phys. Rev. Appl. 23, 044012 (2025)

    2025

  57. [65]

    A. Y. Meltzer, E. Levin, and E. Zeldov, ''Direct Reconstruction of Two-Dimensional Currents in Thin Films from Magnetic-Field Measurements'', (2017). Acknowledgments We thank Erez Berg, Yuval Oreg, Yaar Vituri, Peleg Emanuel and Tobias Holder for fruitful discussions. This wor...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.