Morphology-Driven optimization of Double Nanohole-based Plasmonic Optical Tweezers

Edona Karaka\c{c}i; Mariano Barella; Maria Sanz Paz; Michael Mayer; Pau Molet

arxiv: 2605.20259 · v1 · pith:LZD6DUCBnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · ⚛️ physics.bio-ph · physics.app-ph· physics.optics

Morphology-Driven optimization of Double Nanohole-based Plasmonic Optical Tweezers

Pau Molet , Mariano Barella , Edona Karaka\c{c}i , Maria Sanz Paz , Michael Mayer This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 08:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.bio-ph physics.app-phphysics.optics

keywords plasmonic optical tweezersdouble nanoholemorphology optimizationsingle-molecule manipulationelectric field enhancementtrapping transmission signallabel-free biophysicsnanostructure fabrication

0 comments

The pith

Optimizing double nanohole shapes in plasmonic tweezers delivers almost 3-fold stronger electric fields and 5-fold better trapping signals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that systematic adjustment of double nanohole structures, including their gaps, curvatures, tapers, and added pillars, can markedly improve how well they trap and detect single molecules using light. A sympathetic reader would care because current plasmonic tweezers struggle with weak signals from small proteins and need high laser powers that risk damaging samples. By focusing on morphology, the work shows a way to boost performance without those drawbacks. This matters for advancing label-free biophysics experiments where precise manipulation of tiny biomolecules is key.

Core claim

By evaluating and tailoring structural features such as gap size, gap length, gap curvature, wedged tapers, adhesion layers, and the inclusion of interior pillars, the optimized DNH design substantially outperforms reference structures, delivering an almost 3-fold increase in electric field enhancement and a 5-fold improvement in the trapping transmission signal.

What carries the argument

Morphology-driven optimization of critical structural features in double nanohole plasmonic structures to maximize electric field confinement, trapping stiffness, and transmission variation while minimizing required optical power.

If this is right

Lower laser powers can be used for trapping, reducing the risk of thermal damage to biomolecules.
Enhanced transmission signals improve the signal-to-noise ratio for detecting small proteins.
Greater reproducibility in device performance supports more reliable single-molecule studies.
Provides a framework for further refinements in plasmonic optical tweezers for biophysics applications.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

These morphology optimizations might extend to other nanohole or plasmonic designs to achieve similar performance gains.
Integration with microfluidic systems could enable high-throughput single-molecule analysis.
Reduced power requirements may facilitate the development of more compact and accessible optical tweezers setups.

Load-bearing premise

The electromagnetic simulations and morphological characterization accurately predict real-device performance, including that the chosen gap curvature, tapers, and pillars can be fabricated with sufficient precision without introducing new variability or thermal effects.

What would settle it

Fabricating the optimized double nanohole structures and experimentally measuring the electric field enhancement and trapping transmission signal to verify if they match the simulated nearly 3-fold and 5-fold improvements.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20259 by Edona Karaka\c{c}i, Mariano Barella, Maria Sanz Paz, Michael Mayer, Pau Molet.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Characteristics of a DNH. SEM images of a representative DNH, top view (a) and tilted view at 52° (d). Sketch of a DNH indicating the morphological parameters listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Plasmonic optical tweezers based on Double Nanohole (DNH) structures are an emerging tool for label-free single-molecule manipulation. However, their current performance is hindered by low signal-to-noise ratios for small proteins, fabrication variability, and thermal damage risks from high laser power requirements. To address these limitations, we present a comprehensive optimization of DNH parameters using systematic simulations and morphological characterization. We evaluate critical structural features, including gap size, gap length, gap curvature, wedged tapers, adhesion layers, and the inclusion of interior pillars. By tailoring these variables, we aim to maximize trapping stiffness, local electric field confinement, and transmission variation upon trapping ({\Delta}TT), while minimizing the required optical power. The resulting optimized DNH design substantially outperforms reference structures, delivering an almost 3-fold increase in electric field enhancement and a 5-fold improvement in the trapping transmission signal. These refinements provide a robust framework for developing highly efficient, reproducible optical tweezers for advanced single-molecule biophysics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a simulation-driven morphology sweep on double-nanohole tweezers that reports 3x field and 5x signal gains, but the claims rest on unvalidated sims that may not survive fabrication or heating.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that the authors ran a systematic simulation study on double-nanohole plasmonic tweezers, varying gap size, curvature, wedged tapers, adhesion layers, and interior pillars to boost performance. They report nearly 3-fold higher electric field enhancement and 5-fold better trapping transmission signal compared to reference structures, while aiming for lower incident power. That parameter sweep is the concrete new piece here, and it gives a practical checklist of morphological features that could help people designing these traps for small proteins. The work is straightforward and focused on an established platform rather than a new mechanism, which keeps it grounded. They do a reasonable job laying out the variables and showing how each tweak affects stiffness, confinement, and signal. The citation pattern looks normal for the field and does not appear to create circular claims. The soft spots are clear and worth flagging. All the gains come from electromagnetic simulations with no experimental validation of the final optimized geometry shown in the abstract or stress-test notes. Sub-10 nm curvature and taper details are sensitive to fabrication error, and small deviations in gap size or roughness are known to shift resonances sharply. They also leave out self-consistent thermal modeling of the metal-water interface, so it is unclear whether the higher local intensity creates damaging temperature gradients or refractive-index shifts that would reduce net trapping performance. This paper is for experimental groups already working with plasmonic tweezers who need design guidance on morphology. A reader in that niche can pull useful parameter ideas even if they treat the exact numbers as preliminary. It deserves peer review because the topic is practical, the optimization is reproducible in principle, and the claims are testable with standard fabrication and trapping measurements, though referees will need to see experimental checks and thermal analysis before the numbers can be taken as reliable.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a morphology-driven optimization of double nanohole (DNH) plasmonic optical tweezers. Using systematic electromagnetic simulations and morphological characterization, the authors vary parameters including gap size, gap length, gap curvature, wedged tapers, adhesion layers, and interior pillars to maximize trapping stiffness, local electric field confinement, and transmission variation (ΔTT) while minimizing required optical power. The optimized design is reported to deliver an almost 3-fold increase in electric field enhancement and a 5-fold improvement in the trapping transmission signal relative to reference structures, providing a framework for more efficient and reproducible single-molecule biophysics applications.

Significance. If the simulated enhancements translate to fabricated devices, the work would offer a practical route to higher signal-to-noise ratios for small proteins at lower incident powers, addressing key limitations in current DNH tweezers. The systematic parameter sweep combined with morphological characterization represents a strength, as it grounds the optimization in realizable geometries rather than purely theoretical ideals. Credit is due for the explicit focus on reproducibility and power minimization, which are directly relevant to experimental single-molecule manipulation.

major comments (2)

[Optimization and Simulation sections] Optimization and Simulation sections: the reported gains in field enhancement and ΔTT are obtained from electromagnetic simulations that minimize incident power but do not incorporate self-consistent thermal modeling of the metal–water interface. This is load-bearing for the central claim of reduced thermal damage risk, because the higher local intensity in the optimized geometry could still produce temperature gradients or refractive-index changes that degrade net trapping stiffness.
[Results on Optimized DNH Design] Results on Optimized DNH Design: the 3-fold E-field and 5-fold signal improvements rely on post-hoc selection of the best morphology (gap curvature, tapers, pillars) without reported sensitivity analysis or cross-validation against fabrication variability. Small deviations in sub-10 nm curvature or gap size are known to detune plasmonic resonances sharply, undermining the claim that the simulated performance will be realized in real devices.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction would benefit from explicit citation of prior DNH work on thermal effects to better contextualize the novelty of the power-minimization approach.
[Figures] Figure captions for the field-enhancement plots should include the exact simulation parameters (wavelength, polarization, refractive index of medium) for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions that will be incorporated in the next version.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Optimization and Simulation sections] Optimization and Simulation sections: the reported gains in field enhancement and ΔTT are obtained from electromagnetic simulations that minimize incident power but do not incorporate self-consistent thermal modeling of the metal–water interface. This is load-bearing for the central claim of reduced thermal damage risk, because the higher local intensity in the optimized geometry could still produce temperature gradients or refractive-index changes that degrade net trapping stiffness.

Authors: We acknowledge that the present work employs purely electromagnetic simulations without self-consistent thermal modeling. The optimization explicitly targets higher field enhancement and transmission signal at the lowest incident power needed to reach a target trapping stiffness; this power reduction is intended to lower overall thermal load. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript discussing thermal considerations, including order-of-magnitude heating estimates drawn from the literature on comparable plasmonic structures, and will note the absence of full multiphysics modeling as a limitation. This constitutes a partial revision. revision: partial
Referee: [Results on Optimized DNH Design] Results on Optimized DNH Design: the 3-fold E-field and 5-fold signal improvements rely on post-hoc selection of the best morphology (gap curvature, tapers, pillars) without reported sensitivity analysis or cross-validation against fabrication variability. Small deviations in sub-10 nm curvature or gap size are known to detune plasmonic resonances sharply, undermining the claim that the simulated performance will be realized in real devices.

Authors: The morphological parameters were varied systematically within ranges informed by our fabrication characterization. We agree that an explicit sensitivity study is valuable. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new subsection that perturbs the optimized geometry by realistic fabrication tolerances (±2–10 nm in gap size and curvature) and quantifies the resulting changes in field enhancement and ΔTT. This analysis will be added to demonstrate robustness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; optimization results are simulation outputs, not self-referential fits

full rationale

The paper performs parameter sweeps via electromagnetic simulations over gap size, curvature, tapers, adhesion layers, and interior pillars, then reports the best-case simulated E-field enhancement and ΔTT relative to reference geometries. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that would make the reported 3×/5× gains equivalent to the inputs by construction. The central claim rests on external simulation fidelity rather than any definitional loop or renamed empirical pattern.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central performance claims rest on the assumption that finite-element electromagnetic simulations faithfully capture both near-field enhancement and far-field transmission changes in fabricated gold nanostructures, plus the premise that morphological features can be realized without significant deviation from the simulated geometry.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Electromagnetic simulations accurately predict trapping stiffness, local field confinement, and transmission variation for DNH structures under the tested morphologies.
Invoked when the abstract states that tailoring variables maximizes stiffness, field, and ΔTT while minimizing power.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5725 in / 1298 out tokens · 62103 ms · 2026-05-21T08:04:39.342832+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The resulting optimized DNH design substantially outperforms reference structures, delivering an almost 3-fold increase in electric field enhancement and a 5-fold improvement in the trapping transmission signal.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We evaluate critical structural features, including gap size, gap length, gap curvature, wedged tapers, adhesion layers, and the inclusion of interior pillars.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

[1]

Zhang, Y. et al. Plasmonic tweezers: for nanoscale optical trapping and beyond. Light Sci. Appl. 10, 59 (2021)

work page 2021
[2]

Ren, Y. et al. Plasmonic Optical Tweezers for Particle Manipulation: Principles, Methods, and Applications. ACS Nano 15, 6105–6128 (2021)

work page 2021
[3]

& Gordon, R

Pang, Y. & Gordon, R. Optical Trapping of a Single Protein. Nano Lett. 12, 402–406 (2012)

work page 2012
[4]

L., Gordon, R., Pang, Y., Eftekhari, F

Juan, M. L., Gordon, R., Pang, Y., Eftekhari, F. & Quidant, R. Self-induced back- action optical trapping of dielectric nanoparticles. Nat. Phys. 5, 915–919 (2009)

work page 2009
[5]

Volpe, G. et al. Roadmap for optical tweezers. J. Phys. Photonics 5, 022501 (2023)

work page 2023
[6]

& Wenger, J

Jiang, Q., Claude, J.-B. & Wenger, J. Plasmonic nano-optical trap stiffness measurements and design optimization. Nanoscale 13, 4188–4194 (2021)

work page 2021
[7]

Ghorbanzadeh, M., Jones, S., Moravvej-Farshi, M. K. & Gordon, R. Improvement of Sensing and Trapping Efficiency of Double Nanohole Apertures via Enhancing the Wedge Plasmon Polariton Modes with Tapered Cusps. ACS Photonics 4, 1108–1113 (2017)

work page 2017
[8]

Chen, L. et al. Label-free plasmonic assisted optical trapping of single DNA molecules. Opt. Lett. 46, 1482–1485 (2021)

work page 2021
[9]

& Tsuboi, Y

Shoji, T. & Tsuboi, Y. Plasmonic Optical Tweezers toward Molecular Manipulation: Tailoring Plasmonic Nanostructure, Light Source, and Resonant Trapping. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 2957–2967 (2014)

work page 2014
[10]

L., Righini, M

Juan, M. L., Righini, M. & Quidant, R. Plasmon nano-optical tweezers. Nat. Photonics 5, 349–356 (2011)

work page 2011
[11]

Ying, C. et al. Watching Single Unmodified Enzymes at Work. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.06407 (2021)

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.06407 2021
[12]

& Gordon, R

Pang, Y. & Gordon, R. Optical Trapping of 12 nm Dielectric Spheres Using Double- Nanoholes in a Gold Film. Nano Lett. 11, 3763–3767 (2011)

work page 2011
[13]

& Lee, P.-T

Lin, P.-T., Chu, H.-Y., Lu, T.-W. & Lee, P.-T. Trapping particles using waveguide- coupled gold bowtie plasmonic tweezers. Lab. Chip 14, 4647–4652 (2014)

work page 2014
[15]

Zaman, M. A. & Hesselink, L. Plasmonic optical tweezers with C-shaped nanostructures. in Photonic and Phononic Properties of Engineered Nanostructures XVI vol. 13909 44–47 (SPIE, 2026)

work page 2026
[16]

Saleh, A. A. E. & Dionne, J. A. Toward Efficient Optical Trapping of Sub-10-nm Particles with Coaxial Plasmonic Apertures. Nano Lett. 12, 5581–5586 (2012)

work page 2012
[17]

Sergides, M., Truong, V. G. & Chormaic, S. N. Highly tunable plasmonic nanoring arrays for nanoparticle manipulation and detection. Nanotechnology 27, 365301 (2016)

work page 2016
[18]

N., Roberts, N

Grigorenko, A. N., Roberts, N. W., Dickinson, M. R. & Zhang, Y. Nanometric optical tweezers based on nanostructured substrates. Nat. Photonics 2, 365–370 (2008)

work page 2008
[19]

& Crozier, K

Xu, Z., Song, W. & Crozier, K. B. Optical Trapping of Nanoparticles Using All- Silicon Nanoantennas. ACS Photonics 5, 4993–5001 (2018)

work page 2018
[20]

Toshimitsu, M. et al. Metallic-Nanostructure-Enhanced Optical Trapping of Flexible Polymer Chains in Aqueous Solution As Revealed by Confocal Fluorescence Microspectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 14610–14618 (2012)

work page 2012
[21]

& Hesselink, L

Ryan, J., Zheng, Y., Hansen, P. & Hesselink, L. Long-Range Transport of Nanoparticles Using C-Shaped Plasmonic Resonators. in Optics in the Life Sciences OtM3E.7 (Optica Publishing Group, 2015). doi:10.1364/OTA.2015.OtM3E.7

work page doi:10.1364/ota.2015.otm3e.7 2015
[22]

Yoo, D. et al. Low-Power Optical Trapping of Nanoparticles and Proteins with Resonant Coaxial Nanoaperture Using 10 nm Gap. Nano Lett. 18, 3637–3642 (2018)

work page 2018
[23]

Kim, M.-K. et al. Squeezing Photons into a Point-Like Space. Nano Lett. 15, 4102– 4107 (2015)

work page 2015
[24]

& Wenger, J

Jiang, Q., Rogez, B., Claude, J.-B., Baffou, G. & Wenger, J. Temperature Measurement in Plasmonic Nanoapertures Used for Optical Trapping. ACS Photonics 6, 1763–1773 (2019)

work page 2019
[25]

Rapid single protein analysis by nanoaperture optical tweezers

Gordon, R. Rapid single protein analysis by nanoaperture optical tweezers. Biophys. J. 122, 2a (2023)

work page 2023
[26]

Karakaci, E. et al. BPS2025 - Thermal unfolding of single calmodulin under label-free conditions. Biophys. J. 124, 174a–175a (2025)

work page 2025
[27]

Peters, M. et al. Energy landscape of conformational changes for a single unmodified protein. Npj Biosensing 1, 14 (2024)

work page 2024
[28]

Booth, L. S. et al. Modelling of the dynamic polarizability of macromolecules for single-molecule optical biosensing. Sci. Rep. 12, 1995 (2022)

work page 1995
[29]

Yang-Schulz, A. et al. Direct observation of small molecule activator binding to single PR65 protein. Npj Biosensing 2, 2 (2025)

work page 2025
[30]

O’Neill, K., Osorio, E. A. & van der Zant, H. S. J. Self-breaking in planar few-atom Au constrictions for nanometer-spaced electrodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 133109 (2007)

work page 2007
[31]

& Baffou, G

Rogez, B., Marmri, Z., Thibaudau, F. & Baffou, G. Thermoplasmonics of metal layers and nanoholes. APL Photonics 6, 101101 (2021)

work page 2021
[32]

& Quidant, R

Baffou, G. & Quidant, R. Thermo-plasmonics: using metallic nanostructures as nano- sources of heat. Laser Photonics Rev. 7, 171–187 (2013)

work page 2013
[33]

Jiang, Q. et al. Adhesion layer influence on controlling the local temperature in plasmonic gold nanoholes. Nanoscale 12, 2524–2531 (2020)

work page 2020
[34]

M., Jones, P

Maragò, O. M., Jones, P. H., Gucciardi, P. G., Volpe, G. & Ferrari, A. C. Optical trapping and manipulation of nanostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 807–819 (2013)

work page 2013
[35]

I., Laroche, M

Albaladejo, S., Marqués, M. I., Laroche, M. & Sáenz, J. J. Scattering Forces from the Curl of the Spin Angular Momentum of a Light Field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 113602 (2009)

work page 2009
[36]

M., Bjorkholm, J

Ashkin, A., Dziedzic, J. M., Bjorkholm, J. E. & Chu, S. Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles. Opt. Lett. 11, 288–290 (1986)

work page 1986
[37]

H., Maragò, O

Jones, P. H., Maragò, O. M. & Volpe, G. Optical Tweezers: Principles and Applications. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015). doi:10.1017/CBO9781107279711

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781107279711 2015
[38]

Neuman, K. C. & Block, S. M. Optical trapping. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 2787–2809 (2004)

work page 2004
[39]

Gramotnev, D. K. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Plasmonics beyond the diffraction limit. Nat. Photonics 4, 83–91 (2010)

work page 2010
[40]

Yousefi, A. et al. Structural Flexibility and Disassembly Kinetics of Single Ferritin Molecules Using Optical Nanotweezers. ACS Nano 18, 15617–15626 (2024)

work page 2024
[41]

& Gordon, R

Babaei, E., Wright, D. & Gordon, R. Fringe Dielectrophoresis Nanoaperture Optical Trapping with Order of Magnitude Speed-Up for Unmodified Proteins. Nano Lett. 23, 2877– 2882 (2023)

work page 2023
[42]

Mestres, P., Berthelot, J., Aćimović, S. S. & Quidant, R. Unraveling the optomechanical nature of plasmonic trapping. Light Sci. Appl. 5, e16092–e16092 (2016)

work page 2016
[44]

G., Bozhevolnyi, S

Moreno, E., Rodrigo, S. G., Bozhevolnyi, S. I., Martín-Moreno, L. & García-Vidal, F. J. Guiding and Focusing of Electromagnetic Fields with Wedge Plasmon Polaritons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 023901 (2008)

work page 2008
[45]

& Orenstein, M

Feigenbaum, E. & Orenstein, M. Nano plasmon polariton modes of a wedge cross section metal waveguide. Opt. Express 14, 8779–8784 (2006)

work page 2006
[46]

Babaei, E. et al. Analysis of single unmodified proteins and their interactions with nanoaperture optical tweezers: PR65 case study. in Biophotonics Congress: Optics in the Life Sciences AM3D.5 (Optica Publishing Group, Vancouver, British Columbia, 2023). doi:10.1364/OMA.2023.AM3D.5

work page doi:10.1364/oma.2023.am3d.5 2023
[47]

Anker, J. N. et al. Biosensing with plasmonic nanosensors. Nat. Mater. 7, 442–453 (2008)

work page 2008
[48]

Luk’yanchuk, B. et al. The Fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructures and metamaterials. Nat. Mater. 9, 707–715 (2010)

work page 2010
[49]

Govorov, A. O. & Richardson, H. H. Generating heat with metal nanoparticles. Nano Today 2, 30–38 (2007)

work page 2007
[50]

Lugo, J. M. & Oliva, A. I. Thermal Properties of Metallic Films at Room Conditions by the Heating Slope. J. Thermophys. Heat Transf. 30, 452–460 (2016)

work page 2016
[51]

Habteyes, T. G. et al. Metallic Adhesion Layer Induced Plasmon Damping and Molecular Linker as a Nondamping Alternative. ACS Nano 6, 5702–5709 (2012)

work page 2012
[52]

Siegfried, T., Ekinci, Y., Martin, O. J. F. & Sigg, H. Engineering Metal Adhesion Layers That Do Not Deteriorate Plasmon Resonances. ACS Nano 7, 2751–2757 (2013)

work page 2013
[53]

Abbott, W. M. et al. Less is More: Improved Thermal Stability and Plasmonic Response in Au Films via the Use of SubNanometer Ti Adhesion Layers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 7607–7614 (2019)

work page 2019
[54]

Sukham, J., Takayama, O., Lavrinenko, A. V. & Malureanu, R. High-Quality Ultrathin Gold Layers with an APTMS Adhesion for Optimal Performance of Surface Plasmon Polariton-Based Devices. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 25049–25056 (2017)

work page 2017
[55]

& Oelhafen, P

Büttner, M., Belser, T. & Oelhafen, P. Stability of Thiol-Passivated Gold Particles at Elevated Temperatures Studied by X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 5464–5467 (2005)

work page 2005
[56]

Borzenkov, M. et al. Thermal and Chemical Stability of Thiol Bonding on Gold Nanostars. Langmuir 31, 8081–8091 (2015)

work page 2015
[57]

Peri, S. S. S. et al. Self-induced back-action actuated nanopore electrophoresis (sane) sensor for label-free detection of cancer immunotherapy-relevant antibody-ligand interactions. Methods Mol. Biol. Clifton NJ 2394, 343–376 (2022)

work page 2022
[58]

U., Peri, S

Raza, M. U., Peri, S. S. S., Ma, L.-C., Iqbal, S. M. & Alexandrakis, G. Self-induced back action actuated nanopore electrophoresis (SANE). Nanotechnology 29, 435501 (2018)

work page 2018
[59]

Peri, S. S. S. et al. Self-Induced Back-Action Actuated Nanopore Electrophoresis (SANE) Sensor for Label-Free Detection of Cancer Immunotherapy-Relevant Antibody- Ligand Interactions. Methods Mol. Biol. 2394, 343–376 (2022)

work page 2022
[60]

& Gordon, R

Chen, Y., Kotnala, A., Yu, L., Zhang, J. & Gordon, R. Wedge and gap plasmonic resonances in double nanoholes. Opt. Express 23, 30227–30236 (2015)

work page 2015
[61]

Khaleque, A. et al. Integration of bow-tie plasmonic nano-antennas on tapered fibers. Opt. Express Vol 25 Issue 8 Pp 8986-8996 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.008986 (2017) doi:10.1364/OE.25.008986

work page doi:10.1364/oe.25.008986 2017
[62]

& Zheng, Y

Lin, L. & Zheng, Y. Optimizing plasmonic nanoantennas via coordinated multiple coupling. Sci. Rep. 5, 14788 (2015)

work page 2015
[63]

J., Fromm, D

Schuck, P. J., Fromm, D. P., Sundaramurthy, A., Kino, G. S. & Moerner, W. E. Improving the Mismatch between Light and Nanoscale Objects with Gold Bowtie Nanoantennas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 017402 (2005)

work page 2005
[64]

Yoon, S. J. et al. Non-fluorescent nanoscopic monitoring of a single trapped nanoparticle via nonlinear point sources. Nat. Commun. 9, 2218 (2018)

work page 2018
[65]

Stockman, M. I. Nanofocusing of Optical Energy in Tapered Plasmonic Waveguides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 137404 (2004)

work page 2004
[66]

A., Insua, I

Tseng, A. A., Insua, I. A., Park, J. S., Li, B. & Vakanas, G. P. Milling of submicron channels on gold layer using double charged arsenic ion beam. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Microelectron. Nanometer Struct. Process. Meas. Phenom. 22, 82–89 (2004)

work page 2004
[67]

& Xing, Y

Liu, H., Han, T., Fang, C. & Xing, Y. Study on The Theory and Model of Overcut Effect of Focused Ion Beam Etching Process. in 2021 IEEE 5th Information Technology,Networking,Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC) vol. 5 1105–1108 (2021)

work page 2021
[68]

Sanders, A. et al. Understanding the plasmonics of nanostructured atomic force microscopy tips. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 153110 (2016)

work page 2016
[69]

W., Lezec, H

Ebbesen, T. W., Lezec, H. J., Ghaemi, H. F., Thio, T. & Wolff, P. A. Extraordinary optical transmission through sub-wavelength hole arrays. Nature 391, 667–669 (1998)

work page 1998
[70]

A., Scarabelli, L

Molet, P., Passarelli, N., Pérez, L. A., Scarabelli, L. & Mihi, A. Engineering Plasmonic Colloidal Meta-Molecules for Tunable Photonic Supercrystals. Adv. Opt. Mater. 9, 2100761 (2021)

work page 2021

[1] [1]

Zhang, Y. et al. Plasmonic tweezers: for nanoscale optical trapping and beyond. Light Sci. Appl. 10, 59 (2021)

work page 2021

[2] [2]

Ren, Y. et al. Plasmonic Optical Tweezers for Particle Manipulation: Principles, Methods, and Applications. ACS Nano 15, 6105–6128 (2021)

work page 2021

[3] [3]

& Gordon, R

Pang, Y. & Gordon, R. Optical Trapping of a Single Protein. Nano Lett. 12, 402–406 (2012)

work page 2012

[4] [4]

L., Gordon, R., Pang, Y., Eftekhari, F

Juan, M. L., Gordon, R., Pang, Y., Eftekhari, F. & Quidant, R. Self-induced back- action optical trapping of dielectric nanoparticles. Nat. Phys. 5, 915–919 (2009)

work page 2009

[5] [5]

Volpe, G. et al. Roadmap for optical tweezers. J. Phys. Photonics 5, 022501 (2023)

work page 2023

[6] [6]

& Wenger, J

Jiang, Q., Claude, J.-B. & Wenger, J. Plasmonic nano-optical trap stiffness measurements and design optimization. Nanoscale 13, 4188–4194 (2021)

work page 2021

[7] [7]

Ghorbanzadeh, M., Jones, S., Moravvej-Farshi, M. K. & Gordon, R. Improvement of Sensing and Trapping Efficiency of Double Nanohole Apertures via Enhancing the Wedge Plasmon Polariton Modes with Tapered Cusps. ACS Photonics 4, 1108–1113 (2017)

work page 2017

[8] [8]

Chen, L. et al. Label-free plasmonic assisted optical trapping of single DNA molecules. Opt. Lett. 46, 1482–1485 (2021)

work page 2021

[9] [9]

& Tsuboi, Y

Shoji, T. & Tsuboi, Y. Plasmonic Optical Tweezers toward Molecular Manipulation: Tailoring Plasmonic Nanostructure, Light Source, and Resonant Trapping. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 2957–2967 (2014)

work page 2014

[10] [10]

L., Righini, M

Juan, M. L., Righini, M. & Quidant, R. Plasmon nano-optical tweezers. Nat. Photonics 5, 349–356 (2011)

work page 2011

[11] [11]

Ying, C. et al. Watching Single Unmodified Enzymes at Work. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.06407 (2021)

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.06407 2021

[12] [12]

& Gordon, R

Pang, Y. & Gordon, R. Optical Trapping of 12 nm Dielectric Spheres Using Double- Nanoholes in a Gold Film. Nano Lett. 11, 3763–3767 (2011)

work page 2011

[13] [13]

& Lee, P.-T

Lin, P.-T., Chu, H.-Y., Lu, T.-W. & Lee, P.-T. Trapping particles using waveguide- coupled gold bowtie plasmonic tweezers. Lab. Chip 14, 4647–4652 (2014)

work page 2014

[14] [15]

Zaman, M. A. & Hesselink, L. Plasmonic optical tweezers with C-shaped nanostructures. in Photonic and Phononic Properties of Engineered Nanostructures XVI vol. 13909 44–47 (SPIE, 2026)

work page 2026

[15] [16]

Saleh, A. A. E. & Dionne, J. A. Toward Efficient Optical Trapping of Sub-10-nm Particles with Coaxial Plasmonic Apertures. Nano Lett. 12, 5581–5586 (2012)

work page 2012

[16] [17]

Sergides, M., Truong, V. G. & Chormaic, S. N. Highly tunable plasmonic nanoring arrays for nanoparticle manipulation and detection. Nanotechnology 27, 365301 (2016)

work page 2016

[17] [18]

N., Roberts, N

Grigorenko, A. N., Roberts, N. W., Dickinson, M. R. & Zhang, Y. Nanometric optical tweezers based on nanostructured substrates. Nat. Photonics 2, 365–370 (2008)

work page 2008

[18] [19]

& Crozier, K

Xu, Z., Song, W. & Crozier, K. B. Optical Trapping of Nanoparticles Using All- Silicon Nanoantennas. ACS Photonics 5, 4993–5001 (2018)

work page 2018

[19] [20]

Toshimitsu, M. et al. Metallic-Nanostructure-Enhanced Optical Trapping of Flexible Polymer Chains in Aqueous Solution As Revealed by Confocal Fluorescence Microspectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 14610–14618 (2012)

work page 2012

[20] [21]

& Hesselink, L

Ryan, J., Zheng, Y., Hansen, P. & Hesselink, L. Long-Range Transport of Nanoparticles Using C-Shaped Plasmonic Resonators. in Optics in the Life Sciences OtM3E.7 (Optica Publishing Group, 2015). doi:10.1364/OTA.2015.OtM3E.7

work page doi:10.1364/ota.2015.otm3e.7 2015

[21] [22]

Yoo, D. et al. Low-Power Optical Trapping of Nanoparticles and Proteins with Resonant Coaxial Nanoaperture Using 10 nm Gap. Nano Lett. 18, 3637–3642 (2018)

work page 2018

[22] [23]

Kim, M.-K. et al. Squeezing Photons into a Point-Like Space. Nano Lett. 15, 4102– 4107 (2015)

work page 2015

[23] [24]

& Wenger, J

Jiang, Q., Rogez, B., Claude, J.-B., Baffou, G. & Wenger, J. Temperature Measurement in Plasmonic Nanoapertures Used for Optical Trapping. ACS Photonics 6, 1763–1773 (2019)

work page 2019

[24] [25]

Rapid single protein analysis by nanoaperture optical tweezers

Gordon, R. Rapid single protein analysis by nanoaperture optical tweezers. Biophys. J. 122, 2a (2023)

work page 2023

[25] [26]

Karakaci, E. et al. BPS2025 - Thermal unfolding of single calmodulin under label-free conditions. Biophys. J. 124, 174a–175a (2025)

work page 2025

[26] [27]

Peters, M. et al. Energy landscape of conformational changes for a single unmodified protein. Npj Biosensing 1, 14 (2024)

work page 2024

[27] [28]

Booth, L. S. et al. Modelling of the dynamic polarizability of macromolecules for single-molecule optical biosensing. Sci. Rep. 12, 1995 (2022)

work page 1995

[28] [29]

Yang-Schulz, A. et al. Direct observation of small molecule activator binding to single PR65 protein. Npj Biosensing 2, 2 (2025)

work page 2025

[29] [30]

O’Neill, K., Osorio, E. A. & van der Zant, H. S. J. Self-breaking in planar few-atom Au constrictions for nanometer-spaced electrodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 133109 (2007)

work page 2007

[30] [31]

& Baffou, G

Rogez, B., Marmri, Z., Thibaudau, F. & Baffou, G. Thermoplasmonics of metal layers and nanoholes. APL Photonics 6, 101101 (2021)

work page 2021

[31] [32]

& Quidant, R

Baffou, G. & Quidant, R. Thermo-plasmonics: using metallic nanostructures as nano- sources of heat. Laser Photonics Rev. 7, 171–187 (2013)

work page 2013

[32] [33]

Jiang, Q. et al. Adhesion layer influence on controlling the local temperature in plasmonic gold nanoholes. Nanoscale 12, 2524–2531 (2020)

work page 2020

[33] [34]

M., Jones, P

Maragò, O. M., Jones, P. H., Gucciardi, P. G., Volpe, G. & Ferrari, A. C. Optical trapping and manipulation of nanostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 807–819 (2013)

work page 2013

[34] [35]

I., Laroche, M

Albaladejo, S., Marqués, M. I., Laroche, M. & Sáenz, J. J. Scattering Forces from the Curl of the Spin Angular Momentum of a Light Field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 113602 (2009)

work page 2009

[35] [36]

M., Bjorkholm, J

Ashkin, A., Dziedzic, J. M., Bjorkholm, J. E. & Chu, S. Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles. Opt. Lett. 11, 288–290 (1986)

work page 1986

[36] [37]

H., Maragò, O

Jones, P. H., Maragò, O. M. & Volpe, G. Optical Tweezers: Principles and Applications. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015). doi:10.1017/CBO9781107279711

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781107279711 2015

[37] [38]

Neuman, K. C. & Block, S. M. Optical trapping. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 2787–2809 (2004)

work page 2004

[38] [39]

Gramotnev, D. K. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Plasmonics beyond the diffraction limit. Nat. Photonics 4, 83–91 (2010)

work page 2010

[39] [40]

Yousefi, A. et al. Structural Flexibility and Disassembly Kinetics of Single Ferritin Molecules Using Optical Nanotweezers. ACS Nano 18, 15617–15626 (2024)

work page 2024

[40] [41]

& Gordon, R

Babaei, E., Wright, D. & Gordon, R. Fringe Dielectrophoresis Nanoaperture Optical Trapping with Order of Magnitude Speed-Up for Unmodified Proteins. Nano Lett. 23, 2877– 2882 (2023)

work page 2023

[41] [42]

Mestres, P., Berthelot, J., Aćimović, S. S. & Quidant, R. Unraveling the optomechanical nature of plasmonic trapping. Light Sci. Appl. 5, e16092–e16092 (2016)

work page 2016

[42] [44]

G., Bozhevolnyi, S

Moreno, E., Rodrigo, S. G., Bozhevolnyi, S. I., Martín-Moreno, L. & García-Vidal, F. J. Guiding and Focusing of Electromagnetic Fields with Wedge Plasmon Polaritons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 023901 (2008)

work page 2008

[43] [45]

& Orenstein, M

Feigenbaum, E. & Orenstein, M. Nano plasmon polariton modes of a wedge cross section metal waveguide. Opt. Express 14, 8779–8784 (2006)

work page 2006

[44] [46]

Babaei, E. et al. Analysis of single unmodified proteins and their interactions with nanoaperture optical tweezers: PR65 case study. in Biophotonics Congress: Optics in the Life Sciences AM3D.5 (Optica Publishing Group, Vancouver, British Columbia, 2023). doi:10.1364/OMA.2023.AM3D.5

work page doi:10.1364/oma.2023.am3d.5 2023

[45] [47]

Anker, J. N. et al. Biosensing with plasmonic nanosensors. Nat. Mater. 7, 442–453 (2008)

work page 2008

[46] [48]

Luk’yanchuk, B. et al. The Fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructures and metamaterials. Nat. Mater. 9, 707–715 (2010)

work page 2010

[47] [49]

Govorov, A. O. & Richardson, H. H. Generating heat with metal nanoparticles. Nano Today 2, 30–38 (2007)

work page 2007

[48] [50]

Lugo, J. M. & Oliva, A. I. Thermal Properties of Metallic Films at Room Conditions by the Heating Slope. J. Thermophys. Heat Transf. 30, 452–460 (2016)

work page 2016

[49] [51]

Habteyes, T. G. et al. Metallic Adhesion Layer Induced Plasmon Damping and Molecular Linker as a Nondamping Alternative. ACS Nano 6, 5702–5709 (2012)

work page 2012

[50] [52]

Siegfried, T., Ekinci, Y., Martin, O. J. F. & Sigg, H. Engineering Metal Adhesion Layers That Do Not Deteriorate Plasmon Resonances. ACS Nano 7, 2751–2757 (2013)

work page 2013

[51] [53]

Abbott, W. M. et al. Less is More: Improved Thermal Stability and Plasmonic Response in Au Films via the Use of SubNanometer Ti Adhesion Layers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 7607–7614 (2019)

work page 2019

[52] [54]

Sukham, J., Takayama, O., Lavrinenko, A. V. & Malureanu, R. High-Quality Ultrathin Gold Layers with an APTMS Adhesion for Optimal Performance of Surface Plasmon Polariton-Based Devices. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 25049–25056 (2017)

work page 2017

[53] [55]

& Oelhafen, P

Büttner, M., Belser, T. & Oelhafen, P. Stability of Thiol-Passivated Gold Particles at Elevated Temperatures Studied by X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 5464–5467 (2005)

work page 2005

[54] [56]

Borzenkov, M. et al. Thermal and Chemical Stability of Thiol Bonding on Gold Nanostars. Langmuir 31, 8081–8091 (2015)

work page 2015

[55] [57]

Peri, S. S. S. et al. Self-induced back-action actuated nanopore electrophoresis (sane) sensor for label-free detection of cancer immunotherapy-relevant antibody-ligand interactions. Methods Mol. Biol. Clifton NJ 2394, 343–376 (2022)

work page 2022

[56] [58]

U., Peri, S

Raza, M. U., Peri, S. S. S., Ma, L.-C., Iqbal, S. M. & Alexandrakis, G. Self-induced back action actuated nanopore electrophoresis (SANE). Nanotechnology 29, 435501 (2018)

work page 2018

[57] [59]

Peri, S. S. S. et al. Self-Induced Back-Action Actuated Nanopore Electrophoresis (SANE) Sensor for Label-Free Detection of Cancer Immunotherapy-Relevant Antibody- Ligand Interactions. Methods Mol. Biol. 2394, 343–376 (2022)

work page 2022

[58] [60]

& Gordon, R

Chen, Y., Kotnala, A., Yu, L., Zhang, J. & Gordon, R. Wedge and gap plasmonic resonances in double nanoholes. Opt. Express 23, 30227–30236 (2015)

work page 2015

[59] [61]

Khaleque, A. et al. Integration of bow-tie plasmonic nano-antennas on tapered fibers. Opt. Express Vol 25 Issue 8 Pp 8986-8996 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.008986 (2017) doi:10.1364/OE.25.008986

work page doi:10.1364/oe.25.008986 2017

[60] [62]

& Zheng, Y

Lin, L. & Zheng, Y. Optimizing plasmonic nanoantennas via coordinated multiple coupling. Sci. Rep. 5, 14788 (2015)

work page 2015

[61] [63]

J., Fromm, D

Schuck, P. J., Fromm, D. P., Sundaramurthy, A., Kino, G. S. & Moerner, W. E. Improving the Mismatch between Light and Nanoscale Objects with Gold Bowtie Nanoantennas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 017402 (2005)

work page 2005

[62] [64]

Yoon, S. J. et al. Non-fluorescent nanoscopic monitoring of a single trapped nanoparticle via nonlinear point sources. Nat. Commun. 9, 2218 (2018)

work page 2018

[63] [65]

Stockman, M. I. Nanofocusing of Optical Energy in Tapered Plasmonic Waveguides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 137404 (2004)

work page 2004

[64] [66]

A., Insua, I

Tseng, A. A., Insua, I. A., Park, J. S., Li, B. & Vakanas, G. P. Milling of submicron channels on gold layer using double charged arsenic ion beam. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Microelectron. Nanometer Struct. Process. Meas. Phenom. 22, 82–89 (2004)

work page 2004

[65] [67]

& Xing, Y

Liu, H., Han, T., Fang, C. & Xing, Y. Study on The Theory and Model of Overcut Effect of Focused Ion Beam Etching Process. in 2021 IEEE 5th Information Technology,Networking,Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC) vol. 5 1105–1108 (2021)

work page 2021

[66] [68]

Sanders, A. et al. Understanding the plasmonics of nanostructured atomic force microscopy tips. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 153110 (2016)

work page 2016

[67] [69]

W., Lezec, H

Ebbesen, T. W., Lezec, H. J., Ghaemi, H. F., Thio, T. & Wolff, P. A. Extraordinary optical transmission through sub-wavelength hole arrays. Nature 391, 667–669 (1998)

work page 1998

[68] [70]

A., Scarabelli, L

Molet, P., Passarelli, N., Pérez, L. A., Scarabelli, L. & Mihi, A. Engineering Plasmonic Colloidal Meta-Molecules for Tunable Photonic Supercrystals. Adv. Opt. Mater. 9, 2100761 (2021)

work page 2021